engineering majors attended an SLS session.Bibliography1. Institute of Education Sciences (IES), Highlights from PISA 2006: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Science and Mathematics Literacy in an International Context, U.S. Department of Education NCES 2008- 016, December 2007.2. Fadali, M. S., Robinson, M., and McNichols, K., ‘‘Teaching Engineering to K–12 Students Using Role Playing Games,’’ Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO.3. Abbitt, J. D., III, and Carroll, B. F., ‘‘Applied Aerodynamics Experience for Secondary Science Teachers and Students,’’ Journal of Engineering Education, 1993 v.82 (3), 185–188.4. Jeffers, A., Safferman, A., and Safferman, S., “Understanding K-12 Engineering
same as a lecture-only course. The hybrid approach can also be adapted inother lecture-only courses.References 1. Berry, C, Boutell, M, Chenoweth, S. and Fisher, D., “MERI: Multidisciplinary educational robotics initiative,” Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 2009. 2. Edinbarough, I., Martinez, J., “Web-based control for mechatronics laboratory experiments,” Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 2009. 3. McGrath, E., Lowes, S., Lin, P. and Sayres, J., “Analysis of middle- and high-school students’ learning of science, mathematics and engineering concepts through Lego underwater robotics design challenge,” Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June 2009. 4
offensive. Keepingthis balance may ensure the coexistence of challenging tests with good SET scores (SET scores areobviously not exclusively the result of good grading).References[1] Ieta, A., R. Manseur, and T.E. Doyle. (June 14 – 17, 2009) “Effective criteria for teaching and learning.” The 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX, 2009.[2] S. S. Stevens, “On the averaging of data,” Science, Vol. 121, Jan. 1955, pp. 113–116.[3] Wilbert J. McKeachie, and Marilla Svinicki. McKeachie’s Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College Page 15.629.8 and University Teachers, Boston, Houghton, 2006.[4] Lang, J. W. B
courses.References 1. Meisinger, S. (2008). Talent Shortage Challenge Must Be Met, Human Resource Magazine, Vol. 52 (5), p. 8. 2. Deschenaux, J. (2008). EEOC: Train Managers on Harassment, Human Resource Magazine, Vol. 53 (5), p. 26. 3. Mohsen, P., J. (2009). Professional Development Is Key, ASEE Prism Magazine, Vol. 19 (1), pp. 63-64. 4. Brenner, M. (2009). Group Dynamics Can Enhance Leadership Development, Human Resource Magazine, Vol. 54 (12), p. 22. 5. Colvin, G. (2009). How to Build Great Leaders, Fortune Magazine, Vol. 160 (11), pp. 70-72. 6. Arnold, T., J. (2008). Kicking Up Cross-Training, Human Resource Magazine, Vol. 53 (8), pp. 96-100. 7. Bogue, B. and Marra, R. (2009
, major or the recent graduates. (3) the problem solving abilitieshave significant different between students with different score ranking, with part-time job,class cadre during the high school and college. Based on the findings of this study, somesuggestions were provided at the end of the study for the reference of the inventory users andthe future researchers. The feedbacks of the ability assessments of each student to the relatedteachers to improve the teaching modules are useful for the higher technical and vocationaleducation.AcknowledgementThis work is supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan under contract numberNSC97-2511-S-131-006-MY3
levelfor most students is not enough to work later on many projects.The department of Computer Science offers an introductory course with the objective to assiststudents in developing the skills necessary to succeed in the STEM areas. CCS0’s activities aredesigned to provide analytical challenges typical of STEM professions and to motivate additionalinquiry. It exploits programmed systems’ lenience at manipulating computation to providestudents with a review of foundational mathematical concepts in the context of graphicalmanipulation such as such as the use of nested for-range statements to enumerate the coordinatesof pixels within geometric objects. For the new course we modified the context of the programsto associate them with electric circuit
developed commercially, however, itreceived a significant boost in the late 1990’s when carbon aerogel (CA) – invented about adecade earlier – was proposed to be used as ion absorber in a CDI cell. In general, CDI isdeemed very efficient in many aspects – perhaps most important of which is its low energy use.In addition, a CDI system does not require high water pressure and it can be implementedwithout any membranes. These characteristics make CDI much more suitable for small-scalesystem implementation, which is relatively inexpensive to manufacture and maintain, facilitatingaccess to water purification in remote and/or poor areas. This is of increasing importance due toa number of factors: Earth’s population growth, which places unprecedented
