education classes take a case study approach. This paper will describe the implementation of this hybrid GE/senior project course and will present the assessment of the first year of this program’s implementation. Introduction In January 2013, the California State University Board of Trustees mandated that, unless excepted, undergraduate degree programs, including engineering degrees, be limited to 120 units. Title 5 § 40508 [1] states that “[a]s of the fall term of the 2014-2015 academic year, no baccalaureate degree programs shall extend the unit requirement beyond 120 semester units…” This mandate and short timeline for implementation necessitated swift action for proposals to be submitted and approved via campus curriculum committees and
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 SUCCESS FACTORS FOR MINORITIES IN ENGINEERS: ANALYSIS OF FOCUS GROUP MINI-SURVEYSJacqueline Fleming, National Action Council for Minorities in EngineeringAbstractFocus group conversations were previously reported for minority students from elevenengineering schools.1 This study describes the analysis of a mini-survey administered during thefocus group sessions in order to augment group discussions which can be dominated by strongpersonalities thereby skewing the results. One hundred and forty-four students, comprised of51.4% African American, 36.8% Hispanic, and11.8% of Other ethnicities, completed three open-ended questions on: how they became interested in
various examples and implementations through several oneonone interactions. Oneonone interactions help facilitate a great teaching environment, and are often utilized to teach students about programming misconceptions and errors in an introductory programming course. The repetitive nature of a substantial portion of these interactions makes them a prime candidate for improving scalability through automation. Automated assessment of programming exercises is often utilized to bridge the scalability gap. However, the openended nature of programming assignments can lead to (1) misguided automatic feedback, (2) a disconnection between an errant student solution and proper advice, (3) a complete lack of advice due to the student not understanding
Society of Mechanical Engineers, a Fellow of the Institution of Engineers (India), and a Fellow of the Acoustical Society of India. He is the editor-in-chief of the Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering Grand Challenges Video Competition - A Project Learning Tool in a Cross-Disciplinary ClassAbstract In 2007, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) began working with a marketingcompany to rebrand engineering and better communicate the importance of engineering to thepublic and potential future engineers. The resulting messages were 1) Engineers are creativeproblem solvers, 2) Engineers make a world
assessment for measuring elementary students’ engineering skills andunderstanding-in-use. Finally, we describe the time needed to score the assessments, and discussits utility for larger-scale research studies.IntroductionThe Next Generation Science Standards[1] calls for all American students to learn engineering inaddition to science in grades K-12. The NGSS places particular emphasis on students learningengineering practices and an understanding of engineering design. At the earliest grades, childrenlearn about engineering as solving problems that people want solved. “Emphasis is on thinkingthrough the needs or goals that need to be met, and which solutions best meet those needs andgoals” [1 Appendix I]. Throughout elementary school, students
program’s goal has been to provide a quality program thatmeets accreditation standards while providing the students with a skill set that allows them tosucceed in computing careers. The curriculum content for the Computer Science degree is basedon the 2008 ACM Curriculum Report. The Computer Science degree at UVU is accredited byAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) in 2002 and currently has morethan 850 students. The program also has an advisory board comprised of representatives of localindustry who assist in aligning the program to industry needs and helping to acquire industrysupport and resources.Table 1 and 2 shows the enrollment and graduation trends in the Computer Science program. Ascan be seen from the tables, the
coursecovered essential topics contained in most traditional statics courses, but also includedseveral topics covered in introductory mechanics courses. Table 1 describes weeklytopics, student hands-on activities, as well as learning outcomes.Table 1 – Topics, Student Activities, and Learning Outcomes in Introduction to Solid MechanicsWeek Topics Hands-On Activities Learning Outcomes1 Forces Lab: Card Towers Hands-on design & testing experience with constraints2 Moments Lab: Jenga Analysis Identify moments created by
provided the following definition thatdefines engineering leadership through a list of required capabilities: “the ability to assess risk and take initiative, the willingness to make decisions in the face of uncertainty, a sense of urgency and the will to deliver on time in the face of constraints or obstacles, resourcefulness and flexibility, trust and loyalty in a team setting, and the ability to relate to others”7 (p.1).Lastly, the CDIO Syllabus, an internationally recognized innovative engineering educationframework, recently added an extension to include leadership. Within the extension, it isclearly stated that leadership is not orthogonal to the remainder of the engineering curriculum,but rather there is an extensive amount of
