. IntroductionThis evidence-based paper assesses strategies for Research Experience for Undergraduates(REU) social program success. REU programs typically bring together students from across thecountry – or even around the world – to a university campus for the summer. While at thisuniversity, the students learn how to conduct real research in their discipline by actually doing it,under the supervision of a faculty mentor. Giving students exposure to conducting bona fideresearch allows them to determine whether they may be interested in pursuing a research career(and, to support this, continuing on to graduate-level education).Many students who participate in REU programs remember these programs long after theprogram is complete. The initial experience
Paper ID #36589Work-in-Progress: A Collaborative Model of Teaching andLearning for Undergraduate Innovation EducationJackson Otto (Graduate Student)Greg J Strimel (Assistant Professor, Engineering/Technology TeacherEducation) Assistant Professor, Technology Leadership & Innovation at Purdue University © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress: A Collaborative Model of Teaching and Learning for Undergraduate Innovation EducationIntroduction:A student’s education today should reflect the evolving innovative nature
range of topics including embedded systems,signal processing with VLSI implementations, wireless communications, networksecurity, and antenna arrays.--The Biomedical Engineering Program, in collaboration with the chemical andbiomedical research initiatives, is flourishing under the auspices of the Faculty ofthe School of Medicine and the Medical Center.--IBSAR stands for the Initiative of Biodiversity Studies in Arid Regions. It is aninterdisciplinary research program collaboration between the chemistry, chemicalengineering, and Agriculture departments. The aim is to explore and to developrelated economic opportunities through the study and research of biotechnologyapproaches that support biodiversity and the environmental stability in the
Performance and Compensation of Engineering Majors,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 333–338, 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00822.x.[3] P. D. Gardner and And Others, “Starting Salary Outcomes of Cooperative Education Graduates,” Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 16–26, 1992.[4] J. A. Raelin et al., “The Effect of Cooperative Education on Change in Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students: Introducing Work Self-Efficacy,” Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2019933, 2011. Accessed: Mar. 05, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2019933[5] D. R. DeLorenzo, “The Relationship of Cooperative
higher education in the region.Background and overview of prior workOver 40 students participate annually and perform research in all six engineering departments atthe AFIT Graduate School of Engineering and Management. First, starting in summer 2012, aformal assessment tool is now distributed to students to measure the impact of the researchexperience. Second, starting in summer 2013, students are now provided with four careerbroadening programs that are informed by student survey results in 2012. These programs aremade possible through a partnership among AFIT, the LEADER (Launching Equity in theAcademy across the Dayton Entrepreneurial Region) Consortium, and the Southwestern OhioConsortium for Higher Education (SOCHE). The partnership
three main themes: local drug delivery, endothelial dysfunction in diabetes, and cooperative DNA diagnostics. Recent awards include the Jeanette Wilkins Award for the best basic science paper at the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Dr. Caplan teaches several classes including Biotransport Phenomena, Biomedical Product Design and Development II (alpha prototyping of a blood glucose meter), and co-teaches Biomedical Capstone De- sign. Dr. Caplan also conducts educational research to assess the effectiveness of interactive learning strategies in large classes (˜150 students). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Promoting career reflection among freshman biomedical engineering
development of spatial reasoning abilities for engineering students. Bell has worked at Michigan State University since 1995. His work focused on the development of K-12 teacher abilities to use technology for teaching and learning. His recent research has focused on distance learning and collaboration through telepresence. One key aspect of this work is the study of embodied content for learning and collaboration. Embodied content includes collaborative textual environments as well as augmented/mixed reality. Other research includes idea-centered teaching and learning.Cui Cheng, Michigan State University Cui Cheng is a doctoral candidate in the Educational Psychology and Educational Technology program at Michigan
