for the starter circuitry that heoffered for the previous version of the pulse oximeter.10 Opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the NSF. Page 12.115.13References[1] R. Brinkman and W. G. Zijlstra. "Determination and Continuous Registration of the Percentage Oxygen Saturation in Clinical Conditions," Arch. Chir. Neurol., vol. 1, pp. 177-183, 1949.[2] Design of Pulse Oximeters. Bristol, UK: Institute of Physics Publishing, 0-7503-0467-7, 1997.[3] J. Yao and S. Warren. "Stimulating Student Learning with a Novel 'In House
offering of the INSPIRE Summer Academies.Quantitative and qualitative assessments were used to ascertain local and national Academyparticipants’ views on how well the INSPIRE Summer Academy program objectives were met aswell as the quality and applicability of the curricular lessons for their own students. The aim isto understand the impact of the INSPIRE Academies upon teachers’ views of engineering andopportunities and challenges for implementing engineering activities in their classrooms.I. Introduction“More S&P [Standard & Poor's] 500 CEOs obtained their undergraduate degrees in engineeringthan in any other field.”1 This would lead one to believe that students would be clamoring to gainentrance into our nation’s engineering programs
intercultural opportunities. This will enable studentsand faculty to develop an entrepreneurial and international adventurous spirit to better succeed inthe new frontier of a globalized environment1.History and Evolution of Capstone CoursesIn the early 1990’s there was mounting pressure from industrial and educational leaders to makesignificant changes to the engineering curriculum to better prepare engineers for leadership whileproviding real-world experience1. This was a result of industry feeling that engineeringgraduates were inadequately prepared for the practice of engineering. Response from thesepioneers developed what has become known as capstone courses or programs. These programsbrought open ended design problems and often industrially
)‚ Worksheet for law of cosines problem using both special functions macros (2 pages)‚ Mathcad solutions (X pages)‚ Summary Sheet Excel/Mathcad (1 page) Page 13.321.10A pre-formatted summary sheet was given to the students to fill in as follows: S u m
/10569.2. Kolb, D. A., (1984), “Experimental learning: experience as the source of learning”, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.3. Freitas, S., (2006), “Learning in immersive worlds: a review of game-based learning”, Prepared for the JISC e- Learning Program: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearninginnovation/gamingreport_v3.pdf.4. Pivec, M. & Kearney, P., (2007), “Games for learning and learning from games”, An International Journal of Computing and Informatics Journal, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 419-423.5. Arango, F., (2007), “Tools and concepts to transform a multi-player computer game into a virtual laboratory environment”, Master’s Thesis, Stevens Institute of Technology.6. World of
with theengineering community, both academia and industry, the experience they had with theirrespective second job at an architectural firm and a civil engineering firm and the factors theybelieve need be addressed to make this concept effective.BackgroundIn the 1950’s the engineering students were taught by professors whom a majority of them wereengaging in engineering practice. These faculty members either worked as private consultants orworked with an engineering firm. The highest degree these faculty members possessed mayhave only been a master of science or master of engineering. As the focus of fundamentalresearch heightened and the availability of research funding increased during the early 1960’s,many engineering professors directed
= Induced Drag Coefficient RAC = Total System Weight S = Wing Area SFC = System Complexity Factor W/S = Wing Loading I. Introduction The AIAA Design, Build, and Fly (DBF) Competition brings schools from around the world to compete. Each year the teams design, fabricate, and demonstrate the flight capabilities of an unmanned, electric powered, radio controlled aircraft in order to meet a specified mission profile. This year the competition calls for a surveillance/attack UAV. The capabilities of the aircraft include carrying a large simulated fuel tank and four Estes rockets. There will be five stages of judging for the contest: 1) Written paper. 2
sufficient forfinding an equilibrium state. Press the Enter key or the Calculate button and the complete state iscalculated and displayed. The green background signifies input and the cyan backgroundindicates a computed property. The property symbols are also color coded – red for materialproperties such as the molar mass MM, blue for all thermodynamic properties, green for extrinsicproperties, and black for system properties34. Page 14.1187.6While the ideal gas table displays only hk (T ) , uk (T ) , and sk0 (T ) , the state daemon producesthe complete set of thermodynamic properties – v , u , h , s , g , and c p . To obtain mole basedvalues
