project examined the effect of using working memory utilization improvementstrategies in terms of a clear demarcation of episodic memory in free body diagram constructionand semantic memory in equation building in engineering and technology introductory physicsclasses. Within a technology class, the ESL students having familiarly in translation weredeemed to be a separate group as indicated by the regression Cook’s distance in the assessmentdata. The same assessment task for the calculus physics students majoring in engineeringshowed only one group/population even though the class had twice as many bi-literate students.Whether bi-literacy could predict physics learning is another interesting hypothesis, especiallywhen languages would include
. Sorby and A. F. Wysocki, Introduction to 3D Spatial Visualization: An Active Approach. New York, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning, 2003.9. “Spatial Visualization Skills (SVS): Learn More,” ENGAGE Engineering. [Online]. Available: https://www.engageengineering.org/spatial/whyitworks/learnmore. [Accessed: Aug. 27, 2017].10. J. Segil, B. Myers, J. Sullivan, and D. Reamon, “Efficacy of various spatial visualization implementation approaches in a first-year engineering projects course,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2015.11. R. B. Guay, Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations. West Lafayette, In: Purdue Research Foundation, 1976.Maxine Fontaine Ph.D.Maxine Fontaine is a Teaching Assistant
implementation approaches in a first-year engineering projects course,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2015.12. R. B. Guay, Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation, 1976.
undergraduate degrees compared to the EU’s 1 milliondegrees and China’s 1.7 million degrees in 2016 (NSB, 2020). By 2025, the U.S. is projected tobe short 2 million STEM workers (National Science Foundation, 2018). A better understandingof the barriers that result in students disconnecting or dropping out of STEM fields is essentialfor increasing engagement and retention of STEM undergraduate students.There is a growing demand for skilled STEM workers in both the United States and around theworld. However, despite this growing need for a skilled STEM workforce, there is a highattrition rate among STEM undergraduate students, with 48% of students leaving their STEMfields (Chen, 2013). Leaving a STEM field may involve either changing to a non-STEM
an asset-based perspective to recognize knowledge that is often ignored [13], [14].This framework has largely supported primary and secondary educators’ efforts to create culturallyrelevant pedagogical practices by leveraging students’ lived experiences (see [15]–[17]. Forexample, the work of Mejia and Wilson-Lopez [18] captured how Latino/a adolescents leveragedtheir engineering-related funds of knowledge to create a solution in a design project or in problemsfaced in their everyday lives. Their study found that high school students’ funds of knowledge canbe relevant to engineering bodies of knowledge, skills, and habits of mind such as systemsthinking, scientific or mathematical knowledge, production and processing [19], [20]. The
essay. You don’t go into an essay without having an idea whether in your head or onpaper. The same goes for designing something. You must have an idea of what you want tocreate and sketching is the way to get that idea down and also allows you to share your ideaswith others for critiquing.”The understanding that sketching itself is a way of thinking was very important for students torealize so they could begin using it as a tool rather than as something to perfect by showing totheir peers or instructor. Many students noted how they regretted not having more sketchesleading up to their final design project, which further underlines the newfound importance theyplaced on sketching as a tool to improve their end-product.DiscussionThe exploratory
director for K-12 program. Her work includes the development and design of STEM project- based learning experiences for students and teachers with emphasis on developing modules for engineer- ing design and computer science; She is focused on teacher professional development through technology enhanced and blended learning for teachers and students across urban and rural environments. Her work also involves the execution of MESA statewide signature event that showcase students work at the annual Washington MESA K-12 Engineering Design and Computer Science Challenges. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 MESA Community College Program: Meeting the Need for
own case, I also teach Circuit prepare the students to withstand challenges oftheory, which is the most fundamental course in 21st century posed by evolving technologies.the curriculum of Electrical and ComputerEngineering. I have shown in the classroom, how o Acknowledgement:the measurements of Resonant frequency ‘𝑓! ′, the I wish to thank the administration ofQuality factor ‘Q’ are of paramount importance in UMASS-Lowell as well as the administration ofdesigning and testing Bulk Acoustic Wave Analog Devices Inc. and Skyworks Solutions for(BAW) filters, a research project I was involved at supporting me in this endeavor. I want toSkyworks Solutions for seven years. At the
of required software does not tell the whole story for computer engineering. Acomputer engineering degree is not an electrical engineering degree with a minor in computerscience. There are differences in the hardware courses and the courses that mix hardware andsoftware between electrical and computer engineering. Likewise, many programs teachhardware and software to computer engineering students by way of laboratory projects andexperiments. We have made no attempt to distinguish computer engineering courses in this areaand we leave this to future studies.References1. http://www.abet.org/ABET2. "Computer Engineering Curricula 2016" was issued by the Joint Task Group on Computer Engineering Curricula from the Association for Computing
