. Table 1: Course Descriptions ENEE 204 Basic Circuit Theory — 3 cr.Basic circuit elements: resistors, capacitors, inductors, sources, mutual inductance and transformers; their current-voltage relationships. Kirchoff’s Laws. DC and AC steady-state analysis. Phasors, node and mesh analysis,superposition, Thevenin and Norton theorems. Transient analysis for first- and second-order circuits. Prerequisite:MATH 321. Co-requisite: 182H. ENEE 206 Fundamental Electric & Digital Circuit Lab. — 2 cr.Introduction to basic measurement techniques and electrical laboratory equipment (power supplies, oscilloscopes,voltmeters, etc.) Design, construction, and characterization of circuits containing
AC 2012-5528: CREATIVITY AND DESIGN: A GENERAL EDUCATIONCOURSE FOR ECE FRESHMANDr. Robert Adams, University of Kentucky Robert Adams is an Associate Professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Ken- tucky. He teaches several courses within the department and was the 2006 ECE Teacher of the Year. Most recently, he has redesigned the ECE 101 course: Creativity and Design in Electrical & Computer Engineering. Adams’ research interests and activities are in the areas of theoretical and applied electro- magnetics.Dr. Jens Hannemann, University of KentuckyMr. Lawrence Holloway, University of Kentucky Lawrence Holloway, professor and Chair. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
expenditure of some organizational energy, the focus of TECH-4 EducationalConsortium was on the creation of a technical educational structure that would be compatiblewith the existing community college and university system. This effort lead to a multiyearmillion dollar proposal with industry match to NSF's Advanced Technology Education Division,ATE. Grant partners are Brevard (Melbourne), Hillsborough (Tampa), Seminole (Sanford), andValencia (Orlando) Community Colleges; along with the University of South Florida (Tampa)and the University of Central Florida (Orlando) and Cirent Semiconductor (Orlando). Theawarded grant crossed the boundaries of three ATE areas (Curriculum and InstructionalMaterials; Teacher and Faculty Development; and Laboratory
Occupational Safety & Loss (2) Capstone II: Manufacturing System Design (3)As can be imagined when examining this list of technical topics, there is a diversified group offaculty required to teach such a program. Backgrounds vary from many different engineeringdisciplines including mechanical engineering, materials science engineering, electricalengineering, and industrial engineering. The common thread within the faculty is a distinct arrayof manufacturing experiences. These experiences allow for the integration of current industrialapplications into the technical topics. Faculty supports the “hands-on, minds-on” philosophywithin the curriculum.There is an extensive array of physical laboratory space and associated equipment required
Session 2460 Electrical Engineering Education In Under Developed And Developing Countries E. H. Shaban Electrical Department, Southern University Baton Rouge, LA 70813 Email: eshaban@cluster.engr.subr.eduAbstract:Transfer of Technology in the classroom and/or the laboratory for engineering education inunderdeveloped and developing countries lags far behind developed and industrial countries.Personal computers, interactive multi user mainframe computers, engineering software forsimulation purposes
, inductance and impedance À 3 hours Differential equations and electric circuits À 2 hours Transient response À 2 hours Steady state response À 2 hours AC circuit analysis À 9 hours AC power À 3 hours Transformers and three phase À 3 hours Tests and reviews À 4 hours Professional Component: This course prepares students with the basic skills of circuit analysis. This course includes engineering topics. Relationship of course to program objectives: This course addresses program objective A.One of the unique features of the Electrical Engineering Department at Texas Tech is thelaboratory structure.2-6 There are five 3-hour credit project laboratory courses not directlyassociated with any
to acquire the CAE skills , because a CAE software can provide very accurateresults without dealing with in-depth theories and complex mathematical calculations. Manystudents in engineering technology have already had the experience in this area. They havestarted taken the courses which incorporate CAE software. The purpose of this study is to assesstheir learning outcomes via the evaluation of classroom and laboratory performance.At Central Michigan University, the CAE course was originally developed eight years ago formechanical engineering technology majors. Nevertheless, more students in both industrialtechnology and computer-integrated manufacturing (CIM) today want to take this course even itis not required for their majors. Most of
the weekly directed laboratory assignments as well as the quarter-long project.As part of the course, students were required to purchase their own Arduino board and afew other parts. This is a departure from the way this course has been run in the past inour department, where the school maintained a set of microcontrollers that were onlyavailable during the laboratory sessions. However, due to the desire to incorporate aquarter-long project and potentially longer laboratory assignments, restricting the use ofthe Arduino boards to laboratory sessions was not feasible, so students were required topurchase their own boards. Costs were kept in line with previous iterations of the courseby requiring a much cheaper textbook, however.The following
