Sciences program at Clemson University. Broadly, her research interests include intergenerational learning in informal settings and self-directed learning. Since 2017, Abigail has been the graduate assistant for the General Engineering Learning Community (GELC), a program that supports first-year engineering students in their development of self-regulation and time management skills, effective learning strategies, and positive habits of mind.Baker A. Martin, Clemson University Baker Martin is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University and teaches in the General Engineering Program as part of the first-year engineering curricu- lum. His research interests include choice
(value) and variation were brought up again.The follow up report constituted addressing the following tasks: • Providing a description of the case including background, important factors, critical measures, etc. • Determining each design’s performance with regards to the quality measure(s) identified • Recommending which design that the company should continue with for further advancement based on both technical feasibility and economic value analysis • Providing statistical justification to all responsesAll the information necessary to conduct a technical feasibility analysis using statistical toolswas available in the materials covered during the lectures; but the students had to research togather more information to
the design andmain results obtained after implementing a four-week "Entrepreneurial Vision" module withinthe curricular program of the School of Engineering bachelor's degrees of a large privateuniversity in Chile during the pandemic in the first semester of the academic year 2020.BackgroundThe Academy of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (from now on, the Academy) is a program ofthe Faculty of Engineering of the Andres Bello University of Chile, responsible for leaving anentrepreneurial hallmark among all its graduates is an original model that adapts internationalexperiences and methodologies. The Academy develops experiences through training activitiesfor students in various engineering fields, the most prominent being the semester
Paper ID #32253In-Class Real-Time Assessments of Students’ Fundamental Vector andCalculus Skills in an Undergraduate Engineering Dynamics CourseProf. Ning Fang, Utah State University Ning Fang is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, U.S.A. He has taught a variety of courses at both graduate and undergraduate levels, such as engineering dy- namics, metal machining, and design for manufacturing. His areas of interest include computer-assisted instructional technology, curricular reform in engineering education, and the modeling and optimization of manufacturing processes. He earned
Training: The hands- are also available at a website maintained by the on training takes place on the Center for Manufacturing Research [16]. second day of the workshop and AM-WATCH participants designed and printed includes training the participants innovative/entrepreneurial work pieces during the on using Arduino or Python second day of the studio workshops and rated their coding for advanced learning practices tied to ABET Student Outcomes manufacturing applications. at the end of the programs [17]. Educational Modules: Six educational Two-day, on-ground, train-the-trainer studios modules were developed on
class named “Actuators and SensorsApplication in Robotics” in the department of MET at the New York City College of Technologyin which there are three levels of robotics classes 15,16. In this class, the students are assumed tolearn the applications of popular sensors and actuators and study wireless communication devicesand protocols. Then, they can synthesize the knowledge of fundamental STEM, the introductionlevel of robotics, and design to develop a complicated project. As discussed above, the classmainly focuses on how to understand the theories through practical applications indirectly insteadof how to deliver the theories directly. The educational aim specializes in robotics technology toprepare for career-based classes and laboratories
learning has yet to be seen [4]. The lackof remote teaching in engineering, prior to the pandemic, has been attributed to the inherentnature of the discipline, which requires hands-on training to work with instruments and materialsin controlled laboratory settings [5]. Learning experiences that support practical knowledge andskill development are essential for engineers but are difficult to create in a digital environment[5]. Consequently, researchers have claimed that transiting conventional engineering courses thatfocus on content-centered and designed-oriented learning to online may not provide studentswith the in-depth learning required in engineering [5-6]. Furthermore, converting conventionalengineering courses to remote instruction
curriculum below.1. Vertically integrated design project courses (VIDP). Our program has a strong senior designcourse sequence where seniors work for an entire academic year in teams on real projectssponsored and mentored by industry. Real industry design experience, however, was missing inthe first three years of the program. Hence, a separate design course sequence, where freshmen,sophomores, and juniors come together each spring to work on authentic design projectsmentored by practicing engineers, was added to the curriculum. In this new VIDP sequence,integrated teams consisting of freshmen, sophomores and juniors learn practice skills such asdesign principles, team dynamics, project management, communication, etc., throughexperiential learning
