into accessible forms. Tactile graphics translate visual images into physical, three-dimensional models that aBLV person can feel, similar to braille [1]. For pedagogical content, these are usually slightlyraised graphics on a paper medium for practicality and portability ([2], [3]). Translating visualcontent into a tactile graphic requires reducing the content into just the most important features,and often requires sighted subject matter expertise ([4]–[6]). Other work has explored usinglarger, higher fidelity three-dimensional models ([7], [8]). Additionally, few tools exist for BLVpeople to create their own visual content, and most tactile graphic systems require a sightedperson’s assistance ([9]–[11]). These methods also have
engineering education can benefit from having engineeringstudents work on team projects that involve a blend of cross-disciplinary and mixed-agedcollaborations. An NSF-funded project set out to explore this idea by partnering undergraduateengineering students enrolled in a 300-level electromechanical systems course with preserviceteachers enrolled in a 400-level educational technology course to plan and deliver roboticslessons to fifth graders at a local school. Working in small teams, students designed, built, andcoded bio-inspired robots. The collaborative activities included: (1) training with HummingbirdBit hardware (Birdbrain Technologies, Pittsburgh, PA) (e.g. sensors, servo motors) and codingplatform, (2) preparing robotics lessons for fifth
grow [1],because as class sizes increase, administering assessments becomes increasingly resourceintensive [2] requiring faculty and course staff to commit increased amounts and energy towardsmanaging the logistics of exam administration [3]. The additional resources required foradministering assessments in courses with larger enrollments often lead to a decrease in thenumber and type of assessments used in a course [4, 5], with faculty often relying on assessmentpractices that are not educationally beneficial to students [6].Managing assessment for large-enrollment courses is a challenge that many engineering programsface. In response to these challenges, in Fall 2014, the Grainger College of Engineering at theUniversity of Illinois at Urbana
uncomfortable making mistakes in class, learned to use my own mistakes to model engineeringpractices, and re-framed my perspective on what it means to be a “good” engineering instructor.This work illustrates the benefits of incorporating reflective practice into the professionaldevelopment of engineering instructors.IntroductionSeveral reform pedagogies require students to grapple with confusion in the classroom, framingconfusion as a positive indication of progress towards understanding [1]. For example, inproductive failure [2], students grapple with a complex problem, initially explore incorrect solutionpaths, and eventually, with help from their instructor, collaboratively consolidate their work intothe canonically correct solution. Responsive
entrepreneurial efforts successfully. This concept is critical in the business world. Itplays a crucial role in initiating and developing new ventures, which is essential for economicgrowth, innovation, job creation, and individual empowerment. Fostering and supportingentrepreneurial intention is critical for developing a prosperous and dynamic society [1].Entrepreneurial IntentionEntrepreneurial intention (EI) is a key concept in entrepreneurship research, focusing on the factorsinfluencing the decision to start a business. This decision is often based on deliberate reasoningthat mediates between personal reasons and actions, shaped by various internal and external factors[3]. EI represents an individual's inclination to initiate and develop a new
in their own ways.Dr. Benjamin Ahn, The Ohio State University Dr. Benjamin Ahn is an Associate Professor at The Ohio State University in the Department of Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Re-imagining Behavioral Analysis in Engineering Education: A Theoretical Exploration of Reasoned Action ApproachIntroductionAs a discipline, Engineering Education continues to expand its reach, and subsequently, itsmethods of analysis. Integrating research from the behavioral sciences and psychology hasenhanced researchers’ capacities to explore the intricate and multifaceted behaviors inherent toengineering practice and education [1], [2], [3]. These
Engineering Schools, Departments and Programs [1],the overall average retention rate for obtaining an engineering degree within 6 years was 55.9%.According to the 2021 NSF National Survey of College Graduates [2], only 65% of science andengineering college graduates had an occupation related to their highest degree. Putting this intoperspective, if 100 students enrolled in an engineering program, about 55.9% (~56 students) willcomplete the degree within six years. Of those ~56 students, 65% (~36 graduates) will enter theengineering workforce. In summary about one-third (1/3) of students who enroll in engineeringprograms will complete the degree within six years AND enter the engineering workforce.What about the other two-thirds (2/3)? Why are they
