] T. A. Finholt and G. M. Olson, “From laboratories to collaboratories: A new organizational form for scientific collaboration,” Psychological Science, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 28, 1997.[25] M. Bhandarkar et al., “BioCoRE: A collaboratory for structural biology,” Biochemistry, pp. 242–251, 1999.[26] C. P. Lee, P. Dourish, and G. Mark, “The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure,” in Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 2006, pp. 483–492.[27] S. Lu and J. Zhang, “Collaborative scientific workflows,” in Web Services, 2009. ICWS 2009. IEEE International Conference on, 2009, pp. 527–534
Introduction to Engineering. Cottleville, MO: Great Lakes Press.10. Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences. (2000). Introductory Engineering Design: A Project-Based Approach. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado at Boulder. Accessed at http://itll.colorado.edu/index.php/courses_workshops/geen_1400/resources/textbook/11. Design Squad: Teacher’s Guide. (2010) Public Broadcasting Service. Accessed at: http://pbskids.org/designsquad/parentseducators/guides/teachers_guide.html12. Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages. (2008). Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy of
new, and students who have participated in the workshop as part of ateaching-based co-op indicate that their communication skills are generally enhanced by the co-op. Future offerings of the workshop will include additional topics specifically relevant to TAs,and the workshop will be offered for credit.AcknowledgementsSupport for the TEAK Project is provided by the National Science Foundation's Course,Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) program under Award No. 0737462. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Sarah Cass, an Instructional
make it learner-friendly, contemporaryand research and assessment-driven1,2,3. Several NSF grants under programs like the Department-Level Reform (DLR), Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI),Nanotechnology in Undergraduate Education in Engineering (NUE), and Creative IT facilitatedthe development and implementation of these activities. A number of publications have beenbrought out to document these activities 4,5,6. In addition, this course has also providedopportunities to doctoral students to conduct engineering education research7, 8. This course is aprerequisite for ENGE 1104 and ENGE 1114.ENGE 1104: "Exploring the Digital Future" is a two-credit course that is coordinated by Walkerand typically taken in the second semester
and extent of design and analysis the quality of the documentation the quality of the figures, tables, data, etc. whether experimentation and laboratory work was involved the quality and extent of the referencesFinally, the Capstone Review Committee collect and summarize the oral presentation evaluationsgenerated during project presentation day to assess the quality of the presentations, areas in needof work, and long term trends. Once the project reports have been read and analyzed, and the oralpresentation reviews have been tabulated, a report is generated that summarizes the methods,data and observations, and makes recommendations for quality control and overall projectprogram improvements. This review includes a
modeling for design, drawing, assembly, mass property analysis andmanufacturing operations on a CAD/CAM/CIM system. Emphasis is on computer hardwareutilization for designing products. Two hours lecture and two hours laboratory.ETM 464: CAD Solid Modeling & DesignComputer-aided design and analysis of solid, surface, and sheet metal models emphasizingproduct design. Uses computer software for design, detailing, mass property analysis,dimensional standards, and family tables. Two hours lecture and two hours laboratory. Page 25.222.13Appendix B: Web-based Questionnaire Page 25.222.14Page 25.222.15
, 10Mechanical Engineering Technology (2MET) 194 New Kensington*, 14York 7Medical Laboratory Technology (2 MLT) 16 Hazleton 5Mining Technology (2 MNGT) 90 Fayette 4 DuBois, 5Fayette, 6Science (2 SCCC) 16 Greater Allegheny 12Surveying Engineering
AC 2012-4831: UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLASS-ROOM LEARNING AND ONLINE LEARNING ON MEDICAL IMAGINGWITH COMPUTER LAB EXERCISESProf. Hong Man, Stevens Institute of Technology Hong Man joined the faculty of electrical and computer engineering at Stevens in Jan. 2000. He re- ceived his Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in Dec. 1999. Man is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of ECE. He is serving as the Director of the undergraduate Computer Engineering program, and the Director of the Visual Information Environment Laboratory at Stevens. His research interests have been in image and video processing, medical imaging, data analysis and pattern
Engineering and K-12 Outreach programs and Teaching As- sociate Professor, College of Engineering, North Carolina State University, received a B.S. in electrical engineering in 1984 and an M.S. in electrical engineering in 1985 from Virginia Tech. She received her Ph D. in electrical and computer engineering from North Carolina State University in 1992. Bottom- ley worked at AT&T Bell Laboratories as a member of technical staff in Transmission Systems from 1985 to 1987, during which time she worked in ISDN standards, including representing Bell Labs on an ANSI standards committee for physical layer ISDN standards. She received an Exceptional Contri- bution Award for her work during this time. After receiving her Ph D
applicable BIM-based techniques useful in sustainable building education; 3) to discuss the pedagogical methodsused in this case-study course; and 4) to present the results of and discuss some conclusions of astudent survey administered in this course.A newly developed BIM course served as the laboratory for this paper. One of the courserequirements was for students to gain familiarity with three different BIM software packages(Revit Architecture, Revit MEP, and Autodesk Ecotect®) [11] in order to use the software toconduct “what-if” sustainability analyses during building design and construction later in thecourse. Typical functions of Ecotect®, a BIM based sustainability analysis software, wereanalyzed in relation to their applicability to