Paper ID #20551Spatial Reasoning Difference between Civil and Mechanical Engineering Stu-dents in Learning Mechanics of Materials Course: A Case of Cross-sectionalInferenceDr. Oai Ha, Western Carolina University Dr. Oai Ha is currently an Assistant Professor in mechanical engineering in the School of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University. He was a Postdoctoral Scholar at the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at the Oregon State University, working in the Engineering Cognition Lab on several engineering education research projects. He holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State
. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder Jacquelyn Sullivan has led the multi-university TeachEngineering digital library project, now serving over 3.3M unique users (mostly teachers) annually, since its inception. She is founding co-director of the design-focused Engineering Plus degree program and CU Teach Engineering initiative in the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. With the intent of transforming en- gineering to broaden participation, Sullivan spearheaded design and launch of the Engineering
Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI-II)which measures one’s “willingness to embrace the novel, uncertain and unpredictable nature ofeveryday life” (Kashdan et al., 2009, p. 995).2.2 Mindfulness and InnovationFor the purposes of this work, and the larger Engineering Majors Survey (EMS) project that thedata stem from, we define innovation as “encompassing skills, attributes, and actions relating tonew designs and solutions that fundamentally depart from, and change thinking about,conventional practice” (Gilmartin et al., 2017, p. 4). Based on the work by Dyer et. al., the EMSdraws on five behaviors to assess innovation: questioning, observing, experimenting, ideanetworking and associative thinking (Dyer, Gregersen, & Christensen, 2008
education.AcknowledgementsWe gratefully acknowledge support by a grant from the National Science Foundation under contract DRL‐12487, and encouragement from our program manager, Dr. Edith Gummer. Texas Tech University IRB number for this project is 504973.References[1] National Research Council (2008). Early Childhood Assessment: Why, What, and How? Committee on Developmental Outcomes and Assessments for Young Children, Catherine12 | P a g e 13 E. Snow and Susan B. Van Hemel, (Eds.). Board on Children, Youth and Families, Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National
Abilitycultural differences and being able to 4.11 (0.905) 0.513conduct cross-cultural cooperationBeing able to organize and lead a team to 4.39 (0.849) 0.719expand the work Leadership andManaging one or more projects 4.38 (0.835) 0.749 Decision-Makingeffectively AbilityBeing able to make effective decisions in 4.41 (0.819) 0.661engineering and managementBeing equipped with good verbal ability 4.40 (0.825
officer 14%Dept Committee 9%Dean/Administrator 7%College Committee 4%University Administrator 2%External Entity 2%University Committee 0%Faculty members were selected by 93% of respondents. However, this response option is vague.For example, it could mean that they were solely responsible for approving a project proposed bystudents, or the faculty approval could be one step of a larger process. Faculty members werethe only approver indicated by 25 of 56 (45%) institutions. This implies no formal approvalprocess, yet it doesn’t rule out that they could be filing decisions with the department. This rateis 42% for doctoral
in Journal of Educational Psychology, Contemporary Educational Psychology and Journal of Experimental Education, among other venues. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The influence of modeling on science self-efficacy among middle school students (evidence based practice paper: teaching approaches)Abstract Engineering lacks a presence in the k-12 classroom except through project or designbased curriculum, which is primarily used to teach science concepts. Educators often recommendincluding instructional strategies that create opportunities to increase a students’ self-efficacy toimprove student achievement in science
location on the ambiguity spectrum.The National Science Foundation (NSF) has funded a three-year project to study this importantintellectual development of students in a typical STEM curriculum. Cross-sectional andlongitudinal studies of STEM students as well as non-STEM students at a Historically BlackCollege are being conducted to measure the influence of the current curriculum in context of theconstructs of tolerance of ambiguity, intellectual mental models, and STEM identity.This work-in-progress paper shares some preliminary results of the baseline data that has beencollected during the first year of the NSF-funded project.MethodThe participants of this within-subject and between-group quasi-experimental study are studentsof a Historically
Information Systems (MIS) from the department of Business Administration at the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at the Hashemite University, in Zarqa, Jordan, in 2007. His research interest are focused on Engineering management and systems engineering applica- tions in healthcare, manufacturing, operations management, business, and other industries, modeling and simulation of complex systems, distributed networked operations, and Engineering Education.Dr. John C. Kilburn Jr, Texas A&M International University John C. Kilburn Jr. is Associate Vice President for Research and Sponsored Projects and Professor of Sociology at Texas A&M International University. He has been awarded grant funds from the NSF
. Since its firstconception, IoT came a long way in consumer products and industrial applications. Numerousresearch projects have been conducted; and, countless research papers have been published.IoT gained momentum in recent years and became one of the hottest topics in the IndustrialDesign (ID) discipline. IoT transformed the way once acceptable design methodologies intoobsolete. New design disciplines started to emerge to solve complex information architectureproblems. The consumer market is experiencing a growth of products that work by networking“things” with sensors. House appliances with sophisticated sensors help owners by carrying outhouse chores. Autonomous homes control indoor climate while the owners are not present.Smart devices