research projects, • Participating in community service projects, • Attending guest lectures from world-class engineers, • Serving as mentors for students in later cohorts, and • Participating in community outreach with K-12 institutions in the region.A key objective was to leverage cohort development across cohort years though peer-mentoring.Toward this objective and working within the structure of the NSF S-STEM program, additionalstipend funds were designated to support students participating in peer-mentoring, as well asfunding for a proposed training retreat to instill best practices in peer-mentoring. The University of Idaho hosts programs and resources that support students in achievingacademic and professional success. A
favored face-to-face courses over onlinemodality. The preferred modality was directly tied to the course makeup, for example, time ofthe day offered, how many times a week is offered, topics of the course, and informationavailable for the online course. Using an equivalent face-to-face and online course modalitycomparison, Aragon et al. [11] found that course performance was not impacted by instructionmodality. If hybrid and online courses are well designed and carried out intentionally, the coursecan be successful in engaging a positive student attitude [11], [12]. The COVID-19 pandemicobliges us to implement a rapid transition towards hybrid and online teaching modalities that didnot allow the time required to create a well-intentionally
the University of Illinois’ College of Liberal Arts & Sciences (2019); and the Science Spectrum Trailblazer Award, by career communications group as a part of the 34th Black Engineer of the Year STEM Conference (2020).Dr. Erik M. Hines, Florida State University Dr. Erik M. Hines is an associate professor in the Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems at the Florida State University as well as the coordinator of the Counselor Education Program and School Counseling Track. Dr. Hines prepares graduate students to be professional school counselors. Dr. Hines’s research agenda centers around: (a) college and career readiness for Black males; (b) parental involvement and its impact on academic
collaborative processamong the research team and educators to create exam wrappers for their specific course needs.The research team created an opportunity for educators to learn about reflection practicesthrough the creation of context-specific exam wrappers while the educators contributedcontext-specific knowledge and ideas from personal experience in the co-creation of their examwrappers. The research team decided to have the deliverable of the workshop be a usable productto address the common tension faculty face between having limited time, yet wanting to stay upto date on good practices and pedagogy. We asked the question, “what affordances mightco-design provide as a professional development method in contrast to traditionalprofessional
. In doing so, he focuses on Engineering education policies and practices in teaching learning processes, assessments, laboratories and practical internships. Mr. Halkiyo has been teaching different Civil En- gineering courses at Bule Hora University, Ethiopia, where he also served as a department head, and conducts various research and community projects. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Powerful Change Attends to Power RelationsIntroduction & BackgroundWhile changing engineering departments to become more inclusive and equitable is a commongoal, research repeatedly confirms that such change is rare. Notably, change efforts
practices in technology-enhanced learning environments. Prior to beginning doctoral work, she taught secondary mathematics for four years as well as created and implemented an interdisciplinary, project-based mathematics, science, and principles-of-technology curriculum for fresh- men and sophomore high school students in Albemarle County, Virginia.Ms. Anne Marguerite McAlister, University of Virginia Anne M. McAlister is a PhD student and graduate research assistant in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction and Special Education at the School of Education and Human Development at the University of Virginia. Her research focuses on identity development in higher education, and how STEM graduate students balance and
previousiterations of the ELC, as well as higher levels of academic resilience than other first-yearstudents who began in Fall 2019 but did not participate in the ELC. This all provides evidencethat the ELC, its high-impact practices, its iterations, and the availability of an S-STEMscholarship for financially qualified students are indeed promoting student success inundergraduate engineering.Limitations of this study include a small sample size, a timeframe too short to consider long-termretention and graduation outcomes, and the somewhat narrow understanding of complex in-vivosocial science phenomena that occurs when only quantitative data are considered. Suggestionsfor future research include gathering longitudinal data that includes retention and
