, "The Fisk-Vanderbilt Master’s-to-Ph.D. Bridge Program: Recognizing, enlisting, and cultivating unrealized or unrecognized potential in underrepresented minority students," American Journal of Physics, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 374-379, 2011/04/01 2011.[4] R. Sowell, T. Zhang, B. N, and R. K, "PhD. Completion and Attrition: Analysis of Baseline Demographic Data from the Ph.D. Completion Project," Council of Graduate Schools2008.[5] (1/31/2019). National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Survey of Earned Doctorates. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvydoctorates/#tabs-1&sd[6] (1/31/2019). US News and World Reports 2019 Best Graduate School Rankings in
, male workforce that ignores systems of oppression.Our Proposed Use and Future WorkWithin the neighborhood context, we will attempt to use structural equation modeling to modelthe factors we have described prior into early measurement frameworks through: (1) the deliberatecreation of intersectional comparison groups, and (2) the weighting of variables based on genderedand racialized differences presented in various peer-reviewed literature and government reports.To create intersectional groups, we will follow the procedures outlined by Bahnson et al. [33] tocreate separate race-gender groups that go beyond controlling for race and gender (i.e. “Black-Women”, “Hispanic-Men, “White-Women”, etc). Within outside grant projects, we will thenassign
levels of engagement.Objectives of the StudyThe purpose of this work-in-progress is to report a project that used the Chi and Wylie’s [7]Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP) framework to survey the degree to whichLow-Cost Desktop Learning Modules (LC-DLMs) helped foster different forms of cognitiveengagement as students learned about a venturi meter in a fluid mechanics and heat transfercourse.MethodParticipantsThe participants for this study were 67 undergraduate students of chemical engineering at a largepublic university in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. Students were enrolled in juniorlevel Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer course, the only fluid mechanics course that chemicalengineering students in the
. In the second study, Reid et al., [4] focus on the course content in first yearengineering programs and found that objectives of engineering courses can be grouped into majorcategories (e.g., engineering skills, professional skills, orientation to the program from theviewpoint of the university, orientation to the engineering profession). These studies are criticalefforts that begin to tease out the differences in first-year engineering programs and courses, butthey do not provide insight into the direct experiential impact on students.This Work in Progress paper will give an overview of our interview procedures, recruitmentmethods, and selected participant. The larger project examines first-year engineering differences inthe context of the
expected [10] for most situations. Rationalistic responseswere even found to questions that were supposed to elicit emotive responses. For example, afterbeing asked “In arriving at your decision, did you take into consideration the feelings orperspectives of anyone else? If so, how did this affect your decision making?”, Subject 155responded: “I took into consideration the kids who I guess ... who, who are LGBTQ+ or who have people in their lives who are close to them who are...then I looked at the perspective or I guess the, the benefits and downfalls of the class as a whole…”The emotive response was observed less often (39 out of 132 coded phrases or 30%), usually inone of two ways; first, subjects would project their own
perceptionsof doing engineering work, regardless of occupational title. We also believe that a sequentialregression model will show that engineering belief measures predict a significant proportion ofvariance in perceptions of having jobs “related to” engineering, over and above SCCT variables.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Purdue University Davidson School of Engineering, whosePipeline Center funded this project. This work was also supported by the NSF (DGE-1333468).Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] E. Cech, “The Self-Expressive Edge of Occupational Sex Segregation
attention to howidentities, especially those of the underrepresented, are affected by the changes made. What welearn will lead to a clearer understanding of the changes that promote engineering identities, andhow such identities affect students’ belonging in the program and persistence in the major.AcknowledgementsThis project was funded by the NSF IUSE/PFE: RED grant #1730354.References[1] K. Deaux, “Reconstructing social identity,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.19(1), pp. 4-12, 1993.[2] S. Stryker, and P. J. Burke, “The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory,” SocialPsychological Quarterly, vol. 63(4), pp. 284-297, 2000.[3] E. H. Erikson, Identity and the life cycle. New York: International Universities Press, 1959.[4
over the fiveyear duration of the project. Eligible applicants are evaluated based on financial need, academictalent, and interest in the field. ASPIRE Fellows receive a $2,500 per semester award for up toeight semesters. The Fellows’ progress is monitored from both an academic standpoint (i.e.,GPA) and a personal development standpoint (i.e., relationship with mentors). The ASPIREprogram success is determined by retention and graduation rates, combined with surveys thatcollect information about ASPIRE students’ external employment and perceptions of theprogram.This paper presents details of the ASPIRE program including descriptions of the recruitment andselection process, mentoring program, networking events, and academic design
