students also went on planned (andimpromptu) weekend outings and activities, including hiking excursions, travel to nearbyWashington, D.C., a trip to an amusement park, free concerts in the community, and a wide arrayof other options available in the greater Charlottesville, VA area.Student REU participants met as a group with all of the available faculty mentors and othergraduate students three times each summer: after three and six weeks, respectively, to presenttheir progress to date in a gallery-style poster session, and at the conclusion of the ten-weekprogram to present in a formal symposium. The two group “check-in” meetings served threepurposes: 1) The group meetings gave the students invaluable communication experience indiscussing
commitment to use and support undergraduates in deliveryof instruction. There was not an objection to resituating their use. However, there was additionaloverhead to support the hiring process. In addition, the grant provided support for the pedagogyclass in the form of a stipend. This support will not be tenable after the grant period. Fortunately,the university has recently implemented the construct of a “non-credit” course for high-impactexperiential learning. We are in the process of approval of a LA pedagogy non-credit course.Climate SurveyWe have developed a survey instrument to assess student perceptions of climate (Davis et al.,2018), and delivered the survey for the third year. The plan is to have the survey be a continuedprogram level
prepared to be productive and innovativeengineers in the workforce.Research Objective and Specific Aims The research objective is to develop a situated cognitive model of conceptualunderstanding in civil engineering practice, including misconceptions. The educationalobjective is to develop and implement curricula targeted at core engineering concepts thatare situated in and relevant to engineering design contexts in sophomore through graduatelevel engineering courses. The three specific aims of the Research and Educational Plans are to: Research Aim I: Characterize practicing engineers’ cognitive models of civilengineering concepts. About 400 practicing civil engineers across the country willcomplete existing concept
, or measurement system dynamics.Course objectives: Understand concepts of experimental planning and design, data collectionand analysis. Use modern data acquisition tools to collect experimental data. Analyze data andpresent the results in clear and concise reports. Compare against theoretical results. Assessuncertainty and error sources in measurement systems. Write technical reports.Term project: We expect the project effort and the final report to consist of a description of theidea/concept/design, with reference to the relevant literature, followed by analysis and Page 23.432.10conclusions. Analysis should use material covered in class and
in structural engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez (2004). Portela has primary research and teaching interests in structural mechanics, mostly oriented to bridge, earthquake, and wind engineering. In the General Engineering Department at UPRM, Portela serves as President of the Planning and Development Committee and Member of the Engineering Mechanics CommitteeRosaurelis Marn Ramrez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Rosaurelis Marn Ramrez is a sophomore in Industrial Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez. Rosaurelis is currently employed as an undergraduate research assistant in Engineering Edu- cation, conducting investigation related to the Concept Assessment Tool for
chemistry class as aprerequisite. Data collection was completed on five different days during the first three weeks ofthe semester. Participants were asked to stay for 15 to 20 minutes after the regular class hoursduring these five days. Students received $5 per day for their participation.ActivitiesWe selected two units, atomic bonding and crystal structures, to be used for this study. Weplanned only one type of activity per class period, regardless of how many activities wereoffered, so that we could test for learning that could be attributed to one particular type ofactivity. We planned the types of activities so that a contrast could be made between active andinteractive learning in the atomic bonding unit, and between active, constructive, and
partnership and buy-in for creating change in instructional practices.Future Work To facilitate the desired change to widespread use of evidence-based instructionalpractices, the steering committee and the team will create a transformation plan comprised of asteady stream of communications reporting efforts to date and recognizing desired performances.They will also create opportunities where faculty can create and embrace the change that the Page 25.1028.6adoption of such practices should bring about. The combination of these activities should fosteradoption by providing opportunities for addressing emerging
number PRO-2022-237.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2221511. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] Nielsen, N., & National Research Council (U.S.). Planning Committee on Evidence onSelected Innovations in Undergraduate STEM Education. (2011). Promising practices inundergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: Summary of twoworkshops. National Academies Press.[2] National Research Council. (2011). Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation:America’s Science and Technology
