given a real client, a more open-ended initialdesign brief, and a strict timeline. The engineering students participated in a movementworkshop to familiarize themselves with some of the methods the dancers would be using.Additionally, they met with their clients to establish user needs and engineering specifications e ec . S de de e e then commented on, via the internet, by dancers, setdesigners, potential users of the set piece, and potential manufacturers of the set piece. Thestudents deliverables included written descriptions of their designs, CAD models, and oralpresentations. This paper will address some of the strengths and weaknesses of this collaborativeproject, as well as lessons learned that can be applied to
searched articlesas well as aritcles which cited certain works were also reviewed for relevancy. Lastly, referenceswere further filtered towards those with dates from the past ten years in order to include the mostup-to-date literature. However, a few references prior to the ten year cutoff were used due torelevancy and lack of research within the ten year span.Research PartnershipsThe importance of research involving industry-academia collaboration was recognized as earlyas the late 1990’s, especially in software and computer science2. Professionals in both industryand academia realized that they had to cooperate to solve issues inherent to their workenvironments. Studies continue to focus on the computing field3, which is linked to a
order aggression aggression. to keep my good out- look on life.” Ignore the Individual avoided the 13 “Ignored the per- aggressor person perpetrating the son(s) perpetuating aggression. the stereotype” Rise Individual avoided the 34 “Just pushed aggression and mani- through” fested the desire of ris- ing
(NSF) grants CCF-0939370, and OAC-2005632, by the Foundation for Food andAgriculture Research (FFAR) grant 534662, by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture(NIFA) grants 2019-67032-29077 and 2020- 70003-32299, by the Society of Actuaries grant19111857, by Cummins Inc. grant 20067847, by Sandia National Laboratories grant 2207382, andby Gro Master. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies.References[1] S. Hurtado, R. M. Gonyea, P. A. Graham, and K. Fosnacht, “The relationship between residential learning communities and student engagement,” 2019.[2] C. Ujj, “Impact of Living-Learning Communities on
to sequential logic systemsstarting with the basic S-R flip flop and its evolution into the the T and D flip flops; it is fromthis introduction when the concept of digital clocks, memory cells and registers will discussedalong with their associated key terminologies such as bytes and word. At that point, the binarynumber system can be discussed further extending to hexadecimal numbers system. Details ofarithmetical manipulations of binary and hexadecimal numbers are not necessary, however theknowledge to use standard calculators such as the Microsoft Windows calculator in performingsuch operations is expected. This minimal preparatory work, which can run for up to two classes,is sufficient to put students at the right footing to understand
effectiveness of videos as a learning tool in an engineering ethics course: A students' perspective Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia.[8] High, M. S., & Gelfand, S. D., & Harrist, R. S., & Kennison, S. M. (2013, June), Lessons Learned from Teaching with an Ethics Toolkit Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia.[9] Van Gorp, A. and I. van de Poel, Ethical considerations in engineering design processes.IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 2001. 20(3): p. 15-22.[10] Hedayati Mehdiabadi, A., & James, J. O., & Svihla, V. (2019, June), Ethical Reasoning in First- Year Engineering Design Paper presented at
probabilistically-flawed,potentially dangerous criteria [1]. These criteria have been in-use since at least the 1960’s [2],but their limitations were only formally recognized recently. While prior work has thoroughlyarticulated the technical issues in these flawed design criteria [1], [3], the present work aims tosupport formal study of how engineers recognize and treat variability, with an eye towardsunderstanding how the aforementioned flaws evaded notice for over a half-century.In this work, we present a novel theoretical framework and initial empirical results. We use theproposed cause-source framework to analyze aircraft design flaws and to design an interviewprotocol. Through interviews with engineering students, we find initial evidence of an
