offering a minor or specialized courses, incorporatingentrepreneurial mindset (EM) elements into existing courses, running student competitions thatfocus on ideation and value creation, providing physical spaces to support EM development, andso on. At the University of New Haven, we employ both curricular and extracurricular activitiesto foster EM in students including integration of EM in specific courses in all four years ofstudents’ programs, a few competitions held throughout the academic year, a living learningcommunity with a focus on EM, and an entrepreneurial engineering certificate. These activitiesare summarized in Figure 1. Extracurricular activities are offered to all in the same manner butare optional. Through these activities
members, administrators, and staff hold positionsthrough which they have authority to determine policies and enact practices within academicinstitutions, students also have the ability to drive change. Student-led change is often sparkedfrom the ground up and benefits from students' perspectives and enthusiasm. These changes caninclude the building of new, inclusive, student-centered spaces to continue to move the workforward.In typical Engineering and Science educational systems, students often are not givenopportunities to build skills outside of narrowly defined, technical domains [1]. Experiences thatencourage students to engage in social justice and activist work are crowded out in manytraditional STEM programs. Oftentimes, spaces to
developed for the new student outcomes, which was preparedto ensure clarity of the student work evidence [1]. In a similar manner, Pejcinovic describes anextensive system of criteria and performance indicators that were adopted for an electrical andcomputer engineering department [2]. The faculty of a new engineering program at Angelo StateUniversity posited that a highly structured and clear assessment program is necessary for successin seeking initial accreditation, including the subdivision of SOs into clear and unambiguousparts for measurement of outcomes [3]. Other engineering faculty have described the substantialreliance on design courses for determination of student outcome attainment [4, 5]. The objectiveof this Work-in-Progress paper is
possibilities of thestudy with the audience.IntroductionIn STEM and Engineering in particular, calls for change in faculty’s pedagogical practices havebeen argued and supported by reflections on societal and professional shifts [1], [2], research onstudents’ learning [3], [4], and the imperative of improving the experience and persistence ofundergraduate students [5]. Faculty development programs centered on teaching practices arepivotal for the success of transformational initiatives. They promote faculty engagement instudent-centered instructional practices [6], i.e., methods and strategies that foster students’ activeinvolvement in knowledge construction and problem-solving, broadly known as active learning.Teaching practices convey the learning
ethicseducation and ethics educators are supported.Introduction and BackgroundEthics is an integral part of engineering, a profession that serves public welfare and operates atthe intersection between the natural and built environment. The university experience is criticalin developing professional and societal responsibility as future engineers learn both contentknowledge and professional socialization. Faculty members are crucial in these processes as theyinfluence engineering education through their course instruction and informally through theirrole as socializing agents [1]. Faculty members and students both shape and are shaped by theirenvironment. Within the academic environment, culture provides a way to view the values,decisions, and norms of a
consistencies as well as variations between the key terms generated for each Cand the opinions of the participating KEEN legacy leaders. These findings reinforce the necessityof building a literature-based grounding for the 3Cs framework to benefit stakeholders withinand outside the KEEN community.IntroductionEntrepreneurship has gained importance in engineering education as it provides the opportunityto develop the skills needed to address the complex problems faced by today’s society [1]. It hasalso been recognized as an important field for growth with significant investment from theNational Science Foundation through the National Center for Engineering Pathways toInnovation (Epicenter) program [1], its Innovation Corps (I-Corps) program [2], and the
engineering students to make informed academic and career choices in their late adolescence and early adulthood. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Stigma of mental health conditions within engineering culture and its relationto help-seeking attitudes: Insights from the first year of a longitudinal study 1. IntroductionColleges and universities are trying to keep pace with the increasing mental health needs of students.However, it has been documented that students’ attitudes towards seeking help are still a barrier to the useof available resources, and such attitudes vary across student subpopulations, with engineering studentsbeing less likely to seek help for mental health conditions (MHCs) than
