evaluating the demonstrations indicated (94% agreement) that the SMA interactivedemonstrations are “very effective” or “effective” in demonstrating the concept of SMA.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Science Foundation(Grant No. 0341143 and Grant No. 0305027). This interactive demonstration was an outcomeof an interdisciplinary senior design project.References1. Ambrose, S. A. and C. H. Amon. “Systematic Design of a First-year Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie Mellon University,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 173-181, April, 1997.2. Felder, R.M. and L.K. Silverman, “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,” Engineering of Education, Vol. 78, pp.674-681
International was used in our project, which starts withunderstanding the physics of the basic semiconductor, dielectric, and conducting Page 12.234.3materials. The software provides a Virtual Wafer Fab technology simulation environmentenabling the ATHENA process technology simulators and the ATLAS device technologysimulators to prepare, run, optimize, and analyze semiconductor experiments to achieveoptimal process recipes and device targets3. In our project, the ATLAS device simulatorwas used to simulate the electrical behavior of our devices. The software includes severalmodules: S-Pisces/Device3D, 2D/3D device simulators; Blaze, 2D & 3D devicesimulator
a student enrolls into an institution perceivedas having a particular identity, s/he must engage with that identity and ultimately choose whetherto accept or reject it as personally relevant and desirable or tolerable. Engineering students,particularly at a STEM-intensive institution, must engage with the broader cultural perceptionthat engineers are geeks; at MT, students often refer to themselves and their peers as “engi-nerds,” so closely is the identity of an engineer tied to being geeky or nerdy. APS data indicatethat this process of identification is emergent; first-year students react differently than second-year students to the connection between geeks and engineers. The shift among MT students is todistance themselves from being
Hoffers, TU Delft D. Hoffers is student at Delft University of Technology. He participated 2006 in the BuildingRelations project and developed the sub-tool: SizeDefiner.Matthijs Frederiks, TU Delft M. Frederiks is student at Delft University of Technology. He participated 2006 in the BuildingRelations project and developed the sub-tool: FunctionDistributor.Sander Korebritz, TU Delft S. Korebritz is student at Delft University of Technology. He participated 2006 in the BuildingRelations project and developed the sub-tool: BoundingBox. Page 12.320.1© American Society for Engineering Education
AC 2007-940: A PRIMER ON CAPACITY BUILDINGBethany Jones, United Arab Emirates University BETHANY S. JONES is James Madison Distinguished Professor at the James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia. She recently completed an 18-month term as Dean of the College of Humanities and Social Sciences at the United Arab Emirates University in Al-Ain, UAE. Dr. Jones received her B.A. degree from Chestnut Hill College and her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in French from Case Western Reserve University. Following her doctoral work, Dr. Jones held faculty appointments and administrative positions at Cleveland State University, the University of Delaware, Southwest Missouri State University , and
, “…advancesin performance,… technology, or discipline(s), must be much more highly integrated than Page 12.1544.2in the past” [3]. At the University of Maryland Eastern Shore, (UMES) a steadymovement toward more complex design has been the experience of the first yearengineering students enrolled in Introduction to Engineering Design class. TheEngineering and Aviation Science Department uses its unique programs in AviationSciences as well as the basic engineering program as a spring board to seek outmeaningful projects that compliment both units in the Department. Participating facultyhave recognized a departure from past student designs with more
head training, thisarticle will hopefully help suggest the types of topics that might be included based on existingtraining programs and a survey of current civil engineering department heads.Bibliography1 Graham, S. and Benoit, P., “Constructing the Role of Department Chair”.http://www.acenet.edu/resources/chairs/docs/Graham_Constructing.pdf ACE Department Chair Online ResourceCenter, American Council on Education, Washington D.C. 2004 Accessed January 1, 2007.2 Estes, A.C., Survey Results, Department Head Training. Conducted October 6, 2006. Civil EngineeringDepartment Head list serve, Educational Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 1-5.3 University of Texas, Agenda, Workshop for Department Chairs and Organized Research
. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design: Thinking, Teaching andLearning” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No.1 , 2005, pp. 103 – 120.5. McDermott, L. C., “How We Teach and How Students Learn – A Mismatch?,” American Journal of Physics, Vol.61, No. 4, 1993, pp. 295 – 299.6. Knight, D. W., L. E. Carson, and J. F. Sullivan, “Staying in Engineering: Impact of a Hands-On, Team-Based,First-Year Projects Course on Student Retention,” Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, 2003, Session 3553.7. Fink, L. D., “What is Significant Learning?,” http://www.ou.edu/idp/significant (accessed Jan. 2007).8. Litzinger, T. A., J. C. Wise, and S. H. Lee, “Self-directed Learning Readiness Among Engineering UndergraduateStudents,” Journal of Engineering
Administration and Human Resource Development at Texas A&M University. Dr. Cole has served in a variety of administrative capacities and as the Director of the Summer Seminar on Academic Administration for twenty-eight years training over 1000 higher education administrators representing over 150 institutions. Dr. Cole's professional interests include continuous improvement in educational systems, educational law and educational administration and he is a frequent speaker and consultant on systemic improvement of educational systems. Dr. Cole received his B. S. from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and his M.Ed. and Ph.D. in Educational Administration (Higher Education) from Texas A&M
plant model is assumed (see Equation 1) for the transferfunction from applied voltage (Va) to motor speed (y), and data from a step response is used toselect the poles and system gain. As only 3 parameters must be estimated (2 poles and a DCgain), students generally find the poles through trial and error after calculating the gain fromsteady-state values. y K ? 1 Va s - as - b 2Gathering the open-loop response data is a good exercise as the motor system’s control law mustbe modified to create the step input in voltage—the open-loop control law is that the
reinforcement of the need to stay on task and turn in assignments in a timely manner. High school students are also more likely to lose focus and become diverted in to other topics that interested them.Bibliography1. Wallace, D.R., and P. Mutooni, 1997. A comparative evaluation of World Wide Web-based and classroom teaching, Journal of Engineering Education, 86(3): 211-219.2. Haag, S., and J.C. Palais, 2002. Engineering Online: Assessing Innovative Education, Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3): 285-290.3. Rutz, E., R. Eckart, J.E. Wade, C. Maltbie, C. Rafter, V. Elkins, 2003. Student Performance and Acceptance of Instructional Technology: Comparing Technology-Enhanced and Traditional Instruction for a Course in
years of teaching experience in the fields/subjects of photovoltaics, fuel cells and batteries with over 50 journal and conference publications/presentations. Page 12.255.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Arizona -Texas Consortium for Alternative and Renewable Energy Technologies L.V. Munukutla, R. Newman, A.M. Kannan, G. Tamizhmani, and S. Petrovic Electronic Systems Department Arizona State University at the Polytechnic campusAbstract The focus of the Arizona–Texas Consortium for Alternative and RenewableEnergy Technologies is to
thank the students in all offerings of my course on Engineering and Global Development fortheir feedback in helping develop the course. I thank the reviewers for challenging commentsthat surely improved this paper. This material is based upon work supported by the NationalScience Foundation under Grant No. 0448240. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. ABET Engineering Criteria 2007-2008. http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/C001%2007-08%20CAC%20Criteria%2011-14-06.pdf Accessed January 8, 2007.2. Harvey, D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford
a difference?” Electronic Proceedings, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers’ (IEEE), 1996 Frontiers in Education Conference.2. Brainard, S. G. and Carlin, L. (1998). “A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science.” Journal of Engineering Education, October 1998, pp. 369-375.3. Robinson, T. (1990). “Understanding the gap between entry and exit: A cohort analysis of African American students’ persistence.” Journal of Negro Education, Vol. 59 (2), pp. 207-218.4. Soriana, E. (1985). “Financial aid.” In R. Landis (Ed.), Improving the retention and Graduation of Minorities in Engineering. NACME, New York, pp. 93-98.5. Patangia, H.C. (2003). “A recruiting and retention strategy
