experience resulting ina positive impact on the teachers’ understanding of the meaning and scope of engineering, animprovement in their confidence to try new concepts in their classrooms, and an incorporation ofengineering into their overall course curriculum. We anticipate our further research willinvestigate which factors of the summer camp experiences are most beneficial to teachers’professional learning and to confirm teachers’ reports of engineering adoption and expertise intheir classrooms.IntroductionFew engineering summer camp programs exist that rival the scale (1,700 students statewide peryear) and scope (students from kindergarten through twelfth grade) of The Engineering Place’s(TEP) summer camps at North Carolina State University [1] [2
faculty member in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech, where he now serves as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies. His research areas are in the fields of dynamics, controls, vibrations, and acoustics. He is also active in course and curriculum development. He is a Fellow of the ASME.Dr. Karen M. Feigh, Georgia Tech Karen M. Feigh is an associate professor in the School of Aerospace Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her research interests include cognitive engineering, design of decision support systems, human-automation interaction, and behavioral modeling. She teaches courses at both the undergraduate and graduate level on topics including flight dynamics, cognitive
students might react to an engineering experience—what will be new for students and where might students need scaffolding or support? (p. 204)The professional learning activities created for our institute may be used as a model to empowerteachers to develop and adapt standards-aligned curriculum to incorporate engineering design.This is especially important in the era of STEM integration, where instructional models varywidely. Ostensibly, the four foundational fields of STEM – science, technology, engineering andmathematics – interact and overlap
Paper ID #242582018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Embedding Cross-Cultural Communication Awareness and Skills Trainingin a Living Learning Community for First-Year Undergraduate EngineeringStudentsMs. Ashley R Taylor, Virginia Tech Ashley Taylor is a doctoral candidate in engineering education at Virginia Polytechnic and State Univer- sity, where she also serves as a program assistant for the Center for Enhancement of Engineering Diversity and an advisor for international senior design projects in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Ash
Elsevier and an author of a number of peer reviewed journal articles. She is an active member of the American Evaluation Association and a member of the Ohio Program Evaluators’ Group program committee. Dr. Jarosewich received her PhD in School Psychology from Kent State University and a BA in Psychology from the University of Cincinnati.Ms. Susan Staffin Metz, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Adapting Tested Spatial Skills Curriculum to On-Line Format for Community College Instruction: A Critical Link to Retain Technology Students (SKIITS)I. IntroductionSpatial Skills Instruction
first-year undergraduate females in STEM. Her research interests include pre-service science teacher education, curriculum development, STEM identity, and K-12 outdoor science education. She is currently working on research projects focused on diversity in engineering and the retention of women in STEM.Mr. Hector Enrique Rodriguez-Simmonds, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Raised in South Florida, born in Mexico. Half Colombian and half Mexican; proud Mexilombian. H´ector acquired an MS in Computer Engineering and is currently pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education, both from Purdue University. His research interests are in investigating the experiences of LGBTQ+ students in engineering
semesteras part of the MSOT curriculum. Occupational therapy students are asked to build a prototype ofa custom assistive technology (AT) device and provide a training manual for this original design.An expectation of this assignment is that the occupational therapy students articulate theinspiration for their low technology device and how they envision this will increase ease andindependent participation in an individual’s valued task or activity. The prototypes are expectedto be well-constructed, safe, and easy to use and do what the student says it will do. In creatingtheir prototype, the occupational therapy students focus on universal design, rather than designfor an individual. This assignment was developed as a kinesthetic learning
engineering, K-12 engineering, and engineering curriculum development.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The WISER Experience: Perceived Supports Embedded in a Living-Learning
provides a guiding philosophy and a model for change, which is concretized intonuanced guiding principles and a structure of key actors’ roles. The principles explicitly shapethe character of these roles, for instance, in many institutions the educational innovation andimpact role might engage in top-down curricular dissemination similar to Henderson et al.’sDisseminating Curriculum and Pedagogy category. Instead, the new Associate Director will beguided by PROGRAM principles to take a more emergent and co-constructed approach toinitiating innovation with faculty in the PROGRAM network and in the engineering departmentmore broadly.Underlying much of this plan is an understanding (demonstrated in the conceptual model) ofPROGRAM and the engineering
construction course, capstone design, and aprofessional issues course. Being introduced to leadership ideas early in the undergraduatecurriculum, which are reinforced in later courses, may be a good strategy to motivate studentsand encourage their interest around leadership topics. A number of students also identifiedinternships and other co-curricular activities as contributing to their leadership skills (e.g. ROTC,professional society president, sports activities). Instructors may want to consider the tenets ofEVT when integrating leadership education into the curriculum, explaining the utility value ofthese skills in the workforce and using metacognition to have students reflect on their ownleadership experiences so that they build self-efficacy
