platform ● Piazza - online gathering place where students can ask questions under the guidance of their instructor ● Panopto - a lecture recording, screencasting, video streaming, and video content management software ● Gradescope - an assignment organization and grading softwareResearch methodsTo address the question posed in this study, ‘How does this engineering course use a suite oftechnology-tools to engage students in hands-on learning?, two instructor interviews wereconducted and designed to explore how these educators redesigned their course around the kitand tools, and identify the ‘lessons learned’ for future implementations of courses. Asemi-structured interview protocol was developed using standardized open-ended
interested in civiland petroleum engineering careers. Our students would most likely be older with full-timecareers and life experience. We wanted to make use of their experiences and bring them into theclassroom. We knew we couldn’t expect much time for coordinated, synchronous studentinteraction outside of class time (during normal work hours) since most of our students are Page 22.1411.6employed during the day. Student interaction outside of class, if any, would most likely occurasynchronously online. We wanted to include a component of the course that aides regionalcampus students in understanding the academic advising process and engineering
used ISBL modules aspart of their assignments; and a “control” group that used traditional textbook problems asassignments. All other factors including the instructor, course syllabus/structure, instructionalmode, textbook, etc. remain the same for both groups. Figure 2 summarizes the experimentprocess. Administer a Students are Collect data on outcomedemographics survey randomly assigned Control variables (motivation, (gender, race. major, to Control and experiential learning,GPA, personality type) ISBL (intervention) ISBL engineering identity, self- to establish baseline groups
thebranch that contains the earliest instance of that file), but experience has shown that this structuregreatly facilitates the overall management of the course. Some simple automated scripts havebeen developed to help manage this structure and organization, keeping content synchronizedacross branches, as well as to perform some automated checks on the Courseware (e.g.,compliance to coding standards, integrity of internal cross-reference links, etc.).Courseware DeliveryEach week of the course addresses a new concept or technology with a lecture, including live-coding demonstrations, and accompanying Courseware including the assignment for the week(see Course Syllabus, below, for details). Courseware, including the solution for the previousweek and
Engineering Education, 2015 From Catch-all to Clarity: Revising a First-Year, Multidisciplinary Introductory Course I. Introduction and History of Florida Gulf Coast University The National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transitiondescribes South Carolina’s University 101 course, which was first taught in 1972 as the impetusto improve educational
bythe Technology Accreditation Commission/Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology(TAC/ABET), the leading accreditation agency in the United States. The course consisted of alecture part, a lab part, and an online part; all three parts were supported by a prescribed text.Participants Students were selected from the ECET-110 (Electronic-I) course taken during their firstsemester in the ECET program. The group consisted of 24-29 students from a wide range ofdemographic attributes: their age ranged from 18 to 30 years; their educational backgroundvaried from as little as a recent high school education to 3-5 years of work experience or havingcompleted an undergraduate degree prior to enrolling in the technical program; 96% were
the Fallsemester of 2001, a new ENGR0081 was enacted and linked to the first semester EngineeringAnalysis course ENGR0011. By linking the academic and advising courses, ENGR0081would now be a course in which lectures would provide information needed by the studentsto complete assignments in other courses.The syllabus of the ENGR0081 lecture sessions looks basically the same under both the newdesign and the old design. The major change is a linking of E/FEWP assignments fromENGR0011 with content and activities from ENGR0081, see Figure 1. ENGR0011 writingassignments require that students research their intended fields of engineering, discoveringand analyzing what engineers in various disciplines undertake and produce as well as whatthe ongoing
objectivesbetween the IDE and mechanical engineering versions of the course. We feel non-parametricmethods must be included in the course if students are expected to appropriately analyze thedata that they collect as part of their culminating Design Your Own Experiment (DYOE)project. History has shown that students’ DYOE data are often non-normal with smallsample sizes.AssessmentsTable 2 provides a comprehensive list of the assessments that were created to evaluate theextent to which students achieved the learning outcomes of the course. Collectively, theseassessments account for 92% of a students’ grade in the class, with embedded questions inthe online lecture videos (5%) and professionalism and participation (3%) making up theremainder. One notable