NDSEG Graduate Fel-lowships (D.E.), and the NASA Aeronautics Scholarship (S.D.).Bibliography1. J. Santos, et al., "Instrumentation remote control through Internet with PHP," in IEEE International Conference on VECIMS, Istanbul, Turkey, 2008, pp. 41-4.2. H. A. Basher and S. A. Isa, "On-campus and online virtual laboratory experiments with LabVIEW," in IEEE SoutheastCon, Memphis, TN, 2006, pp. 325-30.3. D. Grimaldi, et al., "Java-based distributed measurement systems," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 47, pp. 100-103, Feb 1998.4. W. Winiecki and M. Karkowski, "A new Java-based software environment for distributed measuring systems design," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and
obtained a B.S. in Physics from East China Normal University, a M.S. in Optics from Chinese Academy of Sciences, and a second M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Purdue University. Her primary research interests relate to the professional development and mentoring of engineering graduate students. She is a student member of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).Phillip Dunston, Purdue University Phillip S. Dunston, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School of Civil Engineering at Purdue University. He obtained his degrees (B.S., M.S., and Ph.D.) in civil engineering from North Carolina State University and then joined the Civil and Environmental Engineering faculty at the
, B.F., Problem-based education (PROBE): learning for a lifetime of change. Proc. 1997ASEE Annual Conf. and Expo., Milwaukee, USA (1997).15. Jensen, D.J., Wood, J.J., Dennis, S., Wood, K.L., and Campbell, M., "Design implementation and assessment of a suite of multimedia and hands-on active learning enhancements for machine design," Proceedings of IMECE, Page 15.1013.9 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Orlando FL, November 2005, CD-Rom, IMECE2005-81599.16. Shakerin, S. and Jensen, D.D., “Enhancement of Mechanics Education by Means of Photoelasticity and the Finite Element Method
evaluation plan over successiveyears to develop a model for trans-disciplinary design courses at SU and beyond.AcknowledgementsThis work was carried out with the support of NSF 08-610- Innovations in Page 15.746.10Engineering Education, Curriculum, and Infrastructure (IEECI) Award EEC-0935168,and the support of the Syracuse University School of Architecture and the L. C. SmithCollege of Engineering and Computer Science at Syracuse University.BibliographyAtman, C. J. Adams, R. S. Cardella, M. E. Turns, J. Mosborg, S. Saleem, J. 2007 Engineering DesignProcesses: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4)pg
Traditional Electrical Engineering Courses for Non-Traditional Students,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June, 20083. M. Plett, D. Peter, S. Parsons, and B. Gjerding, "The Virtual Synchronous Classroom: Real Time Off-Campus Classroom Participation with Adobe Connect," Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June, 2008.4. J. Crofton, J. Rogers, C. Pugh, K. Evans, "The Use of Elluminate Distance-Learning Software in Engineering Education," Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, June, 2008.5. H. Salehfar, J. Watson, and A. Johnson, "Internet Based Class Presentations to Enhance Distance Engineering Degree," Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual
participation of a student(s) who participated in the Afterschool Program?”one teacher responded: “Students enjoyed the aftershcool program and seemed to have abetter attitude towards math class”. This re-enforces the ideal that students participatingin afterschool programs have greater engagement in learning.Attitudes Towards MathStudents attitudes toward math were excessed over the 2-year period and are reported inFigure 7. The comments “I know I can learn math”, “Math is easy for me”, “I am sure ofmyself when I do math”, “Math has been my best subject”, “I think I could handle moredifficult math”, “I can get good grades in math”, “I am no good at math” were used toaccess the students condifence in math. The comment “Girls are as good as boys in math
-circuit programmer, and a CEENBoT™ operation manual containing schematics andexample C code. The lab assignments were completed as individual student assignments duringthe last 6 weeks of the 15 week semester course.The labs began with an introduction to controlling the CEENBoT™‘s stepper motors to achievebasic movement, and built upon this by integrating and controlling active sensors. The labobjectives required using bit-level C programming techniques and communication betweenmicrocontrollers to achieve robot control objectives using the integrated sensors. The labsculminated with an assignment that required students to apply the skills and sensors controlled inprevious labs to achieve autonomous wall following with feedback control. The four
University Press, 2000.12. Seymour, E., “The Loss of Women from Science, Mathematics and Engineering Undergraduate Majors,” Science Education, vol. 79, no. 4, 1995, pp. 437–473.13. National Research Council Board on Engineering Education, Report on Designing an Adaptive System, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1995.14. Ambrose, S., et al., Journeys of Women in Science & Engineering, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1997.15. Committee on Women Faculty in the School of Science, A Study on the Status of Women in Science at MIT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1999.16. Tierney, W., and E. Bensimon, Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe, State