Executive Leadership and Team Development, Strategy Design & Execution, Supply Chain Optimization, Change Management, System Integration and LEAN Process Improvement (technical and business), Dr. Wickliff is passionate about Organizational Wellness and the Holistic Well- ness of individuals. She is also a professional Facilitator and Motivational Speaker. Dr. Wickliff earned a PhD in Interdisciplinary Engineering from Texas A&M University where she com- bined Industrial Engineering and Organizational Development to conduct research in the area of talent management and organizational effectiveness. She also completed an executive MBA from the Univer- sity of Texas-Dallas and a BS in mechanical engineering from the
teams by incorporating a professional theatre troupesketch into an introductory engineering course at the University of Michigan. In this study, therewere 17 study sections of which nine participated in the interactive theatre sketch. Resultsindicated students who participated in the interactive theatre sketches demonstrated increases inthe appreciation for diversity on teams and in being prepared to address conflict on teams.The current study sought to build on prior work by transferring, augmenting, and adaptingpreviously developed curriculum (which included a theatre sketch) targeted to improve first yearengineering students’ appreciation for diversity in engineering, to increase inclusive behaviorsenacted by first year engineering students
helps in understanding the projects. Not too many pictures on one slides.Presentation Requirements with a maximum score of 16 pointsPresenter spoke slowly and clearly.Presenter did not read from the slides which gives an indication that the presentation wasrehearsed.Presenter showed enthusiasm in explaining the content/projects and made eye contact withaudience.Presenter answered audience questions in a polite manner.The presentations indicated that more than 77 % of the camp participants exceeded theexpectations of overall score on their final PowerPoint presentation. The oral presentationsincluded students reflections on projects and possible integration of MATLAB programming intotheir respective STEM fields. Figure 3: Student
included the broader quantitative and information literacies [4].In response to major changes in accreditation outcomes in the late 1990s (a.k.a. ABET 2000),many engineering schools began programs to integrate writing into their technical courses.“Writing across the Curriculum” replaced or supplemented technical communications courses.Engineering faculty were reluctant to participate, as they felt ill-prepared to teach writing, andfelt that writing instruction would take time away from important technical content [5]. With nospecific requirement for graphical communications in the new ABET accreditation requirementsand pressure to address other criteria, graphical communication courses fell by the wayside atmany universities.Defining Visual
EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. Recently, she co-developed the curriculum for the new Minor in Global Engineering offered by the CU Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Science starting in fall 2016. Ms. Sandekian earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder, a Spe- cialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Northern Colorado, and earned her Ph.D. in the Higher Education Student Affairs Leadership program from the University of Northern Colorado in 2017. c American Society for Engineering
Test Facility for fuels and propulsion, and does applied research in fuel and propulsion. He has maintained research interests in propulsion systems and in fuels testing, in areas related to the recruitment of women into aviation. He has worked on methods for re-integrating hands-on skills into engineering and engineering technology education, and in the development of engineering technology in aerospace. He was a team member on an international working group studying inappropriate crew response to engine malfunctions. Prior to coming to Purdue, he was a field engineer for a major aerospace corporation, and worked closely with major airframe and turbine engine OEM’s, a task force examining root causes for propulsion
Paper ID #21596Examining the Literacy Practices of Engineers to Develop a Model of Disci-plinary Literacy Instruction for K-12 Engineering (Work in Progress)Theresa Green, Utah State University Theresa Green is a graduate student at Utah State University pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education. Her research interests include K-12 STEM integration and improving diversity and inclusion in engineer- ing.Dr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela Minichiello is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University and a registered professional mechanical engineer. Her
the resultsof an informal focus-group discussion among first-year educators focused on identfying high-level outcomes of the first-year engineering experience at our instiution. These interpretations ofthe goals of the first-year curriculum on the part of the first-year educator, speaks to the demandsand expectations that construct the students’ learning environment. Faculty articulate theirexpectations for the curricular foundations of the first-year experience, which include theknowledge, skills and attitudes they consider essential to establishing better alignment withincoming student expectations in hand with instructor expectations.As they exit first-year, faculty assert that students should be able to: 1. Understand the principles of
compensate for days when you are unable to attend class. No make-up quizzes willbe given. Quizzes will be closed book with no calculators unless otherwise stated.Final Exam. There will be a final exam on the last day. This will be closed book except for onepage of notes.Project. The project will be a team activity that emphasizes creative engineering design usingpre- calculus math skills. This will culminate in a design competition.Academic Integrity The University’s Code of Academic Integrity will be fully enforced and can be found at [website].Program Evaluation You will be invited to submit an evaluation of the program on the last day. Your feedback is important and all responses are confidential. Schedule of Topics Day
such as introductory circuit analysis may be disadvantaged by entering the class withfaulty mental models of basic concepts related to the subject. While circuit analysis may be firststudied in earnest at the freshmen or sophomore level in college within an electrical andcomputer engineering degree program, concepts related to electricity and magnetism are oftenintroduced into the curriculum much earlier. For example, many fourth-grade students in theUnited States have a module devoted to electricity and magnetism; in addition, students learnmore about related phenomena in their high school and college physics courses. Faulty mentalmodels and common misconceptions relating to the behavior of electric circuits have beendocumented elsewhere [7