% in1963 to 54% in 1993, and the percentages of students who engaged in appropriate collaborationwith other students on homework assignments increased from 11% to 49% (Passow et. al.,2006). It can be due to increase of using collaborations in the classes. Several studies haveidentified variations in rates of cheating among students within different majors. With generalagreement among these studies that higher percentages of business and engineering studentsengage in cheating which are 91% and 82% respectively compared to students in the social andnatural sciences which are 73% and 71% respectively (McCabe, 1997, Mattei, 2008). Likewise,past research has identified that variations in rates of cheating among university students fromdifferent
instructor to the notes of the students -without passing through the mind of either one - continues as “the norm”.The purpose of this paper is to renew the call for deployment of better and more effectiveinstructional strategies in the classrooms of the Arab Gulf States, stressing on cooperativelearning practices as a viable alternative to the traditional (low-interaction lecture-based)environment that has gripped the engineering education of Region’s institution for decades. Thepaper sheds light on: theoretical roots, research support, current practices, and suggestions forredesigning classes-if need be- to stimulate interaction and help break the traditional lecturedominant pattern when cooperative learning protocols are deployed. The paper shows
Education, and he co-authored a chapter in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Springer, 2004). Recently, Dr. Mayhew received two grants from the United States Department of Education, the first investigating how gender identities inform students' likelihood of engaging in high-risk drinking behaviors and the second examining collegiate conditions leading to campus violence. Page 12.161.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Academic Integrity among Engineering Undergraduates: Seven Years of Research by the E3 TeamThe E3 Team (Exploring
Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $14.5 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011. Dr. Ohland is Chair of the IEEE Curriculum and Pedagogy Committee and an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE and IEEE.Nichole Ramirez, Purdue University Nichole Ramirez is a graduate student in the School of
for first-year studentsinfluence the cultivation of teamwork skills. According to the survey results, 94% of theparticipants found team projects with other in-class collaborative activities to be the mostbeneficial in developing teamwork skills and a significant number of students attributed theirteam success to how effectively they distributed the tasks among team members.Therefore, this study aims to contribute to the broader research on teamwork assessments byproviding an understanding of team dynamics and interdisciplinary learning in the context ofteam-based computational modeling projects. The study explores how BiomedicalEngineering graduate students utilize their model-based reasoning skills through effectivecollaboration and social
bycreating a bridge to provide students access to the research and development activities involvedin space exploration, as well as to support and develop a pipeline program to encourage the nextgeneration of engineers and scientists. Of special interest is to ensure that robotics researchknowledge derived from exploration missions and programs is transferred to the educationalarena.2The current exploration vision of NASA is to develop the technology and infrastructure requiredto send humans back to the Moon and Mars.3 Some of the technologies that must be matured arethose that are needed to support combined robot/human crews for establishing a base on theMoon in a safe and cost effective manner. Addressing challenging engineering problems such
operate thePetroleum Institute (PI), a world-class educational institution dedicated to educating engineers forthe oil and gas industry. The PI will offer undergraduate and graduate degrees in five engineeringprograms related to ADNOC operations. A Foundation Program is also offered to help studentsmake the transition from their high school preparation to the entry requirements for thebaccalaureate curricula, especially in the area of English proficiency.The Petroleum Institute is a unique enterprise that represents a collaboration between academia inthe United States and the private sector in the Middle East. The academic programs at thePetroleum Institute involve intensive interaction with industry and four industrial partners (BP-Amoco, JODCO
may proveuseful to review typical past and prevailing typical expectations of both Industry and Academia,i.e., what Industry wants from Academia and, in turn, what Academia expects from Industryfrom both from the industry perspective and from the academic perspective.II. Partnerships and Collaboration: Part I.In the past Industry has given relatively small amounts of money in the form of matching grantsto just about any academic institution that was advocated by some internal alumni. Largeramounts were given to those academic institutions identified for some reason or another asfocus institutions. Grants, student scholarships and in kind donations were given to academicinstitutions that were geographically co-located with corporate facilities
