apply are summarized in table 1.Table 1: Summary of relevance of faculty-led study abroad courses to the different engineeringcurricula. Engineering Mechanics I Engineering Technical (Statics) Economy WritingAerospace Engineering R E RBiological Engineering R E R Chemical Engineering R E R Civil Engineering R E
project results in learning analytics tools for practice-basedSTEM learning that are appropriate for real-world learning environments.IntroductionThe PELARS1 project is intended as a testing ground and generator of 21st-Century STEMknowledge and skills. The project generates, analyses, uses and provides feedback for analyticsderived from hands-on, project-based and experiential learning scenarios. These scenarios are: 1. European High School level STEM classrooms. 2. Postsecondary Science and Engineering practical environments. 3. The more open-form studio environments of the Interaction Design Schools (which form the basis and inspiration for many of the project’s orientations).The project serves to help better understand learners' knowledge
fororal communication acts (Item 8; mean= 75; S.D. =18).At the other end of the spectrum, students reported the least increase in their confidence onItem 1, their ability to identify objectives in speaking about their work, (mean = 76;S.D.= 18).As Table 4 shows, there still was a statistically significant increase in this measure, but notthe strong increases shown in Items 3, 5, 6, and 8. Part of this lower measure of self-efficacymay have come from the highly directive approach of the design team in which studentswere not invited to think about their objectives but instead had a specific activity prescribed.Students then were instructed to complete that activity. A slower pace and more autonomymight have given students time to think critically
; 2005; Jamieson et al., 2009; Mena et al., 2012; Hundley et al., 2012;Knight, 2012; Spinks et al., 2006; Bourn and Neal, 2008). In the Middle East, the GCC, andQatar an investigation similarly has not been conducted, hence this study sheds an importantperspectives bridging an empirical gap in the literature and contributing to better design offuture engineering education in Qatar.There are four main dimensions that are driving Qatar’s economy into a KBE: 1- QatarNational Vision 2030, 2- World Cup 2022 and the associated mega projects, 3- Instability ofOil and Gas prices, and 4- Regional growth and competition for skills, products, andinvestments in the GCC region mainly led by UAE and Saudi Arabia.Qatar is increasingly investing in knowledge
modules in collaboration, a successful launching of a travel course comesfrom not just a single module, but an integrated efforts of them all. All the modules incollaboration are intertwined, and they are fostered throughout the entire duration of thetravel course’s development and implementation.To foster an effective collaboration, the key is to find out the trustworthycollaborators, trust them, learn from them, and appreciate them.Through the collaborations with a wide-range of colleagues and friends, we discovered acolleague had previously drafted a travel course proposal, but the proposal was declinedby the administration. That is why there had never been a travel course offered in ourdepartment before. The common concerns include:1. Why is
suggestions for designing similar engineering leadership programs in the future.IntroductionFast-paced technological transformation and innovation demands not only technical expertisefrom future engineers, but also multiple soft skills, in particular leadership [1]. Crumpton-Young indicated that engineering leadership is the influence and ability to lead otherengineers and technical staff to design, create, innovate, implement and evaluate and assessservices and products [2]. MIT-Gordon engineering leadership program describes engineeringleadership as a set of capabilities and values that enable a person to accomplish a multi-disciplinary complex project by leading teams instead of functioning as an individualtechnical contributor. Engineering
and Remote Laboratories as one of the most importantfuture technologies in learning.1 With this in mind researchers and academics have madeconsiderable advances in the design and development of online laboratories. These laboratoriesare accessible via the Internet 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. These advancements havebeen possible because of the growing advancement of Internet and networking technologies aswell as new developments in e-learning and e-work tools. The forerunners in this area areengineering disciplines and the natural sciences.Active learning by means of online laboratories is especially valuable for blended learningapproaches. Students can access online laboratories from almost any location and the onlyneed is web access
Education Development Graduate Research Assistant at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University and Global Stu- dent Forum Chair for 12th GSF’2016, Seoul. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The Global Student Forum: A model for developing student leaders in engineering educationIntroductionThe Global Student Forum (GSF) is a three-day event organized by the Student Platform forEngineering Education Development (SPEED).1 Students come to GSF from all over the worldto participate in a series of workshops, discussions, and presentations, culminating in the creationof action plans. The chief aim of these projects is to enable students to become a factor
disciplinary success (4 attributes) • Professional Attributes: Workplace-related competencies needed for effective global performance (5 attributes) • Personal Attributes: Individual characteristics needed for global flexibility (4 attributes) • Interpersonal Attributes: Skills and perspectives needed to work on interdependent global teams (2 attributes) • Cross-cultural Attributes: Societal and cultural understanding needed to embrace diverse viewpoints (5 attributes)Of these, the top eight attributes (assumed order of perceived importance) reported by Hundley2are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Top Eight Attributes of the Global Engineer (adapted2) Category
english professor. Students gained valuable transferable skills while workingon this project including creative thinking, audience awareness, teamwork, technical writing,visual design, and communication. The authors of this paper, who include the students thatworked on the project, aim to promote and encourage the idea of undergraduate students activelyengaging and creating STEM programs and initiatives for K-12.IntroductionThe idea of STEM education has been around since the early 1900’s. Originally called, SMET(science, mathematics, engineering, and technology), educators focused on instructing studentsin skills that would benefit their future societies[1]. The idea of enriching these fields by creatingstudents well versed in them quickly