and two-dimensional analysis, they had a very hard time intranslating a linear coordinate “𝑥” with an angular coordinate “𝜃”. Their calculus knowledge isalso another limiting factor in terms of understating and applying these concepts. Also, center ofmass, center of gravity, moment of inertia and torque were introduced along with rigid bodyrotations and most of the time students could not able to identify that they need to treat the centerof mass under the translational motion while the whole rigid body rotates. When we start toderive the moment of inertia of a sphere through first principles of calculus, it requires studentsto follow some complex integrals which they may not have encountered in their math classes yet.3.2: Section 2- Circle
technology and science writer for Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Jared earned a BA in English and creative writing from Colby College, and an MA in literature from Boston College. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Use of Metaphor in Presenting Prototypes to a Technical and Non-Technical Public AudienceAbstractIn undergraduate technical courses, instructors commonly infuse their teaching with metaphors,analogies, and similes to connect new concepts with students’ existing knowledge base. Thispedagogical approach has been shown to be effective in a variety of fields, includingengineering. Similarly, professional engineers translate complex technical
Paper ID #23942Promoting the STEM Pipeline and Enhancing STEM Career Awareness ThroughParticipation in Authentic Research Activities (RTP, Diversity)Dr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an associate professor of science and engineering education in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in science education at the Pennsylvania State University in 2005. Prior to his current position, he worked as a learning scientist for the VaNTH Engineering Research Center at Northwestern University for three years. Yalvac’s
puta lot of effort in reducing the dropout rate of part-time engineering students, particularly focusingon dropout that occurs during the freshmen year. With this objective in mind and knowing that thestudents’ experience with the first calculus course is an important variable that may lead a studentto abandon his career plan, we decided to implement active learning methodologies [6] to teachthat course to part-time students. As [7] states, active learning methodologies may directlyinfluence social integration and indirectly affect the student’s dropout decision.In this paper, we introduce what we call Guided-Lecture Team Based Learning (GL-TBL), whichis a learning methodology whose core relies on the well-known Team Based Learning (TBL
Paper ID #21547Time for Reflection: Development of Twenty Short Videos to Introduce NewTopics and Engage Students in Circuit TheoryDr. Benjamin David McPheron, Roger Williams University Benjamin D. McPheron, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Roger Williams University. Dr. McPheron received his B.S.E.E. in Electrical Engineering at Ohio Northern University in 2010, and his Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from the Department of Electrical Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University in 2014. Dr. McPheron teaches Freshman Engineering and various courses in Electrical Engineering including Circuit
Paper ID #22021Effects of Online Collaborative Learning with Scaffolding in Multiple STEMCourses Based on Results from Three Consecutive-Year ImplementationProf. Wei Zheng, Jackson State University Dr. Wei Zheng is a professor of Civil Engineering at Jackson State University. He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2001 and has over ten years of industrial experience. Since becoming a faculty member at JSU in 2005, he has made continuous efforts to integrate emerging technologies and cognitive skill development into engineering curriculum.Ms. Jing Yan, Nanjing Forestry University
Paper ID #21702Towards Removing Barriers Against learning Control Systems Design: AComprehensive Review of the Math Required for Reaching Milestones inControl Systems DesignDr. Zahrasadat Alavi, California State University, Chico Dr. Zahrasadat Alavi, an Assistant Professor at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing at California State University Chico, received her PhD in Electrical Engineering from University of Wisconsin Milwaukee in May 2015. She received her B.Sc. and M.Sc. from Amirkabir University (Polytechnic of Tehran) with honors in 2007 and 2009 respectively, and another Master of Science from
Paper ID #24382Scale-up and Sustain a Cohort Program for First-Year Engineering StudentsWho Are Placed in Algebra IIDr. Edmund Tsang, Western Michigan University Edmund Tsang received a B.S. with distinction in Mechanical Engineering from University of Nebraska and a Ph.D. in Metallurgy from Iowa State University. Dr. Tsang’s current professional interests include integrating service-learning into engineering, social entrepreneurship, and student success and retention. Dr. Tsang retired in December 2017 as Emeritus Associate Dean and Emeritus Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Western Michigan UniversityLenore H Yaeger
comprehensive research agenda related to issues of curriculum and instruction in engineering education, motivation and preparation of under served pop- ulations of students and teachers and in assessing the impact of operationalizing culturally responsive teaching in the STEM classroom. As executive director of the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research, she collaborates on various state and national STEM education programs and is PI on major grant initiatives through NASA MUREP and NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education and NSF DUE . Araceli holds Engineering degrees from The University of Michigan and Kettering University. She holds a Masters degree in Education from Michigan State and a PhD in Engineering
bring in from their home environments/cultures to recognizing thesystemic ways in which classroom mathematics activities can hinder this “home” mathematicalthinking from becoming integrated into the “school math” students are learning. 5Third, these studies suggest an entanglement between teachers’ noticing of the substance (notjust the correctness) of students’ reasoning and their noticing of equity-related issues ofparticipation and positioning. McDuffie et al. (2014) documented how growth in teachers’attention to the substance of student reasoning was accompanied by growth in their noticing of(in)equitable participation patterns and power