to a variety of microethical and macroethicalissues from safety to equality. A previous large quantitative study found that 43% of theengineering students experienced statistically significant changes in their social responsibilityattitudes over 1½ years. Two research questions are being explored in this research: (i) How doengineering students change their understanding of social responsibility from the end of theirfirst year in college to the end of their second year of college? (ii) What experiences seemed tocause these changes? To answer these research questions, a qualitative approach was used.Thirty-four students were interviewed in their second semester of college, and thirty-two of thesestudents were interviewed again one year later
exceptAnxiety have positive relationships with students’ behavior of using smartphones in classrooms.1. IntroductionOne of the main technologies that have dominated the classroom is the smartphones. Page 26.1224.2Smartphones are one of the most popular devices that allow the users to connect to the internet,check emails, connect to social medias, etc.. Due to these functionalities, smartphones have beenwidely used by new generations and college students. Many researchers are debating whetherusing technologies such as laptops help students to learn better. Although several studies havebeen done to show the impact of different technologies on students
ability of future generations to meet their ownneeds." In today’s global society, the resources and energy humankind presently consumes farexceeds the capacity of the supporting ecosystems,1 Thus, there is little doubt that the currentstate of development is unsustainable, thus making sustainability of all that we do in the future acritical global challenge to every profession, engineering included. As the consequences ofunsustainable ‘overshoot’2 on our planetary resources continues to unfold, it has becomeincreasingly important for educators to introduce students to a common language and vestedinterest in sustainability during the undergraduate years. For engineering students, meaningfulintegration of sustainability into the undergraduate
and a tablet PC. A qualitativecomprehension quiz was administered using the online course shell through which the studentsaccessed the videos. The homework assignment was posted at the same time as the videos, andwas due one week later. During the first of two 75-minute lecture slots, the instructor completedexamples related to the video topics. The second lecture slot was for student-directed homeworkproblem solving. As a partial control, the final course module was delivered in the traditionalmanner. Students reported a strong preference for moving the theory and derivations out oflectures, and an overall preference for the flipped course format.The biggest challenges were 1) instructor’s perception of diminished connection to the
her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student professional development and training. In addition, she is developing methodologies around affective management of curriculum and instruction in engineer- ing students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Self-Regulated Learning in Engineering Education: A Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site ProgramAbstractThis paper reports the most recent results of an ongoing Research Experiences forUndergraduates (REU) Site program funded by the NSF TUES-Type 1 funds. The 10-weeksummer program focuses on engineering education research on self
sacrificing material coverage or educationalscaffolding. Many educators are beginning to invert their classrooms, but there is limited (or no)data on learning gains currently available. We are rigorously examining the impact of threeinstructors inverting two STEM courses, in engineering (thermodynamics) and mathematics(differential equations), by measuring student learning gains and attitudes towards the coursematerial. Our expected measureable outcomes are: 1. Higher learning gains; 2. Increased ability to apply material in new situations (transfer); 3. Increased interest in and positive attitudes towards STEM fields (affective gains); and 4. Increased awareness by students of how they learn and strategies that
Page 26.739.2matrix formulation for frame structures using stability functions (Chen [1]) to account for thereduction of flexural stiffness in the presence of axial compression, i.e. the P-Delta effect.Through the use of homework, quizzes and exams, the students had demonstrated their supposedmastery of the subject material. That is to say they could apply both a differential equationapproach and a matrix-based eigen-analysis approach to solve the given problems. The purposeof the laboratory exercise was to ensure that the students actually understood the P-Delta effecton a conceptual level and not just the mathematics behind it.Pre-test AssessmentTo assess the students’ conceptual understanding of the P-Delta effect, they were given a non
