behavioral health translational research training program. Implementation Science, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0621-9Bamonti, P. M., Keelan, C. M., Larson, N., Mentrikoski, J. M., Randall, C. L., Sly, S. K., Travers, R. M., & McNeil, D. W. (2014). Promoting ethical behavior by cultivating a culture of self-care during graduate training: A call to action. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 8(4), 253– 260. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000056Bang, K.-S., Lee, I., Kim, S., Lim, C. S., Joh, H.-K., Park, B.-J., & Song, M. K. (2017). The effects of a campus Forest-Walking program on undergraduate and graduate students’ physical and psychological health
. Comparative case studies and analyses were introduced with breakout room discussion to help students comprehend the interplay among science, technology and the2Cultivating “global competency” in a divided world formation of world communities in various socio-political contexts.2. Prompt-based Interview: Students conducted three sets of prompt-based interviews with their global partners through which to exchange learning outcomes and detect biases and stereotypes in cross-cultural communication.3. PECE Digital Infrastructure for collaborative homework and research data curation: The digital archival platform PECE (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography) was implemented in this course to facilitate epistemic
funded projects through the sharing of resources, ideation andguidance around mentorship program creation, and a facilitated community ofpractice.Table 1. Funded Projects and Area of FocusFunding Institute Affiliation Focus of ProjectCycle [Redacted]2019 Project #1 Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindset for Women in Engineering Education Leadership2019 Project #2 Faculty Learning Communities (FLCs) for improving mentoring skills in faculty across all departments in the College of Engineering (COE)2019 Project #3 Develop conceptual framework and perform qualitative and quantitative
competition in detail, including goals,implementation, and challenges. The paper also discusses the challenges introduced by theCOVID pandemic and how the event was moved to a virtual platform to ensure social distancing.Finally, lessons learned and future plans are presented. IntroductionIt is currently well understood that team competitions are an important component of engineeringeducation1-3 and support education in teaming, communications, leadership, design and open-ended problem solving. While classroom and laboratory learning are the backbone of engineeringeducation, extracurricular competitions, especially those that involve teaming, are an excellentway to augment learning. Not only does competition
Higher Edu- cation, University of Nebraska, and the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation to implement an ecology of validation model at a large scale to promote student success. At UNL, Deepak mentors the AgFutures first-year living-learning community in leadership, service, and civic engagement. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Community building through technology in a biological systems engineering courseConference: American Society for Engineering EducationDivision: Biological and Agricultural Engineering Division (BAE)Tags: Community-building, student-centered strategies, technologyPaper interests: Undergraduates, Graduate, Faculty
% (67% F, 33% M) - Partially: 60% (37% F, 63% M) Factor in model: Mentoring Do you think it is necessary to establish a formal peer- - Yes: 72% (28% F, 44% M) mentoring program for new professors? - No: 4% (4% F, 0% M) Factor in model: Task In your opinion and compared to your peers in your - Less time: 14% (9% F, 17% M) – assignment department, how much time do you spend working in - Same time: 28% (23% F, 32% M) committees (or other services)? - More time: 58% (68
. J. Educ. Res., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 154–172, 2018.[45] S. A. DeBolle et al., “‘Development of an Academic Surgical Student Program for Enhancing Student-Faculty Engagement,’” J. Surg. Educ., vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 604–606, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.11.007.[46] D. Hammond et al., “Professional Benefits of a Web-based Journal Club for Critical Care Residents and Their Mentors,” AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 1520–1527, 2019, doi: 10.5688/ajpe6907.[47] L. H. Ikuma, A. Steele, S. Dann, O. Adio, and W. N. Waggenspack, “Large-scale student programs increase persistence in STEM fields in a public university setting,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 57–81, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20244.[48
have pledged to graduate at least 20 students specificallytrained in solving large-scale problems like the Grand Challenges.14The GCS program was developed such that each school could develop its own methods forstudent fulfillment of five program competencies. These five GCS program competencies areshown in Figure 1. The program competencies within the GCS program are intended to providethe foundation for graduates to tackle large-scale challenges, such as the 14 outlined in the NAEGrand Challenges for Engineering.14 Hands-on Project or Research Experience • Related to a Grand Challenge Interdisciplinary Curriculum • A curriculum that complements engineering fundamentals with courses in other fields, preparing
