State University’s Salina campus. A Certified Manufacturing Engineer (CMfgE) and a Certified Enterprise Integrator (CEI), she teaches lecture and laboratory courses in the areas of computer- aided design, manufacturing, and automation. Ms. Morse earned a B.S. in Industrial Engineering. from the University of Tennessee-Knoxville and an M.S. in Manufacturing Systems Engineering from Auburn University, where she also worked with Auburn Industrial Extension Service. Her work in industry in- cludes engineering experience in quality control, industrial engineering, and design and development functions for automotive parts manufacturers in North Carolina and Germany.Dr. Doug Carroll, Missouri University of Science and
summary slides about writing mechanics in their own time, as theyfeel necessary. Writing mechanics is not included on the graded test, although students may opt Page 24.966.8to take a self-evaluation of 30 multiple-choice questions to determine if their skills in that areaneed more attention. The faculty members apply the summarized standards of the CGSC and thePurdue Online Writing Laboratory (OWL) APA guidelines to evaluate students’ writtenproducts, so the rules and principles for effective academic writing and writing mechanics areroutinely reinforced.Student understanding of these principles of effective academic writing taught during
theoretical knowledge. She received her M. A. Sc. in Industrial Engineering and her Ph. D. in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Windsor, and is a recipient of an NSERC University Faculty Award. She is presently an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical, Automotive, and Materials Engineering at the Uni- versity of Windsor, and teaches courses related to design and technical communication, such as systems design, computer aided design and manufacturing, and the senior design project course. She is the 2013 Wighton Fellow, which is a national award to recognize excellence in the development and teaching of laboratory-based courses in Canadian undergraduate engineering programs
. Philip Caruso (GeneralElectric Water and Power), Dr. C. Stuart Daw (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), (ChevronCorporation), Professor David Foster (UW-Madison), Dr. Kevin Kirtley (General Electric Waterand Power), and Professor Robert Lucht (Purdue University). Faculty colleagues at Texas A&MUniversity Department of Mechanical Engineering are acknowledged for their assistance inadministering the concept inventory to their respective courses; these colleagues includeProfessor Michael Pate, Professor David Staack, Professor Andrea Strzelec, Mr. Joshua Bittle,and Dr. Jacob McFarland. Finally, Mr. Timothy McDonald, an undergraduate student researcher,is acknowledged for his efforts in processing data presented in this article.References1
launches.Dr. Cameron J Turner P.E., Colorado School of Mines Dr. Cameron Turner is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering with a research interest in the foundations of design across multiple disciplines. Dr. Turner earned his Ph.D. at the University at Texas in 2005, focusing on Surrogate Model Optimization for Engineering Design. He also holds an MSE from the University of Texas at Austin, with a focus on robotics, and a BSME from the University of Wyoming. He has more than 13 years of experience at Los Alamos National Laboratory, and in 2009 accepted a position at the Colorado School of Mines. From 2009-13, he directed the Engineering Design Program at CSM, covering the departments of Civil and Environmental
engagement in the design of research that responds directlyto the community's needs17. CBPR shifts the concept of research from “one in which thecommunity is a ‘laboratory’ for investigation" (p. 5)11 to one in which "research is by and with acommunity rather than simply for or about a community" (p. 23)17. This methodology expandsscientific inquiry to include goals for empowering and building community capacity by utilizinglocal knowledge to promote research solutions from the participants most affected by potentialactions generated within the research17. CBPR is an iterative process in which academicresearchers and community partners develop research projects through collaboration, collectingand analyzing data while making iterative refinements to
.htm13. Wolsko, T.D. (1980) A Preliminary Assessment of the Satellite Power System (SPS) and Six Other EnergyTechnologies. Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL/AA-20.14. Esch, K. (1986) How NASA Prepared to Cope with Disaster. IEEE Spectrum, March 1986, pp. 32-36.15. Vaughan, D. (1997) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA.University of Chicago Press.16. Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident (1986). Available athttp://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/table-of-contents.html orhttp://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/51lcover.htm17. Dunar, A.J. and Waring, S.P. (1991) Power to Explore: History of Marshall Space Flight Center 1960-1990