and 25 EnvironmentalEngineering Majors in DoWRM. USE4WRM plans to recruit students through scholarships andincrease enrollment by 32% in ENE and 40% in WRM during the grant period. This will directlyincrease the enrollments in ENE and WRM to 33 and 21 at the end of the project period.USE4WRM will also attempt to maintain an even distribution of 7 male and 7 female studentsthrough the grant. This will increase the number of female students to 20 and that of malestudents to 34, and raise the male to female student ratio from 1:2 to 1:1.7. We will also raiseminimum qualifications for a USE4WRM scholar. The minimum GPA requirement will be 3.0and/or the minimum ACT requirement for the freshmen of 22. Table 1 provides a summary ofthe proposed
engineering students. In Integrated STEM Education Conference(ISEC), 2016 IEEE, 193-196.Ferri, B. H., Ahmed, S., Michaels, J. E., Dean, E., Garyet, C., & Shearman, S. (2009). Signal processingexperiments with the LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT kit for use in signals and systems courses. InAmerican Control Conference (pp. 3787-3792). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ACC.2009.5160602.Han, B., Zhang, C., & Qin, X. (2011). Based on Matlab signals and systems course project-driventeaching method research. In IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software andNetworks (pp. 466-469). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICCSN.2011.6013873.Huettel, L. G. (2006). A DSP hardware-based laboratory for signals and systems. In Proceedings, 4thDigital Signal
engineering drawing, improve their threedimensional (3D) visualization skills, and to teach the fundamentals of a computer aided design.The students meet with the instructor twice a week in the laboratory during this three-credit-hoursemester-long course with each class lasting two hours long. Each class is scheduled to deliverthe lecture first after which the students are allowed to complete their assigned homework andask questions as needed. The students learn the principles of orthographic projections and applythe principles to multiple view drawings by hand during the first four weeks of a fourteen-weeksemester. A 3D computer aided parametric modeling tool, CATIA, is then introduced after handdrawing, followed by auxiliary and section views
the schoolprovides the environment with a desirable behavior for the system. We call the academic controlobjective the "Operator."This paper focuses on the agent system by building a simple dashboard tool that will collect students'information about their progress through the curriculum in a program and will generate advisingrecommendations. The agent logic employs principles used in project management tools designed tohelp the students complete their degree plan sooner. For example, it would provide a visualizationmap of course sequences, customized for each student, making advising adjustments that willoptimize the time to obtain the degree under a constrained set of resources. At the same time, theagent system provides feedback to the
; Besterfield-Sacre [14] employed model-eliciting activities as assessments ofundergraduate engineering students’ problem-solving capabilities. Despite these studies, it isstill difficult for educators to implement authentic summative assessments for first-year studentsin design classrooms. Thus, many educators employ more authentic tasks for formativeassessments and projects, but not for summative assessment.While assessing students’ engineering design process, first year engineering students are alsodeveloping the affective and regulatory competencies required for engineering success, such asself-efficacy in design, in math, and in engineering overall. Self-efficacy is skill-specificconfidence in one’s ability to succeed in spite of difficulty [15
project examined the effect of using working memory utilization improvementstrategies in terms of a clear demarcation of episodic memory in free body diagram constructionand semantic memory in equation building in engineering and technology introductory physicsclasses. Within a technology class, the ESL students having familiarly in translation weredeemed to be a separate group as indicated by the regression Cook’s distance in the assessmentdata. The same assessment task for the calculus physics students majoring in engineeringshowed only one group/population even though the class had twice as many bi-literate students.Whether bi-literacy could predict physics learning is another interesting hypothesis, especiallywhen languages would include
. Sorby and A. F. Wysocki, Introduction to 3D Spatial Visualization: An Active Approach. New York, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning, 2003.9. “Spatial Visualization Skills (SVS): Learn More,” ENGAGE Engineering. [Online]. Available: https://www.engageengineering.org/spatial/whyitworks/learnmore. [Accessed: Aug. 27, 2017].10. J. Segil, B. Myers, J. Sullivan, and D. Reamon, “Efficacy of various spatial visualization implementation approaches in a first-year engineering projects course,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2015.11. R. B. Guay, Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations. West Lafayette, In: Purdue Research Foundation, 1976.Maxine Fontaine Ph.D.Maxine Fontaine is a Teaching Assistant
implementation approaches in a first-year engineering projects course,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2015.12. R. B. Guay, Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation, 1976.