program for first-generation students and underrepresentedminorities in engineering. The Studio also became a new home for several existing programs,including engineering supplemental instruction and peer mentoring. It is also part of anarticulation plan with the college’s study-abroad program. The Studio has evolved into a hub ofstudent learning and leadership, which encouraged a significant investment from a major energycompany, and expanded the Studio and several other student services into a new entity: the LSUChevron Center for Engineering Education (Chevron Center).Students who participate in our programs do so voluntarily, as do the faculty who certify theircourses as C-I courses. Participation numbers indicate excellent buy-in by both
[16] Dym CL, Gilkeson M, Phillips J. Engineering. (2012), Design at[4] Brian Robinson. (2016), Continued Development and Implementation Harvey Mudd College: Innovation Institutionalized, Lessons Learned. of a Two-Course Sequence Designed to Transform the First-Year ASME. J. Mech. Des. 134(8):080202-080202-10. Experience for Engineering Undergraduates, FYEE Annual doi:10.1115/1.4006890. Conference The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio
historically underrepresented within higher education and engineering. Cathryne earned a BA in Speech Communication, Masters in Public Affairs (MPA), and is currently pursuing an Ed.D. in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies.Dr. Matthew Dunbabin, Queensland University of Technology Dr Matthew Dunbabin joined QUT as a Principal Research Fellow (Autonomous Systems) in 2013. He is known internationally for his research into field robotics, particularly environmental robots, and their ap- plication to large-scale monitoring. He has wide research interests including adaptive sampling and path planning, vision-based navigation, cooperative robotics, as well as robot and sensor network interactions. Dr Dunbabin received his
, students, and staff that is increasingly more inclusive, collaborative, diverse, andcentered on student success. We are meeting this commitment in part through design andimplementation of new and revised practices for recruitment, professional development,mentoring, and advancement. But changing organizational culture is a large-scale undertaking. Inorder to build an organizational conscience for the college and secure its transformation into acommunity where all members feel welcome and engaged, “top-down” policy change must becomplemented by enlistment of change agents from every employment sector of the college. Forthis purpose, a 20-member Change Team — including a balance of tenure-track and professionalfaculty and classified staff — was
- tributed neuromorphic computing. Dr. Arafin’s work has been published in several top-tier peer-reviewed journals and conferences, such as IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration Systems (TVLSI), ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), and Asia and South Pacific De- sign Automation Conference (ASP-DAC). He won the IEEE Asian Hardware Oriented Security and Trust Symposium (AsianHOST) best paper award in 2018. He was a recipient of the prestigious A. James Clerk School of Engineering fellowship (2012).Prof. Kevin Kornegay, Morgan State University Kevin T. Kornegay received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Pratt Institute, Brooklyn, NY, in 1985 and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in
sameproject over multiple years and with a familiar group of students. One of the challenges inrunning a VIP team is the multidisciplinary aspect. This paper discusses the challenges associatedwith transitioning traditionally discipline-siloed projects to multidisciplinary projects using VIPas the catalyst. Said another way, we describe the ongoing lessons learned of changing themindset of students (and faculty) from “you’re electrical engineering, I’m mechanicalengineering” to “we’re engineering”.In Fall 2015, the VIP Program at the University of Hawai‘i consisted of six VIP teams: threecomposed primarily of EE students, one composed of ME students, and two with a mix ofengineering students. The latter two teams are used as case studies to test our
evaluate main project and Quick- 1Build submissions, we developed a rubric with categories spanning the steps in the engineeringdesign process. Accuracy, reliability, and ease of implementation were considered when designingthe rubric.Compared to other high school engineering programs that offer sequential engineering courses,our proposed curriculum is unique in that it offers students an opportunity to learn about differentengineering disciplines, teamwork, time management, project management, planning, execution,and evaluation via a project-based learning environment [12-13]. During the semester, studentssimultaneously work on long term and short
