System for Large Load6. Fuel Cell Inverter Based4. Student AssessmentTable 1 Questionnaire for the evaluation of the Project-based Power Electronics courseQ1 Are the courses challenging and interesting?Q2 Have you learnt more than what you expected with the course?Q3 Is the team project useful to you?Q5 What was the level of “hands-on” feeling experienced the laboratory exercises?Q6 Please, provide an overall evaluation of the courseThe Power Electronics and Senior Project Design courses, using the new teaching and learningapproach was first time offered in theFall 2008 quarter, and 2009-2010 academic yearrespectively at the main campus of our university. It was offered in Winter 2009 quarter at one ofthe partner college. At the end of
they are used as tools for generating ideas and visual communication, especially when it involves the skill to generate quick and realistic sketches of an object or idea. He has also conducted research on how to effectively teach these skills to novice engineers.Miss Myela A Paige, Georgia Institute of Technology Myela Paige is a first-year graduate research assistant in the Engineering Design Research Lab at Georgia Institute of Technology. She is pursuing her Master of Science and PhD in Mechanical Engineering under the advisement of Dr. Katherine Fu. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Maryland Baltimore County in 2015. Myela is passionate about helping students from all walks of life
students elect the course as well. The on-campus version of the course has been taught for many years, with two meetings a week for a 15-week semester. Beginning about five years ago, the college began offering a master ofengineering degree that is not specialized in any particular engineering discipline. At that time, allnon-laboratory master’s courses in the college were required to include online sections that havebeen taught concurrently with the face-to-face sections. Faculty members teach both sections asone course assignment.The advanced engineering thermodynamics course had an initial enrollment of eight students at adistance who were pursuing their master of engineering degrees while employed full time andtwenty-eight on-campus students
AC 2012-3833: ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICE FROM COORDINATORS OFLARGE-ENROLLMENT FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING COURSES WITHSIGNIFICANT ACTIVE-LEARNING COMPONENTSProf. Jenny L. Lo, Virginia Tech Jenny Lo is an Advanced Instructor at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Va. She is currently Co-coordinator of a large first-semester introductory engineering course and has taught a variety of introductory engineering courses.Prof. Tamara W. Knott, Virginia Tech Tamara Knott is Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech. She is the Course Coordi- nator for one of the three first-year engineering courses offered by the department and also teaches in the graduate program. Her interests include assessment and pedagogy. Within
. Graduate student-led teaching efforts have been implemented in engineering disciplines[4]. Many works advance the premise that more strategic development of graduate studentinstruction skills is beneficial for the future engineering professorate. The majority of studentpeer teaching efforts have been conducted in laboratory [5, 6] or workshop settings [4]. Resultsindicate that peer tutoring has the benefit of enhancing content mastery for both the studentsharing information as well as the student receiving information [5, 7]. For the student teacher,practice delivering content in instructional sessions is important for quality and improvement [4].Further, many students have lower inhibitions asking questions of other students than of theinstructor
Session 1375 THE ABC’S OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION: ABET, BLOOM’S TAXONOMY, COOPERATIVE LEARNING, AND SO ON Richard M. Felder, Rebecca Brent North Carolina State University/Education Designs, Inc.If you are like most university professors, you were not taught anything about how to teach ingraduate school or when you began in your first faculty position. All you had to go on was howyour professors taught, but nobody taught them anything about teaching either. It doesn’t make alot of sense, but that’s our system. Teaching is too complex and too important a profession to let people do it
, medicine, andmore. For example, an “Engineering Education Island” virtual world was created via SecondLife [3]. This island featured a virtual laboratory with multiple floors and exhibits such as ACgenerators and DC motors. For creating detailed laboratory exhibits Second Life might be anideal platform. However, users must download software and register for an account, and thecreation of scenes is a labor-intensive task for the instructor. For simple, ready to use scenes tohost small group discussions Mozilla Hubs is a more efficient platform for both instructors andstudents.Figure 1: Mozilla Hubs poster session example. Two students are in a virtual forestdiscussing a draft of a senior design poster. Instead of having all eyes on all participants