Page 25.1084.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Project-based Service Oriented Projects as a way to learn and apply Analog ElectronicsAbstractElectrical and computer engineering students at our university are required during their junioryear to take a three credit lecture course and a two credit laboratory in analog electronics. Overthe past seven years, several attempts have been made to enhance student learning throughparticipation in PBL projects. In Project-based learning “PBL”, since the project is developed bythe instructor and the learning path is predictable, student creativity, ingenuity and innovationmay be diminished. In order to provide opportunities for student creativity
Yi-Ching Liao, University of Texas, San Antonio Yi-Ching Liao is a master’s student in advanced manufacturing and enterprise engineering at the Univer- sity of Texas, San Antonio (UTSA). She is also a Graduate Research Assistant at the Sustainable Manufac- turing System Laboratory at UTSA. She received her B.S. in system and naval mechatronic wngineering from National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) in Taiwan. Her research interests include lean systems design and implementation, simulation and gaming, and engineering education.Dr. Glenn Kuriger, University of Texas, San Antonio Glenn Kuriger is a Research Assistant Professor at the Center for Advanced Manufacturing and Lean Sys- tems (CAMLS) and the Department of
TUES program solicitation explicitlysupports such aims.The purpose of this analysis is to study NSF’s Transforming Undergraduate Education in STEM(TUES) program to understand the engineering education community’s views on transformationand change. TUES and its predecessor, Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement(CCLI), have been an influential and substantial source of funding for U.S. undergraduate STEMeducation change since 199015. For example, CCLI’s emphasis on project evaluation, coupledwith outcomes-based assessment driven by ABET’s EC2000 criteria, is a strong example of howpolicy can influence practice in engineering higher education. This paper also informsprospective PIs of program expectations, provides baseline data for
. Mohammed has been successful in obtaining a number of research contracts and grants from industries and federal government agencies. He has current active and funded research programs in several areas funded by the Office of Naval Research and the U.S. Department of Energy. Mohammed is also interested in developing learning environments and educational techniques for Internet based delivery systems and virtual laboratories. Mohammed is a Fellow of IEEE and is a recipient of the 2010 IEEE PES Cyril Veinott Electromechanical Energy Con- version Award. Mohammed is also a Fellow of the Applied Computational Electromagnetic Society. He is Editor of IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
AC 2012-4155: SOLVING THE ENGINEERING PIPELINE CHALLENGE:REVISED, VALIDATED, AND COST-OPTIMIZEDDr. Robert W. Whalin P.E., Jackson State University Robert Whalin is Associate Dean, Professor of civil engineering, and Director, Coastal Hazards Center, Jackson State University. He is Director Emeritus of the Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Miss. He received his Ph.D. in Oceanography from Texas A&M University in 1971 and is a registered Professional Engineer. Whalin was Director of Army Research Laboratory (1998-2003, Adel- phi, Md.), and Technical Director/Director of Waterways Experiment Station (1985-1998; Vicksburg, Miss.). He has authored/co-authored more than a hundred technical papers and
complex problems that canbe solved by applying the desired content. Many of the modules that came out of VaNTH’sresearch and curriculum development endeavor3, 7, 12 exemplify this approach. For example,Linsenmeir et al. 11, challenged students to determine “how much food is needed by an astronautper day for a two week space mission in order to satisfy metabolic demands and not gain or loseweight” (p. 213). In this case, students that learned the content in the context of the challengingproblem were better able to apply the concepts to novel situations and more engaged than thosestudents that received more traditional instruction and laboratory activities. More broadly,students in classes that enact VaNTH’s engineering modules that contextualize
and readings to provide broad,foundational experiences in cutting edge technologies and applied sciences. Course work and Page 25.1218.2associated laboratory assignments place emphasis on researching, designing, experimenting,fabricating, and managing. The manufacturing program is accredited by ATMAE. 1Beginning in the 2011 to 2012 academic year our school transitioned from quarters to semesters,and required significant adjustments to the subject matter presented in a variety of classes.Several classes have been consolidated, requiring elimination of some specific topics. To assistin the determination of the highest value topics that
normally presented in the class and a written report is submitted.Students are required to summarize the procedure used to produce the product and represent theoutput. There are usually two projects given in the class. The first project is defined by theinstructor, which helps maintain a focus on course and curriculum objectives. In the secondproject, students are allowed to pick their own topic, which gives them the autonomy to choosetheir own project formulations and strategies, which in turn increases their motivation.Project based learning at the individual course level is familiar in engineering education. It isused almost universally in capstone design and laboratory courses. There has been growingfrequency of project based learning approach
functioningknowledge skills, such as problem-solving, written and oral communication, independentlearning, team work, etc4.In our undergraduate electrical and computer engineering programs, students complete a two-course senior design sequence using project-based learning, where, in addition to solvingchallenging design problems, they develop several of the professional skills. They also work inteams in the laboratory components of several earlier courses, but there is little formal instructiontherein on how to conduct good team work. If some of those ideas were learned early in theprogram, they could be used in any number of courses throughout the program, thereby enablingstudents to enter the senior design sequence with strong team skills and thus able to