in Wildpoldsried, thisshift in the ownership form is driven by a strong desire for energy independence and localcommunity engagement.Similarly, district heating systems are often run by German municipal utilities to benefit the localcommunity. This facilitates increased efficiency of power production using combined heat andpower (CHP) and large-scale thermal energy storage. Germany powers CHP units with fossilfuels (coal and natural gas), but increasingly these units are being converted to run with biomassand biogas fuel sources. The participants learned about district heating provided by renewablebiomass and biogas power plants in Freiburg and Wildpoldsried and were also able to visit alarge scale solar thermal seasonal energy storage
Membership Development, Vice Chairman of IEEE Southeast Conference 2019 that was attended by 1100 attendees, organizer of numer- ous international conferences, Invited/Keynote speaker/Panel Moderator/Resource Person in international events. He is a Senior Member of IEEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Inclusive Engineering Consortium Abstract Over the last 7 years, a collaboration of 13 HBCU Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) programs has been working together to implement Experiment Centric Pedagogy to improve their student learning experience. The lessons learned and best practices of that effort have
(albeit with considerable coordination of topics, as will bediscussed in section 6). For the second half of the semester, lectures transitioned into a series ofintegrated engineering case studies that engaged material from both disciplines as well as criticaltools from reflection. Lab activities were similarly organized with the first half-semesterhands-on applications of basic engineering principles and the second half an integrated,seven-week human-centered design project focused on issues of access and accessibility on theBC campus. Reflection utilized BC’s innovative small group Purposeful Ongoing Discussion(POD) model of near-peer mentors guiding students through various reflective practices tograpple with the ethical and moral dimensions of
one sability to contribute to the level of their talent is an ethical and professional responsibility to thefield.This paper shares some early results from our broader NSF-funded project, titled Identif ingMarginalization and Allying Tendencies to Transform Engineering Relationships, or I-MATTER. The project s research questions are: 1. What does marginalization look like within engineering classrooms where teamwork is a primary feature? 2. How is marginalization legible (or not) to instructors at the classroom level? 3. What are the different ways that instructors respond to incidents of peer-to-peer marginalization? 4. How might the lessons of this work be implemented to systematically alert instructors when
, and computer science. The long term goals of this project are to increaseparticipant interest in STEM careers and college attendance. In the short term, we anticipateincreased technology proficiency, STEM engagement and academic achievement. Additionaloutcomes include increased teacher and mentor understanding of STEM instruction delivery andmentorship. This presentation will provide evaluation results and lessons learned during the firstyear of this project, including the effects of strategies, such as mentorship and early exposure touniversity-based STEM resources. Recommendations for developing a prototypical process fordeveloping programs that broaden participation of underrepresented students will also bediscussed.IntroductionIn many
and authentic, the belief thateach member brings different and potentially useful information to the task, and theopportunity to iterate design ideas over time. Framing agency provides a lens forunderstanding the kinds of design learning experiences students need to direct their ownlearning and negotiate that learning with peers in design projects.IntroductionManaging design projects in undergraduate coursework is challenging, in large partbecause design problems are ill-structured, meaning there are many possible solutionsand framings of any design problem [2]. As engineering programs have increasinglyincorporated design challenges into first year and core courses, faculty must makedifficult decisions about feasibly managing design
feedback fromhigh school students who are the participants in educational outreach is the Engineering Projectsin Community Service learning (EPICS) Program at Purdue University, which began as anundergraduate program but has been implemented successfully in high schools for over a decade[22]. In contrast to our work presented here, EPICS is a large-scale program involving longer-scale projects such as design teams. This contrasts with our work in that toy adaptation can beconducted in one session as a 1.5 or 2 hour activity without the required resources, infrastructure,and partnerships needed to facilitate high school design team initiatives, making toy adaptation amore feasible addition to existing or smaller-scale outreach efforts.Ultimately
Programs in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of Research of the Academy for Global Engineering at Virginia Tech, and is affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering educa- tion can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, tends to be data-driven by leveraging large-scale institutional, state, or national data sets, and considers the intersection between policy and organizational contexts. He has B.S., M.S., and M.U.E.P. degrees from the University of Virginia and a Ph.D. in Higher Education from Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Tremayne O’Brian Waller