well as STEM education courses for pre-service teachers through the CU Teach Engineering program. Her primary research interests include the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity - especially women and nontraditional demographic groups in engineering - as well as pathways and retention to and through K-12 and under- graduate engineering, teacher education, and curriculum development. She is passionate about hands-on engineering design for every student, at every age level. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Informing Authentic P-12 Engineering Outreach Efforts Work in
more useableand useful to instructors. Of equal importance, though, was that through the process ofgenerating the list, it became clear to us that some of the ITM’s best practices were written insuch a way that the three of us working on the document did not even agree on what they meant.This discovery helped us make a final set of revisions to the wording of the ITM’s best practicesthat both better aligned with the Model-Antithesis-Exemplar table and better reflected ouroriginal intentions for an ITM. The ITM we designed as a result of the process described here ispresented in Figure 3. Figure 3. The Institutional Teaching Model as presented to participants of the 2020 Teaching Workshop and promoted to faculty.In the summer of 2019, as
development," ed: New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.[17] C. T. Fosnot, Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press, 2013.[18] B. J. Wadsworth, Piaget's theory of cognitive and affective development: Foundations of constructivism. Longman Publishing, 1996.[19] T. M. Duffy and D. J. Cunningham, "7. Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction," 1996.[20] A. E. Wyse, E. M. Stickney, D. Butz, A. Beckler, and C. N. Close, “The Potential Impact of COVID‐19 on Student Learning and How Schools Can Respond,” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 60–64, 2020.[21] Project Lead The Way, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.pltw.org
taught various engineering courses including Engineering Graphics, Solid Modeling, CAD/CAM, and Civil Engineering Drawing for industrial, mechanical, and civil engineering students. Currently, he is a Ph.D. candidate and graduate research assistant at the mechanical engineering department of Tennessee Tech University. His research areas are in design for additive manufacturing, composite 3D printing, and functionally graded materials. Seymur is a member and active participant of SME and ASME engineering societies.Dr. Allen Munyaradzi Mathende, Tennessee Technological University Dr. Mathende is a recent graduate from the College of Education at Tennessee Tech University. His research interests are in the use of
authors provide broadly applicable suggestions,from one junior faculty member to another, discussing ways to maximize prior experiences toexcel in the tenure service requirement category. This “Lessons Learned” paper should bepresented as a lightning talk.KeywordsStudent Leadership, Service Requirements, Tenure Track, Faculty DevelopmentIntroductionIn recent years, there were increased efforts for preparation and development of higher educationfaculty. Examples include: teaching best practices seminars for existing faculty members,teaching preparation programs for graduate students, and research grant writing programs forgraduate students and junior faculty. These programs and practices have shown significantimprovements in junior faculty’s
positive impacts. This paper intends to share findings from the threecohorts of students served by the SEECRS program, and to identify how findings can be utilizedto inform similar support structures at STEM support programs going forward.MethodsThe SEECRS project relies on both formative and summative evaluations from an externalevaluator that includes student surveys and student focus groups. This paper intends to share outintermediate findings of a much larger investigation that will utilize hierarchical linear modelingto analyze the impacts of the program on three cohorts of students when compared to a peergroup not enrolled the SEECRS program. The research group, is currently collecting retention,success (GPA), graduation, and transfer data
and cognitive amplifications of computational code; 4. The role of disciplinarily grounded, normative instructional approaches (e.g., socio-mathematical norms) in refining computational modeling; 5. Reframing coding and modeling as designing for an authentic audience; 6. The importance of using both visual and text-based programming languages for longer-term curricular integration (p. 29-30);Literature ReviewAn NSF ’Researcher Practitioner Partnership - RPP’ must showcase strong partnerships, and thisis a challenging and purposeful task. As such, the WySLICE team relies on the work of theResearch + Practice Collaboratory (researchandpractice.org) and the extensive work of thePI-Team’s Burrows and Borowczak.The ”...educational
