Conference Session

Innovative Pedagogical Techniques in Engineering Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yang Victoria Shao, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Juan Alvarez, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Olga Mironenko, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

designed toencourage students to consolidate their knowledge and foster a deeper understanding of thecourse material by visualizing and summarizing the relationships between key topics. This typeof active learning also empowers students to take ownership of their learning by creating andrevising their concept maps.A fundamental aspect of our course improvement work involved gathering feedback fromstudents regarding their perceptions of the effectiveness of concept mapping in these courses. Ineach course, a survey was administered at the end of the semester to gauge students’ experiences,opinions, and reflections. Our findings from the surveys indicate that concept mapping isperceived positively by a significant proportion of the students

Conference Session

Virtues in Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

in chemical engineering and Russian language. Her research interests focus on the use of reflection in student learning, specifically for self-regulated learning and identity formation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Evidence-Based Practice: Looking Good When It Matters: How Engineering Students Regard the Virtue Ethics FrameworkIntroductionOur first-year engineering ethics unit contains an introduction to and guided practice in ethicaldecision making under each of four ethical frameworks: Deontology, Virtue Ethics,Consequentialism, and Utilitarianism. Students receive a briefing about each framework to learnabout its basic features and how to apply them. Prior studies with

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Himani Sharma; Jennifer Hadley Perkins, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Adam R Carberry, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

relationship [8, 9, 10, 11]. These findings deepen our knowledgeabout the complexities involved in effective faculty mentorship relationships and the importanceof treating mentorship as a multidimensional process.The sum of our findings highlight specific mentoring practices and programmatic structures toenhance the mentorship of junior engineering faculty and support several recommendations formentorship practice. Engineering departments, colleges, and institutions can leverage our initialframework as an assessment tool to evaluate their mentorship programs [15]. The tool could alsosupport self-evaluation, allowing mentors to reflect on their mentoring practices and identifystrengths and areas for improvement [11]. Further, faculty training based on

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON) Technical Session 4 - Engineering for One Planet & Sustainability Innovation

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University; SIDDHARTH SIDDHARTH, Plaksha University; Rukmani Keshav, Plaksha University

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON)

, our paper aims to offernew insights and recommendations for educators and institutions seeking to cultivate well-rounded engineers equipped with both technical expertise and a nuanced understanding of thehumanities.BackgroundEngineering education traditionally emphasizes the development of strong problem-solvingskills. This focus is reflected in the 2004 US National Academy of Engineering report, “TheEngineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century,” which links engineering withtechnology and the identity of engineers as technical problem solvers [8]. This requires engineersto break down large complex problems into smaller, more manageable parts [9]. By breakingdown complex problems into manageable parts, engineers can identify the

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Research Investigations in the Context of Design Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corey James Kado, Florida Polytechnic University; Elisabeth Kames, Florida Polytechnic University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

disciplinescommonplace. These systems are further broken down into specialized subgroups to divide tasksequally and ensure tasks are completed by those most qualified for them, such as materialsselection. Due to the structure of engineering design teams, it is important to maintain propercommunication between the various groups, as alterations in one group’s designs could affect othergroups’ designs.To better prepare students and meet industry needs, new innovative teaching approaches have beendeveloped, such as Project-Based Learning (PjBL). This method of teaching seeks to encouragestudents to learn during a project (Uziak, 2016). The closer a project reflects reality, the more astudent will learn by utilizing the theoretical knowledge gathered through their

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Casey James Keulen, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Christoph Johannes Sielmann P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Elly Park, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

students at remote cohort(s) may feel that they are an afterthought or budgettightening measure, while the students at the local cohort may feel the tensions for competingattention and support. It may be necessary to rebuild and redesign labs, tutorial activities, andexams for each cohort that reflect the needs and constraints of each learning context.Understandably, due consideration and careful planning is required on behalf of theadministrative staff and instructor(s). Table 1: Differences between conventional and multi-campus courses Factor Conventional Multi-Campus Implications In-class Attend to students in Attend to students in Increased cognitive student

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roya Salehzadeh, Lawrence Technological University; James A. Mynderse, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

