Chapter, a member of the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA)’s Emerging Technologies committee, and a reviewer for ERAU’s Faculty Innovative Research in Science and Technology program.Emily Faulconer Dr. Emily Faulconer is Associate Professor within the Math, Sciences, & Technology Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University – Worldwide Campus. She earned a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering Sciences from the University of Florida in 2012. Her research interests are within the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, primarily in undergraduate research and online education. Safety is also an area of interest, and she serves as a founding member of the Academic Safety Committee for Embry-Riddle
E S Rural Urban Technology 2 5 1 6 0 7 Natural Sciences 2 0 0 2 0 2 Social Sciences 1 2 1 2 0 2 Math 1 2 0 3 0 3 All the areas 4 7 7 4 10 2 *E: Elementary – S: SecondaryThe participants answered items such as: I can define
Paper ID #38294Breaking Boundaries: An Organized Revolution for theProfessional Formation of Electrical EngineersChris S Ferekides (Associate Professor) Chris S. Ferekides received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of South Florida. He has been a faculty member in the Electrical Engineering Department since 1992. He is currently service as the department chair, and is the principal investigator of a NSF Funded RED Project that addresses the professional formation of electrical engineering students. His research is in the areas of electronic materials with a focus on photovoltaics.Carol
interview development for the study. The authors also thank the year 1 participantsfor their repeated insight, enthusiasm, and sharing their experiences during the study’s manylongitudinal commitments.References[1] H. Perkins, J. Gesun, M. Scheidt, J. Major, J. Chen, E. Berger, & A. Godwin, “Holistic wellbeing and belonging: Attempting to untangle stress and wellness in their impact on sense of community in engineering,” International Journal of Community Well-Being, vol. 4, pp. 549-580, 2021.[2] S. K. Lipson, E. G. Lattie, and D. Eisenberg, Increased rates of mental health service utilization by US college students: 10-year population-level trends (2007–2017), Psychiatric services, vol. 70, ed. 1, pp. 60-63
courseperformance. This project considers only one course over two academic years for undergraduatestudents. Hence the outcomes cannot be generalized to all majors or students. However, theresults could provide valuable insights to improve the learning outcomes of high educationinstitutions.References[1] S. Singer and K. A. Smith, "Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improvinglearning in undergraduate science and engineering," pp. 468–471, 2013.[2] R. R. Hake, "Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A sixthousand-student surveyof mechanics test data for introductory physics courses," American journal of Physics, vol. 66, no.1, pp. 64–74, 1998.[3] C. H. Crouch and E. Mazur, "Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and
standards in the third andfourth years of study can help students align educational concepts with real-world applications.6However, this requirement is not universally applied in most colleges and universities.2 Phillips, M. and S. Huber (2017). Standards Resources for Engineering and Technology. Issues inScience and Technology Librarianship, Purdue University.3 Harding, B. and P. McPherson (2010). What do employers want in terms of employee knowledge oftechnical standards and the process of standardization? 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition.4 Solomon, D., Y.-T. T. Liao, and J. T. Chapin (2019). Maximizing the Effectiveness of One-timeStandards Instruction Sessions with Formative Assessment. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition.5 ABET
recorder role most easily,participation was either split evenly across members or left one member out, groups seemed tobond over waiting for autograder results and ended group activities with small talk, and groupsasked for help or referenced an external resource when stuck. The observation protocol isundergoing validation, and the research team hopes to further contextualize the observations byusing peer evaluations and surveys.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.#2121412 and Graduate Research Fellowship Program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the
the airflow around a smallwind turbine with a diameter of 1.8 meters and revealed that the maximum power coefficient andtorque coefficient are observed at a wind speed of around 10 m/s and an optimum angle of attackof 5 degrees. In addition, Wang et al. (2019) used pressure-based anemometry to measure theairflow around a small wind turbine with a diameter of 1.2 meters. The study showed that thewake's velocity deficit and turbulence intensity increase with the increase in downstream distance,and the maximum velocity deficit and turbulence intensity were observed at a distance of 3-5D(where D is the rotor diameter) downstream. Over the past year, UVU has hosted a multi-faceted research project which aims atdeveloping an autonomous
different type of institutional agents. In order to measure the latent construct of mattering, we used six items in whichrespondents were asked about the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with statements suchas: “If I don't return to this University in the next month, my classmate(s) will miss me” (seeitems here: https://bit.ly/3H5bwn6). These survey items were developed for a prior surveyinstrument that examined the relationship between student experiences, integration variables(validation, belonging, and mattering), and educational outcomes for first-year students at threeLatin American universities (Unpublished Dissertation Manuscript). The development of the six items was preceded by the revision of theoretical
/focus-group protocols. Theconsortium started the process in spring 2020 by collecting all the interview and focus-groupprotocols used by three different partner ERCs. All questions were extracted and comparedacross the protocols. Five common categories emerged after aligning the questions. These fivecommon categories are listed in table 1. In fall 2020, the consortium conducted extensive reviews and commentaries, as well asfrequent discussions, to determine a set of initial questions that would be included in theprotocol. All prior extracted questions were listed per category in a spreadsheet. All consortiummembers were asked to rate each question with “essential (E)” or “supplemental (S)” and then torank the priority of each question
statics.BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Kolb, D., Experiential Learning, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1984). 2. Wankat, P. C. and F. S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill (1993). 3. Clement, J., "Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics," Journal of research in science teaching, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1241- 1257, 1993. 4. Cadmus Jr and Robert R., "A video technique to facilitate the visualization of physical phenomena," American Journal of Physics, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 397-399, 1990. 5. J. Lowman, Mastering the techniques of teaching, 2nd Ed, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984. 6. D. G. Schmucker, "Models, models, models: The use of physical models to enhance the
Paper ID #36954Exploring the Influence of Students’ Perceptions of CourseAssessment on Retention and Professional Identity FormationLayla S Araiinejad I hold a Bachelor's of Industrial in Systems Engineering from Auburn University and am a future graduate student at MIT!Thomas Matthew Heaps Concurrent undergraduate senior in Mechanical Engineering and first year Master student in Engineering Education.Brooke Elizabeth CochranCassandra J McCall (Dr.) Cassandra McCall, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. Her research focuses on enhancing diversity
, Abdulkarim S. Ahmed3,5, Fatai O. Anafi1,5,Adrian O. Eberemu4,5, Ayodeji N. Oyedeji1,5,6, Kazeem A. Salami1,6, Akinlolu Akande7, David Dodoo-Arhin8 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 2 Department of Educational Foundations and Curriculum, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 3 Department of Chemical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 4 Department of Civil Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 5 Africa Centre of Excellence on New Pedagogies in Engineering Education, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 6
Brimacombe Memorial Lecture Award in 2010, and She and her co-authors also received the AIST Josef S. Kapitan Award in 2005 and 2016, the AIST Computer Applications Best Paper award in 2006. She was awarded 2017 Outstanding Faculty in Engagement by Purdue University Northwest and Gerald I. Lamkin Fellow for Innovation & Service by the Society of Innovators. Dr. Zhou has been a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers since 2003. She has been very active in profes- sional societies. She has served in various boards and committees such as the AIST Foundation Board of Trustees.Tyamo Okosun, Purdue University, NorthwestArmin Silaen ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
ReviewA brief review of literature on the incorporation of curricula related to DEI and the assessmentmethods utilized was conducted. These treatments ranged from separate courses related to DEI[3], activities embedded into first-year courses [4,5,6], design courses and design experiences[3,6,7], and embedded activities across multiple courses within the curricula [6,7]. The methodsutilized to assess the impact of DEI curricula were survey instruments using a Likert scale. Theseinstruments varied in breadth and degree of validation. The short form of the Miville-GuzmanUniversality Diversity Scale (M-GUDS-S) [8] was considered to be too general and not directlyapplicable to the engineering profession. Even the short form has 42 items in the survey
- ciation for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) Florida Peninsula Chapter, a member of the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA)’s Emerging Technologies committee, and a reviewer for ERAU’s Faculty Innovative Research in Science and Technology program.Emily Faulconer, University of FloridaDr. Kelly A George, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Worldwide Kelly Whealan George is an Associate Professor with the College of Aviation at Embry-Riddle Aeronauti- cal University – Worldwide. She is the Graduate Curricular Chair for the Department of Graduate Studies. Her research interests include online education, aviation economics, economic impact studies and under- graduate research. Dr. Whealan George
Support Students’ Diverse Pathways. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21739., 2016.[6] S.-A. A. Allen-Ramdial and A. G. Campbell, “Reimagining the pipeline: Advancing STEM diversity, persistence, and success,” BioScience, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 612–618, 2014.[7] G. N. Arellano, O. Jaime-Acuña, O. A. Graeve, and L. D. Madsen, “Latino engineering faculty in the United States,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 131–147, 2018, doi: 10.1557/mrs.2018.23.[8] National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, “National Survey of College Graduates: 2019,” Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation., 2021.[9] University of New Mexico School of Engineering, “Enrollment and Graduation Data,” Sep. 2022
purpose.Acknowledgment: “This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant EEC-BPE 2135080” Disclaimer: Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.”References[1] National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 2020. Arlington: National SciBoard. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=299268&org=NSB.[2] E.L Kryst, S Kotok and A. Hagedorn, Pursuing higher education in rural Pennsylvaniaschools: Shaping the college path. The Rural Educator, pp. 1 – 11, Winter 2018.[3] G. Saw, C. N. Chang, and H. Y. Chan, Cross-sectional and longitudinal
(Bahia), Brazil” in the Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper ID 26202,Tampa, June, 2019.[10] Building Better Bridges into STEM: A Synthesis of 25 Years of Literature on STEMSummer Bridge Programs. Michael Ashley,† Katelyn M. Cooper,† Jacqueline M. Cala, and SaraE. Brownell*CBE Life Sci Educ December 1, 2017 16:es3. DOI:10.1187/cbe.17-05-0085[11] Merriweather, S. Lamm, H. Walton, S. Butler-Purry, K. Rausch Jr., J. Harris, K . TAMUSLSAMP Project: 25 Years of Success - Finding and Implementing Best Practices for URMSTEM StudentsAmerican Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #18491[12] Pando, M. Suarez, L. Rodriguez-Marek, A. Loree Dika, S. Wartman, J. Asimaki, D. Cox, B.A Bridge To The Doctoral Program Strategy For
. It falls into the directive category because she is using rhetorical questioning toremind the students of a different homework problem and the procedure that they used there.This pattern held across morning and afternoon sections. That is, while there was a small shift inwhich was higher between the morning and afternoon, narrow eliciting and directive advancingwere still significantly higher than any of the other categories.LA1’s move distribution 20% Percent coded of all 15% utterances 10% 5% 0
tosynthesize knowledge across multiple domains, modes of inquiry, historical periods, andperspectives, as well as the ability to identify linkages between existing knowledge and newinformation. Individuals who engage in integrative thinking are able to transfer knowledgewithin and beyond their current contexts. We collected two things to assess the above objectivesbroadly for the University: 1. Student scores on the element(s) of the assignment aligned with integrative thinking (scored using the rubric developed in collaboration with faculty teaching integrative thinking courses provided in Appendix A). 2. Students’ perceptions of their own integrative thinking skills collected via a survey administered by OPA later in the
students Cons: real time, and sometimes, it does not fit • sleep analysis • hard to retrieve data real correctly and would slip off our finger. It time also doesn’t give much usable data.” • Non-adjustable Muse Headband (2 • EEG • two versions to Pros: “Trying to add a plethora of features to a and S) ($250-$350) • heart rate compare • collects multiple types of device makes it more complicated and • PPG • Muse S can