. The total design and development ofboth software and hardware was a two year evolutionary process.I. Introduction The 68HC11 EVB (evaluation board) was made by Motorola, Inc. in the 1980’s.9 Dueto the effort of Motorola University Support program, this EVB was very popular in most ofthe universities and community colleges microprocessor/microcontroller related courses andprojects designs. When Motorola spin off their microprocessor division to Freescale Inc., 5 the68HC11 EVB became very hard to obtain. The alternative EVB made by Axiom is moreexpensive. 1 Another draw back is that the alternative board has limited functions as comparedto the original Motorola 68HC11 EVB.1,9 In order to extend the use of the 68HC11 EVB and keep
; however, there were students in each grade level who recounted how their groupnegotiated specific disagreements around design decisions. Consider, for example, the followingexchange, in which one student describes a disagreement about the placement of the catapult inthe 6th grade design challenge: R: Did you feel comfortable sharing your ideas with the others in your group? S: Yes ma'am. R: Why do you think that is? S: We was all buddies and stuff. She let us choose groups. We got to choose our buddies. I felt comfortable because, you know, there was really no target answers. It was just an idea. R: Was there a time when there was any kind of disagreement in your group? S: Yes. One time me and this
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 In 2 In 4 Institutionalizatio Institutionalizatio Very Institutionalize Freshman department department n n limited d s s in progress in progress In 2 In 2 Institutionalizatio Sophomor Institutionalize
market for the product(s) and other revenue generating streams was discussed (Outcomes 2 and 6). e) A clear recommendation as to whether the project should be considered in more detail was made. This recommendation was based on the I/O economic assessment, as well as on environmental and social measures. It was also made clear which process alternative(s) were viable, if any (Outcomes 1 and 4). f) The proposal was written in a logical format. There were minimal typos and formatting errors, the figures were clear and readable, and the references were cited correctly (Outcome 1).Students were assigned the prompt on the first day of class and were allowed eight weeks tocomplete the
, undergraduate design canvas can improve both student learningand successful product design.Another objective of the work is to develop a “meta-canvas” approach that is comprehensive andrigorous, yet customizable, such that faculty can develop a canvas to suit their specific course(s).Customizability for different faculty approaches is vital, but an underlying metamodel used alsohelps make it clear where the boundaries to customizability lie. Existing canvases, with theirinherent complexity, may be better suited to more advanced courses, and a customizable canvasapproach may broaden the impact of the canvas concept from first-year design through capstonedesign and beyond. Faculty may utilize different approaches or have different learning
s Exams Tutor Measure Integrity E Grading … P Graduate Assistants Computerized Scholar
strategies and style). Presumably,improved instructional support would mitigate the damaging impact of negative perceptions such asstereotype threat (Steele & Aronson, 1995) or avoidance orientation (Midgely, 2001) that limitengagement, and at the same time support student tendencies related to cultural norms and practices.Future research that can untangle the complex combination of these factors can provide new insights intohow to support UREM’s in engineering education contexts. ReferencesBenson, L., Kirn, A., & Faber, C. (2013, June). CAREER: Student motivation and learning in engineering. In ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Prince, M., Henderson, C., &
1. Arduino. (2017). http://www.arduino.org/, last accessed: January 26, 2017. 2. Cardella, M. E., Wolsky, M., Paulsen, C. A., Jones, T. R. (2013). Informal Pathways to Engineering. In Proceedings of the 120 th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA. 3. Carnasciali, M-I., Thompson, A. E., Thomas, T. J. (2013). Factors influencing students’ choice of engineering major. In Proceedings of the 120 th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, GA. 4. Conrad, J. M., Harkins, M. S., Taylor, D. B., Mayhorn, J., Raquet, J. (2015). Prospect for Success in Engineering: Assessing Freshmen Curriculum Engagement. In Proceedings of the 7th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference. Roanoke
