Census Bureau, Dec 2008.3. CPS Disability Data, Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Feb 2009.4. Occupational Outlook Handbook, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2008-09 Edition, 2009.5. T. Cavanaugh, “The Need for Assistive Technology in Educational Technology,” Educational Technology Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, 20026. D. Schaefer, J. H. Panchal, S-K. Choi, F. Mistree, “Strategic Design of Engineering Education for the Flat World,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 247-282, Mar 2008.7. T. L. Friedman, “The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century,” Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2005.8. G. W. Skates, “Interdisciplinary project working
Publishing Company, Singapore, 2003.6. Laliberté T., Gosselin C. and Côté G., 2000, "Rapid Prototyping of Lower-Pair, Geared-Pair and CamMechanisms," Proceedings of the ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Baltimore MD,September 10-13, 2000, Paper DETC2000/MECH-14202.7. Won J., DeLaurentis K. and Mavroidis C., “Rapid Prototyping of Robotic Systems,” Proceedings of the2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation,8. "Bailey, S. A., Cham J., G., Cutkosky, M. R., Full, R. J., "Biomimetic Robotic Mechanisms via ShapeDeposition Manufacturing," Robotics Research: the Ninth International Symposium, John Hollerbach andDan Koditschek (Eds), Springer-Verlag, London, 2000
stoppeddropping after a while. Water at different temperatures were then assigned to different groupsand they were asked to take temperature readings at regular intervals for 10 minutes with a waterflow rate of 74 mL/s (70 gph) and an air speed of 1 m/s (as measured by an anemometer). Figure2 is a schematic of the process. Following the data taking, the students worked on several con-ceptual questions that prepared them for the analysis of experimental data and evaporator per- Page 15.243.7formance predictions that they would be doing as homework. The evaporator analysis involvedfinding the slope of the temperature versus time graph near time zero along
Engineering Curriculum.” Journal of STEM Education Volume 8. Issue 3. &. 4 June-December 2007. 15.4. Hadim, H., Esche, S., Schaefer, C., “Enhancing the Engineering Curriculum Through Project-Based Learning.” Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, 2002.5. Shuman, L., Besterfield-Sacre, M., McGourty, J., "The ABET “Professional Skills” – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol, No 94, January 2005, pp. 41.6. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.7. Paiget, J. 1970. The Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. NY: Grossman.8. Brunner, J., Goodnow, J., & Austin, G. (1956). A Study of Thinking. New York: Wiley.9. Bruner, J
inside Afghanistan and asrefugees outside the country, in conditions of poverty and despair, showed a keen interest in theeducation of their children".References1 UNDP (2000). Human Development Report 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.2 UNICEF (2001). State of the World´s Children 2001. New York: Unicef.3 CIA (2000). World Fact book 2000. New York: Central Intelligence Agency.4 Karlsson P., Mansory A. (2004). “Islamic and Modern Education in Afghanistan-Conflictual or Complementary?” Institute of International Education Stockholm University, 20045 Mansory A. (2000). Mathematics achievements among Afghan primary school children Stockholm Institute of International Education, Stockholm University6 Country Studies, http
, 2010 106. Asmatulu, R., Asmatulu, E., and Yourdkhani, A. “Importance of Nanosafety in Engineering Education,” ASEE Midwest Conference, Lincoln, NB, September, 2009, pp. 1-8.7. Kumar, C. Nanomaterials—Toxicity, Health and Environmental Issues, WILEY-VCH., 2006.8. Karakoti, A.S., Hench, L.L., and Seal, S. “The Potential Toxicity of Nanomaterials—The Role of Surfaces,” JOM Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Vol. 58, 2006, pp. 77-82.9. Brayner, Roberta. “The Toxicological Impact of Nanoparticles,” Nanotoday, Vol. 3, 2008, pp. 48-55.10. Allhoff, F., Lin, P., Moor, J., and Weckert, J. Nanoethics: The
theory into theclassroom experience. In high school Peter S. was an undistinguished student who made his first foray into collegeThe R. L. Moore Method with little idea of why he was there and decided to withdraw before his freshman classes evenR.L. Moore was one of the 20th Century’s strongest began. He subsequently worked in commercialand most successful proponents of a Socratic retail for several years. This led to a lifemethod called the discovery method. [13, 14] changing epiphany. He concluded he did notWell over 1600 PhD mathematician
