derived from the Self-Regulated Learning in Technologyeducation (SRLT) model. The current findings indicate that technology educatorsaccept and support the proposed reform. We feel that collaboration between universityexperts, the teachers and Ministry of Education supervisors has been a key factor inachieving the desired goals.References1. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning, Autodesk, San Rafael, CA. Retrieved March 15, 2009, from http://www.bie.org/files/researchreviewPBL.pdf2. Barak, M., (2002). Learning good electronics, or coping with challenging tasks? Priorities of excellent students, Journal of Technology Education, 14(2), 20-34.3. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S
, according to Marchese and others, is an elusive goal. This paper explains a techniquedeveloped and implemented by several Civil Engineering faculty members teaching structuralmechanics, analysis, and design at the United States Military Academy in the Spring, 2009 andthe Fall, 2009 terms to encourage mastery of critical skills and transfer of these skills tosubsequent courses. The concept is called “Problem Set Zero” to stress the fact that the materialbeing evaluated is from the prior course(s) and must be mastered before a student beginsProblem Set One.1. Introduction1.1 Curriculum Structure A common feature of Civil Engineering and other curricula is the establishment ofprerequisite courses which allow students to progress from basic math
collaborations begun at the symposium and whether theywill complete their innovation projects, although several virtual meetings of attendees have beenconducted. Bibliography1. Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. The Carnegie Foundation for the Enhancement of Teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass. Page 15.1064.7
Engineering”, McGraw Hill, 2008.5. A. Hambley, “Electrical Engineering, Principles and Applications”, 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, 2007.6. W. Hayt, J. Kemmerly, S. Durbin, “Engineering Circuit Analysis”, 7th Edition, McGraw Hill, 2008. Page 15.1357.8
", 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, 1957.5. P. Kohl and N.D. Finkelstein, "Patterns of Multiple Representation Use by Experts and Novices during PhysicsProblem Solvings" in Phys. Rev. ST Physics Ed. Research 4, 010111, 2008.6. A. H. Schoenfeld, “What’s All The Fuss About Metacognition?” in Cognitive Science and Mathematics p. 187.Erlnaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987.7. Lohmann, S., Ziegler, J., and Tetzlaff, L. "Comparison of Tag Cloud Layouts: Task-Related Performance andVisual Exploration." In Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 international Conference on Human-Computerinteraction: Part I (Uppsala, Sweden, August 24 - 28, 2009) Page
importantly, our graduates are finding a flattering reflection of their active-learning educational experience in the integration-rich workplace. Architecture is amultidisciplinary field of study that draws on many areas of study. Architecture education mustsuccessfully involve the integration of art, engineering, business, sustainability, and otherdisciplines.References≠ Nicol, D., and Pilling, S., “Changing Architectural Education”, E & FN Spon Press.≠ Boyer, E. and Mitgang, L., “Building Community, A New Future for Architectural Education and Practice”, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.≠ Kirby, J., Ozcan, H., and Fouad, F., “Sustainability in Engineering and Architecture Design”, Proceedings 2008 ASEE
reported here is a follow-upquestion to a short-answer question. (The short answer question asked those students who wereplanning on continuing in engineering to list their primary reason(s) for pursuing engineering.)The follow-up question asked students to state their level of agreement with this statement:“This class reinforced my decision to continue in engineering.” The average score for the oldcourse was 2.72 (n = 294) and improved to 2.15 (n = 60) for the new course. A 2-sample t-testresulted in a P-Value of 0.000; Cohen’s d equaled 0.57. The significant improvement in student responses begs the question: “is the new courseeasier?” That is, are students more favorable about the course because it is easier? Table 1shows that the grades
strongcommunication skills to effectively communicate technical issues to productdesigners. The desired outcomes of the test engineering graduate certificate wereadopted from ABET’s (a) through (k) outcomes6 shown in Table 1. Table 1 Test Engineering Graduate Certificate Learning Outcomes6 Outcome 1 The application of circuit analysis and design, computer programming, associated software, analog and digital electronics, and microcomputers to the building, testing, operation and maintenance of electrical/electronic(s) systems using laboratory equipments an Automatic Test Equipment (ATE). (ABET 8.a) Outcome 2 An appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills and