4: A screenshot of the Miro AE Design Days Team showing Group 16’s board.Following the lunch break, the students participated in various activities to gain theircomponents. Four activities were created for the event and each activity was approximatelyone hour long. The activities were run over MS Teams and each activity had a channel “A”and channel “B” to allow multiple sessions of an activity to run at the same time. Groupswere randomly pre-assigned to activities and given an activity schedule to follow. For eachsession, there were three to four groups competing. The activities that the students attendedwere Trivi-AE, Sc-AE-venger Hunt, R-AE-ce to 50, and P-AE-per Bridge Competition. Theactivities were facilitated primarily by graduate
master’sthesis students were more concentrated above the mean. As such, master’s thesis students aremore likely to associate with this factor when considering their ideal mentor. While the samplesize for the master’s student population is small, this finding still may hold true, and warrantsfurther analysis with larger samples to ensure its validity. Figure 2: Mann-Whitney U Test Independent-Samples Histogram comparing Graduate Degrees to Value me as a person and my professional goalsRace/Ethnicity: In the demographics, students were asked to select the race(s) that they mostidentified with. Of the responses obtained, students identified as either African American orBlack (n=4), Asian (n=18), White (n=26), and Other
cultivate core interpersonal competenciesand identity. These competencies that are cultivated are essential for exercising relationalleadership. More importantly, the quality of these competencies reflects values of HILs, such asauthentic engagement and meaningful connection.The Human Interaction Lab is a powerful approach to learning that is grounded in identityliterature. This approach fills a need in the current state of engineering education: how tocultivate healthy, complex, and dignifying ways of engaging in professional community. Thisfinding has implications for engineering educators striving to cultivate not only effective, butliberating, ways of leading amongst their engineering students. REFERENCES[1] J. V. Farr, S. G. Walesh
] K. L. Gunckel and S. Tolbert, "The imperative to move toward a dimension of care in engineering education," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 938- 961, 2018.[6] J. L. Hess, J. Strobel, R. Pan, and C. A. Wachter Morris, "Insights from industry: a quantitative analysis of engineers' perceptions of empathy and care within their practice," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1128-1153, 2017.[7] R. C. Campbell, K. Yasuhara, and D. Wilson, "Care ethics in engineering education: Undergraduate student perceptions of responsibility," in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2012, 2012, pp. 1-6: IEEE.[8] J. Strobel, J. L. Hess, R. Pan, and C. A
facultyencouraged them to think creatively, and how they did not believe faculty went through classmaterial too fast [18]. Boone argues that first-generation students’ belongingness in reference tothese factors were higher than they were for continuing-education students. On the contrary,Benson et al.’s account of one white, male, first-generation student’s perspective on classroombelonging described how he felt faculty only resonated with how some students solved problemsand not all students, particularly those with access to skills and knowledge the student felt helacked [12].Socioeconomic background is often referenced alongside studies on first-generation collegestudents due to the general correlation between low socioeconomic background and first
solving heat transfer problems. For example calculators replaced slide rulesin the early 1970’s as the basic computational tool for solving engineering problems. A fewyears later programmable calculators became available and modules containing basic solutions toheat transfer problems were developed for these calculators. In addition, authors began toinclude sections in their textbooks, introducing students to numerical techniques for solving heattransfer problems.Prior to the introduction of personal computers (PCs) in the early 1980’s, complex computercodes were needed for numerical solution of heat transfer problems. Access to mainframecomputers and proficiency in such programming languages as FORTRAN and PASCAL werenecessary for solving
unlikely to become more accurate over time.Mr. S. has taught middle grades at two different rural schools for the past 10 years. The academicyear following the RET, he switched to teaching ninth graders in the same rural system’s highschool. • Mr. S’ developed curriculum activity featured an introductory look at wireless communications in his integrated science course that he shared with his ninth-grade students. Aside from a Morse code activity for the students to complete, the lesson was mostly a lecture format with Mr. S asking frequent questions for comprehension checking. Students did indicate their understanding of the key points being illustrated by the teacher through discussion responses.Ms. M. has