complete all four years at WUST or transfer to UB after two years, will be granted aCertificate of Graduation and a Bachelor’s degree from WUST after satisfactorilycompleting of the program requirements. There are several important characteristics of theprogram between UB and WUST: (1) the program focuses on a specific academic program,so both universities design the program that fits students at WUST: (2) a collaborativeprogram by transferring the credits earned at the other institution: and (3) UB professors visitWUST to teach courses, while WUST faculty members from China visit UB for professionaldevelopments as visiting scholars. As a result of the program, eight WUST students havetransferred to UB at the junior level in Fall 2015, and about
students and morethan 1.800 faculty. The educational project1 of the University of Valparaiso, reformulated in2012, has been defined as “learning outcomes oriented”, which is a nuanced interpretation ofthe learning outcomes educational model. This approach was undertaken to allow the initialintroduction of the learning outcomes model in a public and traditional university, whereresistance to change and administration formalism are serious threats to a massive curriculartransformation. Hence this definition does not necessarily force to completely change allcurricula, but rather a conceptual change that involves four key elements2: 1. Graduate profiles are formulated in terms of learning outcomes 2. Curricular design must be driven by the
Perspectives in Science and Engineering Ethics Abstract In 2014 an interdisciplinary team of researchers from the University of Delaware began a 5-‐year project with the Online Ethics Center (OEC) to gather international perspectives on science and engineering ethics, broadly construed.1 We seek instructional and scholarly materials from international institutions and individual foreign scholars and teachers. This paper describes the rationale and outlines the theoretical foundation of this project. The central issue to be addressed here is: if there is indeed a benefit to the “internationalization” of science and
laboratories based onsimulations are called Virtual Laboratories [1-5]. On the other hand, hands-on/physicalexperiments require equipment. With the traditional approach of performing experimentdirectly with equipment, the need for equipment grows proportionally to the increase ofthe number of students, often resulting in considerable expenses. Following hands-onapproach, the only way for universities to share the same equipment is if the students of aother universities are moving physically to a given university to perform their laboratorysessions. We all now know that one way to overcome this drawback is the use of remotelaboratories [6-14]. Remote laboratories allow students to access and manipulate realequipment located anywhere in the world
produces significantlearning gains for students, although research is sparse on learning thataccrues from internships and co-ops in engineering (Linn, Howard, & Miller,2004). Still, it is estimated that thousands of students participate in either co-op or internships annually, 67% of recent college graduates completed atleast one internship while in school, and 56% of employers expect to hiremore interns in the future. Despite their widespread use and popularity, weknow relatively little about the influence of co-ops and internships on URMstudents' learning in engineering. This is the gap addressed by this study. 1 There is
. Page 19.2.33.1 Detailed Schemes in the Research There are different and more numerous types of questions and answers betweenlearners and teaching staff in the distance learning environment. Fig.1 shows anexample of questions and answers (denoted Q/As) from learners (denoted S1 to S4) andteaching staff (denoted T), respectively. For instance, there may be a volley of answersfor Q3 if it is assumed to be of the highest priority at a certain time during the process oflectures/seminars. It is more effective to timely enhance dynamics between learners andteaching staff by making the usage of shared space mobile Q/A integration. It is alsopossible for any S to get an answer for each question uploaded if it can be found andmatched in the knowledge
program, student need to take course related programminganalyzed statistically. language. These courses are offered to student with further objectives: (1) Student must acquire fundamentalsThe proposed pedagogy incorporated hands on practice of programming languages (2) Student should have abilityin laboratories tailored with short theory sessions to learn software tools related to their discipline.(3)replacing conventional way of conducting theory sessions Student should have adequate skills of analyzingin classroom and practical sessions in laboratory requirement and developing engineering
environments, whichrequires global competency and ongoing, lifelong learning to better understandingengineering cultures around the world [1], [2]. Accreditation bodies and universitiesrecognize that the preparation of lifelong globally competent engineers begins during theundergraduate degree [3]. However, incorporating international experiences into a packedundergraduate curriculum in a meaningful but affordable manner is difficult for courseadministrators and instructors. Furthermore, little is known about the effectiveness ofexisting efforts. This paper addresses the need to better understand how course instructorscan effectively internationalize their learning materials in an engineering classroom.The course used as a qualitative case study in
isachieved by the synthesis of inverted, interactive, and international learning in networkedclassrooms on distributed campuses, while learning technologies are used strategically to enablethe new pedagogy to enrich the learning experiences and outcomes of all domestic andinternational students on local and remote campuses at multiple universities. Such a different, ifnot unique, pedagogy is developed based on three basic premises: (1) contextual understanding isbest achieved via direct engagements (as opposed to linear lecturing), hence the "inverted"learning, (2) what students learn depends on with whom they learn (instead of from whom theylearn), hence the "interactive" learning, and (3) diversity increases learning opportunity foreveryone, hence