computer program was developed by Bosch inthe 1980’s and is the program used by virtually all cars and trucks built since the late 80’s. TheCAN program is not particularly intuitive or user friendly to the inexperienced. To make theCAN system intuitive and easy to use the labVIEW program is used to operate the CAN system.The end result of this is a laptop screen with a user-friendly interface composed of mouseclickable buttons written in simple terms such as “on”, “off”, “system cool down” combined withreal time data including temperature, volts, amps, etc. Using the labVIEW virtual interfaces(VI’s) just about anyone with a quick introduction is capable of operating the fuel cell system. Another area where digital skills were essential was
cases when the acetone mass is attached to location other than the end point of the SWCNT cantilever structure. References[1] R. H. Baughman, A. A. Zakhidov, and W. A. de Heer, "Carbon nanotubes - the route toward applications," Science, Vol. 297, No. 5582, pp.787-792, Aug. 2, 2002.[2] M. J. OConnell, “Carbon Nanotubes: Properties and Applications”, CRC Press, 1st edition, May 3, 2006.[3] Y. Li, X.M. Qiu, F. Yang, X.S. Wang and Y.J. Yin, Ultra-high sensitivity of super carbon-nanotube-based mass and strain sensors,Nanotechnology, Vol. 19, No. 16, pp. 165502-165600, 2008.[4] R. Chowdhury, S. Adhikari, J. Mitchell, “Vibrating carbon nanotube based bio-sensors”, Science Direct
. 6 REFERENCES [1] D. Chubin, K. Donaldson, B. Olds, and L. Fleming, "Educating Generation Net-can U.S. engineering woo and win the competition for talent?," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, pp. 245-257, 2008. [2] J. Holley, "Generation Y: understanding the trend and planning for the impact," in 2008 IEEE 32nd International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), 28 July 2008-1 Aug. 2008, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2008, p. 2. [3] C. Jones, R. Ramanau, S. Cross, and G. Healing, "Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university?," Computers and Education
the United States (i.e., unlimitedeconomic growth reflected by an ever-increasing GDP). We also explored the sometimes subtledifference between “belief” and “knowledge.” In support of this lesson, the major courseworkcomponent was for the students to pick a sustainability-related belief that they held and write a“This I Believe” essay, modeled after the long-lived project started by Edward R. Murrow in the1950’s and continued today by National Public Radio[3]. This introductory section also includedlectures whose purpose was to present a common definition of sustainability which was referredto throughout the remainder of the semester.The Science of SustainabilityAfter defining sustainability, we examined it through the eyes of the natural
References[1] Tight, M. (2002). Key Concepts in Adult Training and Education 2nd. New York: Routledge.[2] Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning; Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, Inc.[3] Zull, J. E. (2006). Key Aspects of How the Brain Learns. In S. Johnson & K. Taylor (Eds.), The Neuroscience of Adult Learning (Vol. 110, pp. 3-10). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[4] Dick, W.O., Carey, L. & Carey, J.O. (2004). The Systematic Design of Instruction, 6th Ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.[5] Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19 (5), 2-10.[6] Gentner, D., &
framework.Refer ences[1] Norton, S.,”Using Lego to integrate Mathematics and Science in an OutcomesBased Syllabus,” The Proceedings of the AARE Annual Conference, Melbourne,Australia, Nov. 28 – Dec 2, 2004. Retrieved Feb. 01, 2010 fromhttp://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/nor04915.pdf[2] Jaksic, N., Spencer, D., “An Introduction To Mechatronics Experiment:Legomindstorms Next Urban Challenge,” Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, Session 2007. Retrieved Feb. 01, 2010 fromhttp://www.icee.usm.edu/icee/conferences/asee2007/papers/2026_AN_INTRODUCTION_TO_MECHATRONICS_EXPERIME.pdf 8[3] Wang, E., LaCombe, J., and Rogers, C., “Using LEGO Bricks to ConductEngineering
1 Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri S at Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Day Day (a) (b) Figure 4. Phase I of the X and R Chart for Dollars Paid for PrintingPhase II Control Charts: The phase II of the x and