. Previously developed instruments could be utilizedto look at impact on design self-efficacy with students who have access to an academicmakerspace at different stages in their undergraduate career [15].References[1] E. Halverson and K. Sheridan, “The Maker Movement in Education,” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 84, pp. 495–504, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063.[2] S. Carlson, “The maker movement goes to college”, Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 61, A26– A28, 2015.[3] V. Wilczynski and R. Adrezin, “Higher Education Makerspaces and Engineering Education,” presented at the ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1115/IMECE2016-68048.[4] M. M. Hynes
. Malkawi, M. Glowatz, R. Burton, P. Magni, and S. Lam , “COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses”. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, vol.3 issue 1, pp. 1 – 2, 2019.[2] V. Tinto. Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago Press, 5801 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, 1987.[3] V. Couch. “ Research Brief: 2018 Your First College Year Survey”. Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA Los Angeles, 2016. Available: https://heri.ucla.edu/briefs/YFCY/YFCY-2018-Brief.pdf [Accessed March 1, 2021][4] Satyanarayana, A., & Goodlad, K., & Sears, J., & Kreniske, P., & Diaz, M. F., & Cheng, S. “Using Natural
Paper ID #34786 1D and 3D dynamic solvers for species transport, heat transfer, electrochemical reactions (adsorption and desorption), impedance, polarization and electrical potential for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) and sodium sulphur batteries (Na-S). He also has developed a novel model to predict the nickel coarsening in high temperature SOFCs based on electro-migration. His current research is related to computational modeling of liquid atomization, drag coefficient of complex geometries, combustion, fire dynamics and heat transfer mechanisms of 3D direct laser metal sintering.Dr. Chip W Ferguson, Western Carolina University Chip Ferguson is the Associate Dean of the College of Engineering and Technology and
assistance until this goal was met. Prior to proposal development, each KickStarterteam performed a STEM-self assessment and developed a STEM plan, out of which researchproposal concepts were identified and matched to the appropriate NSF program, e.g. S-STEM,ATE, and later HSI. In 2016, HSIs in KickStarter cohorts began to acquire grant awards, initiallyin S-STEM and ATE. When the HSI program solicitation was announced, HSIs in KickStarterbegan switching from pursuing the Small Grants for Institutions New to the ATE Program trackto the equivalent track in the HSI program, quite successfully. A total of eleven HSI awardswere earned by 2-year HSIs participating in KickStarter for an 85% award rate. In 2019 theKickStarter program ended and no new
Twin?, www.exorint.com/en/blog/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simulation-and-a-digital- twin. 5. Xcelgo. “More Schools Use Digital Twins: ‘Just Get Started.’” Xcelgo, Xcelgo, 12 Sept. 2019, xcelgo.com/more-schools-use-digital-twins/. 6. Ahmed, S. M., Yaris, C., Farooqui, R., & Saqib, M. (2014). Key attributes and skills for curriculum improvement for undergraduate construction management programs. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 10 (February 2015), 240– 254. 7. Barlow, P. L. (2011). Development and delivery of an integrated project-based jobsite management undergraduate course. 47th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings, 7(August), 3–21. 8. Benhart, B
with those gleaned from student and administrator experiencesacross the larger project.Acknowledgments This project is supported through the National Science Foundation (NSF-RAPID)program under Grant No. (NSF 2028811). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Special thanks to all student and facultymembers that participated in this research.References [1] E. Mahase, “Covid-19: WHO declares pandemic because of ‘alarming levels’ of spread, severity, and inaction,” Bmj, p. m1036, 2020. [2] P. Sahu, “Closure of Universities Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on Education
refinement and 2) class content ownership andstudent agency. When building autonomy by increasing student involvement in program andcourse refinement, participants suggested approaches such as allowing students to provide “inputon syllab[i]” and “feedback on different phases of project[s].” In the case of giving students classcontent ownership/student agency, participants expressed how students could be given autonomyby allowing them to “choose or create their own assignment,” by providing opportunities forstudents to “teach class one day,” as well as by "motivating” students to practice autonomy and“solve problems their own way."As observed in Alterman’s Circumplex Model, motivating teaching styles can be adopted toincrease students’ intrinsic