, no. 3, p. S83, 2007.7. D. A Ahrensmeier, “Practical application of Physics Education Research-informed teaching interventions in a first-year physics service course,” Journal of Technical Education (JOTED), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 165-178, 2013.8. C. Wieman, N. G. Holmes, “Measuring the impact of an instructional laboratory on the learning of introductory physics,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 972- 978, 2015.9. L. C. McDermott and P. S. Shaffer, Tutorials in introductory physics. London, United Kingdom: Pearson, 2002.10. D. Ahrensmeier, R. I. Thompson, W. J. Wilson, and M. Potter, “Labatorials - a new approach to teaching electricity and magnetism to students in engineering
Paper ID #22886Work in Progress: Transforming a CourseDr. Polly R. Piergiovanni, Lafayette College Polly R. Piergiovanni is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Lafayette College. Besides chemical engineering courses, she teaches an engineering course to nonengineering students. Her current research interests include critical thinking evident in student writing and assessing learning in experiential learning activities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Work in Progress: Transforming a CourseThird year students at Lafayette College enroll in an Applied Fluid Dynamics and
workshops and continuing education credit-bearing courses • Counselors: Professional learning seminars • Administrators: Informative workshops• Industry support: ‘ • New facilities: the North Atlantic Engineering Laboratory • Support for high need schools: PSEG and National Grid support participation of high need school students• Aligned to the Next Generation Science Standards. 18 Since the pilot in Fall 2017…• The Engineering Teaching Laboratories have accommodated over 2,000 middle and high school students• More than 90% of participating students have
proceedings and journals, and three textbooks. Page 12.544.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Digital Design Project Competition using Advanced FPGA Technology and Hardware Descriptive LanguagesAbstractThe majority of the undergraduate engineering courses in hardware areas such as Digital Designsequence of courses covers theory and usually have integrated laboratory, evaluating students’knowledge through exams, home-works, and practical laboratory exams. However, there is still atremendous need for more innovative methods to reinforce the students’ technical and practicalknowledge, to meet all the learning
accomplished because instructors at the school come asSubject Matter Experts with a particular area of expertise gained by working years in industry ina specific technical area. This allows the school to develop that specific area, and usuallyincludes developing relationships with industry contacts associated with that area. Examples ofthis type of specialization are schools that excel in teaching composite materials, avionics, orrotorcraft maintenance. Today’s aviation maintenance training programs are complexenvironments.Future ConsiderationsPrograms that incorporate the four C’s can provide transportable skills to their students so thateach graduate will have a greater chance of becoming successful. Critical ThinkingA short definition of
Applied Sciences at UNC Chapel Hill. His research is concentrated in the application of Signal Processing to problems in medicine.Timothy A. Johnson, PhD Timothy A. Johnson holds a BSEd (1972) in education from Illinois State University, a MS (1976) in natural science from Chicago State University and a PhD (1983) in BME from UNC-Chapel Hill. Research interests include cardiovascular electrophysiology, sensors, instrumentation and data acquisition, processing and display. As an Associate Professor in Biomedical Engineering, he teaches linear controls and directs BME laboratory rotations.Stephen B. Knisley, PhD Stephen B. Knisley, graduate of Duke University (BSE 1973) and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (PhD
Session 3547 Transparent Anatomical Mannequin Upgrade Elaine M. Cooney, Kenneth Reid Purdue School of Engineering and Technology Indiana University Purdue University IndianapolisIntroductionThe Ruth Lily Health Education Center has had TAM1 (Transparent Anatomical Mannequin)since the mid-1980’s. She is a life size model of an adult female with clear plastic “skin” andorgans that light up. She is used to teach pre-school, elementary and middle school childrenabout health and fitness. For instance, each year hundreds of fifth graders come to the
years for 15 years.Seniors have been working on a large group project under the direction of a student chiefengineer for over 60 years.1 In the senior, unit operations laboratory, students work in pairs.This paper presents unscientific observations and anecdotes from many years of experience withteam formation and functioning. Methods for assessing teamwork will also be discussed.Observations on Team FormationThree methods have been used to form teams. At times, teams have been formed by student self-selection. At times, they have been assigned by the instructors. And, more recently, studentshave been permitted to choose a partner, and the pairs were paired by the instructors.In the unit operations laboratory, pairs are assigned by the