enhanceinstructional opportunities at the reference desk as they can provide direction for referencelibrarians working with students whose research topics may be outside that librarian's area(s) ofexpertise.Educators and librarians have advocated the incorporation of information literacy instruction intothe curriculum since the 1970's [5]. This type of instruction has become increasingly importantin recent years, particularly to engineers and other technical professionals. While it isimpractical to try to cover all of the ACRL information literacy standards in a research guide,they are well suited to address portions of Standard One (Know) and Standard Two (Access) [1,4]. These standards also fall in line with ABET's Criterion 3(i) in which it states that
Assessment. For example, many student misconceptions of crystalstructure included addition or deletion of atoms in the unit cell. Not all misconceptions involvedadding or removing the same atom, but because these were similar misconceptions, hinting at anemergent theme, they were grouped into one category referencing extra or missing atom(s). Eachstudent conception was then assigned categories based on these emergent themes. This processcontinued for each student response to each question on each Topical Module Assessment. Thecategorization with emergent themes gave categories of misconceptions on atomic bonding,crystal structures, deformation, polymers, and electrical properties.Support for Student Learning SurveyAt the end of the course, students
- teamwork 3e - problem solving, and 3g - professional writing (we emphasized a memo format), and communication (particularly if there were teamwork issues). B. Student GrowthTo investigate individual’s growth over time, we looked at twelve students who completed at Page 15.499.8least four MEA reflections. Table 1 provides a summary of each student and his or hergeneralized responses in terms of the following: the process (es) that the team used, theindividual role(s) assumed in the team, a perception of the main targeted engineering conceptslearned, the professional skills he or she felt were used, and a characterization of the response
data collected in the second phase of the study will be extremely instrumental in further Page 15.79.14understanding faculty beliefs about entrepreneurship education and how these translate intoteaching practices.AcknowledgementThe authors would like to acknowledge grant support from NSF-EEC #0835992,“Entrepreneurship Education and Its Impact on Engineering Student Outcomes: The Role ofProgram Characteristics and Faculty Beliefs.”Bibliography:1. Katz, J. A. 2003. The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education 1876- 1999. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2): 283-300.2. Ohland, M. W., Frillman, S. A
new projects, simply because they cannot pronounce your name; it keeps us from getting the recognition we deserve. (Gonzalez & Musielak, 2002)The article goes on to report: Hispanic women also are underrepresented in higher education. Of the 39,400 women employed as S&E faculty and researchers at universities in 1997, only 1,300 were Hispanic – accounting for just 3.3 percent of all female professors and less than 1 percent of the S&E faculty in the nation. (Gonzalez & Musielak, 2002)Dr. Evelyn Hammonds, a pioneer in issues related to minority women on science andengineering and a professor at Harvard University is quoted as saying that she “was surprisedthat even in 2002, these women (faculty
mobile stations can be used anywhere in the world whereelectricity is available, making engineering education accessible to students without access tobenchtop measurement instrumentation. This might include junior-college students that wish toalign with university-level teaching efforts, or perhaps non-engineering students to whom facultywish to teach circuits principles but do not have the local laboratory resources to support.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation Course, Curriculum, & Laboratory Improvement Program underType I grant DUE–0942425. Opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the
‐90,000 <20,000 20,001‐50,000 50,001‐90,000 >90,001 Blank >90,001 BlankFigure 5 – Question 7) “Many universities have ‘no-loan’ policies based on family income. This means, if your parent(s) or guardian(s) make less than a certain amount of money per year, the university will you a scholarship. How much do you think the ‘no-loan’ family income is at Rice?” “No-loan” university policies displayed in 4 distinct brackets: $0-20,000 per year; $20,001-50,000 per year; $50,001-$90,000 per year; and over $90,001 per year. “Blank” represents the mentees which failed to complete the question. Blank answers for CHS
