Paper ID #9591A New Look at Involving Undergraduate Students, Real Life Applications,and Active Learning Activities in the Industrial Engineering UndergraduateCourse Delivery ProcessDr. Paul C. Lynch, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Paul C. Lynch received his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Lynch is a member of AFS, SME, IIE, and ASEE. Dr. Lynch’s primary research interests are in metal casting, manufacturing, and engineering education. Dr. Lynch has been recognized by Alpha Pi Mu, IIE, and the Pennsylvania State University for his scholarship
AC 2008-161: MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OF STUDENT PROJECTS INDEVELOPING COUNTRIESJim Chamberlain, Clemson University Jim F. Chamberlain is a Ph.D. student at Clemson University in Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences. He received his M.S. in Environmental Systems Engineering from Clemson in 1994 and has worked as an environmental consultant for 12 years. His research interests are in the environmental impacts of growing monocultural switchgrass as a biofuel. Jim is a registered professional engineer and a member of the American Society for Engineering Education. Page 13.913.1© American
inIT. Showcasing opportunities in IT or other STEM-related fields may peak students’interest and participation in computing.5,6,7,8,9,10A challenge to these efforts is measuring and quantitatively capturing the impact of theseefforts on students’ perceptions of STEM fields. Some researchers have sought tomeasure changes in students’ attitudes toward IT or CS using descriptive methods.6,9Although descriptive statistics are useful for describing changes among a given set ofparticipants, they have limited use in terms of generalizing to a broader population. Otherresearchers have developed their own instruments to measure changes in attitude towardIT or CS.4,11,12,13 These instruments often lack the evidence necessary to support thevalidity of
achieve higher grades,use cooperative learning strategies, and be intrinsically motivated, while boys are more likely toengage in competition and challenging activities, use problem-solving strategies, and beextrinsically motivated. Understanding the effect of gender on student learning and motivation inclassrooms is important to promote equity and improve performance in the Sciences.THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKLearning is a dynamic and individual process. It is critical for educators to understand how newskills are developed, new knowledge is acquired, and new behaviors, morals, attitudes, and valuesare instilled. Learning theories describe the structure of how people learn. Research has beenconducted to discover how people learn, and theorists have
of low enrollment and even more serious problem of high dropout in bothprograms. Researchers of science, technology, engineering and math, also known as STEM, [1]propose that one of the problem for student’s retention and recruitment in STEM program is thatthey are not able to associate themselves to this area. Institute of Electrical and ElectronicEngineers (IEEE) and the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) support engagementamong school and university students [8]. A pilot study reported in [9] of beginner studentsindicates that students in Computer Science and other related fields reason, engage and relate tothe knowledge content of the discipline.In [2] authors present a model named Supporting Collaboration and Adaptation in a
graduate research assistant in Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Clemson University in 2014. Her research interests are in undergraduate engineering student motivations and undergraduate engineer- ing problem solving skill development and strategies.Dr. Michelle Cook Page 26.878.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Identifying Why STEM Students Seek Teaching InternshipsAbstract To increase the number of STEM majors exposed to the teaching profession and applyingfor undergraduate
opportunities to assist theirdevelopment when these arise. A caring faculty can assist in bringing students closertogether through formation of learning partnerships, peer teaching, and sharing data andinformation with one another. It has been astonishing to see how working in collaborativedissertation groups has affected students. Long after their graduation, students recall themost significant aspect of their graduate program being the interpersonal learning and thedevelopment of collaborative sensitivity and mutual understanding among groupmembers. Learning how to acknowledge differences, arrive at consensus, set limits, andadminister fair sanctions to non-cooperative members are remembered and spoken of asmore memorable than either the formal focus