Students, Self-Efficacy, STEM identity, Engineering Design Process, informaleducationIntroductionSTEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) education is a critical component ofmodern education and workforce, as it provides students with the skills and knowledge necessaryto succeed in today’s rapidly changing technological landscape, but it is not always accessible toeveryone. The equity gap in STEM education is a significant issue, and individuals from low-income communities often lack the STEM experiences that their more affluent peers receive [1].To address this gap, educators are exploring new ways to engage students in STEM experiencesthat promote positive associations. A positive class experience can impact students in profoundways, for
engineering courses and other STEM programs[1-6]. Furthermore, studies indicate that enhanced 3D visualization abilities contribute tohigher retention and graduation rates, especially among underrepresented groups in thefield of engineering [7-12]. New studies add more details to the growing amount ofinformation demonstrating the need to improve the way STEM subjects are taught inschools [13-17].As a result of these obvious needs, a new program has been developed to help prepareparticipants for STEM careers by enhancing various mental skills. The focus on spatialskills was expanded to 3D visualization, analytical abilities, and pattern recognition. Theprogram has been introduced in a previous paper [18] and has seen successfulimplementation in
innovators. The Adventures inRobotics (AIR) Program at Pittsburg State University has been a pioneer in immersive summeryouth workshops for over two decades. These workshops offer a dynamic blend of activitiescatering to students aged 9-13, serving as a beacon of STEAM-focused educational enrichmentin the southeast Kansas region.The AIR Program also includes the innovative AIR Teacher Workshop, developed in 2022 withsupport from the Kansas NASA Space Grant Consortium [1]. This 11-day workshop equips K-12educators with tools and training to integrate STEAM concepts into their classrooms, utilizingthe LEGO Education SPIKE Prime set [2]. Through hands-on training and mentoring during thesummer youth workshops, teachers gain valuable teaching
schools, thecommunity, and the workplace [1]. Studies show that students who have an increased interest inscience, mathematics, and engineering in the early years (elementary and middle schools) oftheir education are more likely to pursue a STEM-related career [2]. Informal STEM educationexperiences are considered critical to developing the future STEM workforce [3]. InformalSTEM education can also help to address equity and access issues in STEM education. Studentsfrom underrepresented groups, including women and minorities, may face barriers to STEMeducation in traditional classroom settings, but informal STEM education can provide alternativeavenues for learning and engagement that are more inclusive and accessible [4]. Informal STEMeducation
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024TA Training at Two R1 Institutions: A comparative analysisIntroductionTeaching assistants (TAs) play a vital role in the teaching mission of higher education institutions[1], including the College of Engineering at the University of Wisconsin- Madison and ImperialCollege London. TAs are expected to fill a variety of roles: they directly instruct students indiscussions, labs, and lectures, host office hours, and complete a large portion of the formativeand summative assessment for their students [2]. While the value of these educators is evident,training is resource-intensive and there are no standardized models of training. There are,however, some examples of good practice in this area: simulator
instructorsof technical courses that are traditionally visually-based to consider possible ways to enhance theaccessibility of their curriculum.IntroductionIn 2013, the Royal National Institute for the Blind published a study highlighting several keyissues for blind individuals in regards to access to information, including inaccessible technicalnotation and visual resources, as well as teaching methods that can rely too heavily on visualconcepts [1]. These challenges can be especially difficult to overcome in highly technical fieldslike Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). While research has longindicated that blind students are interested in participating in STEM [2], recent analyses haveshown there are still notable gaps in
from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He completed a Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management, from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with 22 years of the academic experience at five different universities. Students and departments have always praised him for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. He has been involved in numerous professional societies to supplement his teaching and research, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE, and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published 100+ journal papers and conference papers. His research interests are 1