-1-2419.The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not beinterpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Office ofNaval Research or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce anddistribute reprints for government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation hereon.Bibliography[1] Aurigemma, J., Chandrasekharan, S., Nersessian, N. J., and Newstetter, W., 2013, "Turningexperiments into objects: The cognitive processes involved in the design of a lab‐on‐a‐chipdevice," Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), pp. 117-140.[2] Cattano, C., Nikou, T., and Klotz, L., 2010, "Teaching systems thinking and biomimicry tocivil engineering
. References[1] National Science Foundation. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities inscience and engineering. Arlington, VA. Retrieved, from www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.[2] Crim, S. M., Iwamoto, M., Huang, J. Y., Griffin, P. M., Gilliss, D., Cronquist, A. B., ... &Lathrop, S. (2014). Incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonlythrough food—Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 US sites, 2006–2013. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 63(15), 328.[3] Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). Autism: the empathizing–systemizing (E-S) theory. Annals of theNew York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 68–80.[4] Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in cognitivesciences, 6(6
Paper ID #26249Knowledge in the Making: What Engineering Students are Learning in Mak-erspacesDr. Louis S. Nadelson, University of Central Arkansas Louis S. Nadelson has a BS from Colorado State University, a BA from the Evergreen State College, a MEd from Western Washington University, and a PhD in educational psychology from UNLV. His scholarly interests include all areas of STEM teaching and learning, inservice and preservice teacher pro- fessional development, program evaluation, multidisciplinary research, and conceptual change. Nadelson uses his over 20 years of high school and college math, science, computer science
see the value inthe process and prefer it to traditional, instructor-graded homework approaches and desire for theprocess to be expanded to more courses.References[1] “Chegg.com.” https://prod.cheggstudy.prod2.cheggnet.com/study (accessed Nov. 13, 2018).[2] L. Feldmann, “What, Why, How Of Homework,” presented at the 1998 ASEE Annual Conference, Jun. 1998, pp. 3.630.1-3.630.5, Accessed: Jan. 25, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/what-why-how-of-homework.[3] A. C. Estes, R. W. Welch, and S. J. Ressler, “The ExCEEd Teaching Model,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 218–222, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:4(218).[4] P. D. Gwen Lee-Thomas, A
financially remunerate faculty who partnered with us, andin fact several excellent researchers turned us down for this reason. (5) Courses housed withindepartments may be better able to prepare undergraduates for the rigors specific types of research(e.g. ecological field research), than an interdisciplinary course.With the resources given, the course instructor(s) worked hard to make this course fly. Strongefforts were expended in assembling a curriculum, accepting overloads etc. In the end, consideringlow enrollment and lack of support from departmental chairs, the interdisciplinary “Ramps intoResearch” course that the STEM center had tested for one year was canceled. We have committedourselves to finding more viable ways for promoting effective
] state, “spatial reasoning is a mental process that involves thinkingabout relationships between three-dimensional (3D) objects.” From the early 1990’s researchershave been studying the importance of spatial reasoning skills. Most researchers who have studiedspatial skills or their components state the fact that engineering, architecture, and most scientificjobs require people to have good spatial thinking skills [2]. People with high spatial abilitybenefit particularly as they have enough cognitive capacity for mental model construction.Researchers like Hsi et al. [3] have been recommending the need to introduce spatial skills inintroductory engineering courses and emphasizing the need for including these skills throughoutengineering
person primarily or even exclusivelyin terms of how s/he relates to other people in her/his network. For example, our colleague WeiWang in the preceding scenario is not simply the individual person Wei Wang. Instead, Wei is aplant manager who supervises eight engineers, he is his parent’s son, he is your colleague, etc.In line with this conception, Wei likely gives a great deal of consideration regarding hisrelationships with his employees. Focused on interpersonal relationships, it is likely that Wei willbe very hesitant to say anything negative about the engineers he supervises, as doing so couldpotentially have detrimental effects on their lives and careers. Furthermore, writing down hisopinions and ratings of the engineers in an e-mail could