Woolfolk: The educational psychology of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 153–176. 4. Ashton, P. T. & Webb, R. B. (1986). Teachers' sense of efficacy, classroom behavior, and student achievement. In P. T. Ashton and R. B. Webb (Eds.), Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. 125-144. 5. Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers' sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323-337. 6. Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H. & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 247-258. 7. Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher
-produce the worldduring WWII. Innovation put us on the moon and fueled the computer and internet boom of the1990’s. Studies going back as far as 1959 have identified engineering creativity as a vitalcontributor to industry competitiveness and the national welfare. 1 A preponderance of literaturepublished in the past five years points to a lack of soft skills, including creative innovation, asfactors in declining global competitiveness. 2,3,4,5 At the root of this problem is a deeplyentrenched educational paradigm that does not encourage creative thinkers.This innovation was possible because there were people that not only understood engineeringprinciples; they also knew how to apply them in ways that satisfied a human need. Theseengineers were
to institute an Innovation Boot Camp. In short, the Innovation Boot Camp was an intensiveworkshop focused on teaching innovation in a collaborative hands-on environment.BackgroundKleppe (2001) noted dating from the late 1700’s to modern day, “a major source of technologicaladvancement has been the result of individual inventors [and] innovations” (p. 16); surprisingly,most technology and engineering programs around the U.S. do not explicitly teach innovation(Smoot, 2006). With the increasingly complex and competitive global market, and with newinterest and concern over environmental issues, biotechnologies, and so forth, many companies(American and foreign) are reforming how and in what they do business. Additionally manyacademic
tremendous growth to a pointwhere the World Wide Web (WWW) currently supports nearly 600 million virtual world usersworldwide with nearly half of those falling into the up and coming 10-15 year old age group.3Current reports also indicate that nearly 150 virtual world environments in existence today withthat number expected to grow to 900 or more within the next three years.4 The past two decadesthe Web has witnessed a 1990’s era, often referred to as Web 1.0, that focused mostly on read-only content and static HTML-based websites with early websites that were generally notinteractive and Web technologies concentrating mostly on linking documents between the ever-increasing numbers of Web servers.Over the past ten years Web users have shifted gears
Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) program. The authors also wish to thank student assistants Matt Bender and Brad Pols for their dedicated efforts.Bibliography 1. National Academy of Engineering. 2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 2. Cone, C., Chadwick, S., Gally, T., Helbling, J., and Shaffer, R. (2005). "Interdisciplinary Freshman Experience," Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 12-15, Portland, Oregon. 3. Helbling, J., Lanning, D., Madler, R., Beck, A., and McElwain, R. (2005). “Integrating Communications into Team-Taught Senior design Courses,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual
of the Kolb’s cycleimplementation will result in positive changes in students’, and later engineers’, approaches tolearning.Bibliography1. Kolb, D. A., “Management and Learning Processes,” California Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1976, pp. 21-31.2. Kolb, D. A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1984.3. McCarthy, B., The 4MAT System: Teaching to Learning Styles with Right/Left Mode Techniques, EXCEL, Inc., 1987.4. Harb, J. N., Durrant, S. O., and Terry, R. E., ”Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering in Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, April 1993, pp. 70-77.5. Harb, J. N., Terry, R. E., Hurt, P. K
for the senior project and on some design for my employer. ≠ KiCad was a powerful tool but required a lot of self learning. A class would have been nice to have… ≠ It was an easy program to use, but seemed to have problems with floating and open points when doing schematics.In question A5 students are asking for more support; in particular, they would like moreappropriate tutorial material and that KiCad be introduced earlier in the curriculum. ≠ It would be nice if there was a tutoring lab for Engineering S/W. ≠ The tutorial on the board layouts and creating the footprints should be improved. ≠ …more components for KiCad and an earlier encounter with it would be helpful.A second survey provides additional