class is spent introducing basic concepts from higher-level courses such as differentiation, integration, first and second order linear differentialequations and linear algebra. Furthermore, the laboratory portion is designed to directlycomplement the lecture periods of the course as students apply that week’s teaching directly toengineering models. This program inaugurates incoming engineering students by introducingapplications of math within multiple disciplines of engineering.Course success was initially examined by issuing a mid-term calculus readiness exam designedby the Oklahoma Christian mathematics department as well as examining student final classgrades. After students who participated in the first incarnation of this course in fall
lab is also described.I. IntroductionMany on-line software development systems such as WebCT, Blackboard, etc., are used bydistance education instructors to develop and deploy non-technical courses. These softwaresystems normally integrate such desired functions as design of presentation of the course,educational tools to facilitate learning, communication and collaboration page design, andadministrative tools to assist the process of management and continuing improvement of thecourse. However, technological realities and lab hardware requirements/constraints of thesesoftware systems present challenges to educators who want to develop online technicalcourses in the fields of engineering or engineering technology with laboratory
aspecialization in optics and photonics. This was attempted through hands-on experimentsdemonstrating basic concepts in optics, and tours of laboratories on campus that demonstrate thewide range of applications of electrical and optical engineering. Experiments included aligningfiber optics, building telescopes, building pinhole cameras, experiments with fluorescencespectroscopy, transmission spectroscopy, and demonstrations of polarization. In addition to thefirst year seminar, the following semester a senior level experiment-based course on appliedspectroscopy was offered as well. In addition to experiments, the senior level course includes peerinstruction. While the audience for the two courses differ, the goals are much the same to recruitand retain
Paper ID #33217Understanding Context: Propagation and Effectiveness of the ConceptWarehouse in Mechanical Engineering at Five Diverse Institutions andBeyond – Results from Year 2Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the
other assessment aids. The student learning objectives of theaforementioned courses were refined and analyzed using Bloom’s Taxonomy for the cognitivedomain to create more meaningful outcomes. The newly developed course plans, exercises, quizzes, exams and laboratory manuals areexpected to be incorporated in each course module to match appropriate level of teaching. The3D simulators allow instructors to create various inspection and maintenance scenarios bymanipulating various parameters to mimic the mechanic in the aircraft maintenance hangarenvironment.2.1. Bloom’s Taxonomy for Mapping Cognitive BehaviorThe educational material development process was initiated with identification of coursemodules to be evaluated with the NDI simulators and
Engineering EducationUnfortunately, engineering educators teaching in developing countries often do not havethe resources to participate in such conferences. Travel expenses, conference registrationfees, and on-site expenses are typically beyond their means. This often leads to a steadydecline in their effectiveness as faculty members, as they fall increasingly behind newdevelopments in engineering education.Based on prior experience of the National Technological University, sufficient electroniccommunication technologies exist, at least in capital cities throughout the developingworld, to allow participation in an electronic conference, so that engineering educatorsthere are able to participate readily. In target developing countries (e.g. in Africa
, the lecture introduced the concepts and helped them set up any laptop softwarenecessary for the lab. As the students rotated between the four professors every two weeks, theyexperienced the professors’ specialty areas, connected with the professors (and EE advisors), andexperienced different teaching styles. Page 7.577.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationThe students were required to attend every lecture and every laboratory, and perform additionalwork if classes were missed. If a
”. She has collaborated with optical scientists from the Australian Defense, Science, and Technology Office on experiments in Adelaide Australia and Kennedy Space Center, Fl. In 2005 she did a sabbatical at the Naval Research Laboratory in which both theoretical and experimental studies were conducted with NRL scientists and engineers. In 2007 Dr. Young was named a fellow of the International Society for Optical Engineers. Dr. Young has received the UCF Research Incentive Award, Teaching Incentive Award, and Scholarship of Teaching and Learning award. Dr. Young is currently the co-director of the UCF EXCEL program.Cherie Geiger, University of Central Florida Dr. Cherie Geiger is an Associate Professor of Chemistry at