undergraduate degrees compared to the EU’s 1 milliondegrees and China’s 1.7 million degrees in 2016 (NSB, 2020). By 2025, the U.S. is projected tobe short 2 million STEM workers (National Science Foundation, 2018). A better understandingof the barriers that result in students disconnecting or dropping out of STEM fields is essentialfor increasing engagement and retention of STEM undergraduate students.There is a growing demand for skilled STEM workers in both the United States and around theworld. However, despite this growing need for a skilled STEM workforce, there is a highattrition rate among STEM undergraduate students, with 48% of students leaving their STEMfields (Chen, 2013). Leaving a STEM field may involve either changing to a non-STEM
an asset-based perspective to recognize knowledge that is often ignored [13], [14].This framework has largely supported primary and secondary educators’ efforts to create culturallyrelevant pedagogical practices by leveraging students’ lived experiences (see [15]–[17]. Forexample, the work of Mejia and Wilson-Lopez [18] captured how Latino/a adolescents leveragedtheir engineering-related funds of knowledge to create a solution in a design project or in problemsfaced in their everyday lives. Their study found that high school students’ funds of knowledge canbe relevant to engineering bodies of knowledge, skills, and habits of mind such as systemsthinking, scientific or mathematical knowledge, production and processing [19], [20]. The
essay. You don’t go into an essay without having an idea whether in your head or onpaper. The same goes for designing something. You must have an idea of what you want tocreate and sketching is the way to get that idea down and also allows you to share your ideaswith others for critiquing.”The understanding that sketching itself is a way of thinking was very important for students torealize so they could begin using it as a tool rather than as something to perfect by showing totheir peers or instructor. Many students noted how they regretted not having more sketchesleading up to their final design project, which further underlines the newfound importance theyplaced on sketching as a tool to improve their end-product.DiscussionThe exploratory
director for K-12 program. Her work includes the development and design of STEM project- based learning experiences for students and teachers with emphasis on developing modules for engineer- ing design and computer science; She is focused on teacher professional development through technology enhanced and blended learning for teachers and students across urban and rural environments. Her work also involves the execution of MESA statewide signature event that showcase students work at the annual Washington MESA K-12 Engineering Design and Computer Science Challenges. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 MESA Community College Program: Meeting the Need for
own case, I also teach Circuit prepare the students to withstand challenges oftheory, which is the most fundamental course in 21st century posed by evolving technologies.the curriculum of Electrical and ComputerEngineering. I have shown in the classroom, how o Acknowledgement:the measurements of Resonant frequency ‘𝑓! ′, the I wish to thank the administration ofQuality factor ‘Q’ are of paramount importance in UMASS-Lowell as well as the administration ofdesigning and testing Bulk Acoustic Wave Analog Devices Inc. and Skyworks Solutions for(BAW) filters, a research project I was involved at supporting me in this endeavor. I want toSkyworks Solutions for seven years. At the
of required software does not tell the whole story for computer engineering. Acomputer engineering degree is not an electrical engineering degree with a minor in computerscience. There are differences in the hardware courses and the courses that mix hardware andsoftware between electrical and computer engineering. Likewise, many programs teachhardware and software to computer engineering students by way of laboratory projects andexperiments. We have made no attempt to distinguish computer engineering courses in this areaand we leave this to future studies.References1. http://www.abet.org/ABET2. "Computer Engineering Curricula 2016" was issued by the Joint Task Group on Computer Engineering Curricula from the Association for Computing