collegesthrough lectures and seminars. The teachers must outline the role of nanotechnology in society,the environment, medical science, and daily life, and the requirement of the nanotechnologyworkforce. Educators must create workforce training programs that provide technicians with thebackground and skills to use nanotechnology [14]. A nanotechnology training program must bescientific and skilled-based. A two-year degree program in colleges with appropriate curriculaand laboratory facilities is needed to provide students with general and fundamental knowledgein nanotechnology.6. CONCLUSIONSNanotechnology has the potential of reducing greenhouse gases emissions significantly andthereby mitigating global warming. The rate at which global warming is
carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) have indicated that the raw material may release vis-ible particles into the air when handled, that the particle size of the agglomerate can be a fewProceedings of the 2012 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Educationmillimeters in diameter, and that the release rate of inhalable and respirable particles is relativelylow (on a mass or number basis), compared with other nanopowders. Maynard et al. [6] reportedconcentrations of respirable dust from 0.007 to 0.053 mg/m3 when energy was applied(vortexing) to bulk the SWCNTs for approximately 30 minutes. Similar findings were reportedby Han et al. [6] at a laboratory producing MWCNTs in which exposure concentrations as highas 0.4 mg/m3 were
WWW: www.squeak.org.8. K. N. Rodhouse, B. Cooper, and S. E. Watkins, Programming for Pre-College Education using Squeak Smalltalk,” Computers in Education Journal, 21(2), 101-111, (2011).9. L. Prechelt, “An Empirical Comparison of Seven Programming Languages,” Computer, 33(10), 23-29, (2000).10. Y. Chen, “An Empirical Study of Programming Language Trends,” IEEE Software, 22(3), 72-179, (2005).11. “Computer Science Department,” University of North Carolina Wilmington, (2012). Available WWW: http://uncw.edu/csc/.12. “Open Cobalt,” Computer Science Department, Duke University (2012). Available WWW: http://www.opencobalt.org/.13. “Contextualized Support for Learning Laboratory,” College of
willing to learn and share ideas. In theseevents, faculty bring a lunch, CERTI provides dessert, and various topics are presented anddiscussed, such as end-of-semester course evaluations, academic dishonesty, classroomdisruption management, best practices in laboratories, and technology tools for teaching (thelatter presented in conjunction with the educational technology office).Instructors from engineering disciplines have made up about one-third of the attendance for thepast two years at faculty development events, followed closely by those in the hard sciences andProceedings of the 2012 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education
Experimental Education. Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 64-69, 1982.[8] P. Totusek and A. Staton-Spicer, "Classroom Seating Preference as a Function of Student Personality," The Journal of Experimental Education, pp. 159-163, 1982.[9] K. Neha, L. Williams, E. Wiebe, C. Miller, S. Balik and E. Gehringer, "On understanding Compatibility of Student Pair Programmers," in Proceedings of the 35th CIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '04), New York, 2004.[10] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.[11] T. Sills-Briegel, "Teacher-Student Proximity and Interactions in a Computer Laboratory and Classroom
can serve alarger number of students.Each team was given a budget of $50 that was also covered by funds for laboratory expenses.The students identified sensors, motors, and other materials that were ordered for the class. Thisallowed the greatest flexibility for the students but it created a number of logistical challengeswith purchasing such a wide array of items. On the next iteration, we would offer a list ofavailable materials that they could select from rather than having each team select their ownitems. This would simplify the ordering process. The list of items would include sensors (suchas pressure, proximity, motion, light, infrared, force, and flex), small lasers, motors, LED’s,holiday light strings, magnetic card readers
engineering from Princeton University in Princeton, N.J. After serving as USAF pilot in KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft, he completed his D.Phil. in engineering sci- ences at the University of Oxford, U.K., and returned to the USAF Academy to teach heat transfer and propulsion systems. At Baylor University since 1998, he teaches courses in laboratory techniques, fluid mechanics, energy systems, aeronautics, wind energy, and propulsion systems. Research interests include experimental gas turbine heat transfer and wind energy. Page 25.602.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012
. Protection of the learner’s security and privacy was the concern is of the utmost importance.Additionally, one must consider issues of equity and the differences among learners that exist (e.g.,personality, learning styles, persons that struggle with depth-perception, hand-eye coordination) whendeveloping cyberlearning tools. It is also important to distinguish what content is better suited for ahuman instructor from what can be effectively taught using cyberlearning. Furthermore, now that so muchdata is not readily available using various cyberlearning mediums, teachers using such resources as part oftheir laboratories must ensure that their students are not losing an appreciation of the data collectionprocess. Additionally, one Program Officer
opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors would alsolike to acknowledge the Centralized Research Facilities at Drexel University as well asMr. Kevin Ayers for their support of this project.References 1) Education. United States National Nanotechnology Initiative. January 11, 2012. 2) For Students K-12. United States National Nanotechnology Initative. January 11, 2012. 3) NanoDays. Nanoscale Informal Science Education. January 11, 2012. 4) Tobin, K. (1990), Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning. School