systems, specifically neural regeneration. Staehle is also particularly interested in chemical, bio-, and biomedical engineering education.Dr. Kauser Jahan, Rowan University Page 25.1467.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Weaving Sustainability into Undergraduate Engineering Education through Innovative Pedagogical Methods: A Student’s PerspectiveAbstractEngineering educators are continually striving to develop teaching tools that engage students’imaginations, provide a platform for integrating modern technology into the
Session 2793 Assessment of Providing In-Class, Hands-On, Activities to Virginia Tech’s First Year Engineering Students Jeffrey B. Connor, Richard M. Goff Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityAbstractHistorically, engineering has been a practical outgrowth of the need to solve physicalproblems. Engineering education was initially based in practical laboratory and shopexperiences, as well as traditional instruction in science and mathematics. FollowingWorld War II, engineering education in the United States began emphasizing theoreticalsciences and mathematics. Though a justified
environment, available in Macintosh and Windows versions,simulates a two-dimensional structural testing laboratory in which users can interactively buildand test model structures in quasi real-time. Dr. Frame provides immediate visual andnumerical feedback of the primary quantities of engineering interest: displacement, internalforces, and reactions. Like its predecessor, Dr. Beam [Miller and Cooper, 1995, Cooper andMiller, 1996], the interface has been designed so that Dr. Frame's use is analogous to using abasic drawing program. Model generation and manipulation is accomplished visually, usingreadily available tools and mouse actions. Dr. Frame is capable of solving quasi-static, linearproblems, with the notable feature that solution updating is
’ experience would be a valuable addition to the course. Allstudents had seen air conditioning systems; some had even worked with HVAC consultants andcontractors. None had seen a desiccant dehumidification system, and most were not evenfamiliar with the idea prior to that section of our course. Thus, while a laboratory set-up mightnot be typically feasible, even a field trip to visit an installed and functioning system would behelpful and interesting to most students. REVISIONS IN THE CURRICULUM MODULEAs a result of using the desiccant dehumidification curriculum module in its final form, severalrevisions were made to make the module more useful for a classroom environment. Some smallchanges for clarification were made in the
design, and education administration, with a majorconcentration in technology or technology education.Graduate students are afforded the opportunity to work and study with School of Technologyfaculty members who have national and international reputations in technical and manufacturingdisciplines, as well as areas of human resources. Many of these faculty members have prominentreputations as authors and scholars; over 70 of their textbooks and laboratory manuals are in printand utilized in technology courses throughout the world.This exceptional faculty, from the eight academic departments within the School of Technology,teach and conduct applied research in 52 individual laboratories, utilizing equipment valued atover 28 million dollars.Applied
disadvantage of being in the competition the first time(Solar Splash has existed for three years), A&T is also handicapped by having onlyone semester to design and build the boat, compared to the two semesters mostother schools devote to the project. To alleviate some of the time pressure, the Page 2.223.2faculty prepared some groundwork prior to the beginning of the semester.Chen, et al. Page 2 of 4Sufficient funding was solicited from four sources: the Jet Propulsion Laboratory(JPL), A&T’s College of Engineering, and the two participating departments. JPLwas attracted to the project because
course.The software and hardware used are LabVIEW and PCI-1200 board from National Instruments.LabVIEW is a graphical programming language that has been widely adopted throughoutindustry, academia, and government labs as the standard for data acquisition and instrumentcontrol software. PCI-1200 board is a low-cost, multifunction I/O Data acquisition card thatcommunicates with a PC through a parallel port. In our laboratory, they are used for measuringtemperatures, stress and other variables. With LabVIEW, PCI-1200 board, and signal conditionalcircuits, students may collect, display, and process the values of those quickly changingvariables. They may also see the variations of these variables in detail, which usually isimpossible without a digital
. Schmalzel, H.L. Newell, “The competitive assessment laboratory: introducing engineering design via consumer product benchmarking,” IEEE Trans. on Education, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 197-205, 2003.Biographical InformationROBI POLIKAR is an Asst. Prof. with the Electrical and Comp. Eng. at Rowan Univ., Glassboro, NJ. His researchinterests include signal processing, pattern recognition and computational intelligence, with applications to biomedi-cal engineering. He teaches wavelet theory, pattern recognition, neural networks and biomedical systems at Rowan.He is a member of IEEE and ASEE, as well as Tau Beta Pi and Eta Kappa Nu..RAVI RAMACHANDRAN is an Assoc. Prof. with the Electrical and Comp. Eng. at Rowan Univ., Glassboro, NJ.His research