, robotics, and human-computer interaction. To comply with such demand, a new course titled “Brain-Computer Interface” was developedat Lawrence Technological University (LTU) located in the state of Michigan in Spring 2024. Thiscourse integrates theory, cutting-edge simulations, hands-on experience, and working with dataacquisition systems in real-time to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of BCItechnology and its practical applications. The course curriculum covers the fundamentals of neuralsignal processing, hardware and software components, and real-world case studies. Thisinnovative course also reflects our university’s commitment to offering cutting-edge educationthat prepares students to meet future challenges and

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaditya Khanal, The University of Texas at Tyler; Prabha Sundaravadivel, The University of Texas at Tyler; Mohammad Abu Rafe Biswas, The University of Texas at Tyler

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

coreundergraduate class each engineering student takes before graduation. This approach introduces thesecritical topics to all graduating engineers, broadening the impacts across the overall engineering field.Hence, we implemented project-based learning (PBL) based on the framework proposed by Engineeringfor One Planet (EOP) for several undergraduate classes and one graduate class at the University of Texasat Tyler. EOP, started by the Lemelson Foundation and VentureWell, is an initiative to transform engineeringeducation to reflect the importance of sustainability in engineering education[5]. The goal of EOP is toensure all future engineers across various disciplines learn the fundamental principles of social andenvironmental sustainability. Thus

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dominic J Dal Bello, Allan Hancock College; Jens-Uwe Kuhn, Santa Barbara City College; Jason Curtis, Cuesta College; Christine L Reed, Allan Hancock College; Eva Schiorring, STEMEVAL; Sean Marc Gottlieb, Allan Hancock College; Sarah Hulick, Cabrillo College; Francisco E Jimenez, Cabrillo College; Gabriel Cuarenta-Gallegos, Cuesta College; Leila Jewell, Monterey Peninsula College; Thomas Rebold, Monterey Peninsula College; Marcella Klein Williams, Oxnard College; Justin William Miller, Oxnard College; Franco Javier Mancini, Santa Barbara City College; Joe Selzler, Ventura College

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

analyzing alliance Embedded Tutor data.In addition, the authors are indebted to Dr. Jane Lehr, Director, Office of Student Research,Director, CSU-LSAMP at Cal Poly, and Professor, Ethnic Studies and Women’s, Gender &Queer Studies, California Polytechnic University San Luis Obispo.The project team also appreciates the assistance of Briante Meeks, Grants AdministrativeAssistant, Allan Hancock College, for general support of the project.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNo. 2110112. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.7. References[1] Foundation

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division (MVD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason M Newell, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Bryan Watson, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans Division (MVD)

systems. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Academic Parallels from a Military Merit ListAbstract To explore the extent that military training can provide pedagogical insight, this research seeks todiscover relationships between classroom (on-campus formative assessment) and “real world”performance (summer training summative assessment) for Army Cadets. This analysis examinesdata from three years of one program’s Army Reserve Officer Training Corps participants. Weestablish what factors on-campus correlate to Cadet Summer Training success.The goal of this research is to spur a discussion about different assessments that could reflect real-world performance. Another goal of this

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

the ability to solve new problems. Interestingly it has been suggested thatdown shifting of this kind might the reason why students fail to apply higher levels of theBloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives [21].We have to learn to be able recognize our biases and prejudices in order to adapt and that maybe achieved through reflection [22].The most pertinent example of dissonance at the present time are the press statements of thespokesman of the Israeli and Hamas in the Gaza War. The same differences in presentation areapparent in media reports of what members of the Israeli and Palestinian public think.Deception and controlIt is likely that we will readily concede that propaganda is a form of deception. It is less likelythat we will concede

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session 2 - Educator's experience and perspective

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yuzhang Zang, Western Washington University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

experiments and activities that reflect authentic sci-entific practices and applications relevant to industry or research fields. For example, using thecommercial available software which students will use in their future career; integrating case stud-ies, simulations, or hands-on projects that mirror real-world problems and scenarios, alongsideincorporating modern technologies, equipment, and techniques used in industry settings. 22.1.3 Assessing student learning outcomesVarious indicators can be employed to assess and evaluate the learning outcomes, including stu-dents’ performance in laboratories, completion of homework assignments, and examination results.Designing homework assignments and quizzes