. In contrast, several REDCON memberteam belong to universities classified as doctoral universities/highest research. The lessons thesegroups learn about accomplishing change will help determine how important are factors such asfaculty reward systems, work-life balance, and student demographic contexts. Through theirsimilarities (e.g., common purpose of improving diversity and inclusion) and their differences(e.g., the pedagogical, organizational, and curricular approaches they employ), we will learnabout barriers and drivers of large scale change efforts. The information produced by the REDteams will serve higher education, and engineering education in particular, by creating a set ofmodels for change.REDPARNSF funded the collaborative effort
-College and Pre-Professional Supports:CWIT’s Bookend Approach to Inclusive Excellence in Undergraduate Tech Education Presented by: Danyelle Tauryce Ireland, Ph.D. Cindy Greenwood, M.Ed. Erica D’Eramo, M.A. Kate O’Keefe, M.S.Ed. 2 AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. Pre-College Programs a. Impact b. Lessons Learned 3. Pre-Professional Programs a. Impact b. Lessons Learned 4. Future Directions 5. Adapting the Model 6. Where to Start 7. Q&AThe Center for Women in Technology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore Countyhas a 21 year record of working to enable success
Disparity in STEM Disciplines: A Study of Faculty Attrition and Turnover Intentions,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 607–624, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11162-008-9097-4.[29] K. Buch, Y. Huet, A. Rorrer, and L. Roberson, “Removing the Barriers to Full Professor: A Mentoring Program for Associate Professors,” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 38–45, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00091383.2011.618081.[30] C. Grant, J. Decuir-Gunby, and B. Smith, “Advance Peer Mentoring Summits For Underrepresented Minority Women Engineering Faculty,” in 117th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Jun. 2010, p. 15.129.1-15.129.20, Accessed: Jun. 29, 2016. [Online]. Available: https
. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 371–395, 2010. doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2010.tb01069.x.[4] G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B. Claar, H. L. Chen, K. Jackson, and S. D. Sheppard, "An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergraduate engineering majors," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 227–234, 2009. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01021.x.[5] L. H. Ikuma, A. Steele, S. Dann, O. Adio, and W. N. Waggenspack Jr., "Large-scale student programs increase persistence in STEM fields in a public university setting," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, pp. 57–81, 2019. doi: 10.1002/jee.20244.[6] P. Dawson, J. van der Meer, J. Skalicky, and K. Cowley, "On the effectiveness
industry working on water and wastewater treatment infrastructure projects.Dr. Eileen Kogl Camfield, University of California at Merced Since 1997, Eileen has been a college instructor, curriculum designer, and faculty pedagogy coordinator. She spent five years as Director of a University Writing Program, which included leading faculty learn- ing communities for Writing in the Disciplines. She subsequently served as the Executive Director of Student Academic Success Services. Eileen’s deep commitment to advancing equity, diversity and inclu- sion connects with her research interests pertaining to student success, writing self-efficacy development, resilience theory, and authentic assessment. At UC Merced, she has a dual
scholars, research, and mentoring: Current and future issues,” Educational Researcher, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 24-27, 1994. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024.[27] B. Sato, Professors of Teaching: Lessons Learned from a Unique Teaching-Focused Faculty Model, Mathematical Association of America, May 23, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://maa.org/math-values/professors-of-teaching-lessons-learned-from-a-unique-teaching- focused-faculty-model[28] A. N. Harlow, S. M. Lo, K. Saichaie, and B. K. Sato, "Characterizing the University of California’s tenure-track teaching position from the faculty and administrator perspectives," PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 1, p. e0227633, Jan. 2020.[29] M. Stains, J. Harshman, M. K. Barker
interests include the use of machine learning in general and deep learning in particular in support of the data-driven and self-driven management of large-scale deployments of IoT and smart city infrastruc- ture and services, Wireless Vehicular Networks (VANETs), cooperation and spectrum access etiquette in cognitive radio networks, and management and planning of software defined networks (SDN). He is an ABET Program Evaluator (PEV) with the Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC). He served on many academic program design, review and planning efforts. He serves on editorial boards of multiple journals including IEEE Communications Letter and IEEE Network Magazine. He also served as chair, co-chair, and technical