“educational mentor” construct dynamic, by serving as customer,providing subject matter and project management advice, and allowing the students to makegenuine mistakes without high-stake consequences.II. Coast Guard Academy Plasma Lab (CGAPL) Background and Initiatives The Physics Section at the CGA continues to make steps toward developing our studentundergraduate research in magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) and Plasma Physics with the CoastGuard Academy Plasma Lab (CGAPL). The lab is in its mid stages of development with 8 activeundergraduate students and 4 collaborating instructors and staff. CGAPL is a nexus for ProjectBasedLearning(PBL) and undergraduate exploration. Here, MHD applications to Coast Guardmissions and investigations into plasma
creativity [18]. A positive impact on jobplacement has also been demonstrated [19].2.2. CybersecurityPBL’s job placement benefits may not be critical for students seeking employment incybersecurity – though job preparation benefits of PBL undoubtedly are – as, at present, there isa critical worldwide need for graduates with cybersecurity skills [20]. This need is only expectedto grow. Between late 2019 and late 2020, over 500,000 cybersecurity positions needed to befilled [21] and greater need is projected in the future. Many of these positions require keyresearch-related skills to understand and effectively respond to new and changing situations.In addition, cybersecurity research is acutely needed to develop new computing approaches thatavoid
Washington. Her research interests focus on multilingual and multicultural elementary students and their teachers in relation to language and equity. Pauline is currently working in collaboration with PNW LSAMP as a research assistant on a project to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM education. The research focuses on strength and asset- based methods that aim at empowering students and work towards systemic change. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Siloed Efforts and Collaboration Among STEM Equity Initiatives: An Organizational Network Analysis1Introduction In the decades-long pursuit of fostering inclusive and equitable learning
, and the ability to create and articulate thevision and strategy of their organizations are the top factors that indicate the traits of the bestleaders.Several authors have researched the importance of interpersonal skills relating to success.Changes in technology have prompted the need for improving such skills as collaboration,customer service, communication, problem-solving, and working with others [15]. Senge [16] © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conferencedetermined these skills needed to be practiced by students before entering the workforce, againindicating a need to teach these topics as part of the COE curriculum.Vandervelde [17
valuableexperiences. They appreciated the opportunity to ask questions and the different innovation andentrepreneurship topics that the speakers spoke about. The interns also went on a facility tour atthe University of Dayton Research Institute (UDRI) for one lecture series to learn about additivemanufacturing. This was well-received, and they expressed interest in more facility tours in thefuture. Figure 3: Word Cloud of Students’ Perception About the Lecture Series4. Conclusions/RecommendationsThe University of Dayton received a generous donation from an alumnus to supportmultidisciplinary collaboration between engineering and business majors through experientiallearning. Consequently, the Stitt Scholars Program was instituted to allow students
the reasons for their preferences, and 64% (124) of the students whoresponded did so with written comments.Of those who preferred the board format, 70% (57) of commenters indicated that the work at theboard improved collaboration among group members. Most of these simply gave very briefcomments such as “more collaborative” or “easier to work together.” The next common responsewas given by 21% of respondents, who noted that the board work made it easier for all to see thework and follow along. Here are a few of the more articulate responses explaining the boardpreference, which capture sentiments expressed by many students in this group: Working on the board seemed to get everyone more involved as we could all follow along step by
among underprivileged com- munities.Aravind Arun, Stanford University Aravind Arun is a graduate student at Stanford University, currently working to complete a Master of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering. He participated in the GEE program in Spring of his senior year as a Stanford undergraduate student. Page 26.1724.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 What is global preparedness? Arriving at answers in collaboration with student engineers working with underserved communities globallyAbstractStudents have demonstrated increasing demand to use their
engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Studying Education Organizational Change: Rigorous Attention To Complex Systems Via A Multi-theoretical Research ModelAbstractThe purpose of this paper is two-fold. We first explore the question how might we rigorously andcompletely study