leading to increasing strategic value of the application ofdesign in businesses (see Figure 1), the ‘Design Ladder’ model (DDC (2003)) highlights the value of design forcompetitiveness. Typically, companies’ design maturity, exhibited by their attitude towards design, is reflectedin how they integrate design thinking as part of their innovation process. In the first step of the ladder, design is anegligible part of their business. When design is applied as ‘style’, it is typically seen as an appearance attribute,relating to the final physical form of the product, which may be the responsibility of a designer or someone elsewithin the company. In the third step, design is not the result, but a method, which is integrated into the
engineering majors complete a studyabroad experience; engineering represents three percent of all US study abroad students whilecomputer science is at 1.5 percent.1 Notwithstanding the significant resources often needed topromote study abroad, there are several other factors that affect the ability of institutions topromote globalization outcomes for students. For example, several universities are revampingtheir core curriculum to include an emphasis on globalization while others are creatinginterdisciplinary courses with an international “thread” linking subject content from disciplinesas diverse as fine arts, social sciences, natural sciences, and economics.2
interdisciplinary activities and assess theentire program.The project will allow a number of results to be achieved: (1) the development of a combinedResearch-Academic undergraduate student exchange program, and (2) the interaction betweenboth institutions' faculty in academic and research domains. Project results will pave futureavenues of collaboration at the graduate level, and increase cultural awareness of studentsstudying abroad to the U.S. and Colombia. Page 19.9.2 BackgroundHigher education institutions are moving toward the internationalization of their campuses. Inthe U.S., universities are recognizing the
Institute was set onproviding humanitarian services for the destination through a leadership learning experience forthe undergraduate Michigan Tech students. As the Institute grew throughout the next few years,it was clear that additional project locations were necessary.Over the next years, the Pavlis Institute broadened its reach to countries such as Argentina, India,and, its most recent addition, Malta. The addition of each leadership practicum location“demonstrates the maturity and success of the Pavlis Institute.” 1 Each location brought aboutpolitical, authority, and educational challenges, all of which were embraced by the studentstraveling there. The learning outcomes of the Pavlis Institute were changed by the experiences inthe developed
Engineering Education Association), and in the past served as First Vice President of IFEES (International Federation of Engineering Societies) Page 19.13.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Engineering for the Americas: Progress on the Action Plans of the Ministers of Science and Technology of the Organization of American StatesThe Organization of American States’ First Meeting of Ministers and HighAuthorities of Science and Technology, held in Lima, Peru in November of 2004,resulted in the Declaration of Lima [1], which pronounced that science,engineering
Regression, Experimental Design, Program Evaluation, and Survey Methods. Page 19.14.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 1 Engineering Leadership Development Programs: Universities Respond to Critical Needs in the US and InternationallyIntroduction In a world where technological innovation continues to accelerate, engineers need tocontinuously evolve and improve, just like the new technology they are developing. The need forengineers to be effective leaders and
Caribbean.These are examined, and a summary of the state of engineering program accreditation in theregion will be presented.IntroductionEngineering program accreditation is the key to a global knowledge economy. Internationallyrecognized Engineering accreditation establishes programmatic and institutional optimizationthat provides quality assurance, internationally recognized standards, and a process ofcontinuous improvement. This would bring internationalization to academia, which would inturn build capacity, foster development, enable mobility and move the countries to globalcompetitiveness.The International Engineering Accreditation Alliance (IEA) [1] groups the agencies that havebecome signatories of the six international mutual recognition
Educational PartnershipIntroduction:Over the last three decades, the internet has accelerated interconnectedness. From thisinterconnectedness, the appearance of the “micro-multinational” or small to medium-sizedcompany that operates internationally has become a major contender. Given the highlyinternational level of economic activity now seen1, engineering graduates will likely be calledupon to navigate effectively in the global economy.In response to economic needs, post-secondary institutions have begun to address ways thatglobal competency can be integrated into engineering programs. Five educational methods thatcan be used to help develop global competency are listed below: 1. International enrolment refers to the traditional student
Faculty Development and International Collaborations Using Vertical Education Enhancement Model Stephen U. Egarievwe1,2 and Ralph B. James2 1 College of Engineering, Technology and Physical Sciences, Alabama A&M University, Normal, AL 35762, USA2 Nonproliferation and National Security Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USAAbstractThis paper presents the international collaboration and experiences of an effective facultydevelopment initiative based on a vertical education enhancement (VEE) model. The VEEfaculty development program was designed to effectively improve performance and moralthrough
Engineering Education’s (ASEE), Going theDistance report, 53.6% Hispanics, 61.4% Native Americans, 61.7% African Americans and 49%Female students who enter engineering programs do not graduate in this major.1 This translatesto an engineering workforce that comprise of about 6% Hispanics, 0.3% Native American, 4%African Americans and 13% females according to the latest National Science Foundation’sreport.2 With such high attrition rates among minorities and underrepresented groups, changingthe current engineering workforce’s diversity portfolio is of grave national importance andrequires a plethora of high impact approaches. In the aforementioned ASEE report, over 60strategies and best practices were proposed. High impact practices included first-year