increased complexity.MotivationA concept map is a visual tool used to organize and represent knowledge. Developed in 1972based on the constructivist pedagogy of Ausubel [1], a concept map is a hierarchical diagram thatshows the relationship between different concepts, ideas, or other pieces of informationoriginating from a key concept. Concepts are represented by nodes, and the relationshipsbetween them are represented by lines or arrows that contain a linker word or phrase thatdescribes that relationship [2]. Concepts increase in specificity as they progress further awayfrom the key concept. Arrangement of a series of related concept-links in a hierarchical chainrepresents a domain of knowledge. The relationship between different domains of
’ skillsin designing courses that are welcoming and effective for all students [1]. A definition ofdiversity from The Inclusive STEM Teaching Project course material is given as:“Individual differences (e.g., personality, prior knowledge, and life experiences) andgroup/social differences (e.g., race/ethnicity, class, gender, sexual orientation, country of origin,and ability as well as cultural, political, religious, or other affiliations).”This same source defines inclusion as:“The active, intentional, and ongoing engagement with diversity—in the curriculum, in the co-curricular, and in communities (intellectual, social, cultural, geographical) with whichindividuals might connect—in ways that increase awareness, content knowledge
other. The groups are Ecuadorian civil engineering students at Universidad SanFrancisco de Quito, a private liberal arts university considered to be the best universityin Ecuador. The survey was translated into Spanish to better understand the users. Theresults supply relevant information about how students perceive aspects of culture anddifferences that were created by Covid-19.IntroductionCulture plays an important role in shaping our identities and how we interact with theworld around us [1]. For Hofstede culture is what we call unwritten rules about how tobe a good member of society or a group [2]. In recent years, there has been an increasedfocus on understanding the role of culture in engineering education, particularly in theUnited
developing future educators; students who have completedthe program can serve as undergraduate course assistants (UCAs) where they help studentsduring their first-year engineering classes and have opportunities to develop and teachworkshops on additional engineering topics. From an overall perspective, the first-year programappears to be successful at achieving its goals; however, a more detailed analysis of thedemographics in the program could elucidate areas in need of improvement.Strength tests are commonly used by companies for team and personal development purposes.One such test is the High5 Test, which combined theoretical and empirical approaches into onetest to ensure both conceptual validity and real-world applicability [1]. It outputs five
industry. His research and teaching interests are in advanced manufacturing, industry 4.0, machine learning & vision, and autonomous robotics. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work-In-Progress: Integrating hands-on exploration into an undergraduate robotics and automation classIntroduction For many students to have a positive educational experience in science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) classes, it is frequently important to have students engagemeaningfully with theoretical, often abstract concepts through active learning-based hands-onexperiences [1]. This hybrid pedagogical technique in which abstract concepts learned in classare paired
, specifically how this programprovides a rich experience and help students to overcome knowledge gaps. We also exhibit howthis initiative fosters a comprehensive interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary context, diversity,and distinctive student engagement practices.IntroductionHigher education, especially engineering institutions are facing unprecedented challenges due tofast and rapidly changing societies and the growing gap between industry needs and curriculum[1]. To better equip the students, it is inevitable for engineering institutions to innovate andimprove their curricula and provide them with the necessary trainings that help in their career[2]. Among many changes, the focus is on adding new courses and introducing co and extra-curricular
innovation, and assessing engineering students’ agency to address climate change. Currently, MiguelAndres is working on a framework to support and conduct undergraduate research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Introducing a coffee break to improve exam performance and reducing student stress in construction majors Raúl Toscano1, Vanessa Guerra2, Miguel Andrés Guerra3*1 Undergraduate student, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador.2 Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, School of Architecture, Department of Urban
of time reading traditionaltextbook content. This leads to many students skimming or skipping the reading, hindering theirlearning [1], [2]. And this is despite students themselves reporting knowing that it’s important toread, and that reading will improve their grades [3]. Many students find engineering courses(including introductory engineering courses) challenging, and failure rates can be high. Forexample, one institution found average failure rates (students receiving a grade of D or E in thecourse, or withdrawing) of 23% for their introductory circuit analysis course [4]. Onlinetextbooks, tutorials and courses developed by academic institutions [4], [5], [6], [7] andcompanies [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] often have integrated interactive
