benefiting a specific ongoing research effort and the students’ educational development.Graduate students are expected to achieve a deeper understanding of the material presented to thecombined undergraduate/graduate enrollment in NSDS and are therefore required to complete anadvanced semester design project involving more laboratory work, device fabrication, analysisand a final report and presentation. They meet with the instructor for one hour each week duringan extra, all-graduate student discussion.Graduate students’ homework assignments also include extra and more complex problems. Theyconduct additional literature surveys which are discussed in the all-graduate class session, andtheir projects require a greater level of work and detail. The
. Natarajarathinam teaches undergraduate and graduate capstone courses. She also teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in logistics, distribution, purchasing, supplier, and customer relationship management. She developed the distribution customer experience course for the graduate program and she has made significant curriculum changes to several courses in the department. Dr. Natarajarathinam’s research focuses on engineering education including service-learning and workforce skills development. She has received over $3.6 million in external research funding from several companies, governmental agencies, and National Science Foundation. Dr. Natarajarathinam has written 22 peer-reviewed journal articles, a business case with a
Maple, and anintroduction to shop practices and use of power and hand tools are covered to help studentscomplete these projects. In the final design project, students are given a list of design criteria anda budget. Students work in groups of five or six to generate ideas, which must conform to thedesign criteria and budget. Upon completion of the final project, students submit reports thatinclude engineering drawings, assembly instructions, calculations, project management chartsand tables. A full-day, on-campus design competition is organised for students to present theirdesigns in front of their fellow students and judging panels, which consist of faculty members,engineers from industry, senior and/or graduate students. One example of the
Paper ID #36927Modular Hydrostatic Vehicle used for EngineeringTechnologyIsraa Azzam (Graduate Student ) Israa joined the School of Engineering Technology at Purdue University as a visiting scholar in September 2021. She conducts research on the design, modeling, simulation, and control of complex fluid power and mechanical systems. Prior to her appointment as a visiting scholar at Purdue, Israa was a graduate research and teaching assistant at the American University of Beirut (AUB) Lebanon from 2019 to 2021. She conducted research on dynamic system control theory, where she designed and validated robust
) of alumni to assist and advise student entrepreneurs.The effort requires the partnership of several academic programs, such as Lehigh’sIntegrated Product Development, Integrated Business and Engineering and Design Artsalong with several internal organizations including Lehigh’s Alumni Association, theDevelopment office and the University’s new thrust in innovation, commercialization andentrepreneurship led by the Vice Provost for Research and the Dean of the College ofBusiness and Economics. The LEN is a critical resource to: 1) help guide successfulstudent e-teams through the product design, development, production ramp-up andmarket introduction phases of new product development, 2) help the students acquireseed funding, and 3) when
Business-Higher Education F. Increasing the Number of STEM Graduates: Insights from the U.S. STEM Education & Modeling Project. Business-Higher Education Forum;2010.5 Church, A. STEM Mentoring--Aspiration to Achievement. NCSSSMST Journal. 2010;16(1):13-14.6 Strayhorn, T.L. & Terrell, M.C. The Evolving Challenges of Black College Students: New Insights for Page 26.1146.10 Policy, Practice, and Research. ERIC; 2010.7 Snead-McDaniel, K. Exploration of the Lived Experiences of Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Minority Students, ProQuest LLC; 2010.8 Redmond, S.P
Institute and State University Dr. Holly M. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education. She is current the Assistant Department Head for Undergraduate Programs and the former Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and practice related to graduate student mentoring. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, was nominated for a Graduate Advising Award in 2015, and won the 2018 Graduate Student Mentor Award for the College of Engineering. Dr. Matusovich has gradu- ated 10 doctoral students since starting her research program in Spring 2009. Dr. Matusovich co-hosts
formation, high-impact learning experiences, and Latino/a/x & first-generation college student pathways in engineering. Through her research, Castillo hopes to amplify the voices of historically underrepresented populations in engineering to improve the accessibility of engineering education for diverse students. Upon graduating, Castillo will be attending Arizona State University to pursue a Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design as an NSF Graduate Research Fellow.Joana Marques Melo (Doctor) Joana Marques Melo, PhD worked as a Visiting Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Marques Melo graduated from Penn State University with a Ph.D. in Architectural Engineering, and B.S. in
Mechanical, Electrical and Computer, Civil and Environmental, EngineeringTechnology, and General Engineering. These programs all share a common core of first yearthrough senior level coursework.Existing First-Year ExperienceThe need for a robust first year program to support first time in college (FTIC) engineeringstudents is well established. Much research has been done in this space over the past twodecades. LeTourneau’s awakening happened around 2009 when school leaders took a hard lookat 6-year graduation rates and calculated a 5-year average of just 42%. An NSF Step grantentitled FIRE, First Year Initiatives for Retention Enhancement, was received beginning in 2010with the goal of raising the 6-year graduation rates to 65% (Neimi et al., 2011
demonstrate an explicit connection to graduate education theory and criticalconstructs/concepts for success. Research has shown that addressing the topics in Table 1 cansignificantly impact student retention. These workshops provide students with tools forsuccessful degree navigation as well as a network of support at their institutions, in the broaderRDI cohort, and the larger online network. Underlying every session is the understanding that students are aiming to persist in anenvironment that was not designed for them. Through our sessions, we provided validation thatfeelings of not belonging are real and valid (Gardner & Holley, 2011; Gildersleeve et al., 2011;Wood et al., 2016), but also that they can succeed with supportive tools. To
proven to be useful in addressing the critical feedback from industryperceiving graduating engineers as unable to tackle real problems and manage professionaldesign practice, because of the change of focus from theoretical to practical2,3. Yet, thealternative paradigm seeks a more integrative role for design, and thus introduces it at thefreshman and sophomore levels, usually dubbed as cornerstone design courses4. Both anecdotaldata5 and hard evidence6 have indicated that cornerstone courses enhance students’ motivation,their retention in engineering programs, and their performance in senior engineering science andcapstone design courses. A major breakthrough in teaching cornerstone design courses, albeitpreviously practiced in the senior
University, where he has taught courses on Hybrid and Electric Vehicles, Vehicle Dynamics, Energy Storage Systems for HEVs and also manages the Electric Propulsion Integration Lab- oratory. Dr. Liao is experienced in the areas of hybrid drivetrains and automotive manufacturing. Prior to Wayne State, he worked as a practicing engineer for over fifteen years with General Motors and Ford Motor Company. He holds a Doctor of Engineering in Manufacturing Engineering from the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Mechanical Engineer from Columbia University, M.S. from the University of Texas at Arlington and B.S. from National Central University (Taiwan), both in Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Liao has research and teaching interests
experience, for example in high school math andphysics, is a better predictor for success on a first-year fluid mechanics midterm than is theexposure to online learning materials such as practice problems (via the LMS) or online reviewvideos. This suggests that prior performance (e.g., grades) and not just experience may be amongthe best predictors available. Finally, the data have confirmed that student performance on amidterm exam is most significantly impacted by whether students attend classes regularly andfor the full duration of the class, and whether they have access to the book—although it does notseem to matter much if that access is to a digital copy or to a printed copy.In conclusion, it is clear that more study is required to elucidate
obtained in labs, research facilities, and testing facilities, allowing students toactually apply what they learn in the classroom to practical real-life situations. For example, inthe architectural technology program, students can design their dream home with all the requiredspecifications and codes, and it will be ready to build whenever the opportunity presents itself.As another example, students taking carpentry and welding courses can actually build andconstruct something of practical use, and not just test it to see if it works, like you would in alaboratory situation at a four-year institution. All of this allows students to actually experiencethe things they want to do, not just visualize or theorize about them.Table 4 shows the required
University Doug Bullock is Chair of Mathematics at Boise State University. His research interests include math education, quantum topology, quantum algebra and representation theory, with particular emphasis on applications to knot theory and the topology of 3-manifolds.Susan Shadle, Boise State University Susan Shadle is the Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning and a Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry at Boise State University. Dr. Shadle received her Ph.D. in Inorganic Chemistry from Stanford University and her B.A. in Chemistry from Colgate University. Her educational research interests focus on the impact of faculty development on teaching practice and student success, as well as on inquiry- based
