constructed to analyze what predictorconstructs contribute to a stronger identity for either engineering or science and how theseidentities influence career path goals and choices. This study shows that recognition from othersis a significant predictor of individual identity and that personal interest is a significant predictorof how an individual views BME. Gender was not found to influence professional identity orperception of BME in this study.1. IntroductionWhile biomedical engineering (BME) continues to grow as a discipline and the number ofprograms increase, there continues to be difficulties with defining BME [1][2]. BMEincorporates aspects of several science disciplines including biology, chemistry, and physics, aswell as traditional
as a frameworkfor promoting professional development and community building for graduate students.Building on the themes of the book, this program sought to promote reflection amongparticipants about the choices and actions that women can take to position themselves forsuccess—and encouraged exploration of students’ personal vision of success. Results of pre-and post-tests, along with observational data gathered by the facilitators, indicated that studentswere concerned largely by two topics: concerns about how to balance their career ambition andtheir goals for a fulfilling personal life (whatever that may be), and how to have positive andbeneficial relationship with mentors or advisors. Students also shared their challenges andfrustration
significant predictor of job satisfaction and well-being (Mor Barak &Levin, 2002).One of the most significant issues facing Black engineers is a cultural mismatch between theirown identity and the White male-dominated workplace culture (Dotson, 2008; Gibbs, 2008;Ross, 2016; Ross & Godwin, 2016;Hofacker, 2014). To combat that mismatch, some Blackengineers turn to personal agency to maintain their personal identity in the workplace (Ross,2016; Ross & Godwin, 2016).While the various studies cited above provide some information to understand the experiences ofBlack engineers in the workplace, considerably more work is needed to fully understandworkplace culture and how it impacts the career pathways of Black engineers. Most of thestudies
faculty in the California State University systemLalita Oka 1*, Kimberly Stillmaker 1, Constance Jones 2, Arezoo Sadrinezhad 1, Maryam Nazari 11 Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering, California State University, Fresno2 Department of Psychology, California State University, Fresno* Corresponding AuthorAbstractGiven the low representation of women among engineering faculty, it is important to ensurewomen in engineering academia have networking opportunities and resources necessary toadvance in their careers. To this end, an online survey was sent in April 2018 to engineering facultyemployed at California State University (CSU) campuses offering a degree in engineering orcomputer science. The main objective of this study was to evaluate
Paper ID #251684th Grade Engineering – Building Upon the Curriculum of Science, Math,and Creativity to Inspire the Next Generation of Engineers (Evaluation)Dr. John C. Oliva, Corteva Agriscience Dr. John C. Oliva has had a diverse career spanning the fields of academia and industry. John spent the first part of his career teaching mechanical engineering as a full-time faculty member, first at Kettering University and later at Grand Valley State University. He then transitioned to the corporate world where he has spent the more recent portion of his career as a professional engineer. John currently works as the Tools &
confidence.1. IntroductionChoosing a major is a pivotal decision in a student's academic journey, setting the course fortheir future career and professional development [1], [2], [3], [4]. Engineering is a cornerstone ofmodern society, driving innovation, solving complex problems, and improving the quality of lifefor people around the globe. As a field of study covering a broad range of disciplines, includingmechanical, electrical, civil, and computer engineering, engineering offers diverse career pathsand opportunities. However, the decision to pursue a major in engineering is not one to be takenlightly, given its rigorous curriculum and the demands of the profession. As a result,understanding engineering as a major is paramount, not only for
@uce.edu.ecAbstractThis study focuses on testing a pedagogical model designed to foster collaborativeentrepreneurship competencies in students pursuing technical careers. Entrepreneurship as a keycompetence for the economic and social progress of the country. However, the current training intechnical careers does not adequately cover the collaborative skills associated withentrepreneurship. The general objective was to test Moscoso´s pedagogical model that integratesspecific competencies, such as leadership, team communication, and team mediation, within thecurriculum of technical careers. The specific objectives focused on designing and proposing apedagogical model for the development of each of these competencies, comparing responses to aquestionnaire applied