Paper ID #20551Spatial Reasoning Difference between Civil and Mechanical Engineering Stu-dents in Learning Mechanics of Materials Course: A Case of Cross-sectionalInferenceDr. Oai Ha, Western Carolina University Dr. Oai Ha is currently an Assistant Professor in mechanical engineering in the School of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University. He was a Postdoctoral Scholar at the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at the Oregon State University, working in the Engineering Cognition Lab on several engineering education research projects. He holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State
. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder Jacquelyn Sullivan has led the multi-university TeachEngineering digital library project, now serving over 3.3M unique users (mostly teachers) annually, since its inception. She is founding co-director of the design-focused Engineering Plus degree program and CU Teach Engineering initiative in the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. With the intent of transforming en- gineering to broaden participation, Sullivan spearheaded design and launch of the Engineering
Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI-II)which measures one’s “willingness to embrace the novel, uncertain and unpredictable nature ofeveryday life” (Kashdan et al., 2009, p. 995).2.2 Mindfulness and InnovationFor the purposes of this work, and the larger Engineering Majors Survey (EMS) project that thedata stem from, we define innovation as “encompassing skills, attributes, and actions relating tonew designs and solutions that fundamentally depart from, and change thinking about,conventional practice” (Gilmartin et al., 2017, p. 4). Based on the work by Dyer et. al., the EMSdraws on five behaviors to assess innovation: questioning, observing, experimenting, ideanetworking and associative thinking (Dyer, Gregersen, & Christensen, 2008
education.AcknowledgementsWe gratefully acknowledge support by a grant from the National Science Foundation under contract DRL‐12487, and encouragement from our program manager, Dr. Edith Gummer. Texas Tech University IRB number for this project is 504973.References[1] National Research Council (2008). Early Childhood Assessment: Why, What, and How? Committee on Developmental Outcomes and Assessments for Young Children, Catherine12 | P a g e 13 E. Snow and Susan B. Van Hemel, (Eds.). Board on Children, Youth and Families, Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National
Abilitycultural differences and being able to 4.11 (0.905) 0.513conduct cross-cultural cooperationBeing able to organize and lead a team to 4.39 (0.849) 0.719expand the work Leadership andManaging one or more projects 4.38 (0.835) 0.749 Decision-Makingeffectively AbilityBeing able to make effective decisions in 4.41 (0.819) 0.661engineering and managementBeing equipped with good verbal ability 4.40 (0.825
officer 14%Dept Committee 9%Dean/Administrator 7%College Committee 4%University Administrator 2%External Entity 2%University Committee 0%Faculty members were selected by 93% of respondents. However, this response option is vague.For example, it could mean that they were solely responsible for approving a project proposed bystudents, or the faculty approval could be one step of a larger process. Faculty members werethe only approver indicated by 25 of 56 (45%) institutions. This implies no formal approvalprocess, yet it doesn’t rule out that they could be filing decisions with the department. This rateis 42% for doctoral
in Journal of Educational Psychology, Contemporary Educational Psychology and Journal of Experimental Education, among other venues. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The influence of modeling on science self-efficacy among middle school students (evidence based practice paper: teaching approaches)Abstract Engineering lacks a presence in the k-12 classroom except through project or designbased curriculum, which is primarily used to teach science concepts. Educators often recommendincluding instructional strategies that create opportunities to increase a students’ self-efficacy toimprove student achievement in science
location on the ambiguity spectrum.The National Science Foundation (NSF) has funded a three-year project to study this importantintellectual development of students in a typical STEM curriculum. Cross-sectional andlongitudinal studies of STEM students as well as non-STEM students at a Historically BlackCollege are being conducted to measure the influence of the current curriculum in context of theconstructs of tolerance of ambiguity, intellectual mental models, and STEM identity.This work-in-progress paper shares some preliminary results of the baseline data that has beencollected during the first year of the NSF-funded project.MethodThe participants of this within-subject and between-group quasi-experimental study are studentsof a Historically