problem rather than the actual solution found 3. Considering that concept,students are really solving problem, not performing problem solving. Page 10.1067.1Several papers 4,5 and texts6-7 have addressed the concepts of teaching problem solvingtechniques in the classroom. However, these concepts need to be reinforced in everything the Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society of Engineering Educationstudent does, and one of the areas that traditionally are not addressed is reinforcing theseconcepts during exams. .New Jersey
Anderson et al (Anderson &Krathwohl, 2001). CUREs and other laboratory exercises are a method to have students observeengineering phenomena and gain experience with practical data collection techniques, butgeneral lab courses students have experience with more fundamental techniques. As we enterinto Industry 4.0, with multiple technologies, such as cloud computing, the industrial internet ofthings (IIoT), and machine learning, students need to be exposed to the higher-level instrumentsand technologies, that are more common in research labs that in teaching labs.A major concern of this study, and one of the variables measured, was student self-confidence.As a learner is exposed to a new topic area, the learner is quickly introduced to more
understanding and receive feedback on their progress with self-test problems(c) Verify their results, as well as and investigate the effects of parameter variations and other modifications of a circuit with CircuitLab and,(d) Validate their results by building the circuit and testing it with the myDAQNone of the above activities require specialized laboratory facilities, so a student can work on all phasesof circuit analysis and design in their normal study environment (for example, their dormitory room).This flexibility allows students to actively explore circuit concepts and remedy deficiencies outside ofthe traditional classroom and laboratory. The use of the myDAQ supports a key requirement ofengineering pedagogy: comparing actual measurements
-minded inquiry series: Observations,” Los Angeles, CA: Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California, 2018. Available: https://cue.usc.edu/ (accessed Sept. 17, 2021).[13] Center for Urban Education, “Identity in the College Classroom Workbook. Los Angeles, CA: Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California, 2019.[14] L. Vanasupa, L. T. Schlemer, and Y. V. Zastavker, “An emancipatory teaching practice in a technical course: A layered account of designing circuits laboratory instructions for a diversity of learners,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2020.[15] Forney Independent School District, “How We Learn,” YouTube, 2016. Available: https://youtu.be/wlaG99awCD8
board member position in the Indo American Chamber of Commerce (IACC) Education Council and part of the strategic planning committee of International Federation of Engineering Education Societies (IFEES).Dr. Rajendra Kumar Joshi, WIPRO Technologies Dr. Rajendra Joshi is the Head of Research Center, Mission10X. Dr Joshi completed his PhD from Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, after his post graduation in Philosophy from Bangalore University. Joshi taught for 17 years as lecturer, Reader in philosophy and Vice-principal of Chowgule College-Goa. Later he worked as Dean Education at International Academy for Creative Teaching, Bangalore and as founder Director of Indus Training and Research Institute, a training
equations course), 12 credit hours of physics courses with a lab component, and7 to 8 credit -hours of chemistry. The chemistry requirement is flexible and varies dependingupon the chemistry background of the student. All students must take Chemistry I, which has alab component, for gaining the associated experimental skills. Students then may take the secondcourse in the sequence with or without the lab component. The latter option is for those, who areinterested in acquiring more laboratory skills. Further, as the courses with lab component areoffered every semester as opposed to the limited offering of the course without the labcomponent, several students prefer the latter sequence.Several courses in the major also contain the basic-sciences
. His work in research, development, and teaching has been interdisciplinary, with a predominance of subjects in the area of Systems and Control. He has been a hôte académique at the Federal Polytechnic School of Lausanne (EPFL), and a Humboldt research fellow at the German Aerospace Center (DLR) and at the Technical University of Berlin (TUB).Rubens Afonso Rubens Junqueira Magalhães Afonso received his PhD (2015) and MSc (2012) degrees in Electronic and Computer Engineering and his BSc (2009) degree in Electronic Engineering from Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA), Brazil. During the year of 2008 he was an intern at the Institute of Aircraft Systems Engineering (IFST) in the Hamburg University of Technology