researching human disease and working to find newsolutions to human health problems – clinical laboratory technologist, medical scientist,biomedical engineer, epidemiologist, and pharmacologist.” This career interest section of thesurvey used a four-point response scale (1 = not at all interested to 4 = very interested). A moredetailed description of the development of the S-STEM Survey, including validity and reliabilityresults, can be found in Faber (2013).17 This prior published work provides details on how career Page 24.1114.3areas were derived from U.S. Department of Labor classifications, prior research, expert review,and field testing of the
laboratory activity wascompleted using the editing tools that demonstrated how much a story could be altered withcreative editing. Successfully completed projects touched on each component of Hobbs’ media Page 24.1130.7literacy framework 36 from accessing relevant information to be used through the act of sharingthe completed work online.Video Project Requirements• Create an original video essay that informs the viewing audience about a particular topic related to digital computer networks and/or the Internet.• Length of video is between 2 - 4 minutes, including credits. No more, no less.• The format of the video should be a minimum of 360p
tosee.Pedagogical Use and AssessmentThis program has been employed in the classroom as a demonstration in the introductorysynchronous machines instruction of the junior and senior undergraduate curriculum. It has alsointroduced the appropriate topics in our first-year graduate courses. We have not yet used it inour service course for junior-level mechanical engineering undergraduates. It has not been usedas part of student projects or laboratory work yet. In the classroom, it served to illustrateimportant points about synchronous machine behavior. Students readily understood thepresentation format, an illustration method common to finite element programs. Showing themagnetic field’s paths and the magnetic flux density throughout the machine while the
studies in learning, thinking, and reaction time2. Below, we summarize some ofthe relevant works on cognition relating to our research based on the extended summary ofcognition, value and decision-making research by Sprehn18.Earlier studies on cognition began in 1940s, where laboratory studies aimed at identifying groupsof people with significant differences in their cognitive processes. Some of the predominanttheories of this epoch are: 1) Perceptual versus Conceptual Groupers3, 2) Sharpeners andLevelers4, 3) Field Dependency/Independency5, and 4) Impulsive versus Reflective Thinkers6,7.We refer the readers to Kozhevnikov8 for an in depth review in this area. One salient criticism ofthese early theories, as voiced by Walker9, Kogan and Saarni10
, R., “Strategies for Retention and Recruitment of Women and Minorities in Computer Science and Engineering”, http://www.cse.unt.edu/~rakl/AKG07.pdf43. Tindall, T., and Hamil, B., “Gender Disparity on Science Education: The Causes, Consequences, and Solutions”, Education, Vol. 125, Issue 2, 2004.44. Glenn, D., “Close the Book. Recall. Write it Down”, The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 1, 2009.45. McDaniel, M., Roediger, H., and McDermott, K., “Generalizing Test-Enhanced Learning From the Laboratory to the Classroom”, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2007, pp. 200-20646. Klionsky, D., “The Quiz Factor”, Letter to the Editor, CBE Life Sciences Education, American Society for Cell Biology, Vol. 7, No. (3), 2008
official journal of the National Association for Science, Technology & Society (NASTS) 23(4), 236-245. 3. Shabani, R., Massi, L., Zhai, L., Seal, S., & and Cho, H.J. (2011). Classroom modules for nanotechnology education: Development, Implementation and Evaluation. European Journal of Engineering Education 36(2), 199-210. 4. Moosavifazel, V., Kumar, A., Cho, H.J., Seal, S. (2013). Laboratory research motivated chemistry classroom activity to promote interests among students towards science. J of Nanotechnology Education 5, 1-5. 5. Massi, L., Georgiopoulos, M., Young, C., Geiger, C., Lancey, P., & Bhati, D. (2011). Defining an evaluation framework for undergraduate research
Technologies Laboratory have addressed sus- tainability challenges in the fields of systems design, technology selection, manufacturing, and water.Mr. Adam B. Baker, University of Michigan Page 24.1238.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The PhD Advising Relationship: Needs of Returning and Directing-Pathway StudentsI. IntroductionThough a majority of engineering PhD students begin their doctoral career shortly aftercompleting an undergraduate degree (and perhaps a Master’s), a significant minority of studentsare “returners,” students who pursue a PhD after