thechallenges that are present during graduate training are common among graduate students. Thesesimilarities are more evident among graduate students that share certain backgrounds, and inparticular among members of minority groups. While much research has been devoted to theexperiences of gender and ethnic minorities [1]–[3], the experiences of English as SecondLanguage (ESL) students in graduate school has been poorly explored. The challenges of ESLstudents often interplay with those of gender and ethnic minorities because their identities areintersectional with such characteristics. Therefore, being an ESL student represents a dimensionthat would be valuable to explore in the context of graduate education.Supporting the development of graduate
sustainable exchangemechanism for people-to-people and cultural exchanges in the engineering technology field,and the failure of the exchanges to effectively interact among university-industry’ platformsas well as universities are weak in helping enterprises to promote Chinese engineeringstandards. Therefore, we propose a bilateral and multilateral mixed exchange mechanismwith government-led and multi-agents’ participation, integrating platform resources amonguniversity-industry, strengthening the promotion of China’s engineering standards, andimproving and studying China’s engineering standards.INTRODUCTIONInterconnection, production capacity cooperation, and people-to-people and culturalexchanges are the three pillars of the Belt and Road
Session as did the desireof the organizers – Karl Smith, Ruth Streveler, and Rocio Chavela Guerra – to pass the torch.The Engineering Education Community Resource maintained by Adam Carberry and KenYasuhara provides up-to-date information on most aspects of the community, e.g., graduateprograms, conferences, employment opportunities, resources for researchers, and much more.We suggest that the participants of this panel consider the potential opportunities and affordancesof in-person networking sessions at engineering education conferences.Research on Engineering Education for Practice (REEP)Reasoning that an important outcome of engineering education is the preparation of students topractice engineering after graduation, there is growing
curriculum and locally developed hardwarein 2000. About that time, the primary author was asked to assist EECS with evaluation of theplatform for learning. Since then, graduate students and faculty from the Department of Scienceand Mathematics Education (SMED) at OSU have been involved in evaluation research relatedto the curriculum reform.17An essential aspect of educational design research is the development of theory. Moretraditional approaches to curriculum development and implementation only apply theories ofinstruction and learning to new settings. A curriculum that incorporates cooperative learning isevaluated for the effect on student learning. The evaluation usually does not shed light on howcooperative learning functions to improve student
enumerates numerous additional reasons that engineers may not use physicallibraries, ranging from the practical (having to travel some distance compared to the convenienceof remotely accessing online resources) to the psychological (the phenomenon of libraryanxiety).21-27 To overcome this, the scholarly record reflects numerous innovative efforts bySTEM liaison librarians to reach these hermetic students and researchers. Previous initiativesrecorded in the literature include reorganizing staffing at service points to provide subjectspecialists with more time for advanced research questions,28 revamping libraries’ web presenceto make subject specialists more visible,29 launching satellite reference services within academicbuildings,30-32 creating
Paper ID #41767Preparing Students for Successful Industrial Collaborations in Engineering(Work in progress)Mr. Chun Kit Chan, The University of Hong Kong Mr. Ryan Chun Kit Chan is a Senior Technical Assistant in the Tam Wing Fan Innovation Wing, Faculty of Engineering at the University of Hong Kong after graduation. Before graduation, Ryan served as an undergraduate research assistant in Innovation Wing and has involved in the design and implementation of a world-record-holding robotic fish. Ryan received his Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Hong Kong. Ryan’s research focuses on robotic
establishing a successfulacademic path. We believe a major cause is often students’ inadequately developed mathematicalintuition as well as numeric and symbolic skills set.During Fall 2008, around 350 students and 7 teachers participated in MA-117 redesign. Acommunity of practice was formed with the teachers, and 4 months before the semester startedthey attended workshops related to How People Learn framework; assessment; active,collaborative, and cooperative learning; and research methods in mathematics; as well as the onerelated to rubric implementation1-2, 4-9, 10-12, 17, 20-22, 26, 28-29, 43. Several classroom activities,assignments, quizzes, homework, tests, and rubrics were designed by the community of practiceduring this four months4. Further