a statics textbook: they would generate necessary statics content and include it in acourse study guide. This decision was based on several factors: (1) the visual appeal of thistextbook’s images and emphasis on clear explanation to beginners; (2) the rich online contentprovided with this text in the form of demonstration videos, problem solving videos, andMecMovies; (3) cost savings by selecting a single textbook which would provide necessaryreference for two courses; and (4) a deep library of faculty generated statics content.SEQUENCE OF COURSESOne important aspect of this course redesign was that MC300 and MC364 be maintained as asequence of courses and this sequence be as obvious to students as possible. The final syllabireflected this
professor of chemical engineering at The Cooper Union in New York City. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Introduction of a Carbon Dioxide Capture Experiment in a Senior Chemical Engineering Laboratory CourseAbstractWith the severity of climate change impacts increasing, it is imperative to educate students aboutclimate change and potential technologies that may be used to mitigate it. To teach studentsabout climate change and an emerging industry in carbon dioxide removal (CDR), a carbondioxide capture experiment was included in a senior chemical engineering laboratory course. Theexperiment was iteratively scaled-up and student-designed in one rotation of a single
discussion time to solicit feedback from thestudents midway through the semester in order to make any necessary mid-course corrections.One problem encountered by the authors was the result of them carrying a full teaching load on-campus, with one of the authors carrying a teaching overload. This made rapid turnaround ofgraded assignments problematic. All lectures were not completed prior to the beginning of the Page 12.500.8semester, and this caused problems in the latter half of the semester. Some lectures had to bepresented out of order in order to work around lectures that were not ready for presentation ontheir designated date on the syllabus. In
20 0 2 0 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly AgreeFigure 4: Survey results relating to ABET outcome fOutcome f is the “Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. Although this isprimarily addressed in the lecture class and tested by an online quiz, The assignments associatedwith the project assessment process included elements designed to encourage students toconsider their group members, and their professional and ethical responsibilities to theirteammates. Since engineering ethics is offered and required as a separate course, this was lessemphasized, which may account for the larger number of neutral responses
Page 25.1320.8engineering design tradeoffs. Faculty can aid students in making a habit of refocusing back to“big ideas” throughout the course by intentionally making connections between smaller andbigger ideas. For instance, in the design of a project, the assignment might ask students to run acost-benefit or design tradeoff analysis as part of a report. Additionally, students can find reallife engineering projects in newspapers or online articles and reflect on how the skills they arelearning in the classroom present themselves outside of the academic realm6.LimitationsOne of the limitations in this study is in the nature of the course. Although ECE 101 follows apre-defined syllabus and has had similar course objectives over the years, like
presentation on a section of the report for an individualgrade. Half of the students in a group made presentations on the first assigned experiment andthe remainder presented on the second experiment.The only lab lecture given by the instructor was a 2 hour introductory lecture during the firstweek of the semester. At this time the syllabus, lab reports, presentations and grading weredescribed in detail. Students were also given an overview of each of the 5 experiments.Assessment SurveyA 5-level Likert scale was used to assess the learning experiences of students nearing completionof their lab courses during the Fall Semester of 2010. This survey was similar to a Likert scalesurvey that had been conducted for several years for the senior-level
and goals. We establishedindividual course objectives for each major based on their disciplinary background, as well ascommon course objectives for all students. Course objectives for each major are listed asfollows (as stated in the course syllabus):Mechanical Engineering majors will: Understand the fundamentals of robotics including spatial description, forward and inverse kinematics and trajectory generation; Gain hands-on experience on the design and development of a robotic system; Get training in the skills required for creative problem-solving, and computational thinking; Interpret the music conducting behavior from engineering point of view.Computer Science majors will: Gain hands-on experience in problem statement, algorithm