accomplish the same goal and would be easier toimplement. Lynxmotion, in fact, markets a small turn table for this type application.Simulation of Lynx Robot The MS Robots Suite includes a simulation package. One of the nextgoals is to model the Lynxmotion robot so that programs may be executed off line. Oregon Institute of Technology has several old robots from the 1970’s that are stillmechanically sound, but whose controls are hopelessly out of date. Modern stepper or servodrives are available relatively inexpensively. Software drivers will be written for the some ofthese devices to allow MS Robotics Suite to address them as services. The software written forthe Lynxmotion controls will be modified to allow the same user interface to drive these
common knowledge in the field of engineering education that numbers of women andminorities obtaining engineering degrees is far below their representation in the U.S.population[1]. Many studies have sought to discern reasons for lack of representation of womenand minorities in science, mathematics and engineering degree programs. Studies related tominority students point to, among other factors, lack of pre-college academic preparation,financial difficulties, barriers related to being first generation college students [e.g. 2, 3, 4] and socio-cultural factors [5]. Studies related to female student underrepresentation in S&E fields havesuggested that women leave not from a lack of academic ability, but among other reasons,because of socio
Page 12.640.3reduced lunch— preliminary post-hoc examination of the data has not shown evidence ofinteraction effects.Because control data was collected in the 2005-2006 school year, comparison against a controlpopulation has not been possible for questions developed after 2005. For these more recentquestions—most of them unit questions—only the EiE student results are presented.Sample SizeWe are working with a sample size of 5,139 students who used the EiE curriculum and 1,827students from the control sample who did not. Each EiE student completed a GeneralEngineering assessment, as well as questions from the EiE unit(s) he or she completed. Eachcontrol student completed 1/3 of the General Engineering assessment (questions randomlyassigned
Written System Interactions Constitutive Eqn Principles 0 absent absent absent absent absent Description Picture present Incorrect Incorrect present but Incorrect 1 but missing governing constitutive missing heat interactions heat exchanger principles equation(s) exchanger
. References[1] Reese, Susan, “Elements of an Effective Mentoring Program,” Connecting Educationand Careers, v81, n6, p20-21, Sep 2006.[2] Snyder, Ilana ; Jones, Anne ; Lo Bianco, Joseph; Using Information andCommunication Technologies in Adult Literacy Education: New Practices, NewChallenges. An Adult Literacy National Project Report, National Centre for VocationalEducation Research Ltd. P.O. Box 8288, Stational Arcade, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.[3] Bornmann, L. ; Mittag, S. ; Danie, H.-D., “Quality Assurance in Higher Education--Meta-Evaluation of Multi-Stage Evaluation Procedures in Germany,” Higher Education:The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, v52, n4, p687-709, Dec 2006
students inMay 2005 and May 2006. These results are presented below in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 showsthe rubric scoring averages in each of the five assessment categories for the industrial advisoryboard and the faculty. In general, the IAB assessed the students higher than the faculty but theaverages were very close. Page 12.1551.8 4 3.5 3 R u b ric A v e ra g e s 2.5 Board
(problem-based, tool-based, cases) Pedagogical goals Targeted course Targeted student audience, Prerequisite(s) Lecture notes (e.g. slides). Reading materials for the instructor (e.g. list of references) set of exercises and/or projects Instructor solution manual for the provided exercises Evaluation of module for potential curriculum impact assessment rubricsFaculty Training
teaching three second-semestersophomore courses, and is in a position to work with these students to produce better team projectreports using LATEX/Subversion. Lessons learned from the first pilot study should lessen some ofthe difficulties experienced by the Juniors in learning how to participate in this collaborativewriting effort.6 AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Mr. Kevin Hickey, University of Detroit Mercy Web ServicesTeam for his technical support of this project.References [1] S. Miertschin and C. Willis, “Building infrastructure to develop electronic collaboration skill among students,” in Proc. 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: The Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology Education in a Global