Likert response questionsfocused on the course format and themes that appeared in the pre research survey. The followingdemographic information was collected and used to create a description of the participants andthe format of the courses they took: sex, high school graduation year, living situation and theformat of the classes students were taking. There were other questions on the survey that are notused in this study.Data were collected using an anonymous Qualtrics survey emailed to students at the end of fall2020 semester. Participation was voluntary and the survey was anonymous. As an incentive forparticipation, students received a small amount of extra credit for completing the survey.After the surveys were completed, the datasets were
other factors. Workers hired after thenew scheme was implemented were on average 28% more productive than the ones hired in theold regime.Experimentation is an effort that requires collaboration among Science, Product, andEngineering teams which means it is typically multi-disciplinary in nature. Experiments typicallyhave three phases: the pre-experiment planning, the implementation and monitoring, and thepost-experiment analysis. During the pre-experiment planning, Science, Product, andEngineering work together to translate the business problem at hand into testable hypothesis,make ethical and legal considerations and submit the research proposal for review if applicable,define the details of the intervention, design the randomization, define
Paper ID #11249Digital-Storytelling for Apprenticeships in Sustainability Science and Engi-neering DesignDr. Tamara Ball, UCSC Baskin School of Engineering Dr. Tamara Ball is a project-scientist working with the the Sustainable Engineering and Ecological De- sign (SEED) collaborative at UCSC. She is the program director for Impact Designs - Engineering and Sustainability through Student Service (IDEASS) and Apprenticeships in Sustainability Science and En- gineering Design (ASCEND). She is interested in understanding how extracurricular and co-curricular innovations can support meaningful campus-community connections in
. Page 25.665.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Gendered Socialization During the First Semester: Contrasting Experiences of Male and Female Transfer/Non-Traditional Engineering StudentsAbstractAs part of a larger, multi-year, mixed-method research study that examined the attitudes,perceptions, and experiences of engineering students, this paper presents an in-depth qualitativeanalysis of 15 transfer and/or non-traditional engineering students attending a large urban publicuniversity located in the Southeast. Transfer students at this institution have shown a higher levelof persistence and higher graduation rate in comparison to traditional
phase of their careers ifthey could collaborate with an international team during their educational phase [14]. Moreover,international virtual exchange programs are not associated with high cost and investmentcompared to study abroad programs and are timely and more flexible; hence can be adopted asan alternative or supplement to study abroad programs [13].IVE allows for international and intercultural interactions among students, which substantiallylowers the barriers for participating in such exchange. It is clear that IVE has potential tocontribute to sustainability, and develop the ability to collaboratively contribute to the alleviationof global sustainability issues, such as climate change [15].The InVEST (International Virtual
thatpositively impacted instructor and student collaboration included comfortable and flexible(movable) furnishings, sufficient space between collaborative groups, an abundance of white-board surfaces, and digital technology for sharing ideas. Providing a flexible, open design allowsfor easier movement and encourages social interaction among peers and students, enablesstudents and instructors to share knowledge, and creates a feeling of community and engagement[6].Flexibility in the university classroom is becoming increasingly important to meet limitedclassroom space needs and support multiple learning and instructional methods. Studies haveindicated positive perceptions of students and instructors when furnishings allow for moving andadjusting to
(including their administration, faculty, and students), government, and industry to optimize thesystem for preparing and ramping up freshout engineers in the workplace. This initiative alsogoes beyond existing efforts to provide cooperative learning experiences and internships. Whilethese learning experiences are valuable, they are only one component of a larger system todecrease rampup time to competent workplace performance.MissionThe mission of this coalition is to reduce the time to competent performance and reduce thedropout rate for new freshout engineers by fostering collaboration among academic, government,and industry stakeholders in ways that create, implement, maintain, and continuously improvesystemic solutions
Improvement, National Center for Educational Statistics.Coles, A. (2011). The role of mentoring in college access and success. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. 2009. Mentoring College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50: 525–545.DuBois, D. L., Hollaway, B.E., Valentine, J.C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A Meta-Analytical Review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 157–197.Eagan, K., Hurtado, S., Figueroa, T., & Hughes, B. (2014). Examining STEM pathways among students who begin college at four year institutions. Commissioned paper prepared for