our pre-treatment period to begin in 2019 andomitted the year 2020, which was the chaotic pandemic year that saw a mid-semester upheavalof pedagogy. Thus, for this study, the pre-treatment period was defined as 2019 and 2021—twoyears, symmetric with the post-treatment period 2022 and 2023.Other than the change to maritime-specific content, the machine learning course remained thesame pre- and post-treatment. The course’s instructor, syllabus, objectives, expectations,content, etc. did not change from 2019 to 2023, a timeframe we refer to as the study period(omitting 2020). A total of 132 students completed the course during the study period, 68 pre-treatment and 64 post-treatment.The DiD method can be understood as follows. If xpre and xpost
Paper ID #37917A Module on Ethics and Social Implications of Computingfor Introductory Engineering Computing CoursesBrooke Odle (Assistant Professor) Dr. Brooke Odle is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Department at Hope College. She and her team of undergraduate researchers are interested in developing interventions to reduce risk of musculoskeletal injury associated with manual patient-handling tasks. Courses she teaches include “Engineering Computing,” “Biomechanical Systems,” “Dynamic Systems Laboratory,” and “Mechanics of Materials Laboratory.” Prior to joining Hope College, Dr. Odle was a
first-year students a shared opportunity to successfully make the academic and socialtransition to university life. Seminar activities and programs are designed to prepare students fortheir first year and beyond. Students receive instruction in the course from a faculty/staffmember and an upper-level student instructor who both facilitate this unique universityexperience”14.Though an optional course, approximately 50% of first-year WMU students take either a generalor themed FYE 2100. The “classic” sections and the “themed” sections of FYE 2100 all share acommon syllabus and course objectives, including an introduction to college-level research,extra-curricular activities and assignments, and participation in the University Common Readproject
and perspectives. Faculty hope that, by the end of course,students experience a similar level of comfort with other disciplines, how to communicate with peoplefrom different academic backgrounds, how to think critically about subjects not “in their wheelhouse,”and employ concepts and terms introduced during the course.Near the beginning of the semester, faculty felt greater urgency to finish the course design,assignments, syllabus, et cetera, similar to what students experience near the end of their academicterms. I found this ironic and amusing. Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX Copyright
was almost identical to one of the homework problems (numberschanged and sometimes slight changes in topology). The laboratory activities were unchangedand still included a mix of lab work and group problem solving. A midterm exam and a finalexam were given. Shown in Figure 1 is an excerpt from the course syllabus describing themethod of instruction. Method of Instruction: 1. Lecture classes will be a mixture of in class instruction and recorded lectures. Students will be responsible for checking the course management system classroom for recorded lectures that they must watch before attending class. Time will be allocated for in-class group problem solving
/or graduate school. Note that thecourse outcome mappings may be incomplete, since in most cases a full syllabus was notavailable. Some of the courses counted toward fulfilling general education or core requirementsat the university. Some of the courses were noted to be graded pass/fail or satisfactory/fail. Someof the papers noted excellent support materials that could be used in a variety of coursesincluding the ASME’s Professional Practice Curriculum E-book training manual and podcasts(http://php.aist.org/ela/training_series.htm) and the EPSA case scenarios and professional skillsassessment rubrics25-27; the Institute for Professional Practice materials referenced in Clemence& McGinley28 could not be found using an online search (only
figures components are and typed words detailed missing 1-2 items in the format. Final The The proposal was The proposal fulfilled deliverable proposal fulfilled mostly all components (50 pts) was not missing 1-2 items. proposed in the proposal fulfilled successfully. Table 3. Learning objectives of the Statics course from the Syllabus By the end of the semester, students should be able to: 1. Draw free body diagrams
. in Engineering Mechanics from Iowa State University in 1992. His main interest areas include Computational Mechanics, Solid Mechanics, and Product Design and Development. He has taught several different courses at the undergraduate and graduate level, has over 50 publications, is co-author of one book, and has done consulting for industry in Mexico and the US. He can be reached at Karim.Muci@sdsmt.edu.Dr. Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University. After a seven year career in the hard disk drive industry, Dr. Bedillion was on the