integrated, and both provide opportunities for individual skill development byconducting Professional Development sessions across a variety of professional and technicaltopics. This study employs both a quantitative analysis of the utilization of professionaldevelopment and a thematic analysis of student focus groups to investigate differences acrossgenders. This study has implications for a wide range of engineering programs looking to createequitable opportunities for students.IntroductionEPICS and VIP Program HistoryThe EPICS program was founded in 1995 at Purdue University in response to a need forengineering students to gain more practical, hands-on design experience before transitioning intotheir professional careers [1]. EPICS connects teams
) byapplying a text-mining technique. The results conclude that this methodology is useful not only for graspingthe effectiveness of PBL program contents from a cause-effect perspective but is also applicable to othernonstandard teaching methods that cannot be quantitatively assessed with conventional exams.1. Background and problem statement1) Learning outcomes from techno-socio PBLsTechno-socio Project-Based Learnings (PBLs), which are designed from the combination of social issuesand technology-based solution developments through collaborations amongst public sectors, educationalinstitutions, and industries, are a very effective teaching approach for nurturing engineering skillsets andmindsets for those who will become professional engineers in the
Ph.D. in Educational Policy and Planning from UT Austin.Rachel Porcelli, Society of Women Engineers ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Multifaceted Examination of ALWE's Influence on Personal Growth and Leadership in Engineering Academia Introduction Research shows that we need more than a multifaceted approach to achieve gender equity inengineering – we need tailored and personalized responses to tackle specific challenges faced inmale-driven and dominated fields. Numerous research studies suggest that effectiveinterventions highlight the importance of programs that go beyond improving individual skilldevelopment to tackle systemic and institutional barriers [1].Such
projects [1]. Well supportedacademic makerspaces provide students with open access to resources that help them developtheir problem-solving skills, provide opportunities for collaboration, increase self-efficacy, anddevelop sense of belonging [2] [3]. Sense of belonging generally relates to self-perceptions of fitwithin a given context [4] [5] and has the ability to positively impact academic achievement andpersistence in STEM [6] [7] [8]. There is evidence to suggest that the presence of a non-intimidating, informal community established within an academic makerspace can potentiallybenefit student sense of belonging [9].Creating an inclusive community within a makerspace that promotes belonging requirespurposeful considerations. Research has
communicating ideas to an audience. Inventioneducation provides a platform for students to identify real-world challenges and devise novel andinnovative solutions, fostering a sense of self-efficacy. Encouraging invention, innovation, andan entrepreneurial mindset helps students become more self-determined and contributes tostudents’ acquiring the skills needed to shape their own future [1].Students’ sense of belonging, psychological safety, and decision-making processes about theirfuture often align with their interests and curiosity, but anxiety can negatively influence theseperceptions. The aim of this study is to examine the constructs of interest and anxiety, withrespect to science and math and specifically to inventing. Prior research efforts in
while also conducting it with partners and collaborators. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Three Bad Words: Perspectives on the Changing Landscape of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Postsecondary Institutions Jordan Williamson1 and Monica M. McGill2 1,2 Institute for Advancing Computing Education 1 jordan@csedresearch.org 2 monica@csedresearch.org Abstract Research Problem. The U.S. Supreme Court cases and state legislation have forced significant changes to higher-education institutions’ diversity, equity, and
. Ann-Perry Witmer P.E., University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign A teaching professor, researcher, lecturer, and professional civil engineer, Ann-Perry Witmer is the architect of the emerging discipline of Contextual Engineering, which merges technical design with societal understanding to improve adoption outcomes. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 THE INFLUENCE OF PERSONAL EXPERIENCE &IDENTITY ON DESIGN: TEACHING POSITIONALITY TO ENGINEERSINTRODUCTIONFor more than a decade, scholars have called for the engineering profession to shift towards amore socio-technical approach [1, 2]. A majority of undergraduate engineering programs nowrequire social science or
Students' Performance and Beliefs about MathematicsInquiry-oriented (IO) instruction is one of many inductive teaching approaches that relies heavilyon active student learning. However, there are key features that distinguish IO instruction fromactive learning in other classrooms. Traditionally, if students actively participate in a universitymathematics class, it is after an instructor has presented key concepts and procedures. That is,their engagement is that of practice. In an IO classroom, however, students are expected toreinvent mathematics in their quest to solve real-world problems [1]. Therefore, the applicationsprecede and motivate, rather than follow, the theory.In an IO course, students are presented with novel problems; they are not