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 13: Technological Advancements and Applications

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Golnaz Mirfenderesgi, The Ohio State University; Syedah Zahra Atiq, The Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

, and then share their thoughts withthe class [24], [25]. Additionally, the use of discussion boards provides students with a platformto engage in collaborative and reflective discussions on course topics, thereby promoting deeperunderstanding and critical thinking [8], [26]. Furthermore, the "muddiest point" techniqueencourages students to identify and articulate the most challenging or unclear aspects of thematerial, allowing instructors to address these areas of difficulty directly. By integrating theseactive learning strategies into the course, students are provided with opportunities for peerinteraction, self-reflection, and clarification of complex topics, ultimately contributing to a moredynamic and effective learning experience in the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Hasler, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

required lecture nuggets. The hands-on part of the course is seen as the primaryfunction of the class, which is in contrast to cases where laboratory exercises are seen as a sideeffort of the class or something required for accreditation. Students are motivated by theavailability of time to work through technical issues as a community with their design systemphysically present.These project-based assignments tend to focus on higher-level learning, particularly synthesis /creation and reflection of the measured results. Each project is written in IEEE format with a hardpage limit (e.g. 4 or 9 pages) depending on the exercise particularly to require students tofine-tune their submission and encourage reflection on the hands-on experience

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Stewart Thomas, Bucknell University; Rebecca Thomas, Bucknell University; Michael S Thompson, Bucknell University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Figure 3). We haveadapted the language used in the literature, replacing the term ‘capability’ with ‘opportunity’ and‘functioning’ with ‘achievement’ since this makes the framework more approachable forengineering educators. The list below comprises our working definitions: • Opportunities (capabilities) are a person's real freedoms or affordance to achieve a life they desire, including their capacities—both innate and learned—and the beings and doings that contribute to their identity. • Outcomes are included since they represent the current paradigm. They are educational milestones that reflect goals of the program and processes students go through in engineering education. • Achievements (functionings

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Valentina Kuskova, University of Notre Dame; Nitesh Chawla; Sugana Chawla, University of Notre Dame; Danielle Wood, University of Notre Dame; Ann-Marie Conrado, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

summers (2022, 2023) of dataenabled researchers to examine the impacts of the C-EEEM on smaller subgroups by aggregatingthe two cohorts, thereby increasing statistical power.In the first year of the C-EEEM replication (2022), researchers began with data collectionprotocols and instruments developed in the original pilot at the University of Notre Dame, whichwere then modified slightly [1, 4, 5, 18-21]. Instruments included weekly check-in surveys forteam feedback, prompts to encourage reflection on the experiences, and the main post-internshipsurvey instrument. The original instruments reflected researchers’ consistent interest of theimpact of the C-EEEM on STEM-learning experiences for students generally andunderrepresented groups in particular

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 8

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University; Amy Trowbridge, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

students to showcase and reflect on their experiences. Amy has contributed to the development of an interdisciplinary grand challenges focused course and introduction to engineering course in both in-person and online (MOOC) formats at ASU. She is also actively involved in the ASU Kern project and Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), focused on students’ development of entrepreneurial mindset. Amy received the national 2019 KEEN Rising Star award from KEEN for her efforts in encouraging students in developing an entrepreneurial mindset. She is also a member of the current interim Executive Committee for the international GCSP Network, and mentors schools to develop GCSPs as part of the GCSP New Programs

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Reeping, University of Cincinnati; Aarohi Shah, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

Literature Review of Empirical Research on ChatGPT in Education.” Rochester, NY, Sep. 06, 2023. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4562771.[18] C. K. Lo, “What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13040410.[19] C. M. L. Phillips, J. S. London, W. C. Lee, A. S. Van Epps, and B. A. Watford, “Reflections on the messiness of initiating a systematic literature review on broadening participation in engineering and computer science,” in 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2017, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2017.8190482.[20] L. Krupp et al., “Unreflected Acceptance -- Investigating the Negative Consequences of ChatGPT