students.Lastly, utilizing academic support services positively impacted the students’ academic success atthe CCs. These academic services that were available on campus included tutoring centers,libraries, and computer laboratories.4.4 Key to Success through Psychological FactorsPsychological factors that emerged from Wood’s (2010) in-depth interviews with the studentsincluded motivation, focus, and academic confidence. Internal and external motivation, as seenearlier, is key in students’ persistence and academic success. Students’ academic focus andpersonal commitment to their academic careers can also positively impact their academic successin CCs. Expressing an academic confidence also positively impacts the students’ success in their
business. He also is a faculty member in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. In the decade of the 90s, Dr. Sticklen founded and led a computer science laboratory in knowledge-based systems focused on task specific approaches to problem solving, better known as expert systems. Over the last decade, Dr. Sticklen has pursued engineering education research focused on early engineering with an emphasis on hybrid course design and problem-based learning; his current research is supported by NSF/DUE and NSF/CISE.Prof. Abdol-Hossein Esfahanian, Michigan State UniversityHannah McQuade, The Center for Engineering Education ResearchAndrew League, Michigan State UniversityMr. Chris John Bush, Center for Engineering
, the use of real-timebehavioural rubrics in laboratories has allowed TAs to become more aware of studentexperimental skills and adapt their instruction to student need16. These behavioural rubrics wereuseful in this context as the TA to student ratio was 1:2, but in ratios much higher than this, itwould not be possible for TAs to fill them out in real-time and respond to student needssimultaneously. One approach that could allow student assessment of larger classrooms is the useof behavioural checklists, such as those used to simultaneously assess technical and non-technical skills in medicine17, which provide a binary assessment of the existence of observablebehaviours. While this has potential for demonstrating weaknesses in terms of
thirty plus years, Dr. Rodgers has held various academic, research and administrative positions including serving as director of the Georgia Tech Air Quality laboratory from 1988 to 2008. He currently serves as deputy director for Research and Technology Transfer for National Center for Transportation Productivity and Management at Georgia Tech. Page 24.1305.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Use of Concept Maps to Assess Student Sustainability KnowledgeIntroductionSustainable DevelopmentSustainable development has emerged as a promising strategy for combating un-sustainablepatterns of
Engineers (SAE) Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award recipient.Mr. Michael DeLorme, Stevens Institute of Technology Mr. Michael DeLorme is an Adjunct Professor and Senior Research Associate at the Davidson Laboratory at the Stevens Institute of Technology. He has conducted over 50 significant marine hydrodynamic exper- iments on both surface and subsurface vehicles. Other areas of recent research include; the application of hydro-acoustic techniques for the detection, classification and tracking of non-emitting small vessels, the implementation of UUVs for port/maritime security and environmental assessment, and path planning of a UUV through a complex estuary.Eirik Hole, Stevens Institute of Technology (SSE) Eirik Hole has
— against placing unknown CD media in their computer (whyhigher application—which represents application, but only if does potentially malicious code have access to informationinformed by analysis, evaluation, and creation. that could cause harm?), and it urges them not to trust links A project at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory devel- in emails (why is the source of information being presented tooped a series of computer-security awareness training materi- the user not always clear?). In the economy of individual endals, and they posited that their training exercises Bloom’s first users—who consider the benefit of following security
academic advising tools. However, we argue that theCentre of Excellence Program. continued development of online advising tools has not kept N. Mattei affiliated with NICTA, University of New South Wales, Neville pace with development of course delivery, educational theoryRoach Laboratory, Level 4, 223 Anzac Pde., Kensington NSW 2052 about online education, or education evaluation systems. InAustralia. (Nicholas.mattei@nicta.com.au; +61 2 8306 0464). T. Dodson affiliated with Department of Physics and Astronomy, the process of designing an advising support system, we haveUniversity of