, and Math (STEM) careers are vital to the success of anadvanced economy [1]. People in STEM jobs represent roughly 1 in 18 workers in the UnitedStates [2]. In addition, workers in STEM earn on average 26% more than those who are notemployed in STEM fields [2]. Despite the large benefits of a STEM career, growth of STEMemployment has plateaued, and many individuals leave those fields after joining [3]. In addition,there is a significant gap between men and women working in STEM-related fields, with menoutpacing women. One potential factor in this gap can be attributed to self-efficacy.A student’s self-efficacy refers to a “Judgement about one’s ability to organize and execute thecourses of action necessary to attain a specific goal” [4, p. 1
encounter after leaving formal education” [1](p.292). This recognizes the informal and largely self-directed nature of lifelong learning. Asdiscussed in previous papers documenting this work ([2], [3]), it is important that undergraduateengineering programs develop effective lifelong learners given their need to take ownership oftheir increasingly unpredictable careers and serve the public good in a landscape of volatility,uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA). We focus on the concept of a lifelong learningorientation, or positive disposition towards lifelong learning in terms of motivations (intentionsbehind learning) and approaches (high-level learning techniques).This study takes place at a large Canadian research institution. Our aim is
the challenges of recruitingand retaining engineers in Oklahoma and other underserved communities.Introduction and MotivationNearly forty million students use various social media platforms (SMP) [1] and studentsincreasingly use SMPs on their devices since they are generally available and easy to use [2].Social media users can do different things on various SMPs such as connecting with otherstudents, exchanging helpful links, tagging others in posts, responding to posts by others, andprivately messaging their connections. Currently, the use of SMPs are gaining traction fromeducators and students to connect, team up, and share data [3]. For example, according to a2015 study, students were more likely to use these social media platforms such as
theories, the involvement of religious values,intellectual property and legal liability, employer/employee and mentor/mentee relationships,and employee rights. Under half of the textbooks included sections on ethics in research andeducation/academia. The findings of this study can (1) provide engineering educators insightsabout the current list of thematic topics that fall under engineering ethics, (2) identify gaps inengineering ethics knowledge, and (3) offer a discussion of the opportunities to improveengineering ethics education. To the best of our knowledge, this systematic and comparativeengineering ethics textbook review is the first of its kind.I. INTRODUCTIONEngineers play a vital role in bettering humanity through technological
significant increase from the 17.8% recorded in 2010[1]. However, this growth has not been reflected in the workplace. Between 2001 and 2019, thenumber of women engineers in the workforce only rose from about 10% to 14% [2]. Theunderrepresentation of women is particularly pronounced in mechanical, electrical, and computerengineering, with only 17.5%, 15.6%, and 20.4% of bachelor’s degrees in these fields awarded towomen [1]. Furthermore, women represent only 9%, 10%, and 12% of working engineers inthese respective fields [3].For underrepresented minorities, the statistics are even more dismal. Bachelor’s degrees inengineering awarded to Black or African American individuals have risen only slightly from4.5% in 2010 to 4.7% in 2021 [1]. Hispanics now
research to better understand the influencingfactors for students’ choice in career pathways after graduation. Previous work compiled by hasshown that participation in certain activities, such as engineering internship/co-op andstudy abroad experiences can influence the career path decisions of engineering graduates [1].Extracurricular and co-curricular activities, such as club participation, undergraduate researchand mentorship opportunities, can also be influential to career path decisions [2]. Though it hasbeen noted that different demographics can choose different career pathways, most work hasbeen done to look at gender and not at race[3], [4] . Research has begun to look more at race,though many studies group all underrepresented racial
to a more qualitative understanding of the experience of an engineering classroom. Theshift towards qualitative research has been accomplished through incorporating aspects ofsociology, anthropology, and ethnography into the research process [1]. This drive toward moreholistic understanding motivated our research team to try and understand the roleproblem-solving mindsets play in the work of engineering and education faculty. Awareness ofmultiple possible mindsets when approaching problems could help educators be more effective inthe classroom. Further, if educators displayed a noticeable preference for a particular mindsetwhen approaching issues in the classroom, helping them to understand this tendency could helpraise awareness of