Time, [s] 4 30 3 25 20PSD 2 CPSD 15 10 1 5 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15
functional mini-desktopCNC machine. The assessment of the Capstone design experiment indicated that the six programoutcomes achieved levels of 80 to 93%.References: 1. “ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs”, Effective for Evaluations During the 2007-2008 Accreditation Cycle. WWW.ABET.org 2. J. Ansari, A. Javaheri, S. Tompkins, K. Williamson, “OUTCOME ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN A MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING PROGRAM”, Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 3. J. Ansari, A. Javaheri, N. Ghariban, “CIM LAB TO SUPPORT MANUFACTURING DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION”, Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
. Page 15.291.10AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by a National Science Foundation grant no. 0935211. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Rampersad, H.K., Integrated and simultaneous design for robotic assembly, Chichester, England: Wiley, 1994.2. Hsieh, S. (2005). "Automated Manufacturing System Integration Education: Current Status and Future Directions," Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR. Page 15.291.11
) distributedhandouts of Linksman’s characterizations and recommendations for each super link.Also in this study, (5) students were shown previous student projects submitted in the earlierMATH 131 courses to introduce each new topic visually and (6) were required to complete amuch more comprehensive project component (hence the term Project-Directed Mathematics).The authors discovered that students’ documented super links did not confirm the previousassumption, that most designstudents by nature would be visual 2 0 0 6 - 2 0 0 7 M ATH 1 3 1 St u d e n t s' Le a r n in g Pr e f e r e n ce sor tactile right-brained learners, thus ( n = 37
were selected: The Journal of EngineeringEducation, Advances in Engineering Education, and the International Journal of EngineeringEducation. These journals were selected for their engineering education specific audience andfull article content availability online. Selection criteria for the articles included theclassification of the article as “mixed methods” by the author(s) or by the specific mention ofqualitative and quantitative data collection in the abstract. Following an initial review of thearticles in each publication, the sample (nine articles) was insufficient to fully characterize mixedmethods research in the field. In light of this an internet search was conducted for additionalengineering education research articles featuring a
and Environmental Engineering, and the Engineering Studies Program. Her research focuses on decision-making for environmental and infrastructure systems. Dr. Jones received a BS Civil Engineering from Columbia University, and a PhD Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University. She is a licensed professional engineer in several states.Christopher Ruebeck, Lafayette College CHRISTOPHER S. RUEBECK is an Associate Professor in the Economics Department at Lafayette College, teaching in the areas of industrial organization, marketing research, introductory Principles and Microeconomics courses, as well as simulation and evolutionary game theory. Dr. Ruebeck holds the
. Page 15.1151.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Survival Tips from the Trenches Susan A. Lantz, Ph.D.; Trine University; Adrienne R. Minerick, Ph.D., Michigan Technological University; Donna S. Reese, Ph.D., Mississippi State University; Beena Sukumaran, Ph.D., Rowan University Abstract: Panel Discussion: Four women in academia---one with 5-10 years of experience, two with 10-20 years of experience, and one with 20-plus years experience---will offer advice, suggestions, and discuss tips and techniques that worked (or did not work) for them. The panelists include a woman who left academia
25.Retrieved from http://www.webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html6. Maness, J. M. (2006). An evaluation of library instruction delivered to engineering students using streamingvideo. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, (48), 6-6. Retrieved fromhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=22189393&site=ehost-live7. Michel, J. P., Hurst, S., & Revelle, A. (2009). Vodcasting, iTunes U, and faculty collaboration. ElectronicJournal of Academic & Special Librarianship, 10(1), 6-6. Retrieved fromhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lxh&AN=41534766&site=ehost-live8. Osif, B.A., and DeSantis, S.M. (2005). Engineering resources tutorial [Video tutorial]. Penn State