for a greater diversity oftraining setups to be utilized in a smaller area.IntroductionIn order to effectively teach instrumentation, mechatronic and robotic courses in an Engineeringor Engineering Technology curriculum, a variety of electromechanical laboratory setups aredesirable. [1] Exposing students to an assortment of technologies is also desirable, to give themas broad an experience as is reasonable. Thus, setups containing different sensors, effectors andactuators and indicators are needed. Quite often, the cost of such laboratory setups (or trainers) ishigh, thereby challenging the desire to have numerous full setups.To broaden the students’ programming capabilities, many programs teach such courses acrossboth microcontroller and
26.94.5Study ParticipantsThere were two types of participants for this study. Group 1 participants were high schoolgraduates, former ANSEP Precollege component participants, and who were currentlyparticipating in ANSEP’s University Success component at one of the University of Alaska maincampuses: University of Alaska Anchorage (UAA) and University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF).Group 2 participants were current high school students and current ANSEP Precollegeparticipants.To recruit Group 1 students, I attended Group 1 weekly meetings hosted by ANSEP. I alsoemailed ANSEP Group 1 students information about the study and a flyer. I also posted studyflyers in the ANSEP Building. Students emailed me to let me know they could participate. Ithen verified they
could be implemented in a variety of ways in orderto achieve the same objective.ImplementationThe proposed learning experience was implemented within an undergraduate fluid mechanicscourse. In the studied semester, this course was offered in two sections, scheduled for Mondays,Wednesdays, and Fridays at 8:00-8:50 am (Section 1) and 9:00-9:50 am (Section 2). On everyFriday in each section, an activity named “Fluids Friday!” was conducted for the first 5 minutesof the class period. This activity was run through a digital slideshow, consisting of four primarycomponents: 1. An introductory slide containing a fun picture conveying the message “We are happy that it is Friday!” 2. A picture revealing the “Fluid of the Week” with a link to
undergraduate environment and curriculum.Research DesignResearch questions guiding our work included: 1) To what extent are secondary school studentsin Trinidad and Tobago exposed to engineering as part of their school curriculum?; 2) How doesthe current level of exposure relate to students’ interest in undergraduate engineering studies?;and 3) How well do current engineering undergraduates who attended secondary school inTrinidad and Tobago think their education prepared them for engineering?Participants in the study included a sample of secondary school students in Trinidad and Tobagoand students from Trinidad and Tobago who pursued engineering degrees (Table 1).Table 1. Participant Demographics Students who pursued Engineering
(laser pointers used by students) that aims to solve the shortcomings of these popularmethods. I have used this method in some of my classes with largely positive results. I willdiscuss how this can been used and how it compliments many of the common methods currentlyin use, while providing superior functionality.Current popular methods for in-class student feedbackThe popular methods commonly used for getting student feedback1,2 are listed in Table 1,alongwith their performance on a set of criteria listed in the first column. The first method(students raising hand) satisfies most of the criteria listed in the table but suffers majorly fromtwo big drawbacks. First, it is not able to involve introverts in an engineering classroom (thatnumber
, President Obama called for 1 million new STEM graduates within the next decade. Thiscall to action was met with a myriad of local and federal educational initiatives, STEM-specificgrant funding, and an emergence of STEM programming at every level of our education system.This new momentum also focuses on the under-representation of minorities and women pursuingSTEM. As a federally-designated Hispanic-serving community college, our goal of fosteringmore STEM-educated students is embedded within a complex web of obstacles and challenges.In response to these challenges, The STEM Center at Cañada College identified four keyobstacles faced by a majority of our community college students interested in STEM: 1)exponential attrition – the longer the course
quality of life of the general public withtheir skill sets. The long term outcomes of the course are: 1) to be able to communicate andwork with the general public as the ultimate recipients of our engineering goods; 2) to be able totransfer the knowledge to younger generations and to continue to produce professional engineers.Our curriculum includes the service learning requirement as a course for all of our engineeringmajors. This has been a successful class to provide the students with the mindset of an engineer,serving the community. The course also helped our college to be involved with local countyaffairs and helped surrounding elementary schools to high schools with many Science,Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) activities.How is the
industry change moretimely than the fundamental courses.The department’s connection with industry also set up a channel for students to exploreinternship opportunities, which is required for their graduation. The IAB members are invited tovisit our classroom frequently and interact with students directly. Their presentations givestudents an insight to what industry is looking for. It’s worth mentioning that this connection isalso set up at school level [1] and university level [2] collaborated with the department,providing students multiple but consistent channels to industry. In addition, donation from thelocal industry helps upgrade the NIT laboratory with cutting-edge equipment.In summary, the industry has provided the new program with various