AC 2008-1165: A PROJECT-BASED ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURINGLABORATORY COURSE FOR LOWER-DIVISION ENGINEERING STUDENTSJianbiao Pan, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Jianbiao (John) Pan is an assistant professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA. After completing a PhD at Lehigh University in Industrial Engineering in 2000, he joined the optoelectronics center at Lucent Technologies/Agere Systems as a member of technical staff. He received a M.E degree in Manufacturing Engineering from Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, and a B.E. degree in Mechatronics from Xidian University, Xian, China. Dr. Pan's research interests include
connect the dots, obtain a deeperunderstanding of the material, and retain information for years to come.As a greater effort to improve student learning, work is currently underway to (re)define success.Assessing student performance across a sequence of courses is being proposed. As soon as databecomes available, student from the project terms reported here will be re-evaluated by assessingtheir retention of knowledge in an intermediate-level thermodynamics course.References1. Abdullah, S. R. S., Markom, M., & Hasan, H. A., “Challenges in teaching and learning fundamentals of thermodynamics in engineering,” Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 29-37, 2013.2. ABET Sample Syllabus (Introductory
alumni, GSI, or professor, some helpful starter questions may includethe following: ● What did you study in college? ● How did you choose your major? ● What did you get involved in during your time at University that helped shape your career? ● Where do you work now and what’s your job title? ● What skills do you use from your degree at your job? ● What’s your typical workday like for you? ● What’s the most rewarding aspect of your work?If you want any in-person guidance on this, feel free to meet with anyone on the instructional teamduring his or her office hours, or feel free to email us to set up a time one-on-one. Email addressesand office hour times/locations are on the course syllabus. We look forward to
understand the content while also preparing them for commonpoints of confusion or difficulty.Curriculum Implementation, Evaluation, and RefinementUpon completion of the summer program, participating teachers will have formed a syllabus andinstructional materials for an engineering design-centric course. They are expected to implementthe resultant course or modules in their schools within one (1) academic year of programparticipation. Hk Maker Lab provides ongoing financial and pedagogical support for theseclasses. The financial support ($1000/year) is used to purchase supplies necessary for the labactivities and design work. Pedagogical support is supplied by an Hk Maker Lab program teammember, who joins the teachers in their classes as a de facto
. Questions are submitted online as the students gothrough lectures and are compiled for an interactive instructor-led session. Student led exampleproblems occur at a frequency of at least once per week; presenting students are providedstructured guidance on example preparation. The audience is fellow students, so the classevaluates the example and the student presenters with a strong emphasis on constructivefeedback. The process is open, interactive, and iterative to maximize learning by all participants.This paper will provide a practical roadmap based on this instructor’s four-year effort to flip amath-intensive graduate course. Anecdotal and quantitative assessment without a control groupis presented. It is hoped that this paper will be thought
and walk around theclassroom.A secondary goal of this course was to empower graduate students with the pedagogical skillsfor university teaching and course development. The course instructors were doctoral studentsenrolled in different civil engineering disciplines. Instructors were selected through anapplication process during the fall semester, approximately 9 months before the course, and metregularly to develop course activities and coordinate logistics throughout the spring semester andearly summer.Course planning contained various steps ranging from recruiting and training instructors torecruiting high school students, developing course content (i.e., syllabus and assessments),incorporating active learning techniques, collecting
five modules covered the subdisciplines within civil engineering: con-struction engineering, environmental engineering, geotechnical engineering, structural engineer-ing, and transportation engineering. The final syllabus, showing all lesson topics, for the firstoffering of the course is included in Appendix B.Module ThemesIn addition to covering basic content, each of the “subdiscipline” modules covered multiplethemes that the authors felt were important to introduce to civil engineering students. Thethemes were: • Analysis vs. design • Maintenance and rehabilitation • Sustainability • Planning • Public financing