, J. Courtney, K. Dahm, J. Everett, C. Gabler, R. Harvey, L. Head, D. Hutto, H. Zhang, “Setting theMultidisciplinary Scene: Engineering Design and Communication in the ‘Hoistinator’ Project”, ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 2005, Portland, OR.6. S. Bakrania, W. Riddell, K. Dahm and L. Weiss, “Wind Turbines for Teaching Parametric Design,” ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 2009, Austin, TX.7. W. Riddell, M. Simone, S. Farrell, P.M. Jansson, “Communication in a Project Based Learning Design Course,”Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, June, 2008, Pittsburgh, PA.8. S. Wilson, K. Blauth, W. Riddell and P. Jansson, “RFID Technology for Universally Accessible Doors in PublicBuildings,” The International Journal of
in the U.S.,Black and Hispanic Americans represented 2.5 million (under 10.8 %) while White and AsianAmericans represented 19.6 million (nearly 87%). These percentages illustrate the vast disparitybetween the representation of White and Asian Americans and underrepresented minority groupsin the science and engineering workforce. The engineering workforce has an even more disparaterepresentation of underrepresented minorities with African American and Hispanic Americanscomprising only 4.7% of engineers, while White and Asian Americans represent 95%. NationalScience Board studies encourage the government’s leading science and engineering (S&E)organizations to consider under-represented groups as un-tapped resources with enormouspotential
, Washington, D.C., pp 57-64.9. Handy, S, L. Weston, J. Song, K. Maria, and D. Lane, (2002), Education of Transportation Planning Professionals. Transportation Research Record No. 1812, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp 151-160.10. Krizek, K. and D. Levinson (2005). Teaching Integrated Land Use-Transportation Planning: Topics, Readings, Strategies. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 24, pp 304-316.11. Zhou, J. and S. Soot (2006). Nationwide Survey of Transportation Planning Courses: Introduction, Findings, and Recommendations. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1956, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp 175-18312. Zhou, J. and L. Schweitzer (2009
toucheseveryone and to think critically about what they do on the job.Bibliography 1 Harris, Jr., C. E., Davis, M., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M. J., “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 4/19962 Abraham, S., Knies, A. D., Kukral, K. L., and Willis, T. E., “Experiences in Discussing Ethics with Undergraduate Engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 10/19973 Freyne, S. F. and Hale, W. M., “A Preliminary Survey of Engineering Ethics Courses Nationwide,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20094 Hole, L. D., Radebaugh, D. W., and Soschinske, K. A
AC 2010-1331: THE HYREV PROPULSION SYSTEM: A B20 POWER-SPLITEXTENDED RANGE ELECTRIC VEHICLE FOR THE ECOCAR CHALLENGEVincent Sabatini, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Vincent Sabatini is a second year graduate Mechanical Engineering student at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He graduated from Embry-Riddle with an B. S. in Mechanical Engineering, with a focus in Robotics and High Performance Vehicles. He is currently the Team Leader for ERAU's EcoCAR Team, the EcoEagles.Ryle Maxson, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Ryle Maxson is a second year graduate Mechanical Engineering student at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He graduated from Embry-Riddle with an B. S. in Aerospace
· Wave equation in the frequency domain · Propagation constant k 3. The boundary conditions · Incident and reflected waves · Changing reference system (x = l − d) · Reflection coefficient Γ 4. The scattering matrix S · Scattering matrix S of a transmission line · Obtaining Sij (general case) · The Smith chart 5. Practical transmission lines · Ideal vs. real transmission line · Microstrip line · Introduction to
minority program. Southern Economic Journal, 2005. 72(1): p. 78-97.15. S Russell, M Hancock, and J McCullough, The Pipeline: Benefits of Undergraduate Research Opportunities. Science 316 (5824):548 549, 2007. 316(5824): p. 548-549.16. M Summers and F Hrabowski, Preparing minority scientists and engineers. Science 2006. 311(5769): p. 1870- 1871.17. Office of Research-Labor Market Information, Connecticut Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). 2008, Connecticut Department of Labor.18. Office of Research-Labor Market Information Connecticut Forecast: Occupational Projections: 2006-16. Accessed March 14, 2010, http://www1.ctdol.state.ct.us/lmi/forecast2006-2016/ctforecast.asp.19. S