, Dr. Brent Ferns, Dean of Applied Sciences andTechnologies and co-PI, left the college in December 2023, and was replaced by MichelleLeidel. The NSF was petitioned to add her as a co-PI, which was approved in February 2024.The change in grant personnel, as well as other personnel turnover at SFSC, has presentedsignificant obstacles to the implementation of the grant. An example of this difficulty is that inthe grant application, the director of the college’s quality enhancement plan (QEP) was taskedwith overseeing the faculty mentorship program, including developing mentoring practices,maintaining program guidelines, and facilitate training to the program faculty on the mentorshipprogram. This training was supposed to occur before the first
engagedstudents in various STEM disciplines (biology, biochemistry, biomedical engineering andmechanical engineering). We have observed this introductory course to be a cohort buildingexperience and anticipate a largely positive experience, with improving retention rates in not justengineering but in other STEM fields. We plan on fostering student teams with students invarious disciplines to expand the scope of capstone projects and develop design projects thatprovide solutions for authentic community challenges.REFERENCES:Klingbeil, N. W., and A. Bourne. 2013. “A National Model for Engineering MathematicsEducation: Longitudinal Impact at Wright State University.” 2013 ASEE Annual Conference &.https://peer.asee.org/a-national-model-for-engineering
study was built around three critical narratives thatwere obtained from publicly available episodes of the NPR programs Radiolab and ThisAmerican Life. Importantly, the critical narratives we selected don’t present the issues beingexplored as having one right answer. Rather, the narrators offer multiple perspectives, along witha variety of details, research, and the hallmarks of a podcast: authenticity, fast pace, sound bites,etc. [3]. The first narrative, Rhino Hunter [4], discusses current practices that are intended topreserve endangered species by selling permits to hunters to kill them. The second narrative,Hungry, Hungry People [5], describes a plan in the early 20th century to address a food shortagein the US by importing hippopotamuses
, each with unique strengths and local challenges. Weuse a collective impact model, allowing each campus to contribute to the development,deployment, and continuous improvement of the curriculum. Our team is composed of computerscience educators and social scientists with expertise in evaluating inclusive STEM education andtraining faculty at Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs). Our evaluation plan examines bothstudent and faculty outcomes, enabling us to reflect and refine our approach. Shared leadershipand site teams are integral to sustaining the work, even amid potential academic personnelchanges.Our research is impactful in the learning sciences for several reasons. It utilizes faculty learningcommunities as a vehicle to bring change to
scholarships in the amount of $5,000 each.The breakdown per cohort of the numbers of ACCESS scholarships awarded, graduatedACCESS scholars, not renewed scholarships, and current ACCESS scholars are shown in Table1.The cohorts’ sizes had consistently increased over the four years, from 9 scholars in Year 1 to10, 13, and 18 scholars in Years 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Thus, Cohort 4 represents the largestgroup of students since the project began and is double the size of Cohort 1. The increasing sizeof the Cohorts is due to ACCESS scholars’ graduating faster than initially planned, whichopened additional funds for scholarships.1 All freshmen students in the Statler College are admitted to the common Fundamentals of Engineering Program(FEP) and must
with the PI and co-PIs or senior personnel. The lab sessions will serve as practice for the graduate students to exercise the implementation of good teaching practices. Typically, graduate students (even those with teaching assistantships) lack the experience of designing educational activities, as these are usually designed by senior instructors/faculty members, whereas teaching assistants are only responsible for the implementation. This training will provide graduate students the educational training that they will need as they progress in their careers, especially if they plan to secure an academic job.(iv) To develop a multi-platform nanotechnology educational app—i.e., an app that will be able to run on
. students can be successful in a Software Engineering MS Our recruitment plan consisted of marketing Program.through on-line advertisement, direct email campaigns, We are intent upon opening this new pathwaynewspaper articles, relationships with undergraduate into computing careers, which will be a significantschools and conferences, emphasizing the career contribution to both women and our national priorities.opportunity and financial assistance available. We have a program, we are learning how improve it, and To ensure academic success, we adjusted the expect over the next few years to be able to report morecurriculum