outcomes were assessed for the actual course (F and J),but all could be considered. These assessment tools are representative examples, and moreexamples could be created. The new ABET outcomes would also be able to map similarly to thecourse activities. Student Outcome Potential Assessment Tool(s) Mathematics: cryptology proof; science: electromagnetic (A) An ability to apply knowledge of mathemat- side-channel attack recreation or simulation; engineering: ics, science, and engineering any of the laboratory assignments listed in Table 1 (B
University.Dr. Kenneth A. Loparo, Case Western Reserve University Kenneth A. Loparo is the Nord Professor of Engineering in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and holds academic appointments in the Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the Case School of Engineering. He has received numerous awards including the Sigma Xi Research Award for contributions to stochastic control, the John S. Diekoff Award for Distinguished Graduate Teaching, the Tau Beta Pi Outstanding Engineering and Science Pro- fessor Award, the Undergraduate Teaching Excellence Award, the Carl F. Wittke Award for Distinguished Undergraduate Teaching and the Srinivasa P. Gutti Memorial
dimensions of diversity explored hereare presented as a useful first step in the necessary and difficult process of reimagining ourengineering institutions, classes, spaces and research environments in order to create the roomfor different kinds and types of voices to speak and be heard. References[1] “Engineering - Field of degree: Women - nsf.gov - Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering - NCSES - US National Science Foundation (NSF).” .[2] E. Mather, “Facts and Stats,” University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science, Jun-2017. .[3] C. E. Brawner, M. M. Camacho, S. M. Lord, R. A. Long, and M. W. Ohland, “Women in
communication skills.Presenting problem solutions in a clear and concise structured manner is an important skill for the studentto develop. This provides an opportunity to practice the language of the scientific method includingspecifying the knowns and unknowns, the assumptions and the applicable principle(s), the solution, aninterpretation of the results, and a discussion on the accuracy and the recommendations for further study.Working homework problems outside of class, whether done individually or in a study group, is also anopportunity for the student to engage in a self-evaluation of mastery of the concept and whether additionalhelp is required to develop the expected level of mastery. Learning is enhanced when homework is goal-directed
research into engineering identity is the extent to which it reflects a commitment toengineering as a career [19]. Nora et al.’s model leads to the proposition that engineering identityis an intermediate outcome preceding the decision to reenroll, and increasing degree productivityhas become an important policy goal for the field of engineering [1]. Figure 1 depicts theconceptual framework of this study.Nora et al.’s model also identifies and organizes other factors that affect students’ decisions topersist in their studies [14]. These factors also impact student persistence. Differences have beenobserved among students based on their background characteristics in terms of their likelihood ofbeing retained, such as gender, underrepresented racial
engineering include a program at University of Arkansas that showed significantly higherfall-to-spring student retention and higher average GPA among students who were part of a freshmanpeer mentoring program [6], as well as Marra et al.’s study of students who participated in a peermentoring program and their subsequent feelings of belonging and intentions to persist in engineering[7].Summer Bridge ProgramsIt is well established that summer bridge programs work. Summer bridge programs have beenimplemented at many universities in an attempt to combat the high rates of attrition observed in STEMmajors, especially in students from underrepresented backgrounds in STEM [8]. Bridge programs takemany forms, with some focusing substantially on
, "The green report: engineering education for a changing world," American Society for Engineerig Education1994, Available: https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/The-Green-Report.pdf.[5] M. Klassen, D. Reeve, C. Rottmann, R. Sacks, A. E. Simpson, and A. Huynh, "Charting the Landscape of Engineering Leadership Education in North American Universities," in ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016: ASEE Conferences.[6] S. Stryker and P. J. Burke, "The past, present, and future of an identity theory," Social psychology quarterly, pp. 284-297, 2000.[7] K. L. Tonso, "Engineering identity," in Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds