data through two questionnaires, onefor social justice and another for compassion.For the quantitative part, we used an ad-hoc survey that assessed the perspectives and attitudes ofundergraduate and graduate students towards social justice behaviors and compassion; this lastone is considered a precursor of social justice. The questionnaire was structured in three sectionsguided by three published surveys: 1) an adaptation of the Social Justice Perspective Survey(SJPS) related to perspectives on the role of social justice in engineering practice and previousexperiences; 2) the Social Justice Attitudes sub-scale from the Social Justice Scale (SJS), and 3)the Compassion to Others subscale from the Compassionate Engagement and Action Scales
goals andinterests for the future. Details of the program design and outcomes have been reported inprevious work [1-4].During the academic year, RAMP directors work with students on their individual needs,connecting students electing to participate in research with faculty mentors and findingopportunities for community engagement for those interested in volunteering and outreachactivities. Informal meetings, interviews, and cohort get-togethers are also organized. Theseevents have helped inform students' progress, their experiences, accomplishments, andchallenges. A key component of RAMP has been the engagement of students in focus groupsusing the framework of participatory action research [2]. In Fall 2023, a group of seven RAMPstudents from
, a secure space for thedevelopment of all individuals. This methodology allowed for the co-construction of knowledgewith students and faculties, illuminating the proposal for institutional actions that ensure theeffective incorporation of gender equality. It is intended to expand this work by organizingworkshops involving students and faculty members from all school campuses.Keywords: gender, institutional sensitivity, gender stereotypes, Lego Serious PlayIntroduction and FrameworkWomen are underrepresented in science and technology, particularly in leadership positions andspecialized, higher-paying roles. The representation of women in these fields is notably low, atmost 20% in OECD countries [1]. While participation rates may vary between
engineer.Introduction: what does it mean to be inclusive in engineering education?Active learning coupled with high-structure course design has proven to benefit all learners inthe STEM fields and has the potential to close achievement gaps for minoritized and under-resourced learners [1-6]. Active and experiential learning asks students to become activeparticipants in their knowledge construction through activities that often better align withprofessional engineering practice. This contrasts with didactic approaches traditionally utilized inuniversity engineering classrooms, affording learners more opportunities to practice within theirintended discipline [1-5,7-9]. Synergistically, high-structure learning makes participation in theseopportunities to practice
programs that boost the academic success of different groups of students. She teaches in active learning environments and strives to bring EE and CER into practice.Gloria J. Kim, University of Florida Dr. Gloria Kim is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Florida (UF). She is also an affiliate faculty in UF’s Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. She received her B.S. in chemistry from Seoul National University, M.S. in biomedical engineering from Johns Hopkins University, and Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. As an instructional associate professor, she was awarded several grants from the National Science Foundation (IUSE Level 1, IRES
, the students who designed this projectalso developed a prototype McKibben Creature that adhered to the project scope. General manufacturingand design methodologies for that robot are provided.IntroductionSoft robotics specialize in the use of flexible compliant materials to produce actuation as opposed tocommonly used rigid links [1]. The use of these soft systems are particularly advantageous in prostheticsand surgical machinery but have the potential to evolve in a wide variety of fields [2]. The McKibbenCreature project strives to introduce and familiarize students to soft robotic concepts, specifically pneumaticactuation. The goal is to expose students to this new growing field of engineering early in their academiccareers to hopefully
. He is currently non-tenure track faculty in mechanical engineering at Georgia Tech, lecturing in mechanic ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Chasing assessment: The faculty experience of trying to implement evidence based practices wellA significant focus in engineering education research is encouraging faculty to improve the way theyteach [1], [2], [3]. A research to implementation pipeline exists to achieve that goal - new approaches aredeveloped and disseminated, faculty are trained or supported in implementation, and then results areevaluated [4], [5], [6]. Such efforts are often measured through increased use of evidence-based practices[7] as part of a
graduate students. The quantitative visualizationsshowed that the students engaged in knowledge-sharing and interdisciplinary learningevents seventeen times in all three project meeting sessions.Implications: The insights derived from this research can prove valuable in implementingeffective team-based course intervention strategies that pertain to project-based modeling andsimulation instruction. Students and practitioners are furnished with evidence-based outcomesendorsing the need to fully integrate comprehensive team-focused problem-solving methods intackling complex STEM-based modeling and simulation challenges.1. Introduction and BackgroundComputational modeling and simulation (CMS) involve the application of computationalscience principles
Medicine released their report onNew Directions for Chemical Engineering [1]. In this report, a section on curricular reformincluded recommendations “that would help students understand how individual core conceptsmerge into the practice of chemical engineering” and “include earlier and more frequentexperiential learning through physical laboratories and virtual simulations” as well as otherrecommendations.However, implementation of curricular reform can be challenging. A paper by Davis andJacobsen, which focused on mentoring undergraduate research projects, provided faculty insightsto barriers to curricular innovation [2]. This paper identified three main barriers: preparation,time constraints, and demands related to the promotion and tenure
in research knowledge and skills, deeper relationships with mentors, and clarity andinsight into career paths. This work involves thematic analysis of interviews with GEAR-SRparticipants and highlights student voices, including those traditionally marginalized in STEM.The advantages of undergraduate research experiences (UREs) are widely recognized, leading tohigher student retention, a sense of belonging in their field, improved academic outcomes, and agreater likelihood of pursuing advanced degrees [1, 5, 6]. This positive effect can be even greaterfor traditionally minoritized students [7], including students who are Black/African American,Hispanic/Latino(a), American Indian, and Pacific Islander. However, finding and performingresearch
matter, in all STEM fields), a trend noted both by students [1]and practitioners [2]. The processes by which scientists and engineers develop software hasbecome more complex, involving many collaborators [3] and close coupling with other parts ofthe engineering design process [4]. Despite this increasing importance, the treatment of softwarein undergraduate STEM education largely consists of programming, that is, implementingsoftware for achieving a specific task, rather than software engineering practices and tools(SEPTs), that is, tools and techniques used in the overall process of designing, implementing, andmaintaining software. This gap between teaching programming and SEPTs seems to exist both incomputing-centric STEM disciplines such as
Outcome 2, and how the students felt about the applications of thesetopics in the courses. The following questions will be addressed: (1) How can chemicalengineering educators better address sustainability topics in chemical engineering courses? (2)How could chemical engineering educators implement sustainability topics throughout thechemical engineering curriculum to improve students understanding of the need and ability toapply these topics?IntroductionThe United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development represents a global commitmentto addressing the world's most pressing economic, social, and environmental challenges. This2030 Agenda consists of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that aim to end poverty,protect the planet, and
doscholarly research.Keywords: first generation, undergraduate research, mentoring, motivation, persistenceIntroductionThe National Science Foundation (NSF) has sought to broaden participation in STEM bydeveloping programs that create opportunities for people of all socioeconomic backgrounds, likethe Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation program and many others [1]-[2]. First-generation students stand to benefit from these programs since they are primarily from a lowsocioeconomic status and/or from underrepresented groups (Black or African American,Hispanic/Latino, and Asian) [3]. A 2021 report by the National Center for Science andEngineering Statistics (NCSES) showed that graduate enrollment among Hispanic or Latinostudents was 15.2
neurotypical. We havegenerated a preliminary assessment tool to understand the perspectives of neurodiverse studentsin undergraduate research, specifically their priorities in community, culture, and futureprospects. Our investigation reports a qualitative assessment of these categories betweenneurodivergent students in STEM research environments compared to their neurotypicalcounterparts. The survey was first improved after cognitive interviews, and then distributedamong STEM undergraduates. In this paper, we report the refinement process of the survey andthe initial quantitative survey results.IntroductionOver a quarter of the United States population identifies as having a disability [1]. The disabilitycommunity encompasses a diverse subset of
surfaces were performed using water as asafe alternative to DBT. The research successfully visualized bubble formation on the surface ofthe catalyst, and the custom MATLAB code measured bubble volumes. The promising resultsobtained with water as a substitute offer a foundation for future research using DBT. Suggestionswere made to simplify the procedure to be easily used in lab class settings. It is expected thatperforming this lab procedure will help students understand that hydrogen is considered a futureenergy source, as well as its limitations.1. IntroductionScientific data has indicated that climate change is ongoing. The average global temperaturecontinues to rise, and sea levels are steadily increasing [1], [2]. Climate change leads to
impact societyand the environment.Introduction and MotivationIn the face of escalating global challenges, the demand for sustainable engineeringsolutions has never been more pressing [1]. The imperative to address complex issuessuch as climate change, resource depletion, and social inequality necessitates afundamental reorientation in how we educate the engineers of tomorrow. This paperunderscores the urgency of this paradigm shift, advocating for a holistic, multi-disciplinary approach in engineering education that goes beyond traditional boundaries.The urgency of sustainable development requires engineers to navigate an intricateweb of ecological, social, economic, and ethical factors. In fact, ABET accreditationcriteria specifically require
. Theultimate goal is for this initiative to serve as a model and inspiration for universities andcommunities alike, highlighting the transformative power of collaboration between highereducation institutions, industry, and community partners to drive meaningful improvements inour communities, fostering growth, innovation, and social well-being.1. IntroductionOverview of Community Engagement in Engineering EducationIn recent years, the field of community engagement in engineering education has been growing,reflecting a shift towards a more holistic approach that extends beyond theoretical knowledge.Building sustainable and resilient communities is a core purpose of civil engineering andeffectively engaging with communities is vital. Such engagement is
of communicating learning achievement since theearly 1900’s [1]. Despite grades having the very practical purpose of communicating our levelsof learning or performance achievement to both the learners and the educational system morebroadly [2], [3], when reflecting on the moments and instances in which we remember receivinggrades we likely don’t only remember the learning material or content. Intertwined with thesememories of receiving grades are likely emotional reactions - sometimes incredibly strong. Thejoy and pride of achieving a good grade, the disappointment or frustration with a bad grade, orthe anticipatory excitement or fear related to either preparing for a graded event such as an examor presentation, or even waiting for a grade
toward needed policyand practice change in the department and hope to gain feedback from the EQUITY communityregarding our efforts and next steps at Praxis, sharing these counternarratives in departmentalspaces to draw out faculty, staff, and student dialog toward change.IntroductionIn this work in progress (WIP) research paper, we examine pathways of post-secondaryengineering students who are first in their family to attend college in the U.S. navigate multipleobstacles on the way towards four-year degrees and graduate school pathways [1]. Literatureregarding students who are first in their family to attend college indicates that while the absenceof the legacy of college may serve as a logistical barrier to success in higher education
the data focused on the re-flective third interview. To analyze the data, we followed basic qualitative practices for first and second cycle coding,including 1) reviewing all nine interview transcripts to establish a base understanding, 2) creatingparticipant profiles to include basic information, 3) re-reading each interview and noting signif-icant statements about the participants’ experiences, 4) comparing these noteworthy and signif-icant experiences to determine emergent codes, 5) creating a preliminary codebook that definedeach code and provided examples, and 6) grouping the codes into categories to better understandthe participants’ experiences. Although we did not use ICT as an a priori coding framework, itdid serve as a set of
oftensocialized into traditional gender roles, with boys encouraged to pursue STEM fields while girlsare directed towards more “feminine” subjects.1 This societal bias can manifest in educationalsettings, where girls may feel discouraged from pursuing careers in construction and engineeringdue to perceived gender norms and stereotypes.Moreover, the lack of female role models and representation in construction fields can impactfemale students’ enrollment decisions. Exposure to female role models in the fields has beenshown to positively influence girls’ interest and confidence in pursuing construction andengineering careers.11 However, the underrepresentation of women in construction professionsmeans that female students may have limited exposure to such
, “Building a Digital Water Temperature Thermometer” for ComputerEngineering, and “Material Property Testing” for Mechanical Engineering.At the conclusion of the event, attendees were invited to participate in a survey to assess theirSTEM experience and to offer suggestions for program enhancement. This paper presents thesurvey findings and discusses the challenges encountered and potential improvements for futureSTEM outreach events, considering the valuable insights gathered from the students’ feedback.Index Terms ‒ Outreach, Female Students.1. IntroductionThe U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce is fundamentalin propelling innovation and making significant contributions to national growth. The ever-growing
