not good at • Challenge-The project assignments force the students to strive and open their minds, which allows endless possibilities and outcomes • Variety-There is a paper, presentation, assessment, and reflector’s report due with every project, which gives each student practice in the areas that are most important for engineering work. • The distance teaching by Dr. Neuman from Memphis was excellent • Group work is important to have in the classroom setting. – Our “people skills” improved • Assessments were a strength of the course because it
Session 3225 Striking a Balance: Bringing Engineering Disciplines Together for a Senior Design Sequence Robert B. Stone and Nancy Hubing Basic Engineering Department, University of Missouri-Rolla E-mail: rstone@umr.edu and nhubing@umr.eduAbstractHistorically, the essence of engineering is the act of creating products to improve society. Morethan ever, today’s engineers are expected to work across disciplines to design increasinglycomplicated products. At the University of Missouri-Rolla, we have introduced aninterdisciplinary design curriculum to
Session 3266 IME, Inc. – A New Course for Integrating Design, Manufacturing, and Production into the Engineering Curriculum Timothy W. Simpson, D. J. Medeiros, Sanjay Joshi, Amine Lehtihet, Richard A. Wysk The Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstractIME, Inc. is a new two-semester undergraduate course in which multidisciplinary student teamsfirst design and prototype new products, and then produce them in volume. The objective in thecourse is to provide students with manufacturing and production experiences analogous to thoseobtained by an English student
, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, CivilEngineering, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and Math. CSULA faculty train fellows through apreparation course and workshops in order to improve communication, collaboration, andteaching skills. Furthermore, a strong partnership between CSULA, LAUSD, local industry, andminority serving organizations such as Great Minds in STEM and MESA has been established inorder to achieve program goals. Broader impacts include increasing the number ofunderrepresented minority students who pursue college degrees and careers in STEM and tostrengthen the research and teaching skills of the graduate fellows. At the time these demonstrations and activities were performed, the program consisted ofeight fellows
a product, but also the global and societal contextthat influenced its development. It also provides a context for studying the environmental impactof a product by considering, for example, the energy and material usage throughout the life cycleof the product. When implemented in an engineering classroom, product archaeology allowsstudents to place themselves in the minds of designers during the time a specific product wasdeveloped to try to re-create the global and local conditions that led to its development.2 Paradigm DevelopmentIn order to further develop the archaeological analogy, we consider the four primary phases andtheir relevance in product design. The site preparation phase of archaeology corresponds tobackground research that
fields.Mr. Miles Griffin Evans,Dr. Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette Johannes Strobel is Director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning and As- sistant Professor of engineering education and learning design and technology at Purdue University. NSF and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning, the measurement and support of change of ”habits of mind,” particularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning of complexity
learning outcomes achieved inthis area.However, expanding LTS program goals can have resource implications and this is obviously akey concern for engineering schools. In the LTS programs we are familiar with there are alwaystrade-offs and compromises that must be made. The dimensions in the model are meant to Page 25.72.14identify the major causes of the resource implications (i.e. number of students involved, locationof the projects, etc.) so that a discussion can take place around balancing of resources witheducational learning outcomes and student experience in mind. The model can be used toprioritize the goals of the program and scope
to brainstorm, develop and compare lesson plans. Formany teachers, the experience was beneficial for the connection to othertechnology/engineering-minded teachers, the resulting implementation plans, and therelevancy of professional development. Each teacher developed an action plan toimplement in their course when they go back to their schools in the following school year.In addition to the two-week workshop, teachers were required to attend two callbacksessions to share experiences, both successes and challenges that they had faced duringimplementation.3 PurposeOur purpose in this study is to examine the impact of the CAPSULE PD within theconfines of STEM high school classrooms. Specifically, this paper addresses thefollowing research