Panel discussion on Regional Programs to Increase Participation of Women and Underrepresented Minorities in Computing: Experiences, Partnerships, and Lessons Learned1. IntroductionSeveral high-profile national programs aim to increase diversity of the computing andinformation technology workforce. Among them, the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women inComputing, now “the world’s largest gathering of women technologists,” is the best known [1].By bringing attendees together to celebrate the accomplishments of leading women in computingand technology fields, the Grace Hopper Celebration (GHC) helps counter many obstacleswomen encounter along their career paths, such as lack of role models
, and they highlight hidden narratives of the broaderengineering transfer student experience.These dynamics amplify the importance of a better understanding of how displaced engineersconstruct positively formed professional identities as well as what influences displacedengineering students’ abilities to author and reconfigure their identities as professional engineers.In response, and to guide future data collection and research, this scoping literature review isgrounded in social cognitive learning theory and seeks to understand the current state of researchin displaced higher education student identity development; synthesize the salient impacts ofdisplaced students’ expected career outcomes, social experiences, and educational
. Her aim is to motivate and increase the num- ber of students interested in pursuing schooling and careers in STEM-related areas. Pamela completed her Bachelor of Science at the Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico.Dr. Lily M. Wang P.E., University of Nebraska-Lincoln Dr. Lily Wang is the Charles W. and Margre H. Durham Distinguished Professor of Engineering and Technology, and Director of the Durham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction in the College of Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Her primary research interests are in room acoustics and noise control, particularly human perception and performance in noise, classroom acoustics, uncertainty in acoustic measurements
pursuingbaccalaureate degrees in engineering. Under a limited budget, three initiatives were designed tocreate a respectful and safe environment for students, faculty, and staff, to strengthen communitybonds and contribute to the cultivation of diverse student retention in the engineering college: aSpeaker Series, a Mentorship Program and Epic Fail. This paper presents the findings from ourformative evaluation of the EPIC program. Positive preliminary program results were obtained,suggesting improved self-belonging, self-efficacy and career interest in participants. Areas forimprovement were identified. It is the authors' hope that this work may provide context for otherinstitutions as they develop initiatives to move towards a more equitable and welcoming
havebeen documented to negatively affect the progress of women faculty in engineering and otherSTEM areas. This is presented with an iterative identification of elements through differentstages of the academic career, layered with variables that are measurable, and potentialapproaches for future modeling given existing research and the characteristics of the ADVANCEprogram. The challenges of modeling such a complex system are discussed, together withpotential alternatives as a first modeling approach using existing data from different sources.IntroductionFor the advancement of the engineering discipline in the U.S., it is paramount to ensure fairparticipation of all members of its diverse society [1]; promoting women representation at thefaculty
deficit growing invarious STEM fields. The need for scientists is growing beyond the rate of scientists enteringthe career market, and the promotion of these underrepresented students may help fill this void[4]. The current research intends to predict the academic performance of early engineeringmajors based on student beliefs and feelings about their education in addition to academicpreparation during high school. Prior research has demonstrated a correlation between low-income individuals and specific psychological beliefs that are relevant to student success: lowerself-efficacy [5], fixed mindsets [6], and a lack of sense of belonging in academia [7] are allinstrumental in understanding the underrepresentation of low-income students in
recognize that STEM is a path that is open to them if they want to take it. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Ten Years Later – Where Are They Now?AbstractThis paper explores the educational and career trajectories of the alumnae of an outreach activityfor girls. The outreach activity was originally developed using an integrated marketing approachto attract girls into engineering programs.1 The program, a two day, overnight experience forrising 9th, 10th and 11th grade girls, focuses on showcasing engineering as an exciting, creativeactivity, including activities developed from that perspective. Started in 2005 and held annuallysince then, a total of over 500 girls have
predominantlydescriptive. They also found weaknesses in the two or three-factor model because of the lack ofwidespread usage. Through factor analyses, Cnaan and Goldberg-Glen found that most motivesgrouped to one factor, suggesting a unidimensional scale. (Cnaan & Goldberg-Glen 1991). However, the unidimensional scale was soon challenged by multifactor models. Clary andSnyder found that different volunteers have different motivations for volunteering, and that onevolunteer can have several motivations (Clary & Snyder 1999: 157). They developed theVolunteer Functions Inventory (VFI) to identify the extent to which 6 sources of motivation,known as “functions” (Values, Understanding, Career, Social, Enhancement, and Protective),have the greatest influence
holds a B.A. in Mathe- matics from Pomona College and PhD in Cognition and Development from the University of California, Berkeley. Professor Stevens began his professional career as a mathematics teacher. For the past two decades, he has studied STEM learning both in and out of school. His research seeks to understand how and when learning environments are productive for people and to translate those findings into practical use in the design and resdesign of learning environments. In recent years and in collaboration with colleagues at Northwestern, he created FUSE Studios to reimagine STEAM education around the values of innova- tion, making, and collaboration (https://www.fusestudio.net/). Since 2012, FUSE has
NSF CAREER grant and reallyinspired my own research which seeks to connect rural education andengineering education through a specific focus on partnership and engagement.So we’re coming to this paper from a lens informed by research and practice, andI’m also a rural student, so I’m excited I get to be here to talk to you all moreabout this today. 3 4 (HOLD FOR AUDIENCE ENGAGEMENT) What is rural? • Question 1: What most aligns with your current job/role? • Research, outreach and engagement, practice, policy
a prosthetic limb from recovered materials ordesigning an electronic dance game pad. In one camp session, students primarily found out about the camp by being nominated bycounselors at their schools, with an intentional focus on recruiting students who might nototherwise be exposed to engineering. In the other camp session, parents signed up campers afterhearing about the camp via information sent through the schools. All students who applied wereaccepted to the camps. Identical pre- and post-camp surveys asked campers questions about theirknowledge of what engineers do, their interest in math and science, and what factors areimportant to them when choosing a career. Survey analysis showed that there were statisticallysignificant
caretakingstudents, I included this in the Discussion section. The breakdown of these themes is presented inthe Results, below.ResultsThis paper seeks to answer the following research questions: 1) What types of programs are offered to support community college students in engineering-for-transfer programs? 2) What aspects of these programs contribute to the success of students who have responsibilities like employment or caretaking of another person? Each paper had between one and four sub-themes, which were categorized into fourmajor themes: Social Capital, Financial & Career Capital, Flexibility, and Information Access.Table 2 shows the sub-themes which fall under each theme. Table 3 provides a breakdown of
contributes to women’s recruit- ment, retention, and graduation within the TCE. Thompson has mentored student leaders throughout her career, most recently with women-centric organizations in the college. She has served as a Chancel- lor appointed member of UT’s Commission for Women and a board member with NASPA’s Center for Women. Thompson has received numerous recognitions and honors, including the 2017 NAMEPA Out- reach Program Award, 2017 NAMEPA Wings to Succeed Award, 2014 Outstanding New Professional, 2014 NACADA Region III Excellence in Advising – New Advisor (NC), and 2012 Gold Winner-Student Health, Wellness, Counseling and Related-Excellence Award. Thompson earned a Master’s degree in business administration
paper, using dataand narratives from the United States and Iran as examples, I identify roadblocks to theengagement of women in STEM careers. Using the two countries with which I am mostfamiliar as examples is instructive, because this side-by-side comparison shows thatundesirable outcomes in the domain of women in STEM fields can and do occur forvastly different reasons, which I discuss.Keywords: education; equal opportunity; gender equity; labor laws; misogyny; sexism;women’s rights; workforce diversity1. IntroductionIt is generally recognized that the economic benefits of scientific and technologicaladvancement cannot be achieved unless the available workforce is efficiently and fullyutilized [1], [2]. So, far from being an issue that
outside of the classroom. She is fascinated with how people learn and develop in ways that enable them to thrive. Rebecca’s career began in environmental education and outreach to support natural resources management through experience at the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and as a Peace Corps Volunteer. A keen interest in research and evaluation blossomed during her time as an academic editor and researcher at ETH Zurich, which led to her PhD research in Geneva, Switzerland, where she studied the effectiveness of a mobile science learning laboratory. In 2017, she joined the Wisconsin Evaluation Collaborative, UW-Madison, where she continues to support education programs through research and evaluation. By
Paper ID #28426Black Unicorns: STEM Access for Black Student-Athletes in Non-RevenueSportsDr. Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Dr. Leroy Long III is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Fundamentals at Embry-Riddle Aeronauti- cal University in Daytona Beach, FL. Dr. Long directs a research team called Engineering and Sports Engagement (EASE). His research interests include: (a) equity and inclusion, (b) student retention and career readiness, as well as (c) students’ technology use, with a particular focus on STEM students. He has helped to lead research, funded by the NCAA
. Thomas served as the Virginia Community College System’s director for statewide Workforce Investment Act programs. She also served as Director of Capacity Building for the Cameron Foundation, and Deputy Director at the Crater Regional Workforce Investment Board in Petersburg, Vir- ginia. Over the course of her career, Dr. Thomas’ work has generated grants and contracts totaling more than $1.5 million.She was named a Southeastern Council of Foundations Hull Fellow, keynote speaker at the Virginia Career Coach Academy and Commencement Address speaker at Fortis College, Richmond, VA. In February of 2013, she received the Living Legacy Award from the Association for the Study of African American Life and History. She
Paper ID #25846WiCSE: Impact of a Women’s Support Group on Increasing the Percentageof Women Students in a Department of Computer Science and EngineeringDr. Jing Wang, University of South Florida Dr. Jing Wang is an Instructor II in the department of Computer Science and Engineering at University of South Florida. Dr. Wang is the faculty advisor of the student organization Women in Computer Science and Engineering (WiCSE). WiCSE focuses on gathering together female students who are majoring, or interested, in computer science and engineering to provide support, career guidance, opportunities to discuss relevant topics
for BRCCstudents. The Pathway scholars have been incorporated into the formalized College Peer MentorTraining program and participated in the Transfer Career Day for new transfer students.Advising for BRCC students was enhanced with the addition of a counselor who spends time atboth campuses. Survey tools were created to gain a better understanding of the transfer studentsat key points of their academic career and to assess the program. The questionnaire has beenadministered to students considering transferring to LSU and Pathway scholars.Scholarships have been awarded to three cohorts; Cohort 1- five students, Cohort 2 – sevenstudents and Cohort 3 - twelve students. The eligibility and selection criteria included earningpre-engineering AS
in engineering.Dr. Oscar Barton Jr. P.E., George Mason University Oscar Barton, Jr., Ph.D, P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at George Mason University A native of Washington, D.C., Professor Barton received his B.S in Mechanical Engineering from Tuskegee (Institute) University, his M.S in Mechanical Engineering and Ph.D degree in Applied Mechanics from Howard University. Dr. Barton joined the faculty of Mechanical Engineering Department at George Ma- son University fall 2014, after completing a 22 year career at the U.S. Naval Academy. His research focuses on the development of approximate closed form solutions for linear self-adjoint systems, those that govern the responses of composite
community culture [27].Erikson’s identity theories ignited the investigation of different forms of identity and submitted tothe complication of this process. Particularly, in STEM—research on identity suggest individualsbegin to form their identities, additionally, establish thoughts concerning career aspirations earlyas elementary [28-34].Role Identity/STEM identityDeveloping and establishing a STEM identity has influential significance in educational and careeraspirations for an individual [35-37]. Conversely, history demonstrates STEM identitydevelopment for marginalized students has been laden by a representation deficit in STEM—academia and the workplace. Positions in these areas are predominantly comprised of Caucasianmales [1, 38]. Research
bridges video gaming with engineering learning principles. His academic journey has been marked by mentorship and instruction, a legacy from his tenure as a STEM tutor and supplemental instructor. Artre’s discipline and leadership skills, finely honed during his time as a sergeant in the United States Marine Corps, now serve as the foundation for his scholarly pursuits. His ambition is to forge a career in academia, where he can influence the next generation of engineers with an educational framework that is as rigorous as it is innovative.Prof. Ruth Wertz P.E., Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Wertz has earned a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Trine University, a M.S. in Civil Engineering from Purdue
-related higher education programs, and STEM-related career pathways.Research to determine the impact of the program on students' interest, understanding, and self-efficacy towards STEM careers, as well as teachers and undergraduate students’ understandingof promoting change, will also be conducted. The Partnerships in Education and Resilience(PEAR) Common Instrument for students and teachers, and interviews with stakeholders arebeing used to support data gathering and program feedback. These data sources will be used forprogram assessment and future research.Introduction An interdisciplinary team of faculty, staff, and students at Illinois State University (ISU)is collaborating with Chicago Public Schools (CPS) and non-profit Community