%)Teaching course(s) 83 (28.8%) 75 (90.4%) Although this seemingly high number of available opportunities appears to contradict theidea that doctoral students are not getting adequate preparation for teaching careers, it isimportant to note that a very small percentage of grad students participate in such programs.One of the authors of this paper with experience with teaching certificate programs and coursesat three separate universities estimates that less than 5% of the graduate students at anyuniversity participate in such opportunities, suggesting that these programs are a good first stepbut need to become integral to graduate education to really make a difference. In addition, thePFF
, “Mathematics counts,” Tech. Rep., London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1993.3. M. S. E. Board and N. R. Council, “Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education,” Tech. Rep., Washington, DC, 1989.4. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, 1989.5. Professional Standards for teaching mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, 1991.6. Assessment standards for school mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, 1995.7. Principles and Standards for School
(2008). Development for the other 80%: engineering hope, Journal forAustralasian Engineering Education, 14(1): 1-12.[6] Bielefeldt, A.R., B. Amadei and R. Sandekian (2008). Community service attitudes of engineeringstudents engaged in service learning projects, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Paper AC 2008-2430.[7] Paterson, K.G., A.R. Bielefeldt, and C.W Swan (2010). Measuring the Impacts of Project-Based ServiceLearning in Engineering Education. Lulu, 80 pp.[8] Gelmon, S.B., B.A. Holland, A. Driscoll, A. Spring, and S. Kerrigan (2001). Assessing service-learningand civic engagement. Campus Compact. 154 pp.[9] Burack, C., J. Duffy, A, Melchior, E. Morgan (2008). Engineering Faculty
for increasing underrepresented groups in thesustainable biomaterials manufacturing engineering program each semester. Based on thefindings of these evaluations each semester, the curricula materials and outreach activities will bemodified to increase the impact and effectiveness this approach. Page 15.724.6Bibliography 1) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century," National Academy of Engineering. 2004 2) Archel M. A. Ambrosio, Harry R. Allcock, Dhirendra S. Katti, Cato T. Laurencin, Degradable polyphosphazene/poly([alpha]-hydroxyester) blends: degradation studies, Biomaterials, Volume 23, Issue 7
. The physical properties of the accelerometer included sensitivity of102 mv/(m/s^2), a frequency range of 0 to 100 Hz, and a 10 Hz phase response of under 3°1.The accelerometer contains a voltage regulator integrated within its structure. This allows forexternal power to be supplied by any source within the 10 to 30 VDC excitation range. Thechange is capacitance is detected by a capacitance bridge where each arm of the bridge functionsas a capacitance divider. The outputs of the bridge are then amplitude modulated signals that aredirectly proportional to the changes in capacitance. A series of diodes and capacitors within theaccelerometer are used to demodulate the signals which are then summed, amplified, and filteredto provide a voltage
. Alvarado, “Power engineering technology: a new program targeted at the nuclear power industry,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2008.2. L. Parker, M. Holt, “Nuclear Power: Outlook for New U.S. Reactors,” CRS Report for Congress, March 2007.3. R. Mott, Applied Fluid Mechanics, 6th edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2006.4. Y. Cengel, M. Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 6th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2008.5. D. Kaminski, M. K. Jensen, Introduction to Thermal and Fluids Engineering, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005.6. F. P. Incropera, D. P. DeWitt, T. L. Bergman, A. S. Lavine, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 6th edition, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2007.7
, different norms of junior high, senior high,vocational and college male and female students from 2003 academic year were set up to serveas an objective comparison purpose. The creditability and validity contents of the local studentswere used as the norms, and the creditability were found to be high. The re-test creditability wasbetween 0.78~0.92, and the validity was between 0.64~0.85. The four factors and 15 traits of LAI scale include5: (1) Introversion and extraversion personalities: 1. General activity (G), 2. Ascendancy (A), 3. Page 15.1239.4 Social extraversion (S), 4. Thinking extraversion (T), 5. Rhathymia (R
