well that worked are then presented.Our Path Toward Online OfferingsThe Colorado School of Mines began offering its first fully-online program, a graduate programin Space Resources, in Spring 2019. Prior to that time, we had offered a few “distance-enabled”courses as part of special programs and continuing education, but only a few and no onlinecourses for resident students. In 2019, 28 course sections for students enrolled at Mines inundergraduate and graduate degree programs were offered online, and we are continuing toexpand our online offerings. One particular demand for online courses from our residentstudents is to offer them over the summer so that students can take classes from home, whileworking, while traveling abroad, etc. This
universities nationwide, specifically in the areas of software engineering and cybersecurity pedagogy. Dr. Buckley is a member of the Upsilon Pi Epsilon, Golden Key International and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).Dr. Geoff Potvin, Florida International UniversityDr. Mandayam Thirunarayanan, Florida International University Mandayam Osuri Thirunarayanan is an associate professor in the School of Education and Human De- velopment (SEHD), in the College of Arts, Sciences, and Education (CASE) at Florida International Uni- versity, in Miami, Florida. He teaches courses in learning technologies at the undergraduate, masters and doctoral levels. He also supervises doctoral dissertations. His research interests
Academy of Engineering, Volume 49, Number 4, Winter 2019. 9. C. O. Hilgarth, "Should We Consider Transforming the Definition of Technological and Engineering Literacy,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 10.18260/1-2—33964, ASEE, 2020. 10. J.A. Stieb, “Understanding Engineering Professionalism: A Reflection on the Rights of Engineers,” Sci Eng Ethics 17, 149–169, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9166-x [Last accessed 7 October 2024]. 11. L. Callaway, “The Origin of the Word Engineer: A Linguistic Exploration,” Symbol Genie, September 27, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://symbolgenie.com/origin-word- engineer/ [Last accessed 7 October 2024]. 12. A. Portillo-Blanco, H
Society of Engineering Association (ASEE)Virtual Conference. Accessed February 9, 2023, https://peer.asee.org/37585.16. Beghetto RA, Dilley AE (2016) Creative aspirations or pipe dreams? toward understanding creative mortification in children and adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016(151):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20150.17. Hennessey BA (2019) Motivation and creativity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, pp. 374–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.020.18. Conti R, Amabile TM, Pollak S (1995) The positive impact of creative activity: Effects of creative task engagement and
, “Undergraduate student experience with research facilitated by project management and self-regulated learning processes,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023[6] P. Rawlusyk, “Assessment in higher education and student learning.” Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, vol. 21, 2018.[7] C. B. Davison and G. Dustova, “A quantitative assessment of student performance and examination format.” Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, vol. 18, 2017.[8] Merriam-Webster.com, 2019. Definition of EXAMINATION. [online] Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/examination.[9] A. Ghaicha, “Theoretical framework for educational assessment: A synoptic review.” Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 7, no. 24, pp. 212
of Innovative Education 2.1 (2004): 11-26.[16] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, 2021.[17] S. A. Atwood and A. Singh. "Improved pedagogy enabled by assessment using gradescope." 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2018.[18] Electrical Technology, “Active, Reactive, Apparent and Complex Power,” https://www.electricaltechnology.org/2013/07/active-reactive-apparent-and-complex.html[19] M. Yen. S. Karayev, and E. Wang. "Analysis of grading times of short answer questions." Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. 2020.[20] J. L. Falconer and J. deGrazia. "Grading Exams and
= Average of all grades in this column in %References[1] Lee, John; Wickens, Christopher; Liu, Yili; Boyle, Linda., Designing for People: AnIntroduction to Human Factors Engineering. 2017.[2] D. E. Melton, “Stacking Entrepreneurially Minded Learning Alongside OtherPedagogies,” ASEE Prism, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 32–35, 2019.[3] C. D. Wickens, W. S. Helton, J. G
Case Study of zyLabs,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Feb. 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37887[2] “DOMjudge - Programming Contest Jury System.” https://www.domjudge.org/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[3] “Judge0 - Where code happens.” https://judge0.com/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[4] “Sphere Online Judge (SPOJ).” https://www.spoj.com/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[5] “zyBooks - Build Confidence and Save Time With Interactive Textbooks.” https://www.zybooks.com/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[6] “Runestone Academy.” https://runestone.academy/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[7] “Revel | Pearson.” https://www.pearsonhighered.com/revel/index.html (accessed Feb
results (particularly Figure 4) support thefinding that even partial implementation of ETT can result in an improved teamwork experiencefor the students in the context of this study, both in terms of their perception of psychologicalsafety and their perception of how well their team embodied good teamwork practices.References[1] K. K. Wobbe and E. A. Stoddard, Project-Based Learning in the First Year: Beyond All Expectations. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2019.[2] Folk-Williams, John, “How Diversity Improves Collaborative Problem-Solving – Cross Collaborate,” Sep. 01, 2022. https://web.archive.org/web/20220901160838/http://www.crosscollaborate.com/2010/05/div ersity-improves-collaborative-problem-solving/ (accessed Sep. 01, 2022).[3] D