. Literature on data visualization spans several decades—from the time wherevisualization activities required significant and dedicated computing facilities and proprietarysoftware, to distributed and collaborative visualization using inexpensive yet powerful desktopcomputers. 9, 10, 11Currently, visualization technologies are at a critical crossroad. Will data visualization remainthe provenance of an elite few or will structures and approaches arise to distribute its Page 12.1594.4functionality to those who can best make use of its potential? It is the modern equivalent of the1990’s centralized versus decentralized computing conflict.In this
distance education classes onwireless network configuration and security.References1. Mark Ciampa “ Security + Guide to Network Security Fundamentals, Second Edition” ISBN 0-619-21566-6 ©20052. Michael T. Simpson “ Hands-on Ethical Hacking and Network Defense” ISBN 0-619-21708-13. Allied Telesis Company. Available: http://www.alliedtelesyn.co.uk/site/files/documents/datasheet/MC1X_G.PDF downloaded January 17, 2007.4. Raza, I, “Containing emissions from a microprocessor module”, IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Volume 2, 21-25 Aug. 2000 Page(s):871 – 876 vol.2.5. Phil Lunsford, Lee Toderick, "Firewalls for Remote Computer Labs", presented at the 2003 Convention of the National Association of Industrial
Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad. Vol. X. 2004.[15] DiBiasio, D., N.A. Mello, and D. Woods, (April, 2000). Multidisciplinary Teamwork: Academic Practices and Assessment of Student Outcomes. Paper presented at Best Assessment Processes III Conference, Rose-Hulman University, Terre Haute, IN.[16] Besterfield-Sacre, M., L.J. Shuman, H. Wolfe, C.J. Atman, J. McGourty, R.L. Miller, B.M. Olds, and G.M. Rogers, (2000). Defining the Outcomes: A Framework for EC 2000. IEEE Transactions on Education 43 (2), 100-110.[17] DiBiasio, D., & Jiusto, S "Experiential Learning Environments: Do They Prepare Our Students to be Self- Directed, Life-Long Learners?" 2006. JEE, 95 (3), pp. 195-204
set provides the mechanical link connecting the ICE, the electric drive motor and an electricmotor/generator which are independently controlled to allow power flow to and from all threecomponents, typically called Power Split. Each power source component in equation (1), in this case, isdivided by its independent rotational velocity term to yield component torque,The planetary gear set, having a sun gear, planet or carrier gears and the ring gear, provides a linearrelationship between the component rotational velocities through the following [6],where ω s is the rotational velocity of the sun gear, ω r the rotational velocity of the ring gear, ω c therotational velocity of the carrier gears and k the ratio of the ring and sun gear radii. This
universities, offer opportunities to expand the impact of programs to new audiences, but require clarity of goals and synergy of mission. 4References1. Massachusetts Department of Education. Science and Engineering Technology Framework. Malden, MA. http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/2001/2. New Jersey Department of Education. New Jersey Core Curriculum Content Standards (NJCCCS). Trenton, NJ. http://www.state.nj.us/njded/cccs3. Lowes, S., Sibuma, B. 2006. Evaluation of the Spring 2006 Implementation of the EOFNJ Project: The AWIM Pilot. Teachers College/Columbia University. http://www.stevens.edu/ciese/eofnj
elective none of which is humanities & social restricted to technical sciences)* Includes 23 hours of upper division and EGR 225, EGR 226 and EGR 235.References 1. One University in Many Places: Transitional Design to Twenty-First Century Excellence www.asu.edu/president/univdesign/OneUniversity80305.ppt 2. C. Roberts, D. Morrell, R. Grondin, C.-Y. Kuo, R. Hinks, S. Danielson, and M. Henderson, “Developing a Multidisciplinary Engineering Program at Arizona State University’s East Campus,” 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, June 2005 3. Annette
University. This experience enabled usto choose the teaching principles, namely different aspects of problem based learning that bestimprove student learning and motivation. The pilot program of dispersed product developmentteams was a success and is continuing today. We highly recommend similar programs to otherschools as well.Bibliography1. Meier, M. Best practice in product design: concept outlines and experiences in project-oriented product design education. International Journal of Engineering Education. Vol 19. No 5. pp. 338–345.2. Eppinger, S. D. and Kressy, M. S. 2002. Interdisciplinary product development education at MIT and RISD. Design Management Journal. Summer 2002. pp. 58–61.3. de Graaf, E. and Kolmos, A. 2003
Engineering Education (CAEE). Page 12.94.11Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Huang, G., Taddese, N., Walter, E. Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education. NCES 2000-601. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics, 2000.[2] Besterfield-Sacre, M.E., Atman, C.J., Shuman, L.J. "How freshman attitudes change in the first year," ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, vol. 1, pp