various branch conditions listed in Table 4. The signal name “NATT” is the acronym for“next address if the test result is true” and serves as the target of a branch action, so that a branchis performed by loading the NATT value into the address counter. Address Microstore Test NATT EnA EnD EnL EnN SelMux SelALU KVal Wr 2 4 1 2 1 1 2 2 8 1 Kval Wr ’0’ I0 S ’1’ I1 Data path control signals Cflag I2 Mux Zflag I3
development will be discussed.Overview of Engineering Curriculum DevelopmentsThe quality of engineering education and the ability to recruit a U.S. engineering workforce hasbeen a growing concern among engineers in university and industrial settings. In the 1990’s,ABET, the engineering accreditor of postsecondary degree-granting programs, revamped theprogram outcomes and assessment criteria to improve quality by implementing the EngineeringCriteria 2000 (EC2000).5 Beginning in 2001, all accredited engineering programs were requiredto demonstrate that their graduates possess the following eleven skills (known as a-k): ≠ Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; ≠ Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
and J. Brooks Zurn, “Evaluation of Tablet PCs for engineering content development and instruction”, Proceedings of the 111th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20-23, 2004.2. Kuldeep S. Rawat, George B. Riddick, and Lakiesha J. Moore, “Work in Progress – Integrating Mobile Tablet- PC Technology and Classroom Management Software in Undergraduate Electronic Engineering Technology Courses”, 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008.3. Amelito Enriquez, “Developing an Interactive Learning Network Using Tablet PCs in Sophomore-Level Engineering Courses”, Proceedings of the 114th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual
one problem related to each lesson objective for thatday; therefore, some problems might require different approaches and techniques to solve.Regardless, I ensure that I offer time for my students to attempt at least one problem on theirhandout either by working alone at their desk or with a partner next to them. During my lessonplanning prior to class, I strategically outline in my mind which problems I will personallyreview in class on the board and which problem(s) I will have the students attempt on their ownduring the lesson period in class. Typically, I do not allocate more than 15 minutes of class timeto student reflection on a particular because I need the remaining lesson time review the problemand introduce the other problems on the
the next generation of professionals and help students inintegrating undergraduate teaching and research with interdisciplinary environment.References[1] Bergman C. A.: “Senior Design Projects with Industry.” Frontier in Education Conference,1998.[2] Jang S.: “Senior Capstone Project”, NY City College of Technology, 2009.[3] Brackin P., J. Gibson D.: “Capstone Design Projects with Industry: Emphasizing Teaming andManagement Tools”, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2005.[4] Goldberg J., Ropella k.: “Senior Design Projects”, Marquette University College Engineering,Biomedical Engineering, Milwaukee, WI 2009.
Institute of Technology.[3] Cover, T. & King, R. (1978). “A convergent gambling estimate of the entropy of English”,IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 24(4):413-421.[4] Lanctot, J., Li, M., & Yang, E. (2000). “Estimating DNA Sequence Entropy”, Symposiumon Discrete Algorithms.[5] Farach, M., Noordewier, M., Savari, S., Shepp, L., & Wyner, A. (1995). “On the entropy ofDNA: algorithms and measurements based on memory and rapid convergence, Symposium onDiscrete Algorithms.[6] Behr, F., Fossum, V., & Mitzenmacher, M. (2002). “Estimating and Comparing Entropyacross Written Natural Languages Using PPM Compression”, Technical Report TR-12-02,Harvard University.[7] Tsonis, A., Elsner, J., &Tsoni, P. (1997). “Is DNA a language
the environment taught in the courses. The most common feedback was the course(s)changed their outlook on the environment/planet and made them very excited about being an engineer. They very much like the holistic approach of thinking about the 3 pillars of sustainability. At least 3students converted to vegatarian/vegan as a result of taking the course and pondering their personaloptions. Also, the students liked the opportunity of writing memos/Powerpoint as a way to learnbusiness communications.By focusing the team projects on real world situations, many dealing with how the students arecurrently living, we assure ourselves a very practical focus and energetic response. It has been verysatisfying to see the students clearly and openly deal