AC 2012-4035: PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING IN A PRE-SERVICE TECH-NOLOGY AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION COURSEDr. Nicholas Massa, Springfield Technical Community College Nicholas Massa is a Full Professor in the Laser Electro-Optics Technology Department at Springfield Technical Community College in Springfield, Mass. He holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engi- neering from Western New England College and a Ph.D. in educational leadership/adult learning from the University of Connecticut. Massa is currently Co-principal Investigator on the NSF-ATE STEM PBL Project of the New England Board of Higher Education.Dr. Michele Dischino, Central Connecticut State UniversityMs. Judith Franzosa Donnelly, Three Rivers Community
AC 2012-3625: REPRESENTATION GUIDANCE WITH ABSTRACT ANDCONTEXTUALIZED REPRESENTATION: EFFECTS ON ENGINEERINGLEARNING PERFORMANCE IN TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY EDU-CATIONDr. Gamze Ozogul, Arizona State University Gamze Ozogul is an Assistant Research Scientist in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU). She received the undergraduate degree in Curriculum and Instruction in 2000 from Hacettepe University, and the M.S degree in Computer Education and Instructional Technology in 2002 from Middle East Technical University. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Technology in 2006 from ASU. She completed a Postdoctoral Research fellowship in the Department of Electrical Engineering at ASU in
: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2).3. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. 90, 85, 86.4. Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100, p.90.5. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals; Handbook I: Cognitive Domain New York: Longmans, Green.6. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking
AC 2012-5224: TEACHING-TO-LEARN SESSIONS TO ACHIEVE SUB-JECT RELEVANCE IN AN INTRODUCTION TO BIOMEDICAL ENGI-NEERING COURSEDr. Steve Warren, Kansas State University Steve Warren received a B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering from Kansas State University in 1989 and 1991, respectively, followed by a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Texas, Austin, in 1994. Warren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Kansas State University. Prior to joining KSU in Aug. 1999, Warren was a Principal Member of the technical staff at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, N.M. He directs the KSU Medical Com- ponent Design Laboratory, a facility partially
Session 2230 Learning Essays and the Reflective Learner: Supporting Reflection in Engineering Design Education Jennifer Turns, Wendy Newstetter, Janet K. Allen, and Farrokh Mistree Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstract: Learning engineering design requires more than simply having design experiences.Design experiences provide a context for students to practice design skills and an opportunity forstudents to learn deep lessons about the nature of engineering design. Reflection on theexperiences is necessary in order to recognize and realize these lessons. Student questions like“Why do we
professional [1]. With this in mind, the authors embarked on a (re)vision to anexisting multidisciplinary capstone course to develop a truly integrated approach to writing in thedisciplines [1] with the development of sociotechnical engineers in mind.This paper shares how the authors have found opportunities to meet these professional needs byintegrating a faculty member with a Ph.D. in English and background in writing pedagogy andtechnical communication as a member of the instructional team alongside the course’s existingengineering faculty. We will share the modifications made to the course, the rationale for thosechanges, and some of the preliminary data regarding student perception of the development ofboth their collaborative and technical
follow up of a reflectionsurvey tailored to the specific activity. The research team identifies how these tasks fall into oneof three categories, including why engineers should care about diversity, how to work on diverseteams, and keeping in mind the stakeholders of engineering design problems. The results of thisstudy showed that over the course of the semester, students felt they could create a moreinclusive and understanding culture when working on a diverse team of engineers. With the useof the included activities to encourage and intentionally place students of diverse backgrounds onteams, this research team was able to help students identify how to promote a healthy culturewithin a team.In conclusion, there are feasible paths to implement