shelter. Students on severaloccasions have stated that upon leaving the class, they not only learned the class material, buthad fun doing it.IntroductionStructural Materials, CVEG 2113, is a required civil engineering class at the University ofArkansas. The class is typically taken by second semester sophomores or first semester juniors.The course introduces students to construction materials used in everyday civil engineeringapplications. Approximately two-thirds of the class discussions involve concrete materials withthe remaining lectures concerning steel, wood, and fiber reinforced polymers. The classschedule consists of two fifty-minute lectures and one three hour laboratory each week of thesemester. The laboratory is designed to emphasize
) is illustrated with a representative model that shows a latent variable“Hands-on Aptitude” having manifestations in kinematics and laboratory grades, and hasa 100% loading on another latent variable “Concept Theory Aptitude”. Extension toother pre-engineering course grades is discussed briefly.Keywords: structural equation model, LISREL software, educational researchIntroductionStructural equation models (SEM) have been used to probe the aspects that concerncausative hypotheses/elements contained in engineering and technology educationalresearch datasets 1. The causative hypotheses/elements would convey causal assumptions,but not necessarily a model that would generate validated causal conclusions. Structuralequation model analysis is an
) is illustrated with a representative model that shows a latent variable“Hands-on Aptitude” having manifestations in kinematics and laboratory grades, and hasa 100% loading on another latent variable “Concept Theory Aptitude”. Extension toother pre-engineering course grades is discussed briefly.Keywords: structural equation model, LISREL software, educational researchIntroductionStructural equation models (SEM) have been used to probe the aspects that concerncausative hypotheses/elements contained in engineering and technology educationalresearch datasets 1. The causative hypotheses/elements would convey causal assumptions,but not necessarily a model that would generate validated causal conclusions. Structuralequation model analysis is an
Paper ID #49560A Workshop on ABET-EAC Accreditation EvaluationDr. Amir Karimi, The University of Texas at San Antonio Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio Amir Karimi is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kentucky in 1982. His teaching and research interests are in thermal sciences. He has served as the Chair of Mechanical Engineering (1987 to 1992 and September 1998 to January of 2003), College of Engineering Associate Dean of Academic Affairs (Jan. 2003-April 2006), and the Associate
research on Si and GaAs electronic devices and semiconductor lasers at the research laboratories of GEC and ITT and published numerous articles in this field. He was a professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Dominion University. He has advised 14 PhD and 16 MS students. He received numerous awards: Doctoral Mentor Award 2010; Excellence in Teaching Award 2009; Most Inspiring Faculty Award 2008; Excellence in Research Award 2004; and Certificate of Recognition for Research - NASA, 1994. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and a Member of the Electrochemical Society.Dr. Demetris Geddis, Hampton University Demetris L. Geddis is an associate professor and Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Hamp
AC 2012-5561: ASSESSMENT OF DISCOVERY APPROACHDr. Mysore Narayanan, Miami University Mysore Narayanan obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of electrical and electronic engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic, and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several ency- clopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional, national, and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized, and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a Senior Member of IEEE and is a member
: July 1,2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.boisestate.edu/coronavirus-response/campus-reintegration-guide/[3] L. D. Feisel, and A. J. Rosa, "The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education." Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, Jan. 2005. [Online]. Available: WorldCat Discovery,https://boisestate.on.worldcat.org. [Accessed Jun. 16, 2020].[4] S. Yen, Y. Lo, A. Lee, and J. Enriquez, "Learning Online, Offline, and In-Between: Comparing StudentAcademic Outcomes and Course Satisfaction in Face-To-Face, Online, and Blended Teaching Modalities."Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2141–2153. Mar. 2018. [Online]. Available: WorldCatDiscovery, https://boisestate.on.worldcat.org