engineeringproblems, on the other hand, invariably involve information and skills associated with a variety ofengineering, mathematics, and physical science courses. When students do not understand theinterrelations between different subjects, they tend to be less motivated to learn new subjectmatter and consequently less able to solve realistic problems. Recognizing this problem, the pastdecade has seen several universities develop first-year engineering curricula that includemultidisciplinary integration.1,2 A previous paper from a multi-coalition collaboration provides acomprehensive review of the pros and cons of curriculum integration.3The NSF-funded Southeastern University and College Coalition for Engineering Education(SUCCEED) was formed in 1992 by
Paper ID #27100How Analogies Fit in a Framework for Supporting the Entrepreneurial Mind-set in an Electric Circuits CourseDr. Heath Joseph LeBlanc, Ohio Northern University Heath J. LeBlanc is an Associate Professor in the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Sci- ence Department at Ohio Northern University. He received his MS and PhD degrees in Electrical Engi- neering from Vanderbilt University in 2010 and 2012, respectively, and graduated summa cum laude with his BS in Electrical Engineering from Louisiana State University in 2007. His research interests include cooperative control of networked multi-agent
been assigned specific roles or functions to perform and who have a limited life span of membership [1]. Over the past few years, at the University of Oklahoma, a graduate course titled AME5740 Designing for Open Innovation has been designed, course content and assignments developed and a learner centric paradigm instantiated. Different facets of this course have been described in several publications – most recently in [2], [3]. In these papers, the authors explore the key question: How can we foster learning how to learn and develop competencies? In this paper we document our initial findings as to how far we have succeeded in facilitating students learning how to learn and develop competencies within this course
Science Foundation (NSF) established aDivision of Engineering to provide more focused support for engineering education and research.The National Academy of Engineering, a private, non-profit institution whose goal was toprovide leadership and advice on matters related to engineering and technology, was alsofounded in 1964.During the 1950s student enrollments in engineering programs increased at all levels, especiallyafter 1955. Undergraduate enrollments, including part-time students, rose from 142,954 in 1950to 205,765 in 1964.[5] Enrollments continued to increase through the 1960s as members of theBaby Boom generation reached college age. At the graduate level enrollment growth wasespecially strong. In 1950, the number of master’s and doctoral
success of our member’s industrial interactions.The mission has broadened to include aid in placing new or recent graduates in BME who havehad internship experience in selected industrial experiences. This natural growth will provide ameans to continue mutual rewarding interactions among students, faculty, alumni, and industry. Page 10.144.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationThe Alliance is a network of member universities throughout the United States that cooperate forthe benefit of
.Key:Participants: Numbers are given as undergraduates/total students, except for Classes 1–3, which had a graduate-only listing, though both undergraduates and graduate students were enrolled.Course Structure:A All students: 6 first-half exercises with checkouts or brief lab reports; second-half project (did not have to be Egg Hunt robot), design notebook for project only.B All students: 7 first-half exercises, no lab reports; second-half project is Egg Hunt robot; design notebooks kept throughout the semester.C Like B except, for graduate students only, 7 first-half lab reports and a 10-page design paper about the final Egg Hunt robot were required, in addition to the semester-long design
AC 2012-5247: A NEW VISION FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN INSTRUC-TION: ON THE INNOVATIVE SIX COURSE DESIGN SEQUENCE OFJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering
students unstructured information, which they had tosynthesize, encouraged them to start thinking about the process of invention.Top “likes” for the students were the feeling that they had gained insight into the past, or theprofession, and the physical handling of original documents. For example, one student explained,“I felt like a real archaeologist/researcher. Mainly I felt I received an experience that placed meinto the context of a historical analysis of the progression of technology.” Another studentcommented that exploring an inventor’s papers aided his or her understanding of the process ofinvention. “It was interesting to see a successful inventor’s first hand notes of what failed andwhat didn’t.” As we have seen in other classes