bear. What could be more tragic than losing a house and fourchildren in a day? [1]" That was an emotional question from a 50-year-old victim of Nigeria’sbuilding collapse. The man lost four children, ages 23, 15, 13, and eight, when his family house,located in Lagos State, Southwest Nigeria, collapsed in the early hours of Saturday, November 7,2015.As pitiable as the man’s situation was, it is not an isolated case. A 71-year-old widow had alsosuffered a similar fate. Her building collapsed on November 21, 2012, at Jakande Estate in LagosState, Southwest Nigeria. The widow lost not only her building on that fateful day but also hertwo grown daughters, who were graduates of the University of Lagos [2]. Several other parentsalso suffered similar
, Minorities, and Persons withDisabilities in Science and Engineering: 2023 produced by the National Science Foundation,24% of the United States workforce consists of STEM or STEM-related occupations. However,only 18% of the total working females are employed in STEM professions, resulting in 35% ofthe overall STEM workforce [1]. This number becomes more dire when filtered for science andengineering occupations, reducing the percentage of females to 28%. Furthermore, whenlooking at the makeup of engineers in the labor force, only 16% are females [1].More promising is the statistic that over a ten-year period from 2011 to 2021, the female STEMworkforce saw a 31% increase. A small contribution to this is the number of bachelor’s degreesawarded to
barriers to entry and participation. Our work can be of value to others who are interested in designing a program that combines theoretical depth in both mathematics and computer science with practical applicability along with a focus on diversity and inclusivity. I. IntroductionThe field of computing is developing at a rapid pace, and in particular, the field of Data Science has beengaining popularity due to its importance in the current era of artificial intelligence and big data [1, 2].The growth in the amount of available data, computational resources, and improved algorithms hasresulted in the blossoming of Data Science in many domains [3, 4].In healthcare, Data Science will continue to
criticalskills and meaningful learning [1-3].Araya [4] states that small group work benefits students' integral development. Teamworkallows them to develop fundamental skills and attitudes for professional practice, enablingthem to argue their proposals and solutions in a collaborative environment. Similarly,Bedregal et al. [5] conclude that students recognize the contributions of each team member,constructive criticism, and equitable participation as relevant aspects of teamwork. Inprecursor research, Davis and Yadav [6] determined that students place significant value onachieving "collaborative teamwork" competence. This valuation highlights the importancestudents attribute to acquiring skills that allow them to respond professionally
students to see themselves as engineerswhen they experience internal and external recognition from being in the Makerspace. Theresults of this analysis will aid in the creation of effective intervention methods universities canimplement during the first year engineering curriculum to increase retention rates.IntroductionUniversities are focused on improving retention rates of engineering students [1]. Existingquantitative research studies statistically correlate retention with high grades in both high schooland college and high ACT or SAT scores [2]. With the increasing emphasis on engineeringidentity being a prominent contributor to the overall success of engineering students [2], it isimportant to understand why certain students drop their
issues. Thereport entitled 'Barriers and Opportunities for 2-year and 4-year STEM Degrees: SystematicChange to Support Students’ Diverse Pathways,' from the National Academies of Sciences,Engineering, and Medicine [1] focuses on furnishing a comprehensive overview of the currentchallenges faced by students aspiring to attain an engineering degree or certificate. As such theyexplore the available opportunities and strategies needed to surmount these barriers associatedwith the culture of engineering education, defined as the shared patterns of norms, behaviors, andvalues within engineering disciplines that significantly impact teaching methods, and the overallclassroom experience.Over the past ten years, there has been a theoretical shift in
work.Notably, students who were taught how AI works had significantly different views on AI tools’impact on academic integrity concerns.Computing students’ use of Generative AI is growing, and thoughts on academic integrity are farfrom decided – but there does seem to be an opportunity to teach students the variety of ways itcan be used effectively for programming tasks.IntroductionChatGPT, a Generative AI product developed by OpenAI, was released in November 2022 andalmost immediately, its popularity began to surge worldwide, as illustrated by its steep increaseas a search term on Google. Teachers and administrators took notice – “‘plagiarism’ was rankedin two out of the top five related search queries alongside ‘ChatGPT’” [1]. The popularization
those results to the overallaverages amongst each population. This article will analyze if the separation of race, sex, anddisability in this report is suppressing or erasing the negative implications for these marginalizedgroups in STEM.Introduction The purpose of this WIP research paper is to study the impact an intersectional analysis ofdisability, race/ethnicity, and sex has on the salary of Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM) professionals. For almost a century, the United States has made political,academic, and professional pushes to fill a decreasing STEM workforce. Laws have been passedand programs put in place to increase the number of STEM professionals in all areas of industryin the U.S. [1]. In parallel