. Instructors were encouraged to usestudent-centered teaching techniques such as active learning strategies and backward course design tofurther promote the success of FYS-CUREs. Undergraduate researchers in the laboratory of facultyinstructors, Learning Assistants, and students were provided internship units for their work as part of theinstructional team.Graduate students or postdoctoral fellows, and staff as part of the instructional teams having faculty asinstructors of record taught the FYS base CUREs (FYS-CUREs). FYS based CUREs (FYS-CUREs) wereoffered as 2-unit, letter-graded courses, meeting for two consecutive hours each week for 10 weeks.FYS-CUREs enrollment was managed on a first-come, first-served basis, and seats were initially reservedfor
AC 2008-1170: REVERSE ENGINEERING TO DESIGN FORWARD: ANINTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING MODULEWITH VIDEO PODCASTSSteven Shooter, Bucknell University Steven Shooter, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University where he has taught for thirteen years. He teaches Senior Design, Mechanical Design, Mechanics, Mechatronics, and Introduction to Engineering. His research is in the area of design methodology, information management in design and robotics. He is a registered professional engineer in Pennsylvania and consults considerably with industry. He is currently a PI on an NSF Cyber Infrastructure Teams project to examine techniques for exploiting
, andengineers to constantly innovate new product manufacturing strategies in reducing productdevelopment cost and time. Contemporary manufacturers have the option of selecting optimumtechnologies or processes to suit their manufacturing environment. Fast paced transformations inEngineering Technology (ET) field require new and enhanced learning and teaching strategies inengineering technology curriculum. More than ever, the educational advance is leaning towardsmeeting the demands of industrial world. Engineering Technology curricula needs to adapt tonovel technologies and modern tools by enabling students to acquire meaningful and relevantpractices. Laboratory activities should be incorporated into dry-lectured courses, being vital to ETprograms
methods for improving or supplementing the teaching of heat transferincluding the use of spreadsheets to solve two-dimensional heat transfer problems7, the use of atransport approach in teaching turbulent thermal convection8, the use of computers to evaluateview factors in thermal radiation9, implementation of a computational method for teaching freeconvection10, and the use of an integrated experimental/analytical/numerical approach that bringsthe excitement of discovery to the classroom11. Supplemental heat transfer experiments for usein the laboratory or classroom have also been presented, including rather novel experiments suchas the drying of a towel12 and the cooking of French fry-shaped potatoes13. Suggestions for theintegration of heat
the Franklin Institute of Boston) in 1947. [1] Theseprograms very successfully educated engineering technicians and made them a valuable part of theengineering team.After Sputnik was launched in 1957 by the Soviet Union, leaders in the United States became veryconcerned that the Russians were surpassing the U.S.A. in engineering. As a result, moremathematics and science was pumped into the engineering curriculum. Something had to give andthat was experiential learning laboratories with most of the engineering classes. As a personal aside,when one of the authors majored in electrical engineering at Purdue University, only five or six ofhis engineering classes had laboratories with them. Later when he became a faculty memberteaching electrical
Development (CRCD) proposal is submitted to NSF andfunded. The principal investigators use NSF and institutional funds to develop a new course,which includes a major laboratory experience. The course is placed in the university catalog. Atthe end of the funding period, the course is dropped and the faculty members involved moveonto other scholarly interests.In this case the faculty were rewarded for writing the proposal, receiving the NSF award,developing the course, and publishing papers related to the project. There were no tangiblerewards for continuing to teach the course or to integrate lessons learned into the curriculum. Page 7.451.4
simulation to perform virtual tensile tests on platinumnanowires and analyze the results using interactive methods. The simulations are performedonline using the nano-Materials Simulation Toolkit on nanoHUB.org7. This tool provides asimple and intuitive graphical interface to a research-grade molecular dynamics code denotedCMDF7,8. During the laboratory, different diameter platinum nanowires could be chosen and thetemperature and strain rate could be defined by the students. Results from these tests consisted ofstress vs. time curves and images of the nanowire at different times during the simulated tensiletest. For the laboratory, a specific strain rate and temperature (300 K) were defined, but thestudents were encouraged by the teaching assistant