]. Thisperception can cause students to question the relevance of the content they are learning insideand outside the academic content area. Establishing students' positive self-beliefs about theiracademic capabilities early on is vital as their beliefs about their abilities become less malleableover time [9]. If students do not understand mathematics and do not believe they can do it, theybecome disinterested and ultimately abandon pursuing mathematics and mathematics-relatedfields such as engineering [10].The integration of engineering with math and science is one mechanism that can foster theadoption of positive beliefs about mathematics. Harlan et al.'s [11] longitudinal comparison studyof middle school student cohorts showed the combination of
like, no, screw you. I'm actively going to go against which is like what my friend is like who was on my team…for the girls on my team, you kind of knew it was going to be this way and I feel like you have to actively get on that. I don't know. Yeah and that sounds s****y and I feel bad saying it but it's, it can't be fixed right now, so you need to do what you can, be on that to not let it get worse.Data Analysis: Graphical RepresentationsAfter developing the codebook, we developed a way to graphically represent male studentperceptions of gender dynamics. Each of the three spectra described previously are representedon the graphs, as follows: ● Does the student indicate conscious awareness of a gender-related
components of the voluntary workshopthat need to be further considered. Moving forward, it would be interesting to assess the effect ofa mixed-methods approach (CAD/origami) in our context and to develop a larger sample usingthe indirect (origami) method (n=19 in this study).AcknowledgementsThis work was conducted under IRB 2017-011(N) and grew out of work started under the NSFEngage Project, Award #0833076, at Stevens Institute of Technology.References1. Sorby, S. A. (2009). Educational research in developing 3‐D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459-480.2. Smith, I.M. (1964). Spatial ability - Its educational and social significance. University of London Press.3. Wai, J., Lubinski, D
(advanced global imaging techniques). Areas of applications include flow-induced vibrations, flow around bluff bodies, airfoils, perforated plates, cavity configurations, and biomedical devices.Dr. Inci Ruzybayev, York College of Pennsylvania Inci Ruzybayev is Assistant Professor in Engineering Physics at the York College of Pennsylvania. She received her Ph. D. in Physics from University of Delaware and her M. S. and B. S. in Physics Education from M.E.T.U. in Turkey. Her technical research interests are in structural and characterization of TiO2 thin films and magnetic nanoparticles along with pedagogical research interests in improving engineering physics curriculum and seeking solutions to gender bias
has also worked extensively with high schools to advance student learning success. Malshe’s notable honors include: Membership in the National Academy of En- gineering (NAE) for ”For innovations in nanomanufacturing with impact in multiple industry sectors”; Society of Manufacturing (SME)’s David Dornfeld Blue Sky Manufacturing Idea Award for ”Factories- In-Space”; SME-S.M. Wu Research Implementation Award; three Edison Awards for Innovation; Tibbett Award by the US Small Business Association sponsored by EPA for successful technology transfer; R&D 100 Award, (the ”Oscar” of innovation); Fellowships to the International 1. Academy of Production Engineering (CIRP), 2. the American Society of Materials (ASM), 3
], adapted from Zhu et al. [13]. During the module session, the graduate student teaching team… 1. Addressed my individual needs or concerns 2. Helped me and my partner(s) when we needed assistance 3. Provided responses that guided me in problem-solving 4. Motivated me to continue learning 5. Facilitated my communications with professors or other Learner-Centered course staff 6. Acknowledged that learning engineering concepts can be challenging at times
available resources and5/15/21 3constraints. While all three approaches to learning involve decisions related to the product(s) ofstudy and one or more processes for studying, the “surface” approach is more stronglyinfluenced by the products of study, and the “deep” approach by processes [11]. Thecombination of task, motive, resources and strategies has been labeled as “metalearning”, whichis a form of metacognition [11].How Transfer Students Differ from First-Year StudentsBoth transfer and first-year engineering students face the major challenges of adjusting to a newand often much larger institution. However, transfer students have experience as collegestudents because they had already attended a two-year