an unconventional job after graduation. For the femalesthis includes the desire to help a community with their needs, career goal, the influencefrom a class they had taken (university or high school), and hands-on experience. Somesimilarities between males and females are evident in this second tier of reasons, but thefew differences are noteworthy. Classes have an impact on females in a way that they donot for males, universities should work to attract women to these kinds of programsthrough positive classroom experiences (e.g. relating engineering practice to helping Proceedings of the 2011 North Midwest Section Conferencecommunities). In general many men might be receptive to messaging about theprofessional value to
end. Although she was atfirst concerned about teaching STEM, especially under COVID constraints, she soon foundpassion for both teaching and learning STEM material. Because the engineering curriculum shedelivered included considerable focus on computer science, and more specifically, in coding, shewas exposed to a STEM discipline that really ignited her passion and validation for her chosencareer. Simply put: This experience served as a career affirmation event that we want all PSTs toexperience during their teacher education trajectory. Kristina also experienced the true power ofcollegial and collaborative relationships during her time in practicum. Holly routinely revisitedthe best-practice research in teaching with Kristina, and those
Ethics and Societal Impacts via Cocurricular Activities.” This paper was recognized by the Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice as an Editor’s Choice. Currently working with Dr. Angela Bielefeldt as a research assistant. Preparing to submit four papers regarding ethics in engineering education as co-author at the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE
Design Methodology and Engineering Education. As a member of the Integrated STEM Education Research Center (ISERC) at LaTech, Ethan’s primary research area is engineering design education with a focus on developing prototyping skills through both class-based projects and extra-curricular clubs, competitions, and activities. This includes a focus on hand-drawn sketches and how they are used as tools for generating ideas and visual communication, es- pecially when it involves the skill to generate quick and realistic sketches of an object or idea. He has also conducted research on the impact involvement in academic makerspaces has on students in engineering programs. American
exposure. Just-in-time modifications withTeaching Assistant (TA) support aiding in educating those practices were needed. In Fall 2020, one section of AE 124 was designated as remote only for students whowere not on campus. The same instructor taught a second mixed-mode section for on-campusstudents. Unfortunately, the number of students impacted by the pandemic, either directly orindirectly, made it necessary to hold all but one class remotely as well. Even so, the studentevaluation of teaching effectiveness (SRTE) indicated up to a one-point variant between on-campus and at-home students, from 7/7 to 6/7. The only significant difference between the twosections is the ability for students to visit the building site independently, most
. Thestudents were graded upon their approach to the problem and quantification of uncertainties inmeasured and predicted values. Using the 2019-2020 senior capstone students, I found astatistically significant increase in preparation for engineering design from taking the lab coursewith PjBL. I discuss the impacts of specifications grading, project-based learning competition,and detail the measured improvements in technical writing throughout the semesters in Fall 2018and Fall 2019. The impacts were measured based upon a standardized rubric and qualitativeassessments.IntroductionEngineers are expected to create models, take measurements, make predictions, validate modelsand communicate difficult concepts. The most important ABET outcomes ranked by
Engineering at Michigan. Cassie received a B.A. in Engineering Sciences at Wartburg College (Waverly, IA) and a M.S. in BME from the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor).Annie AnMeng Wang, University of MichiganDr. Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University In February 2021 Dr. Huang-Saad joined the Bioengineering faculty at Northeastern University and be- came the Director of Life Sciences and Engineering Programs at The Roux Institute (Portland, Maine). Dr. Huang-Saad has a fourteen- year history of bringing about organizational change in higher educa- tion, leveraging evidence-based practices at University of Michigan. She created the U-M BME graduate design program, co-founded the U-M College of Engineering Center for
let aloneteacher empathy.In engineering education, though the concept of empathy is implicitly present in engineeringthrough human-centered design and user design [19], active use of empathy as a skill to connectwith customers is not commonplace in engineering “as these terms traditionally do not mesh withthe dominant image of engineering” [20, p. 2]. Much of the research on empathy and its relatedterminology [20] is focused on teaching empathy to students and how students become moreempathetic [21]–[23]. For example, Walther et al. [21] introduced empathy modules in anundergraduate mechanical course to practice empathy as a skill and provided results of thesensitive nature and complexity of teaching empathy.While most of the research in