make them transforming the transitional problems into reduced-specificitysuch. Context rich problems have real-world context settings. problems.To increase motivation, one can start problems with “Youare…/you have been…” and then describe situations in such IV. DESCRIPTION AND RESULTS OF THE STUDYcontexts that can motivate the solver to find an answer (e.g., Course Descriptionstart the problems with statements like: you have been hired as The General Physics I (PH-201) course at QCC is an… and your job is…; you are watching TV about… and algebra-based 3 class hours and 2 laboratory hours course (4wonder…; etc). More suggestions on making problems credits). It is a
. Higher thresholds reduce the search space ofnode outages, workload logs and error logs in Los Alamos prediction process. Because the prediction process is triggeredNational Laboratory. The data spans 22 high-performance by the threshold, higher threshold setting triggers fewercomputing systems that have been in production use at Los prediction processes.Alamos National Lab (LANL) between 1996 and November2005. The data contains an entry for any failure leading to anode outage that occurred during the 9-year time period andthat required the attention of a system administrator. For eachfailure, the data includes start time and end time, the systemand node affected, as well as categorized root causeinformation
introduction to systems- 4.1Thinking in Systems, Chapters 1 & 2 [6] thinking and model-based reasoning. To show how cognitive scientists study the waysNersessian (2009) engineers think and solve problems. Also, toHow Do Engineering Scientists Think? provide a second case study of an engineer at work, 2.7Model-Based Simulation in Biomedical to be analyzed later through the lens of Koen’sEngineering Research Laboratories [2
engineering through a two-week residential summer camp. The Summer Engineering Instituteprovides participants an insight into the engineering profession and the engineering educationalsystem through a combination of lectures, hands-on laboratory activities, field trips, workshops,panels, and projects. Among the strategies employed in developing the program are emphasizingall the major fields of engineering and the various paths to an engineering career, including therole of community colleges; targeting first generation students and underrepresented minorities;collaborating with high school faculty and staff through a nomination process to identify andselect potential students; collaboration among community college and university faculty indeveloping
effects of major disruptions on the supply chain. He serves as Teaching Assistant for the STFS course.Mr. Hai Fu, University of Kentucky Hai Fu is currently a PhD student in Brazing and Heat Exchanger Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky. He received his master’s degree from Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China and bachelor’s degree from Southeast Uni- versity, Nanjing, China. Prior to his PhD study, he worked in Shanghai Intel Asia-Pacific R&D Ltd. as a thermal engineer for one and a half years. He also studied in the University of Cincinnati for his PhD for two years before transferring to the University of Kentucky to continue his PhD
Qualtrics software (www.qualtrics.com) and studentsreceive a $5 gift certificate upon completion. While the survey is not anonymous so as to linkstudent achievement outcomes with affective outcomes, student responses are kept confidentialaccording to IRB protocol. The survey “The Student Opinion about Calculus Courses Survey,” developed by DukeUniversity for its NSF sponsored Project CALC: Calculus as Laboratory Course,16-18 forms thebasis for the closed-ended questions in our survey and is available on the Online EvaluationResource Library (OERL) website (oerl.sri.com). The purpose of the original survey, whichclosely matches the intended purpose of the survey used for this research, was to gatherinformation about student attitudes and
equal moral standing.Yet largely for historical reasons, engineering education in China continues to reflect both nativeChinese and imported Soviet influences, and largely lacks the kinds of pedagogical foundations,engineering curricula, institutional infrastructure, laboratory resources, and faculty resources tosupport and realize outcomes that initially emerged in a very different national and culturalcontext. The policy reforms needed to effectively adapt and apply such ideas will likely requireincredible pedagogical and institutional reforms in Chinese engineering degree programs. Page 24.497.11“Incomplete” Pragmatic Policymaking