target and perceiver effects 𝜌𝑟 0.167 correlation between reciprocal ratings Next, we independently generate two sets of 1,000 datasets using equations (6)-(15) andthe parameter values in Table 1. The first set of 1,000 smaller datasets each has 15 student teamswith five students per team, and we observe ratings across four different time periods. The nextset of 1,000 larger datasets each has 30 student teams with other settings identical. Aftergenerating the simulated datasets, we estimated the modeling parameters in Table 1 separatelyusing our Bayesian method, the SR-SEM using the "srm" R package (Nestler et al., 2019), and astandard two-step model using the "TripleR" package (Schönbrodt et al., 2012). The
Student Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Education by Improving Teaching and Assessment,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–30, 2019.[28] National Research Council, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.[29] H. W. Fennell, G. S. Coutinho, A. J. Magana, D. Restrepo, and P. D. Zavattieri, “Enhancing student meaning-making of threshold concepts via computation: The case of Mohr’s circle,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017, vol. 2017-June.[30] K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson, “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no
-Life Balance Is a Myth. Do This Instead, TimeMagazine, June 6, 2019, https://time.com/5601671/work-life-balance-advice-love-loathe/Deenadayalan, Y., Grimmer‐Somers, K., Prior, M., & Kumar, S. (2008). “How to run an effectivejournal club: a systematic review.” Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 14(5), 898-911.Gehringer, Edward F., “Using independent-study projects in your research and teaching program,”2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education,Honolulu, HI, June 24–27, 2007.Gelman, Andrew, and Eric Loken. “The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be aproblem, even when there is no ‘fishing expedition’ or ‘p-hacking’ and the research hypothesis wasposited ahead of time
experiences for pre-college students. Furthermore, theexpanding agenda to enrich Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)education is often proposed as a solution to educational inequities (Bullock, 2017). While we areencouraged by efforts to strengthen the PCEE infrastructure we propose more robustconsiderations are necessary to examine how these investments of resources will not deepenongoing inequities, particularly as STEM courses suffer from an exclusionary culture (Carter etal., 2019; Nasir & Vakil, 2017). In this paper, we will explore critical consciousness as a conceptual framework that canassist pre-college engineering educators in advancing equitable PCEE. Critical consciousnesscan help educators disavow
were challenged to create a simple circuit so that LED lights would light upwhen a certain amount of rainfall had accumulated (e.g., 1 cm=red light, 2 cm = green light). Wehave documented elsewhere how the shape of the cup and the support of caregivers served as aseed for their children’s understanding of inverse proportional relationships [19]. The kits werenot developed with an intent to evoke science and mathematics moments, nor were caregiversprovided any training before interacting with their child.ParticipantsParticipants in this study were four families (1 African American; 3 White), seven caregiver-child dyads. Children were between 6-12 years of age with one self-identifying as female and sixas male. Refer to Table 1 for specific
. (2019). Engineering time: Learning analytics initiative to understand how first-year engineering students spend their time. ASEE Conference, Tampa FL.
3.0 to 3.4 range (B to B+ interms of letter grades). This would be the expectation based off the cumulative distributionfunction shown previously. Small sample sizes or incredibly gifted students contribute to theoutliers observed, which are localized to specific terms and majors. For EngineeringManagement in 2010, only one student from this major took MC311. For Chemical Engineeringin 2013, a gifted cohort created this peak; two students had incoming GPAs above 4.0 and themajority had GPAs between 3.3 and 3.8. For Nuclear Engineering in 2019, there was only onestudent from this major and a gifted one at that. The interesting observations garnered from thisfigure is that despite obvious outliers, the general trend for incoming GPAs has
in Engineering Software, vol. 87, pp. 43–56, Sept. 2015. [4] S. Asgari, J. Trajkovic, M. Rahmani, W. Zhang, R. C. Lo, and A. Sciortino, “An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic,” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, p. e0250041, Apr. 2021. [5] W. Friedrich, “ARVIKA-augmented reality for development, production and service,” in Proceedings. International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, (Darmstadt, Germany), pp. 3–4, IEEE Comput. Soc, 2002. [6] R. Aggarwal and A. Singhal, “Augmented Reality and its effect on our life,” in 2019 9th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence), (Noida, India), pp. 510–515, IEEE, Jan. 2019. [7] J. Paavilainen
26 Year started 2016 2017 2019 2019 Type of professional practice II I I I Subjects pending 2 10 14 15As can be seen from Table 1, students were from two different programs from the School ofEngineering, Geology and Mining Engineering. For both degrees, professional practices areinstances that allow working in Community Engagement projects. Except for Dina, the restwill finish their degree in 2 or 3 semesters. The sequence of their professional practicesdictates how they onboard their future working world. The professional practice I and II havea minimum duration of 320 chronological