famous female AfricanAmerican Mathematician Dorothy Johnson Vaughan, Colombian planetary geologist AdrianaOcampo Uria, a Japanese American meteorologist Tetsuya Theodore Fujita, Mexican Americanastronaut Jose Hernandez). This is incorporated as a puzzle progression theme within the levelsof the subgame. At the beginning level in the subgame, students are “solving” simpler problemsor are guided through solving longer problems. Then, at the intermediate and advanced levelsstudents are “solving” more complicated and longer problems with less guidance.The research plan includes first testing the games in co-requisite pre-calculus Math 126E/26B atUNLV and CSN in Spring and Summer 2024, then refining the game and testing it again. Thegame on basic
effectiveness of validated instructional practices across five diverse institutions. This research will identify ways to support engagement and conceptual learning of diverse populations of students, within the contexts of the educational systems (i.e., institutional contexts, instructor and student histories, beliefs and practices, and the innovation – the CW). 4. Promote and track propagation of the enhanced CW via targeted community building in ME. This will be accomplished through workshops, implementation of an Action Research Fellows Program, collaboration with professional societies in ME and outreach efforts to two-year colleges. 5. Continue to develop and refine a sustainability plan for continued
have lead to real world implementations and/or are being developed with Cornell Technology Licensing. Some of the David’s favorites include: ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #38838* Creation of the Cornell Cup USA presented by Intel, now the Cornell Cup – Arm Enabled, internationalembedded systems competition * Cape Canaveral AFS / NASA Kennedy collaboration Minotaur LaunchVehicle Feasibility Study, turning minotaur missiles into low orbit launch vehicles and leading to success-ful launch of the OSR-5 satellite * Unmanned Aircraft Evasive Maneuver Mission Re-planning AlgorithmDevelopment
Transportation Research. His research interests include systems modeling, analysis and control, data analysis and decision support in healthcare, infor- mation systems and engineering education research. His work has been funded by federal organizations including National Science Foundation and Army Office of Research and medical device manufacturing industry. He has taught courses in the areas of systems modeling and performance analysis, information systems design, production planning, facilities design, and systems simulation. He co-authored the 2006 Joint Publishers Book-of-the-Year textbook, Design of Industrial Information Systems, Elsevier.Dr. Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh Renee Clark serves as the Director
engineering and science experiences. The survey was administered by ourexternal evaluator, who also removed identifying information and sorted the data for thefaculty team to examine. In this paper, we analyze student responses by multipledemographic categories: gender, race and ethnicity, and scholarship status (a proxy forsocioeconomic status, given that recipients must meet particular income and financialneed requirements). We did not conduct a statistical analysis due to the small sample size(n=13). In future work, we plan to combine descriptive statistics with qualitative analysisof student interviews.ResultsBelongingnessThe most significant difference in student reporting of undergraduate belongingness wereby socioeconomic status, as students
, Phase 2Baccomplished but extended with supplemental funding to increase our sample size, and Phase 3underway. To summarize the overarching research plan for the CAREER grant: Phase 1A (years1 and 2) was a qualitative study of N = 42 graduate students that were identified as “departers”(those who left their doctoral plan of study) and questioners (those who were considering leavingtheir program). Phase 1B (years 3 and 4) collects time-series data from questioners using SMS textmessages, collected three times per week from participants over an entire year. The first cohort ofparticipants completed an entire year of the study in January 2023, and a second cohort ofparticipants started in October 2022. Phase 2 (year 5) investigates faculty
Commission and, as commissioner, served as chair for two terms. She also chaired the Driver’s Education Advisory Committee and the Motorcycle Safety Advisory Com- mittee for the Michigan Department of State—work that resulted in new legislation for Michigan. She began her career as an engineer for General Motors Truck Group and has been nationally recognized in higher education as both an American Council on Education Fellow and a New Leadership Academy Fellow. Currently Dr. El-Sayed serves on the Bloomfield Hills Board of Education, serves as a director on the BHS Foundation Board and serves on the Advancement Committee for the Society for College and University Planning (SCUP). She is married and has three adult
perspectivetowards and impact of the classroom’s physical features and conditions (i.e., whether supportiveor not to learning) differed from student to student.6. ConclusionsOur preliminary research on perceived “surroundings” in the classroom is part of a larger studyof the impact of systematic, repeated reflection on the development of metacognition, self-regulatory skills, and academic performance in engineering education. We plan to continue ourinvestigation of students’ reflections regarding their “surroundings” as part of our larger researchstudy. Upon conducting a focus group with these students one year later, their notion of peersand instructor as “surroundings” persisted. In fact, these students further named the “vibe” in theclassroom as their