-relatedcourses, and the course assessment showed positive learning outcomes. The exploratoryproject is a work in progress and we will continue the development in order to lead anational model of SDR laboratory based courses.1. IntroductionToday, there are more than 355 million wireless subscribers in the US, which is 110% ofthe US population. There are 208 million smart phones and 35 million tablets, and 44%of US households are wireless only. It is reported that every $1 invested in wirelessdeployments amounts to $10 in added Gross Domestic Product, including impact uponjobs and wages1. The explosion of wireless technology has made it a hot topic inundergraduate education. Many talented students in the Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics
worker shortage can alsobe reduced.The National Center for Women in Computing (NCWIT) created the Pacesetters program as afast-track approach for addressing the gender gap in computing. The strategy recommendationsfrom the Pacesetters program are8: 1. Improve the first course experience 2. Create community and visibility 3. In reach (recruit women from within your organization) 4. Support and draw on female talent pools 5. Influence the influencers 6. Tap new pools of talentCIO magazine suggests the following six approaches for recruiting and retaining women in IT6: Page 26.1444.2 1. Provide paid parental leave for both men and
institution (Section 1).We asked the students to provide demographic information such as: gender, age, family status,etc. (refer to Section 5 in Appendix A for the complete list of questions). Questions weredesigned for two main purposes: to determine any preexisting differences between the groupsand to determine the unique needs of transfer students. Presumably, most of these answers werenot expected to be different among community college attendees, however we do expect there tobe significant differences between those who attended community college and those who did not(traditional 4-year university students). For the current paper, we were only able to compare thedemographic responses of existing Pathway Scholars and anticipating transfer students
Bromilow et al.1 The authorsanalyzed the time-cost data for a total of 419 building projects in Australia to develop themodel. The equation defining the mean construction time as a function of project cost wasfound to be:T = K*CB (1)WhereT = duration of construction period from the date of possession of site to substantialcompletion, in working daysC = completed cost of project in millions of dollars, adjusted to constant labor and materialpricesK = a constant indicating the general level of time performance per million dollarB = a constant describing how the time performance is affected by the size of the constructionproject measured by its cost.The model
on transferability of STEM-related military training to post-secondaryeducation.Rank structureGenerally, the five primary US military organizations have the same rank structures. There areenlisted ranks E-1 through E-9, warrant officer ranks WO-1 through WO-4, and officer ranks O-1 through O-10, in addition to a few special ranks [1, 4, 5, 12]. The enlisted ranks are theprivates, seamen, or airmen through sergeant or petty officer. An E-1 is the lowest private,seaman, or airman for the Army and Marines, Navy, and Air Force, respectively. Corporals,sergeants, and petty officers are enlisted ranks, but are sometimes referred to asnoncommissioned officers (NCO) and start at E-4. The most senior NCOs are E-9s. In a verygeneral sense, enlisted
(ETD) and Engineering TechnologyCouncil (ETC). The primary goal of this research effort was to explore the variousavenues and opportunities for future leadership of ETD and ETC. Past, current, andpotential future leaders of ETD and ETC were surveyed to determine factors that drivethe motivation and dedication for service leadership within ASEE. The members of ETDand ETC were also surveyed to determine what barriers exist to become leaders. Basedon the findings of this pilot study, the authors will expand this research in a larger scopewithin ASEE and into other divisions, councils, etc. Some of the questions that thisresearch attempted to answer were: 1. “Did you receive service recognition for tenureand promotion for working in leadership
universities can take the coursestogether.Subject-Specific Courses: Students will choose from a set of subject-specific courses currentlyunder development using the partnership as a common theme. Each of these courses are taughtby faculty with global health experience, and will provide different perspectives on what globalhealth is (e.g. the implications of food security on diet and disease prevalence). To launch theprogram, three upper-level courses entered pilot stages in the 2015-2016 school year: 1) TropicalEpidemiology, which focuses on basic biostatistical and epidemiological methods formonitoring, control, and prevention of diseases found in the tropics. 2) Technology Innovationfor Resource Limited Settings, which focuses on understanding