Census Bureau, Dec 2008.3. CPS Disability Data, Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Feb 2009.4. Occupational Outlook Handbook, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2008-09 Edition, 2009.5. T. Cavanaugh, “The Need for Assistive Technology in Educational Technology,” Educational Technology Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, 20026. D. Schaefer, J. H. Panchal, S-K. Choi, F. Mistree, “Strategic Design of Engineering Education for the Flat World,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 247-282, Mar 2008.7. T. L. Friedman, “The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century,” Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2005.8. G. W. Skates, “Interdisciplinary project working
Publishing Company, Singapore, 2003.6. Laliberté T., Gosselin C. and Côté G., 2000, "Rapid Prototyping of Lower-Pair, Geared-Pair and CamMechanisms," Proceedings of the ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Baltimore MD,September 10-13, 2000, Paper DETC2000/MECH-14202.7. Won J., DeLaurentis K. and Mavroidis C., “Rapid Prototyping of Robotic Systems,” Proceedings of the2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation,8. "Bailey, S. A., Cham J., G., Cutkosky, M. R., Full, R. J., "Biomimetic Robotic Mechanisms via ShapeDeposition Manufacturing," Robotics Research: the Ninth International Symposium, John Hollerbach andDan Koditschek (Eds), Springer-Verlag, London, 2000
stoppeddropping after a while. Water at different temperatures were then assigned to different groupsand they were asked to take temperature readings at regular intervals for 10 minutes with a waterflow rate of 74 mL/s (70 gph) and an air speed of 1 m/s (as measured by an anemometer). Figure2 is a schematic of the process. Following the data taking, the students worked on several con-ceptual questions that prepared them for the analysis of experimental data and evaporator per- Page 15.243.7formance predictions that they would be doing as homework. The evaporator analysis involvedfinding the slope of the temperature versus time graph near time zero along
Engineering Curriculum.” Journal of STEM Education Volume 8. Issue 3. &. 4 June-December 2007. 15.4. Hadim, H., Esche, S., Schaefer, C., “Enhancing the Engineering Curriculum Through Project-Based Learning.” Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, 2002.5. Shuman, L., Besterfield-Sacre, M., McGourty, J., "The ABET “Professional Skills” – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol, No 94, January 2005, pp. 41.6. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.7. Paiget, J. 1970. The Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. NY: Grossman.8. Brunner, J., Goodnow, J., & Austin, G. (1956). A Study of Thinking. New York: Wiley.9. Bruner, J
inside Afghanistan and asrefugees outside the country, in conditions of poverty and despair, showed a keen interest in theeducation of their children".References1 UNDP (2000). Human Development Report 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.2 UNICEF (2001). State of the World´s Children 2001. New York: Unicef.3 CIA (2000). World Fact book 2000. New York: Central Intelligence Agency.4 Karlsson P., Mansory A. (2004). “Islamic and Modern Education in Afghanistan-Conflictual or Complementary?” Institute of International Education Stockholm University, 20045 Mansory A. (2000). Mathematics achievements among Afghan primary school children Stockholm Institute of International Education, Stockholm University6 Country Studies, http
Assessment. For example, many student misconceptions of crystalstructure included addition or deletion of atoms in the unit cell. Not all misconceptions involvedadding or removing the same atom, but because these were similar misconceptions, hinting at anemergent theme, they were grouped into one category referencing extra or missing atom(s). Eachstudent conception was then assigned categories based on these emergent themes. This processcontinued for each student response to each question on each Topical Module Assessment. Thecategorization with emergent themes gave categories of misconceptions on atomic bonding,crystal structures, deformation, polymers, and electrical properties.Support for Student Learning SurveyAt the end of the course, students
- teamwork 3e - problem solving, and 3g - professional writing (we emphasized a memo format), and communication (particularly if there were teamwork issues). B. Student GrowthTo investigate individual’s growth over time, we looked at twelve students who completed at Page 15.499.8least four MEA reflections. Table 1 provides a summary of each student and his or hergeneralized responses in terms of the following: the process (es) that the team used, theindividual role(s) assumed in the team, a perception of the main targeted engineering conceptslearned, the professional skills he or she felt were used, and a characterization of the response