,Europe, South-East Asia, Western Pacific, and Region of the Americas. The responses varied fromno reaction or continuing traditional teaching strategies respecting through social distancingprotocols on campus, to rapid transition to fully online delivery [1].However, something was definite and common in all responses worldwide: transitioning deliverymode from face-to-face to remote learning, which in many cases was different from the classiconline pedagogy. This imperative transition was the beginning of a new era in higher education toestablish or expand the essential infrastructure for online education. Inadequately resourcedinstitutions and underprivileged learners have been hardest hit due to limited access to internet andtechnology
has always been praised by students and department for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. To supplement his teaching and research, he has been involved in numerous professional societies, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published thirty journal papers and thirty-nine conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Structural BIM Integration, 3) 4D/5D BIM, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Innovative Construction Demolition, and 6) Carbon Footprint Analysis on Roadways.Dr. Rachel Mosier P.E., Oklahoma State University Dr. Rachel Mosier is an Associate Professor at Oklahoma State University
and other workload prioritiesmay have encroached into research time.Teaching In response to the pandemic there were immediate shifts in teaching responsibilitiesand the associated workload. Faculty found themselves rapidly moving to online instruction inthe middle of the semester [1]. The continued use of online education in the 2020-2021 academicyear meant faculty not only had to finish out the spring 2020 semester online but had to investadditional time in learning new pedagogy and technology in order to significantly revise theircourses to be delivered entirely in an online format. This was particularly challenging for coursesinvolving labs, clinical work, studio work, or community engagement. A subset of students (andparents) expressed
Dr. Cassandra Rutherford is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil, Constructions and Envi- ronmental Engineering. Her research focuses on geotechnical engineering and engineering education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021COVID-19 Pandemic Reveals a Major Challenge in Engineering EthicsEducationSummary of Work The COVID-19 pandemic has caused devastating impacts on our society, exacerbatinghuman suffering and upending thousands of lives. However, it is not solely a health crisis; infact, it is a “human, economic, and social crisis” [1] that requires combined efforts spanningdisciplines to solve emerging social problems. Engineers, with
research focuses on sustainable chemical process design, computer aided design, and multicriteria decision making. She also has extensive experience in K-12 STEM education and program evaluation and assessment. She has held a variety of administrative positions: 1) Director of STEM Faculty Development Initiatives-Clemson, 2) Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Sciences-Clemson, 3) Interim Director of Student Services-Oklahoma State University, 4) Coordinator of the Women in Engineering Program-Oklahoma State University, and 5) Director of the Oklahoma State University Measurement and Control Engineering Center-Oklahoma State University.Dr. D. Matthew Boyer
. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, designs research focused on broadening par- ticipation in computer science through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and disciplinary identity; 2) discipline-based education research (with a focus on computer science and computer engineering courses) in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women (specifically Black and His- panic women) in computer-related engineering fields. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
widely-used technology. He has several projects that aim to improve the security of the Web public-key infrastructure (PKI) by building on existing technology, and he is currently studying and improving the economic incentives underlying cryptocurrency. He is also interested in computer science education, particularly in the field of security, and focuses on designing courses that build students’ (1) competence in technical fields, (2) confidence to tackle important and interesting problems, and (3) context in non-STEM fields. Before coming to Olin, Steve was a postdoctoral researcher in the Cybercrime group in the Institute for Software Research at Carnegie Mellon University, supervised by Nicolas Christin. He earned
curriculum rather than treating it as an add-on.Evidence of successfully achieving student outcomes is measured with student surveys andquestionnaires.BackgroundOne of the key skills an engineer must develop is the ability to communicate. They mustcommunicate to their employer, their team, their customers, and a range of other audiences.They must communicate clearly in both technical (e.g. reports) and professional (e.g. emails)areas. While most engineering schools offer excellent technical communication curriculums,many schools presume that education in professional communication skills are handled by theEnglish department or developed naturally.Professional communication development should be a central component in our engineeringprograms [1
, attracting a diverse, technically- and community-mindedgroup of engineers from backgrounds currently underrepresented in engineering.How do we design programs that inspire these technically- and community-minded individuals?Although the number of program participants was small—hence the experience versus researchcategorization of this paper—initial survey evidence and observations from professionals inengineering education and diversity overseeing the program suggest the following consistent-with-research, built-in design elements contributed to its success:1. The program was designed to deepen the understanding of the connection between theory, research, and application, making the participants better researchers, teachers, and professionals.2
advanced materials [1]. The broader region includes two steel minimills, severalwire mills, automotive parts manufacturers, a pickup truck assembly plant, recreational vehiclemanufacturers, orthopedic implant manufacturers, defense plants, and many medical toolmanufacturers. In 2015, the university's chancellor heard from regional business leaders that theyneeded more employees with a knowledge of materials. This demand is supported byemployment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which defines the “location quotient” ofan occupation as its share of local employment relative to that occupation's share of nationalemployment. The location quotient for materials engineers in Indiana is 1.49, or 49% higher thanthe national average. [2] Similarly
increase in educational programs that preparestudents for data science and related fields. As of the writing of this paper, there are at least 632data science and similarly related degree programs listed on this recognized data science website[1], with at least 70 at the undergraduate level. While the total projected number of jobs seemslimited, there is one aspect that has become clear: the skillset associated with data scientists isbecoming a basic requirement within STEM disciplines. As such, while initial data scienceprograms have concentrated on graduate degrees, the growing maturity of the field, as well as therecognized need of its basic skills, has motivated more of a focus on educational programs at theundergraduate level. Driven by
learning utilize recorded videos, which are often well-received byGen-Z. However, previous studies have shown that passive learning videos with stagnant quizzesmay not affect learning outcomes or change students’ perception of learning [1]. Consequently,we conduct a systematic investigation of video platforms that enable active learning interventionswith clickable content and exercises to provide real-time feedback to students during virtual videolectures. We investigate several platforms to measure their aptitude for offering active learningopportunities. We develop a preference matrix with four main criteria: cost, interactivity, learningmanagement system (LMS) integration, and data analytics. We explore 53 highly ranked andpopular video
in shifting student bias towards inclusion in the three interventions. The mostpromising approach is student-led, where senior students worked to change the student culturedirectly.Introduction and BackgroundImproving diversity in STEM fields is an important goal and has been widely studied. It is well-known that students and professionals in STEM careers in the USA do not reflect the generalpopulation of the country [1]. For example, white men make up 31.6% of the general populationwhile they make up 51% of scientists and engineers. Black men make up 6% of the populationand 3% of the STEM workforce. The percentage of non-white and non-Asian people in the USAis 31.3% while the percentage of this sub-population working in STEM is just 12%. In
itspotential to get students to think metacognitively about their learning. In work related toreflection in engineering education, few have looked at creating validated surveys to evaluate thelearning outcomes of doing reflection. Other work in engineering education related to reflectionhas explored reflection, facilitated through portfolio construction, as a way to help studentsgrapple with engineer identity and “feel more like an engineer” without additional courses orexperiences [1]. But there is a push for the engineering education community to be rigorous aswe adopt the practice of creating validated instruments [2], [3].Additionally, reflection is also relevant to educational issues such as diversity in engineering andbringing broader
productive as well as create work-life balance.The typologies are statistically derived from cluster analyses on the parameters from the TTIreports of 251 undergraduate engineering students who took the assessment suite between 2017and 2019 as well as 93 graduate students from a selective professional master program. Clusteranalysis has been used in engineering education research over the last two decades [1] tounderstand the relationship between the future aspirations of engineering students and how theyconduct themselves while in college [2, 3] as well as to inform curriculum redesign [4, 5].These typologies are matched with generalized categories of engineering jobs to provide newinsights and techniques for strengthening the engineering talent
which participants present original research. Findings from data collected fromstudent surveys at the end of each semester are reported. Finally, the impact of transitioning toonline learning as a result of COVID-19 in the middle of a semester on a project that focuses oncommunity development will be shared.The program has 3 broad goals: 1. increase the number of students graduating with a major, minor, or master’s degree in mathematics, 2. strengthen the academic culture of the Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, and 3. strengthen relationships with the broader STEM community within and beyond the university.The project aims to achieve these goals by providing financial assistance to
handleambiguity inherent in navigating and solving engineering problems. In this short course participants willdevelop a unique metacognitive activity for their context using a backward design process of identifyingthe workshop participant’s intended results, evidence necessary to measure the result, and learningexperience to enable the intended results. In addition, fundamental information on metacognition,examples of metacognitive activities, and ways to support students as they navigate their metacognitivejourneys will be provided. Our goals are to 1) enhance the education of engineers through explicitmetacognitive training, and we focus on instructors for their enduring and multiplicative impact on currentand future engineering students, and
these processes relate, specifically, to a software venture. This paperpresents the overall instructional plan of the course and discusses each of the course’scomponents. The implementation of the project component is discussed, in particular, in detail.The design and implementation challenges that were encountered are discussed.This course was run in Spring of 2020 and started as an in-classroom course, later transitioningto an online course due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The outcomes of the course are discussed.Possible future enhancements are considered.1. IntroductionSoftware businesses have been responsible for tremendous growth and changes in society. Oncesmall startups, names like Google, Microsoft, PayPal and Facebook now are among the
this is the case.This study takes place at a highly selective public research university in the Midwestern UnitedStates. As can be seen in Figure 1, the aerospace engineering department at this institution doesnot seem to have a significant retention problem. The common pathway also appears to be quitetraditional; the vast majority of the students enter the department with their cohort (not as transferstudents), initially declare aerospace engineering as their major within the engineering college,and successfully finish their aerospace engineering degrees. However, these results do not answerquestions about who is joining and who is succeeding in the aerospace engineering program.This study follows the authors’ previous investigation of
down by gender: while Black women comprise 6.3% of the generalpopulation, they made up only 1% of engineering degrees awarded in 2016 (7% and 2.3% forHispanic/Latina women).These numbers are a result of both lower initial recruitment into engineering and lower retentiononce in engineering programs. While on average nearly 59% of students who enterundergraduate engineering programs graduate with an engineering degree within 6 years, only45% of Hispanic/Latinx students and 36% of Black/African American students do so (ASEE,2017). Thus, while these students were interested in engineering when they entered college, thesocial/technical dualism may play a role in retention issues by engendering a feeling of split1 Our use of the word minoritized is
, and mathematics(STEM)1. Initial findings from exploratory factor analysis are largely consistent with Yosso’sconceptual CCW framework but suggest some important ways in which the framework can befurther developed.IntroductionMuch of the research on educational inequality by race and ethnicity has taken a deficits-basedapproach, focusing on how students who are systemically marginalized based on racial andethnic status lack the resources valued by the dominant group that contribute to success ineducation, such as cultural capital [1]. While it is important to highlight stark racial and ethnicinequality that exists, this line of research tends to homogeneously characterize racially andethnically marginalized students as failing in the education
-college level sincestudents primarily make career decisions during this time. CTE curriculum is implemented invarious schools, including Title 1, to develop knowledge for students regarding technical careers.The construction, engineering, and management (CEM) curriculum is a type of CTE curriculumdesigned to educate pre-college level students about careers in the construction industry.Knowledge opportunities about the construction industry can contribute to a workforce shortage.Research suggests a shortage of future workforce in the construction industry within the nextdecade or by 2040. Assessing the CEM curriculum at the pre-college level is needed tounderstand how the current state of CEM education impacts current workforce trends. Based onthe
disciplines and hence organically produces a diverseenvironment of learners focused on interdisciplinary issues.Despite these distinct benefits, it is a relatively rare program as far as undergraduate computerscience programs are concerned. In this paper I describe the design of a coordinate major incomputer science program at Tulane University, discuss implementation details, and providepractical suggestions for implementing such a program in another university.1 IntroductionComputer science has grown into a discipline that focuses as much on solving problems in relatedareas as it does on its own research problems. While it is common to see interdisciplinary majorprograms and concentrations with fixed mainstream application areas (e.g
. In addition, we gatheredqualitative data to ascertain the successful delivery of the value propositions. Recent lab alumniand industry partners were surveyed to determine whether they received the value that waspromised and expected, as well as to discover why the lab was important to them, and what theyvalued most. We invited feedback from representatives of the university and school corporateand external relations programs, as well as the members of its advisory board to learn more aboutthe overall value the Lab brings to the university and its stakeholders.1. IntroductionEngineering students interested in pursuing careers in the healthcare industry are in want ofexperiential learning opportunities that allow them to test the waters and
disciplinaryknowledge and practice are often influenced by national history and culture [1]. Culture accountsfor the meaning that people attach to their world and its experience [2], including the values andnorms that dictate their behavior and interactions [3]. Hence, in an academic setting, culturedefines the interactions among the different stakeholders, including the interaction betweenstudents and teachers, which is a significant component of the learning process. While culturaldimensions have been used to study cultural behavior in diverse fields to improve learning [4],there is a limited understanding in the literature about what role cultural differences play inengineering differences. Mahadevan [5] contends that engineering education needs to
education.Keywords: cross-cultural study; creativity; culture of design education; cultural motivation.1. IntroductionStudents from different backgrounds carry with them different culturally-constructed values,practices and knowledge that are relevant to their learning of engineering. Students are moreengaged and more likely to be successful when their cultural ideas, practices and knowledge areacknowledged and supported in classrooms and college communities. But what if their values andunderstandings are repeatedly ignored or discouraged (Felder & Brent, 2005; Choi, 2010; Medin& Bang, 2014; Rivard, cited in Kizilcec, et al., 2017)? In the U.S., we think about “change lives;change organizations; change the world” (Stanford Graduate School of
, lack of role models, andminimal financial support to pursue a college education. One potential reason that has yet to beexplored relates to the cultural and spiritual barriers that could deter AI/AN people from feelinga sense of belonging in engineering fields. These barriers may create obstacles to progressingthrough engineering career pathways. Our research investigates the range and variation ofcultural/spiritual/ethical issues that may be affecting AI/AN people’s success in engineering andother science, technology, and mathematics fields. The work reported here focuses on findingsfrom students and professionals in engineering fields specifically. The study seeks to answer tworesearch questions: (1) What ethical issues do AI/AN students and
paper then discussesthe alignment of the program with the NICE Framework and puts forth recommendations toimprove the alignment.IntroductionThe field of cybersecurity has become a very high in-demand profession. Recent estimatesindicate that the shortage of adequately educated and trained cybersecurity workers will continueinto the foreseeable future [1], [2]. This lack of adequately trained resources has severeimplications for national security and economic growth, as every business these days relies oncyber and its related infrastructure [3], [4]. This critical shortage has resulted in efforts fromvarious sectors (e.g., Government, Industry, Academia) being accelerated and given a highpriority for resources and funding [5]. There is now a
in thequalitative analysis and themes developed were 1) integration of education and design, 2) fivediscourses, and 3) advice for novices. In addition to the interview, two sample case studies focusingon curriculum design from the literature was examined to understand how well they map to the fivediscourses of design thinking. Studies were selected if they discussed curriculum design orevaluated the application of a new curriculum design. Two studies were selected, and keycomponents related to curriculum design or utilization was analyzed. The beliefs and opinions ofparticipants on integrating the discourses of design thinking in curriculum design are presentedalong with findings from the comparative case studies. Limitations and future
University of Missouri System and earned a Faculty Achievement Award for teaching. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Curriculum Element: Economic Analysis Group Project Utilizing VoiceThreadObjectives:The curriculum element discussed may be implemented in an undergraduate or graduate levelengineering economics course. With sufficient instructor and/or TA support, the project may beimplemented with any class size. The primary objective of this project is to provide students theopportunity to 1) evaluate project(s) using a systematic economic analysis technique, 2) supporttheir recommended alternative with data, and 3