., whether supportiveor not to learning) differed from student to student.6. ConclusionsOur preliminary research on perceived “surroundings” in the classroom is part of a larger studyof the impact of systematic, repeated reflection on the development of metacognition, self-regulatory skills, and academic performance in engineering education. We plan to continue ourinvestigation of students’ reflections regarding their “surroundings” as part of our larger researchstudy. Upon conducting a focus group with these students one year later, their notion of peersand instructor as “surroundings” persisted. In fact, these students further named the “vibe” in theclassroom as their “surroundings,” with the vibe defined by the energy of the people and
academic disadvantage compared withstudent who do not need to work. [8]. This is an equity problem. Our goal is to preempt the need for non-curricular work by providing internships tostudents. Internships relevant to an individual’s course of study improve job placement aftergraduation. By practicing concepts learned in the classroom, students find utility with their degree.Their confidence improves. The purpose of the grant is to jump-start an internship pipeline. Thedepartment plans to continue fostering corporate relationships so that the internship pipeline forstudents remains strong. The Program is similar to the the Federal Work Study (FWS) program. FWS is financialaid in exchange for a light workload. A review of 30 other works
beneficial to thestudents.IntroductionThe College of Engineering and Applied Science (CEAS) at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) was awarded an NSF S-STEM grant in 2016 with the purpose of creatingtwo cohorts of academically-talented, financially-needy students to pursue engineering studies.UWM is an urban research institution, and CEAS offers nine undergraduate majors. Currently,there are approximately 1700 undergraduates in CEAS. The Preparing Engineers and ComputerScientists (PECS) program was established, with a plan of creating two cohorts of ~10 studentseach. The program includes encouraging the students to take advantage of programs available toall students in CEAS as well as provides special opportunities to the scholarship
orlesson planning process where an approximation of what was experienced is used with youngerstudents [1].Though the general goal of a research experience is well articulated, little is known about theactivities and interactions that actually occur in the laboratory space. An entire range offundamental questions persist regarding the nature of the experience and the assumptions abouthow these engagements impact participant development. For example: Once placed in aresearch laboratory, what sequence of practices do participants experience? or What set ofpractices and expected duration generalize across all research contexts? and finally, Whichsequence of practices and duration are most effective for building positive participant beliefsabout
widely different faculty, staff and administrativepositions. Traditionally, faculty conduct their research without engaging staff and administrationas peers with an equal stake in the outcome of their investigations. A recent NSF funded project,spanning three very different institutions (Purdue University, University of Texas El Paso, CalPoly San Luis Obispo) took a different approach. Their strategic plan included identifying andenlisting the active participation of Student Affairs personnel in their project’s implementationand data collection. Over the past three years, the PIs have been collecting deep student data,developing educational interventions and disseminating their research findings throughtraditional academic venues.Explicitly
additionalsupports be put in place to help students persist in STEM2-5. This paper will describe theprogram's recruitment strategies, the practices that have been most effective, and thedemographics of the successful applicants. In addition, the paper explores the evolution of cohortcommunity building efforts, starting with mostly faculty-led and planned events to events led bya consultant. Improvement in sense of community has been reflected in the evaluation reports,and selected supporting evidence will be shared from the reports.RecruitmentThis S-STEM grant was awarded in fall of 2018 with the goal of supporting at-risk studentsthrough multiple academic pathways, with our definition of at-risk as students who start atCampbell in a math class before pre
Paper ID #32705Measuring Connections: Novel Methods and FindingsDr. Elise Barrella P.E., DfX Consulting LLC Dr. Elise Barrella is the founder and CEO of DfX Consulting LLC which offers engineering education and design research, planning and consulting services. She is a registered Professional Engineer and was a Founding Faculty member of the Department of Engineering at Wake Forest University. She is passionate about curriculum development, scholarship and student mentoring on transportation systems, sustainabil- ity, and engineering design. Dr. Barrella completed her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Georgia Tech where