commitment toshape a changing world, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (SIUE) has invested personneland resources to create a degree program in Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering (MRE) toprepare students for this growing industry. The SIUE offers one of the most comprehensive andaffordable engineering programs in the St. Louis region with eight undergraduate degrees, fivemaster’s degrees and a cooperative doctoral program. Students learn from expert faculty, performcutting-edge research, and participate in intercollegiate design competitions. Companies in themetropolitan St. Louis area provide students challenging internships and co-op opportunities,which often turn into permanent employment. Students gain extensive hands-on experience in
Additive Manufacturing Lab were offered in the Fall of 2016. Thecourse focused on designing for 3D printing, and the course included 4 multi-week activities.The course met once a week for two hours, which is typical of the other laboratory electives inthe ME program.Activity 1 was focused on learning the basics of 3D printing. The lab periods were spent usingCAD to create solid models that incorporate best practices for 3D printing applications, such asdesigning to avoid supports and tolerancing for 3D printing applications. Students learned howto use Ultimaker Cura [3] as a slicing software. Students learned how to adjust settings in Curato optimize their prints to avoid supports, to reduce print time, to maximize the quality of theirsurface
designed around the three goals: 1) to increase the number of women of color in STEMfaculty positions, 2) to improve the success of all women STEM faculty, and 3) to engage allfaculty in transforming Purdue. Current programming includes: ≠ Search Chair Workshops on Faculty Hiring designed to increase awareness of the impact of unconscious bias; ≠ Cultural Center Events for faculty that celebrate the culture and heritage of African American, Latino, and Native American people, particularly those currently employed by or enrolled at Purdue; ≠ a Mentoring Institute for newly hired assistant professors to develop a peer-mentoring network across campus; ≠ Leadership Development opportunities for tenured faculty
integrated into existingprogrammatic structures for female engineering students, including Living-LearningCommunities and mentoring programs. This preliminary analysis, to set the stage for futureresearch, details the incorporation and impact of coaching in a seminar course while also layinggroundwork for addressing multiple research gaps in these areas: gender and coaching,13application of coaching in higher education,20 development of self-confidence withinprofessional roles and how educational programs can foster this,8 and preparing femaleengineering students for the transition to the workforce/graduate school with the aim ofincreasing their retention in said professions. As a means of identifying future possibleframeworks for further study of
extensionprograms in agriculture.Project DescriptionCurrently, the project is in phase III. During this phase, the program implementationcontinues its focus on nurturing and supporting students through their undergraduatestudies in STEM curricula through the institutionalization of “best practices” learnedduring Phases I and II, and places new emphasis on the attainment of M.S. and Ph.D.degrees in these disciplines. Phase III priorities include expanded undergraduatelaboratory research opportunities, community college recruitment and transfers, a schoolto college summer bridge program, science and mathematics teacher preparation forgraduate students as well as preparation for graduate school through mentoring and peergroup activities
the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of
engineering students collaborate to engage ininterdisciplinary engineering design.Unfortunately, there is a lack of research available into how to best educate students in interdisciplinarydesign around which such a program can be built. Therefore, during the spring semesters of 2012 and2013, a study was conducted at the University of Virginia to assess the impact of the TechnologyLeadership Program. This study only included electrical, computer and systems engineering studentssince mechanical engineering students were just recently added to the Technology Leadership Programthis past academic year. Its aim was to uncover insights into interdisciplinary collaboration andengineering design by developing a strategy to evaluate the interdisciplinary
beenredirected to take the best advantage of these capabilities, and the results have been rewarding.The change in student attitudes developed through this course is becoming clear, as aspectswhich were tentative experiments to the freshmen of 1998 are now expected practice for thefreshmen of 2000. The resulting potential for revolutionary changes to the curriculum isexplored. It is implied that the curriculum can be restructured substantially, as students enterupper-level courses with an excellent experience base of doing the things needed to “gainperspective” on the field.I. IntroductionSince 1997, freshmen at Georgia Tech have been introduced to aerospace engineering throughthe experience of conceptual design, applied to a complete aircraft. While
Paper ID #40181Innovation for Remote Teaching of Digital Logic Laboratory CoursesDr. Nazanin Mansouri, University of Portland Dr. Nazanin Mansouri is an assistant professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Portland. She earned her Ph.D. in Computer Engineering in 2001 from the University of Cincinnati with a focus on formal verification of digital systems, where her research focused on developing methodologies for formal verification of digital hardware systems, and her B.S. in Electrical Engineering with a concentration in computer hardware design from Iran University of Science and Technology. Dr
, and critiques for video game designing (Finkel, 2017). The instructor role varied by age and level of skill depending on organizational structure.In research apprenticeships, students worked directly with a graduate student or researcher andreceived additional support from a faculty advisor (Avent et al., 2018). Some programs traincollege students to teach and tutor high school students in STEM subject areas (Finkel, 2017). Afew programs incorporated skilled high school students to provide instruction to their peers(Tucker-Raymond et al., 2016). The role in which instructors served beyond instruction as asource of support and guidance which helped bolster students’ confidence.Theme 3: Formal and Informal Support Systems Support
assignments were focused on the individual to help each student identify his/her ownlearning objectives. The teams were core to developing an answer to the Question for theSemester (Q4S) and an important component of the end of semester deliverables. The details ofthe assignments are presented in the appendices. In addition to the team answer to the Q4S. at theend of the semester, each student submitted two reports, namely, an end of semester Assignment0 and a semester learning essay. For details see Appendix II.4 Research questions and design of studyIn Fall 2012, we received IRB approval to investigate the impact of individual mental modelson the shared (team) mental model (and vice versa), how individual mental models changeover the course of a
. The exception would be theteam assignment where division of labor was allowed. The definition of unfair practices includedany effort to get ahead by holding someone back. A Web Page was created, with links to theSchool’s Pages, the author’s research group and the outside world, and a table of names and e-mail addresses posted with the consent of all students. A second objective was to build up asupport network between the AE students. On the first assignment, suggestions were provided,but no points deducted for anyone who completed the assignment. Incomplete assignments werereturned for re-submittal without penalty. This “one-time exception”, based on the Iterative 17Learning concept served to get everyone moving, and give
platforms. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 RUE: Integrating Performance Engineering in Software Engineering Education: A Multi-Course Project Approach Lu Xiao, Andre Bondi, Eman Abdullah AlOmar, Yu Tao lxiao6, abondi, ealomar, ytao@stevens.edu Stevens Institute of Technology1 IntroductionPerformance considerations are often an afterthought in software development. Softwareengineering and computer science courses frequently emphasize design, implementation, anddelivery over quality attributes such as performance, dependability, reliability, and security. Thisleaves many graduates with limited exposure to performance
Paper ID #13613Engineering students teaching hands on engineering design challenges to un-derserved community familiesDr. Amy Hee Kim, Iridescent Amy Kim is the Sr. Director of Content Development at Iridescent, a science and engineering education nonprofit. She is trained in physical chemistry (Ph.D. University of Chicago) with a strong passion for improving STEM education in informal settings. In graduate school, she chose to pursue a career path where scientists can give back to their communities. She was a science policy fellow at the National Academy of Sciences where she learned how to effectively communicate
the Department of Defense, aims to understand how near infrared light can be used to heal wounds. Outside of conducting research, Dr. Oliver is passionate about increasing diversity in STEM. She currently directs several undergraduate research programs which provide collegiate black women with the training and expertise needed to acquire jobs in the field of data science. Her passion resides in mentoring and sustaining minority students in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), by studying and evaluating the best practices for people of color who are interested in pursuing careers in research and medicine. Dr. Oliver presents nationally and internationally to student groups, major scientific