. In addition, a classroom with desktop computers will be used toreduce the usage of personal laptops that created a disconnect within the groups during dataanalysis.References[1] Perkins, D. (2006) “Constructivism and troublesome knowledge.” Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding, edited by Jan Meyer and Ray Land, Routledge, London, pp. 33-47[2] Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem- solving: What do they say?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 142-151.[3] Wolff, M., et al. (2015) "Not another boring lecture: engaging learners with active learning techniques." The Journal of emergency medicine 48.1,85-93.[4] Le Doux, J. M., and Waller, A.A. (2016) "The Problem
8 +/- 1 32 +/- 5 8 +/- 1 Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas Tech University Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Dtank = 2.866 +/- 0.0079 Dhole = 0.372 +/- 0.001 hf = 1.125 +/- 0.0312 hi = 1.875 +/- 0.0312 G F E D A ACT 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Time (s)Figure 4 : Team A-G estimates of drain time compared with actual for Tank #1. Dtank = 4.078 +/- 0.1158
Science, Engineering and TechnologyDevelopment4 made the following statement: As we enter the twenty-first century, U. S. jobs are growing most rapidly in areas that require knowledge and skills stemming from a strong grasp of science, engineering, and technology. In some quarters – primarily information technology – business leaders are warning of a critical shortage in skilled American workers that is threatening their ability to compete in the global marketplace. Yet, if women, under-represented minorities, and persons with disabilities were represented in the U. S. science, engineering, and technology (SET) workforce in parity with their percentages in the total workforce population, this shortage could largely be
/aimag.v40i4.5289[2] S. Anwar, N. A. Bascou, M. Menekse, & A. Kardgar, (2019). “A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics”. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 9(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1223[3] National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology. 2016. “Preparing for the future of Artificial Intelligence”. Technical Report. Office of Science and Technology Policy.[4] J. J. Lu and L. A. Harris. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Education”. Technical Report. Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/IF10937.pdf[5] T. Narahara and Y. Kobayashi. 2018. “Personalizing homemade bots with plug & play AI for
Reviews, vol. 66, no. 4, p. 040802, 2014, doi: 10.1115/1.4026911.[4] E. Rietman and J. Glynn, "Band-gap engineering of phononic crystals: a computational survey of two-dimensional systems," arXiv preprint arXiv:0708.3669, 2007.[5] H. Ammari, H. Kang, and H. Lee, "Asymptotic analysis of high-contrast phononic crystals and a criterion for the band-gap opening," Archive for rational mechanics and analysis, vol. 193, no. 3, pp. 679-714, 2009.[6] S. Vemuganti, J. C. Stormont, L. J. Pyrak-Nolte, T. Dewers, and M. R. Taha, "Cement sensors with acoustic bandgaps using carbon nanotubes," Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 30, no. 3, p. 035011, 2021.[7] O. Sigmund and J. Søndergaard Jensen, "Systematic
researched numerous papers © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Midwest Section Conferenceto understand Computer Vision and Facial Recognition to take on this task. I also have years ofapp development experience, so I was uniquely poised to create a mobile app that can achievequick, easy diagnosis of Acromegaly so that I can help all those get the treatment they need toprevent Acromegaly from permanently harming their lives.References[1] M. S. Broder, E. Chang, D. Cherepanov, M. P. Neary, and W. H. Ludlam, “INCIDENCE AND PREVALENCE OF ACROMEGALY IN THE UNITED STATES: A CLAIMS- BASED ANALYSIS,” Endocrine practice: official journal of the American College of
[5] Mentzer, N. (2014). Team based engineering design thinking. Journal of Technology Education 25.2 (2014): 52-72.[6] Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379.[7] Schön, D. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Society (pp. 254–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[8] Dorie, B. L., Cardella, M., & Svarovsky, G. N. (2014). Capturing the design thinking of young children interacting with a parent. 2014 ASEE Annual Conference &
within thecurriculum 4 . This paper presents the design and educational merit of a low-cost, portable,multidisciplinary pendulum platform that enables students to conduct experiments remotely. Thissystem aims to address the high-cost, lack of mobility, lack of accessibility and large spaceaccommodations that traditional dynamic systems and controls learning platforms present.The learning outcomes are similar to their traditional high-cost counterparts and include: systemidentification, modeling, simulation, s-domain analysis, frequency-domain analysis, and feedbackcontrol principles. Further setting this low-cost experimental system apart from others is the openarchitecture. The hardware is comprised of common off-the-shelf components and 3D