for LearningMathematics,” Frontiers for Young Minds, vol. 8, May 2020, doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/frym.2020.00050.[8] Y. Maeda and S. Y. Yoon, “Scaling the Revised PSVT:R: Characteristics of the First-YearEngineering Students’ Spatial Ability,” 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--18522.[9] Y. Maeda, S. Y. Yoon, G. Kim-Kang , and P. K. Imbrie, “Psychometric Properties of theRevised PSVT:R for Measuring First Year Engineering Students’ Spatial Ability,” InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 763–776, 2013.[10] Y. Onder, N. Bhide, D. B. Radhakrishnan, and J. Deboer, “Rethinking Spatial VisualizationAssessments: Centering Recognized Prior Knowledge in 2D/3D
. Population and Engineering Workforce Volume 3, Number 5," January 2014.[3] D.-. D. USA, "Data USA: Engineering," [Online]. Available: https://datausa.io/profile/cip/engineering?degree-grads_ethnicity_gender=degree5. [Accessed 06 12 2022].[4] Ramoni, Monsuru O., Jonathon Chinana, Ty Shurley, and Kathryn Hollar. , "Applying Entrepreneurially Minded Learning to the Design and Fabrication of Soft Robotic Fish with Native American Engineering Students.," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, 2023.[5] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), "Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering," 2017.[6] Turner, Sherri L., Ellen H. McWhirter
, professionalorganizations, and engineering ethics. Planned Strategies for the CAM program: CAM scholarmeetings will include career and graduate school preparedness topics every year (with theassistance of the Career and Internship Center) so that the students are prepared at all academiclevels. E-portfolios will be created with applications for internships, jobs, and graduate schoolsin mind.5. Current Academic Tutoring. In addition to general academic tutoring available through theUniversity, the CET offers tutoring specific to engineering in lower-level classes at theEngineering Tutoring Lab. Tutors are advanced upper-level students. CAM scholarship recipientswill receive tutoring as needed. Planned Strategies for the CAM program: Additional tutors willbe hired
Paper ID #42338Designing and Conducting Research Using an Ethnographic Approach toIdentify Pedagogical Practices in Engineering EducationDr. Hye Yeon Lee, Georgia Institute of Technology Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of TechnologyProf. Joseph M. LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology Joe Le Doux is the Executive Director for Learning and Training in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. Dr. Le Doux’s research interests include narrative and inclusive pedagogies and practices. ©American Society for
research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459-480.3. Yang, M.C. (2005). A study of prototypes, design activity, and design outcome. Design Studies. 26(6), 649-669.4. Bodner, G. and Guay, R. (1997). The Purdue visualizations of rotations test. The Chemical Educator, 2(4), 1–17.5. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. Basic Books, New York, NY.6. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books, New York, NY.7. Shea, D.L., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604-614.8. CEEB special aptitude test in
). “TheRole of Contextual Supports and Barriers in the Choice of Math/ Science Educational Options: A Test of SocialCognitive Hypotheses.” Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 4, 474-483.30 Lent, R. W., Sheu, H-B, Gloster, C. S., and Wilkins, G. (2010). “Longitudinal Test of the Social Cognitive Modelof Choice in Engineering Students at Historically Black Universities.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 387-394.31 Raelin, J. A. (2010). The Work Self-Efficacy Inventory, Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden, Inc., Available at:http://www.mindgarden.com/products/wsei.htm32 Betz, N. E., Klein, K., and Taylor, K. M. (1996). “Evaluation of a Short Form of the Career Decision-MakingSelf-Efficacy Scale.” Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 47-57.33 Lent, R. W
AC 2011-2176: FACILITATING TRANSFER OF STUDENTS FROM 2-YEARTO 4-YEAR ENGINEERING PROGRAMSKevin Lemoine, Texas Higher Education Coordinating BoardJames K. Nelson, The University of Texas at Tyler Dr. James K. Nelson received a Bachelor of Civil Engineering degree from the University of Dayton in 1974. He received the Master of Science and Doctor of Philosophy degrees in civil engineering from the University of Houston. During his graduate study, Dr. Nelson specialized in structural engineering. He is a registered professional engineer in four states, a Chartered Engineer in the United Kingdom, and a fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers. He is also a member of the American Society for Engineering
AC 2011-303: BRIDGING THE VALLEY OF DEATH: A 360 APPROACHTO UNDERSTANDING ADOPTION OF INNOVATIONS IN ENGINEER-ING EDUCATIONKirsten A. Davis, Boise State University Kirsten A. Davis is an Assistant Professor in the Construction Management Department within the College of Engineering at Boise State University. Dr. Davis earned a B.Arch. in Architecture and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Tennessee, an M.S. in Civil Engineering specializing in Construction Engineering and Management from the University of Colorado, Boulder, and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineer- ing specializing in Construction Engineering and Management from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Her educational research