serving as a Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Tyler. Dr. Barakat is a professionally registered engineer in Ontario, Canada, a Fulbright Specialist, and is a fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). Dr. Barakat holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from McMaster University, Ontario, and a Master Degree from Concordia University, Canada. He is also the recipient of multiple awards including the ASME Edwin Church Medal (2020), ASME McDonald Mentoring Award (2014), ASME Dedicated Service Award (2011), and GVSU Distinguished Early-Career Award (2010). Dr. Barakat has served in many leadership positions for professional organizations such as ASME and ASEE. Dr
Computer Society, Frontiers in Education 2018 : fostering innovation through diversity : 2018 conference proceedings.[5] Nigel. Spinks, Nick. Silburn, David. Birchall, Henley Management College., and Royal Academy of Engineering (Great Britain), Educating engineers for the 21st century : the industry view : a study carried out by Henley Management College for the Royal Academy of Engineering. Henley Management College, 2006.[6] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, “Applying authentic learning through cultivation of the entrepreneurial mindset in the engineering classroom,” Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019, DOI: 10.3390/educsci9010007.[7] J. A. White et al., “Core Competencies for Undergraduates in Bioengineering
. Balapgol, “Employability skill matrix for engineering graduates of tier-II institutes,” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30(3), 71-76, 2017.[2] A. Eggleston, A., R. Rabb, and R. Welch, “Employer and Student Mismatch in Early-Career Skill Development, Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/40895.[3] STEMNext. [Accessed Feb. 26, 2023]. [Online]. Available: https://stemnext.org/wp- content/uploads/2020/04/Engineering-mindset-brief_Final.pdf[4] KEEN. [accessed 26 February 2023]. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset.[5] N. K. Schlossberg, “A Model for Analyzing Human Adaptation to Transition
career success: a pilot study,” in ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, paper # 11735, 2015.[2] A. Mohammadi, K. Grosskopf, and J. Killingsworth, “Workforce development throughonline experiential learning for STEM education,” Adult Learning, vol. 31. no. 1, 2019.[3] J. M. Nunley et al., “College major, internship experience, and employment opportunities:Estimates from a résumé audit,” Labour Economics, vol. 38, pp. 37-46, January 2016.[4] E. Townsley et al., “The impact of undergraduate internships on post-graduate outcomes forthe liberal arts,” NACE Center for Career Development and Talent Acquisition, TechnicalReport, 2017.[5] J. Gault, J. Redington, and T. Schlager, “Undergraduate business internships and careersuccess: Are they related
-33052007000100001.[2] R. E. Vásquez, F. Castrillón, S. Rúa, N. L. Posada, & C. A. Zuluaga, «Curriculum change for graduate-level control engineering education at the Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana», IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, n.o 9, pp. 306-311, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.08.225.[3] M. E. Serna & J. A. Polo, «Logic and Abstraction in Engineering Education: A Necessary Relationship», Ingeniería Investigación y Tecnología, vol. XV, n.o 21, pp. 299-310, abr. 2013.[4] L. R. Vega-González, «La educación en ingeniería en el contexto global: propuesta para la formación de ingenieros en el primer cuarto del Siglo XXI», Ingeniería, Investigación y Tecnología, vol. 14, n.o 2, pp. 177-190, abr. 2013, doi: 10.1016/S1405
Interventions.” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 4, 2021, pp. 503–27, https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1903835. 3. Claro, Susana, et al. “Growth Mindset Tempers the Effects of Poverty on Academic Achievement.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, vol. 113, no. 31, 2016, pp. 8664–68, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608207113. 4. Margo. L. Brewer, Gisela van Kessel, Brooke Sanderson, Fiona Naumann, Murray Lane, Alan Reubenson & Alice Carter (2019) Resilience in higher education students: a scoping review, Higher Education Research & Development, 38:6, 1105-1120, DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1626810 5. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation
, and graduate schoolacceptance. Nonetheless, the desire to attain a competitive grade-point-average may lead tonegative psychosocial effects such as increased mental exertion, physical exhaustion, anxiety, andoverall lack of work-life balance. In this paper, the authors extend their prior study on the impactof grades in engineering education. The first study was conducted in the spring of 2019 at a tierone, small private research university in Texas with the intention of understanding the mindset ongrades before, during, and at the end of the semester. The study extended herein aims to explorethe emotional and academic impact grades have on engineering undergraduate students in aminority-serving institution, and further understand the issues
contribution to theliterature in this context.Table 1. Summary of prior literature that focuses on labor based grading methods. Author/Citation Year Class Context Summary Medina [10] 2018 English Social justice pedagogy and grading contracts. Inoue [3] 2019 English Equity and inclusion in the context of labor based grading. Gomes et al. [11] 2020 English Student and faculty narratives about grading contracts. Shubert [12