(p=.001) and Term GPA (p=.003), but with anegative correlation coefficient. The students that Strongly Agreed that the oral exam increasedtheir motivation to learn had the lowest GPA (Cumulative GPA = 3.23 and Term GPA=2.89).These 3 statistically significant correlations all indicate that students who may likely benefit frommore academic support had a larger increase in motivation following an oral exam. Hypothesesare presented for the reasons for student gains following oral exams, and proposals are made forthe roles of Instructional Assistants and instructors in future studies and classroomimplementations.IntroductionThe research question explored in this paper is whether a 15 minute oral exam can increasestudent motivation and performance
industry and the benefits received by educationalinvestments is limited and therefore the samples for this research are taken from industrialalliances, the case study of one company and current graduate students.This paper provides insight from members of the Buying and Information Group (BIG), astrategic alliance of twelve independent welding gas and supply companies located throughoutthe United States. The BIG group meets on a regular basis to discuss best practices within theindustry. While all of the companies within the BIG group provided information regarding theirviews on educational support, only half of the companies financially support education of theiremployees. Only Red Ball Oxygen provided us with permission to name its company in
© 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationFunding for the Akamai Program is provided by the National Science Foundation Science andTechnology Center for Adaptive Optics, managed by the University ofCalifornia at Santa Cruz under cooperative agreement No. AST – 9876783, and an NSFResearch Experiences for Undergraduates Supplement to the Center grant. The Maui EconomicDevelopment Board, Inc. Women in Technology Project is funded by the U.S. Department ofLabor as a pilot and demonstration workforce development project.Thanks to: graduate students, postdoctoral researchers and educators at the CfAO, especiallyAndy Sheinis, Jenny Patience, and Fernando Romero; John Pye, Mark Hoffman and WallettePellegrino of Maui Community College; Doris Ash
experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She is also responsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won the "Ameet and Meena Chakma award for exceptional teaching by a student” in 2014 and the "Engineering Society Teaching Award" in 2016 and the "Outstanding Performance Award" in 2018 from University of Waterloo. Her students regard her as an innovative teacher who continuously introduces new ideas to the classroom that increases their engagement. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
engineering education that emphasize active,collaborative learning environments over passive, lecture-based instruction. Future research couldfocus on further exploring the specific aspects of the supportive environment that students foundmost beneficial and investigating how these supportive elements contribute to long-term skillretention and application in professional settings. Additionally, longitudinal studies could assesshow the supportive environment impacts students' professional development and career readinessafter graduation.ConclusionsEngineering graduates are highly prized for their skill sets; therefore, engineering curricula shouldbe based on the principles of skill development to maximize student value. The key takeaway fromskill
be looking for college graduates, including engineers, with some sort ofinternational exposure. Hence, many universities and colleges have developed and aredeveloping methods to expose their students to international culture, business and engineeringpractices. Traditional methods involve exchanges of students and/or faculty between a U. S.institution and a foreign one. Types of exchange include: the exchange of graduate orundergraduate students with another institution for part of their education; the exchange ofgraduate students for research efforts; and, the exchange of faculty for purposes of research orteaching. Other methods involve the teaching of globalized culture, business and engineeringcourses at the U. S. institutions, and
ASEE.Ms. Elizabeth A Parry, North Carolina State University Elizabeth (Liz) Parry Elizabeth Parry is an engineer and consultant in K-12 Integrated STEM through Engineering Curriculum, Coaching and Professional Development and a Coordinator and Instructor of Introduction to Engineer- ing at the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. For the past sixteen years, she has worked extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school, parents, preservice and in- ser- vice teachers to both educate and excite them about engineering. As the Co-PI and project director of a National Science Foundation GK-12 grant, Parry developed a highly effective tiered mentoring model for graduate and