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Wood, University of Notre Dame; Hazel Marie, Youngstown State University; Faisal Aqlan, University of Louisville; Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame; Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

replication (2022), researchers began with data collectionprotocols and instruments developed in the original pilot at the University of Notre Dame, whichwere then modified slightly [1, 4, 5, 18-21]. Instruments included weekly check-in surveys forteam feedback, prompts to encourage reflection on the experiences, and the main post-internshipsurvey instrument. The original instruments reflected researchers’ consistent interest of theimpact of the C-EEEM on STEM-learning experiences for students generally andunderrepresented groups in particular; these integrated considerations informed by research onhigh impact practices for STEM motivation and retention, as well as those for facilitatinginnovation ecosystems and place attachment [3-12, 22, 23

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd Jeffrey Freeborn, The University of Alabama; Sarah T Dunlap, The University of Alabama; Debra Moehle McCallum

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

a reflection to a guided "3-2-1" prompt. After the tour of Brno, this prompt was: o What were the 3 most interesting pieces of Czech culture or history you learned from these sites? o What are 2 questions you have after these tours you would like to learn more about? o Share 1 picture of an artifact or piece of art that you found most compelling and give a brief paragraph of its history (or the artist’s biography). A similar prompt was provided after travel to Prague (and all other trips for the remainder of the summer). These reflections aimed to increase the active engagement of the students in the sites and history in which they were being

Conference Session

Spotlight on Diverse Learners

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Minkyung Lee, Pennsylvania State University; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University; Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University; Sam Spiegel, Colorado School of Mines; Ibukun Samuel Osunbunmi, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

Paper ID #43097Student Preferences and Performance in Active Learning Online EnvironmentsMinkyung Lee, Pennsylvania State University Minkyung Lee is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Learning and Performance Systems at Penn State University and serves as a Graduate Assistant at the Leonhard Center, an engineering education center at Penn State. Her academic journey and professional contributions reflect her dedication to the field of educational technology and design.Dr. Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Stephanie Cutler has degrees in Mechanical Engineering, Industrial and Systems Engineering

Conference Session

Wellness, Readiness, and Thriving

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Choi, University of California, Irvine; Natascha Trellinger Buswell, University of California, Irvine

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

healthcare spaces, our project aims to sharethe perspectives of engineering students engaged in an authentic activity and reflection. Theexercise allows for students to pursue any activities that they may associate with mental wellnessand their reactions highlight the impact that the activity had on them. This activity aims toimprove students’ wellness not only in the hour required but for the lessons to be carried onthroughout their educational and professional career. To better understand the goals and impactsof our intervention, we examine existing literature on mental wellness and how to share it as aresource.Literature ReviewAwareness towards mental wellness has an increasing importance placed on it for studentsstudying in higher education

Conference Session

International Division (INTL) Technical Session: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Juan Sebastián Sánchez-Gómez, Universidad de los Andes; Laura Eugenia Romero Robles, Tecnológico de Monterrey; Maria Catalina Ramirez; LIBIS DEL C VALDEZ C; Luis Alberto Cruz Salazar

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International Division (INTL)

addition to adopting inclusive teachingpractices that reflect the basic principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion [11], [12], it isimportant to ensure clear and objective language, conventional structure, and precise words.In the STEM field, the issue of teacher development with a DEI approach can be particularlychallenging. STEM teachers often encounter additional obstacles in identifying authenticgoals, objectives, and tasks related to DEI [13], [14]. There is often a lack of consensus orunderstanding regarding the definition of DEI activities, who should participate in them, howSTEM teachers perceive their involvement, and what level of support is appropriate.Educators are also concerned that DEI work is disproportionately shouldered

Conference Session

Student Engagement in Construction Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University; Bobbi J. Spencer, Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

negatively worded items tended to havea decreased agreement over that period. While the trends showed the expected movement thatwould reflect an increased sense of belonging to the construction industry, only two showedstatistical difference between pre- and post-internship scores. Item 8, “I am similar to the kind ofpeople who succeed in my career” was statistically significant at the 95% level (t(104) = -1.70, p= .046) and Item 13, “ I do NOT know what I need to do to make a supervisor in my companylike me” was statistically significant at the 90% level (t(104) = 1.49, p = .070). Strongly 7 Agree Agree 6 Somewhat 5 Agree Neither Agree nor 4 Disagree Somewhat 3 Disagree Disagree 2 Strongly Disagree 1