focus on understanding and improving the learning that occurs in experiential, out-of-class activities for engineering students. Cassie previously received a B.A. in Engineering Sciences at Wartburg College (Waverly, IA) and her M.S. and Ph.D. de- grees in BME from the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Supporting the Development of Professional Competencies and Engineering Identity at ScaleWork in Progress PaperIntroductionExperiential learning opportunities have long been known to be important in higher education [1]as they have been linked to more successful recruitment and retention efforts and better
academia.IntroductionAttempts to understand research culture are not new, and there are examples of scholarsmapping, analyzing, and critiquing research culture in the sciences. Some examples are studiesranging from ethical concerns in psychology research [1], critiques of the underlyingphilosophical assumptions of scientific research [2]–[4], developing a framework for scientificresearch in the life sciences [5], to social and political critiques of funding practices in the STEMresearch enterprise [6]–[8]. Following these trends, scholars have explored the nature ofengineering and the cultural underpinnings that guide the field in both practice and training offuture engineers [9]–[13]. These works are often concerned with developing a deeperunderstanding of the
curriculum (one that is contextual to their uniqueroles and identities of people in their learning/working environment), individuals either: (1)change their environment, (2) change themselves, or (3) perform no or minimal action.Particularly, majority women (White American) tended to perform the first two strategies morecompared to women of color (Black American, Latinx, Native American) who took no or minimalaction regarding their surrounding hidden curriculum. More recent unpublished research has alsofound similar findings among self-identified men and LGBTQIA+ individuals. The findingsuggests that for situational hidden curriculum, the actions, and decisions one may take to facepower is contextual and vary by different gender/racial/ethnic
, connections, and creating value (3C’s) [1]. In the 2022-23 academic year, a team of laboratory and design course instructors at a large public universityin the Midwestern United States began to explore this overlap and surveyed students enrolled inthe laboratory courses about various aspects of the framework. This work-in-progress paperillustrates the overlap between the framework and undergraduate laboratory courses and presentsthe initial student survey results. The initial analysis shows similar results to previous surveys atother institutions implementing the framework.Entrepreneurial Mindset and Laboratory CoursesLaboratories are key learning spaces in undergraduate STEM programs. They bridge the gapbetween theory and practice whilst engaging
transferability of aneurodivergent codebook developed from social media content on TikTok. Neurodiversitystudies and acknowledgement of neurodivergence within diversity conversations are starting toemerge within engineering education research [1]–[5]. For example, a spike of publicationsmentioning “neurodivergent” or “neurodiversity” in the ASEE Peer depository occurred in 2020,which marks the early COVID-19 quarantine timeframe (e.g., [6]–[9]). This quarantine wassignificant for the neurodiverse community as many undiagnosed adults discovered throughsocial media (specifically TikTok) that they are, and always were, neurodivergent [10]–[14].While neurodivergent experiences are being included, fundamental understanding of what itmeans to be neurodivergent
resistant capitals. An 18-item survey was designed to connect engineeringstudents’ cultural assets to the ways they navigate their present-day lives as college students andforesee their future lives as engineers. The study recruited a sample of undergraduate studentsregistered in engineering majors at three institutions of higher education including a publicHispanic Serving Institution (Angelo State University), a Tier-2 research institution (JamesMadison University), and a Tier-1 research institution (University of Colorado Boulder). Thesurvey findings corroborate results found in other studies. Although our study is limited by asample size of just seventy-five students from three different engineering schools, the findingsshow two key results
Mathematical Preparation and Engineering PersistenceAbstractThis work-in-progress research paper is at the early stages seeking to further understand the linksbetween incoming engineering students’ mathematical preparation and their actual degreeattainment in engineering. The importance of mathematical achievement and preparation toengineering persistence has long been studied. This investigation seeks to further enhance thisresearch-base. A sample of 450 incoming engineering majors were divided into three differentengineering tracks by their university based upon their level of mathematics preparation:Engineering Track 1 (Calculus-ready), Engineering Track 2 (Calculus-ready with Precalculusreview), and Engineering Track 3 (College Algebra-ready