AC 2011-2919: COMBINING THE FRESHMAN INTRODUCTION TO EN-GINEERING AND THE FRESHMAN WRITING COURSE INTO ONE CLASSDr. Dan Budny, University of Pittsburgh Page 22.340.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Combining the Freshman Introduction to Engineering and the Freshman Writing Course into one Class Dan Budny, Beth Newborg and Michael W. Ford, Jr. University of Pittsburgh, budny@pitt.edu, bateman@pitt.edu, ford29@pitt.eduAbstract- Collaborations between engineering faculty and skilled experts outside ofengineering proper build strong undergraduate engineering curricula that
AC 2011-1052: COMPARISON OF TWO CURRICULUM MODELS FORMAPPING ENGINEERING CORE CONCEPTS TO EXISTING SCIENCEAND MATHEMATICS STANDARDSMike Ryan, CEISMC - Georgia TechBrian D. Gane, Georgia Institute of Technology Brian Gane is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Psychology at Georgia Tech and a research assistant at CEISMC. His research focuses on skill acquisition and instructional design.Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology Marion Usselman is Associate Director for Federal Outreach and Research for Georgia Tech’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing. She has been with CEISMC since 1996 managing programs, interacting with K-12 schools, and assisting Georgia Tech faculty in
AC 2011-2178: DEFINING ”SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING”: A COM-PARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED SUSTAINABILITY PRINCIPLESAND EXISTING COURSESStephen R Hoffmann, Purdue University, West Lafayette Stephen R. Hoffmann is the Assistant Head of the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. He brings to this position a background in chemistry, and a PhD in Environmen- tal Chemistry and Technology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Current research involves sustainability in the curriculum: definitions, material development, and mechanisms and assessment of integration of sustainability ideals into all Engineering curricula.Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University Dr. Alice L. Pawley is an
AC 2010-603: INCORPORATING THE IMPORTANCE OF INTERDISCIPLINARYUNDERSTANDING IN K-12 ENGINEERING OUTREACH PROGRAMS USING ABIOMIMETIC DEVICEStanley Hunley, Michigan State UniversityJoshua Whitman, Michigan State UniversitySeungik Baek, Michigan State UniversityXiaobo Tan, Michigan State UniversityDrew Kim, Michigan State University Page 15.715.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Incorporating the Importance of Interdisciplinary Understanding in K-12 Engineering Outreach Programs using a Biomimetic DeviceAbstractThe project presented in this paper is designed to motivate interest in the engineeringfield for K-12 students, especially those who have previously
” NACADA Journal, 19,2 (Fall), 5-10.8. Piaget, J. (1990). “The child's conception of the world.” New York: Littlefield Adams.9. Bruner, J. (1986) “Actual Minds, Possible Worlds,” Harvard University Press.10. LSU, “ENG2: Engineering Engagement For Student Success--Building A Community For First-Year Freshmen In The College Of Engineering,” Conference Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference, June 2009, X. Page 15.936.16 APPENDIX I. Table 1. Number and Demographics of Program ParticipantsProgram Program Year # of Students Demographics or
AC 2011-280: A MODEL FOR INITIATING ABET-ACCREDITED ENGI-NEERING DEGREE PROGRAMS USING DISTANCE EDUCATIONDarrin S. Muggli, Benedictine College Dr. Muggli is a Professor and Chair of the Engineering Department at Benedictine College. Previously, he was a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of North Dakota, where he taught both traditional and distance courses for ten years. Dr. Muggli received his Ph.D. from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 1998. He has taught a broad range of chemical engineering and foundational general engineering courses.Brian Tande, University of North Dakota Brian Tande is an assistant professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the
promote the development ofcreativity skill in their students. Traditional engineering curricula is focused mostly in technicaldevelopment; 13 this practice has shown a decreasing level of creativity in students rather thanincrease while they are moving forward in their career. The teaching of idea generation(ideation) methods could enhance the student’s designer creative capacity; this has been shownby multiple research studies14,15,12 . Learning about ideation methods can tackle creativedeficiencies. Although various Ideation Methods exist (e.g. brainstorming, mind-mapping,synectics, lateral thinking or morphological analysis16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23 ), engineering educationinstitutions as well as industry tend to prefer quick and simple methods