Conference Session

Programming Education 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Scott Pierce P.E., Western Carolina University; Chaitanya Borra, Western Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

Python in the introductory computing course. The course topics and learning goalsfor the course were not changed, and course lectures were only changed to reflect the change inprogramming language.This paper compares student achievement between classes that took the MATLAB-based versionof the course and those who took the Python-based version. Students in the two versions weregiven very similar exams and final project problems so that their achievement of course goalscould be compared.This work is the first phase of a longer-term project intended to assess the digital literacy ofWestern Carolina Engineering graduates. Students’ programming skills will be assessed as theyprogress through the four-year engineering curricula. A particular focus of

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL) Technical Session - Effective Teaching 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Manish Roy, University of Connecticut; Christa L. Taylor, University of Connecticut; Maria Chrysochoou, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

such as this. Instead, students were encouraged to reflect ontheir own strengths and challenges and make choices based on their understanding of theirabilities. Following every exam and the group project, the students were asked to respond toreflection questions, encouraging them to take ownership of their learning. For example, after themidterm II exam, the students were asked to answer the following questions among others: a)What was/were the most important factor/s behind your performance in Midterm-II exam? b)“How well do you expect to perform in Midterm-III exam? What is/are your plan(s) to achievethat?”The term group project was part of the Project-Based Learning implementation in the course andhad specific milestones for deliverables

Conference Session

DSA Technical Session 7

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isil Anakok, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kai Jun Chew, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Data Science & Analytics Constituent Committee (DSA)

can be effectively andresponsibly integrated into different types of engineering courses.Regarding specific courses, we found that people teaching first-year courses reported GAI wasinfluencing thinking about assessment. This relatively high recognition might reflect thefoundational nature of these courses, where incorporating innovative technologies could play asignificant role in shaping early educational experiences. In contrast, Capstone Courses, oftenbeing the culmination of academic programs, showed a notable number of acknowledgments.This suggests that even in advanced stages of education, where comprehensive projects andpractical applications are prevalent, the potential of GAI to influence and enhance educationalpractices is widely

Conference Session

International Division (INTL) Technical Session: Cultural Perspectives

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hashim Alyousef, Oregon State University; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International Division (INTL)

viewing knowledge as constructed by the knower’s interactionwith surroundings such as experts, world, and texts [5].Individual experiences have been shown to reflect how people perceive and make sense of theknowledge being handed to those individuals. Individuals under authoritative governments oftenregard educators and textbooks as the primary sources of unquestionable knowledge, influencingthe shaping of their personal epistemological beliefs. The same concept applies to the culture inwhich an individual experiences. For example, when considering Youn's study in Korea, theauthor emphasizes the contrast of the cultures between the two countries in individualism-collectivism, power-distance, uncertainty-avoidance, and masculinity-femininity. Thus

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xi Wang, Drexel University; Kathleen M Short; Christine Marie Fiori

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

which reflects long-term thinking, they could earn 3 pts. Table 2 shows thedesign evaluation rubric. The design work of each group was assessed by both the instructor andtheir peers following the same sustainable design rubric shown in Table 2. Peer evaluation is aneffective collaborative learning strategy [19]. Related to self-assessment, peer evaluationencourages students to critically examine peers’ work and reflect on the meaning of quality workin general, primarily when consulting a detailed rubric as a guide. Students themselves providefeedback to one another, while the instructor focuses on more targeted guidance toward alearning outcome. Through peer evaluation, students ultimately learn to better self-assessthemselves, which pays

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division WIPS 1: Projects, Teams, and Portfolios

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew James, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Juan David Ortega-Alvarez, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University / Universidad EAFIT; Cassondra Wallwey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Michelle Soledad, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research and service interests include teaching and learning experiences in fundamental engineering courses, faculty development and support initiatives – including programs for the future engineering professoriate, and leveraging institutional data to support reflective teaching practices. She has degrees in Electrical Engineering (B.S., M.Eng.) from the Ateneo de Davao University in Davao City, Philippines, where she previously held appointments as Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Electrical Engineering. She also previously served as Director for Communications and International Engagement at the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech