://www.oir.uiuc.edu/Did/workshops/Fa07Workshops.htm. Accessed on January 17, 2008.6. Graduate Academy for College Teaching. Online at http://www.oir.uiuc.edu/did/TAs/GraduateAcademy.htm. Accessed on January 17, 2008.7. EOL 585: College Teaching and Academic Careers syllabus. Online at https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/loui/www/eol585syllabus.pdf. Accessed on January 17, 2008.8. Graduate Teacher Certificate program description. Online at http://www.oir.uiuc.edu/did/Certificates/GraduateTeacher.htm. Accessed on January 17, 2008. Page 13.674.6
innovative reforms; and (3) a reformed curriculum and teachingmodel that will not only benefit students in EP but will also benefit students in other engineeringand science degree programs at UW.20The cornerstone to a successful launch of a student into a research project is a new coursedesigned for the EP degree program, EP 468 Introduction to Engineering Research (the first in aseries of four courses in the research sequence). In this one-credit course students are introducedto issues in the context of research. An outline of the syllabus from a recent offering of thecourse is given in Table 1. The main objectives of EP 468 are to provide: (1) content knowledgerelevant to the conduct of research, apart from specific technical skills, (2) a
scientists and entrepreneurs. The Chicago Tribune. 3. Walters, W. (2005). Nanoscience Education. Retrieved February 12, 2008, from http://www.nanoscience.com/education/profiles/Wilbur_W/WW-1.htmlAppendix A:Sample Course syllabus of Nanotechnology modeling, fabrication/rapid prototyping.Course number: ITMF 420Course Title: Nanotechnology Modeling, Fabrication/Rapid PrototypingCourse Description: A developmental analysis of nanotechnology fabrication developmentswith a focus on nanoparticles modeling, nanoscale devices, production techniques, rapidprototyping, and their interdisciplinary applications in various industrial fields such as materialscience, manufacturing, physical sciences, and electronic
critical because of demand by industry for broadly qualified graduates. Intheir previous paper, the authors analyzed the student information gathering patterns using onlythe students’ final reports at the end of the semester. An assessment rubric and scoring for thestudents reports was proposed. In this paper, additional to the final reports, the student designnotebook and presentation slides are also analyzed. An assessment rubric and scoring areproposed for the design notebooks and the presentation slides. The data collected is used to mapthe information gathering activities across the whole design process. Using the informationobtained, information literacy is integrated into a capstone syllabus. Information literacy mayinculcate in the
guest speakers delivered via distance, it has several uniquefeatures: 1) non-traditional syllabus where students and faculty will collectively make decisionson course structure and rules. Through this exercise, students will understand that they are partof the course and learn how to measure their performance in the course. 2) team-based, open-ended problems where students will actively learn the course content and apply it. For example,students can take apart of common household products to identify and sort material types,perform a life cycle analysis, and analyze the design for potential improvements in terms ofsustainability. Students can use inexpensive kits available on the market to convert solar energyinto electricity, with subsequent
courses are used for soft skills training by theET programs. What has been learned over the years from advisory groups is that employersprefer to hire technical graduates that also have the “people” skills offered by the OLS program.Today, we live in a world that is constantly changing, not only in an informational sense but alsoas a society. It is not enough to create a static base curriculum in such an environment.Educators are required to update course objectives and materials depending on the needs anddemands set by the industry and society. For example, who would have thought it was necessaryjust a short time ago to include on each syllabus the instructions for dealing with dangerousindividuals on campus?2 Obviously, course objectives have
composition? How do I add one more component to myalready filled syllabus? A cursory search of academic articles in College English will turnup some depressing results: hundreds of articles, spanning twenty years, which contradictand argue one another - not even the composition experts have definite, practical answersto these questions.What should a WAC course do? Most faculty understand WAC to promote “writing as a way of learning” inspecific disciplines [3]. From this view, one can take a formalist approach and assignresearch papers, training the student in hunting and gathering information to toss togetherin a mix of academic discourse and student slang. Or one could assign journal entries orshort reader response papers, allowing the
closely paralleled one or more of the topics covered on the course syllabus. Inaddition, their chosen topic had to be congruous with the new millennium conference theme.Students were encouraged to research past, present, and future applications of their chosen topic.The key idea was to have students explore a topic(s) in more depth than would be covered inclass, thus making them the “experts.” Each student in the AU course wrote a single-authorpaper.The theme for papers prepared for the Pittsburgh conference was a little different. Given thatPitt uses an integrated curriculum approach for their freshman courses, students were told thatwhere possible, their papers should relate to topics covered in the fall or spring semester of theirPhysics
statements of research and teaching plans − Being ready for likely interview questions • Starting a research program 1.5 hr − Identifying funding sources and writing successful proposals − The NSF CAREER program − Attracting graduate students to your research program • Planning and teaching the first course 1.5 hr − ABET and learning objectives − Preparing a syllabus − Active learning • Success strategies for new faculty members (based on the work of 0.5 hr Robert Boice[2000]) • Open discussion 0.5
accreditedengineering programs require mechanics courses at entry to major. Because mechanics isso centrally situated in the engineer’s intellectual training, it lends itself to the study ofengineers’ thinking, learning, and metacognition.Perhaps because of these characteristics, a great deal of research has been conducted toassess student learning in mechanics and methods of teaching mechanics. Educators inphysics and engineering have developed a clear understanding of misconceptions thatconflict with student learning, and the concept inventory has emerged as a powerful toolto identify these misconceptions. I review several results of the literature onmisconceptions and use of concept inventories. In the course of this review, I raise theissue of whether
in general. As a result, theannotations need to make it clear what the reader is learning about the student. In the followingexample, a casual reader reading the first part of the second paragraph might jump to theconclusion that the point is going to be about the class. Fortunately, the student does bring theattention back to himself in the third sentence. MANUFACTURING PROCESSES When an engineer designs a product, he/she has to know how to manufacture the product economically. Many great inventions have been made, but they are not produced. Why? Because they are too expensive to build! That is why a great invention has to be relatively cheap to manufacture. The artifact below is a portion of the syllabus of the course
AC 2008-1474: ENERGY AWARENESS EFFORTS AT BAYLOR UNIVERSITYKenneth Van Treuren, Baylor University Dr. Van Treuren is a professor on the faculty in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Baylor University. He teaches the capstone Mechanical Engineering Laboratory course as well as courses in heat transfer, aerospace engineering, fluid mechanics, and wind power. His research interests include energy education and literacy and gas turbine heat transfer. He can be contacted at Kenneth_Van_Treuren@baylor.edu.Ian Gravagne, Baylor University Dr. Gravagne is an assistant professor with the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Baylor University. He teaches the Engineering Design II
instructorused power point to present the course information. Most of the course management and classcommunication was done through blackboard, where the syllabus, assignments and lecturepresentations were all posted.According to the instructor’s syllabus for this particular ECE100 section, the course was Page 13.1289.7designed to emphasize the process of problem-solving, to prepare students to meet the generalpresentation requirements associated with technical work and to introduce them to the process ofcreating purposeful models. These skills and experiences will help them succeed with thediscipline-specific problems to come later. The course