highlighting, etc.), stress, and interruption [3]. Theobjective of this article is to provide a survey of literature that shows current efforts that haveaddressed the need to showcase the importance of the technical interview process in academicTECHNICAL INTERVIEW INTEGRATIONsettings, and highlight the need to further alleviate the awareness deficiency of its overallimportance to CS and related majors who aspire to have careers in tech.2. Literature ReviewTo better understand the current efforts involving interview preparation in academia, notableactivities seen in literature are categorized into four descriptions below (Table 1). The followingsubsections provide example case studies and initiatives that fall into one of these categories,respectively
, are both described in Table 1. Table 1. Initial Themes Relating to Student Awareness of Macroethics in Aerospace Engineering Theme Definition Example Excerpt Sees Both Sides Students feel that there are valid “I believe it is a poor reflection on the (Acceptance) arguments on “either side” of community but is also important to ethical dilemmas within the field. understand that military spending has been fundamental to finding new advances that help the world outside of
developed a complete embedded system that enables usersto control the motion of the four joints - base, shoulder, elbow, and wrist, as well as the gripperof the robotic arm by simply turning the corresponding knobs on a custom-designed control box.They modified the 3D CAD model of the base, shown in Figure 1, to enclose all the electronicsand allow multiple ports and connectors to be conveniently accessed for battery charging,software update, and diagnosis. Figure 1. Base of the Robotic Arm (a) 3D CAD Model; (b) Base with HardwareThree MG996 servo motors were used for the base, shoulder, and elbow joints while two SG50micro-servos were used for the wrist and gripper. The PCA8695 PWM servo control board wasadopted to drive the motors and
, 2023Sustainability designation, introductory course, and a new textbook in anengineering curriculumSustainability is an important topic. If human societies don’t live sustainably, by definition, wewill experience drastic reductions in our population and/or standard of living and may cease toexist. Knowledge about sustainability has become a foundational component of a generaluniversity education and of being an informed citizen. Sustainability, as a subject of study, isincreasingly popular with students and is an increasingly relevant skill domain in the job market[1]. Given that undergraduate engineering curricula are typically very full of technical content,how is it possible to incorporate sustainability principles into an undergraduate
interests are on studentsˆa C™ problem-solving disposition and instructional strate- gies to advance their ways of thinking. Dr. Lim is particularly interested in impulsive disposition, stu- dentsˆa C™ propensity to act out the first thing thatLisa Garbrecht, University of Texas, AustinPhilip B. Yasskin ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Introduction Mathematics has historically been taught in ways that are a barrier to minority studentspursuing advanced STEM courses in high school and college [1] while current teaching methodsare heavily reliant on spoken and written language, which can be particularly problematic forbilingual students [2]. Consequently, too few underserved students such as
alsopresented.Introduction of Problem and NeedThe benefits of project-based learning have been well established, especially in providingstudents opportunities to develop their independence, responsibility, and social skills [1]. This, inaddition to the push of the Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) toinvolve students from multiple disciplines in solving complex engineering problems [2], haveresulted in the implementation of interdisciplinary team-based projects throughout engineeringcurricula.However, team-based project teaching can experience several instructional challenges,particularly when working with a large number of students and projects. Interdisciplinary teamformation can also impose difficulties as students vary in technical skills
on their impressionof the self-revised assignments to evaluate the efficacy of these assignments in three areas: 1. Student academic performance on exams compared to previous cohorts 2. Student perception of the homework and learning experience 3. Instructor perception of the assignment style’s benefits to students and ease of gradingOutcomes proved neutral to slightly positive in each area. Student grades remained similar toprevious cohorts, but struggling students demonstrated increased time spent engaging with thematerial during the revision process. Students reported neutral to positive perceptions of themethod, and instructors generally favored the approach for its reduction in time spent grading.Overall, we recommend other
. The purpose of soliciting feedback from theseinstructors was to learn how to best design a flipped course so that future instructors caneffectively use the materials for a flipped course with little additional work on their part.IntroductionIn 2013 a flipped classroom was described as “a new pedagogical method, which employsasynchronous video lectures and practice problems as homework, and active, group-basedproblem-solving activities in the classroom” [1]. A summary of flipping classes in engineeringand the type of activities used in class is provided in Ref. 2. Ten years after these papers, we donot think it is appropriate to call the pedagogical method “new” anymore, but the number ofpapers discussing the flipping of Dynamics is limited