postsecondaryeducation choices [2, 3]. Given the unique geographic and cultural factors, it is critical to studyrural students’ college and career choice in context. Thus, this project focuses on ruralcommunities to understand how key stakeholders and organizations support engineering as amajor choice and addresses the following questions:RQ1. What do current undergraduate engineering students who graduated from rural high schools describe as influences on their choice to attend college and pursue engineering as a post-secondary major?RQ2. How does the college choice process differ for rural students who enrolled in a 4-year university immediately after graduating from high school and those who transferred from a 2-year institution?RQ3. How do
Paper ID #31442Design and Development of a Sensor/Actuator Module to EnhanceProgrammable Logic Controller (PLC) Laboratory ActivitiesMr. Brad L. Kicklighter P.E., University of Southern Indiana Brad holds a BS in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (1989) and an MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University (2001). His past work experience includes eleven years at Delphi (formerly Delco Electronics) as an Advanced Project Engineer, eleven years at Whirlpool Corporation as a Lead Engineer/Solution Architect, and three years at Ivy Tech Community College as an Instructor/Program
related to culture, curriculum, and community to achieve adaptability, innovation, and shared vision. Alongside her research, Dr. Ogle has been active in the development of engaged learning and has led two interdisciplinary undergraduate translational research and education courses - Clemson Engineers for Developing Countries (CEDC) and Clemson Engage. Both courses include trips to developing countries, international internships and sig- nificant fund-raising to support projects with community partners. As a result of her efforts, the CEDC program grew from 25 students to over 100 from 30 different departments and was recognized by the Institute for International Education (IIE) with the Andrew Heiskell Award. As a
Dean’s Ambassador Program seeks to enhance leadership developmentand foster a spirit of pride among undergraduate as well as graduate students within the Batten College ofEngineering and Technology and the ODU community.● Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE): SAE provides students a hands-on opportunity to applyclassroom knowledge to real-world projects for international competitions.● Student Government Association (SGA): SGA recommends, promotes and advises the development ofrelevant programs and services; a medium between student body and university administration.● VEX U Robotics Team: Students from a variety of majors (not only engineering) who design, build andprogram robots for tournament competitions.● Engineering Makerspace and
Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is
class families are more accustomed tostraightforward orders from authority figures than to the indirect communication strategies(Delpit, 1995; Melnick & Meister, 2008). Whenever instructors choose to use these indirectcommunication strategies, they need to provide students with explicit lessons on how nondirective verbal interventions are actually “code” for direct commands.Instructors interviewed in this study mentioned that email communications to some middle-eastern students sometimes seemed less effective, these students preferred face to facecommunication. So, taking few minutes in the class explaining what they need to do for anassignment or project produced better result.Effective instructors of culturally diverse students
, and associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Impact of Prior Experiences on Future Participation in Active Learning
creation of formal and informal entrepreneurship programs [2]. Students areexposed to business knowledge and entrepreneurial experience in project-based experiential 1formal coursework, student incubators, pitch competitions and mentorship opportunities underpracticing entrepreneurs. Shartrand, Weilerstein, Besterfield-Sacre, & Golding [3] have reportedthat, in 2010, more than half of ASEE-affiliated schools were exposing their students toentrepreneurship through formal coursework and/or extracurricular programs [3]. In the nearfuture, these numbers are likely to increase as more institutions begin focusing on developingentrepreneurially minded
=Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Sure) for participants to rate their opinion of experiences inSTEM majors at their HBCU. Survey items were developed to reflect the common reasons forstudent departure as outlined in the published text Talking About Leaving and the experiences ofsenior leaders on the project from STEM fields and at HBCUs [4]. To ensure the survey focusedon the intended areas and that the researchers engaged in a comprehensive approach, each surveyitem was aligned with a research thrust area and compared with the theoretical framework. Toaccount for differences in demographic information needed, two parallel surveys were createdfor each group (Group 1 and 2).Data Collection Data were collected from students (Group 1
been involved in collaborative research projects focused on conceptual learning in chemistry, chemical engineering, seismology, and astronomy.Dr. Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, and in the ways hands-on activities such as
propose a Fundamental Learning Integration Platform (FLIP) which creates aphysical connection between the conceptual and practical engineering concepts throughout anentire 4-year Mechanical Engineering curriculum [10]. Students were made explicitly aware ofhow each concept from their courses fits into the bigger picture through an end of semesterproject that revolved around a specific aspect of the steam engine. This concept is difficult toapply to Electrical Engineering because of the wide variety of specializations offered within themajor. While connections between areas are plentiful, creating a singular project that faculty ofall specializations will deem sufficiently applicable would be nigh impossible.Alnajjar proposes “Integrative Learning