Written System Interactions Constitutive Eqn Principles 0 absent absent absent absent absent Description Picture present Incorrect Incorrect present but Incorrect 1 but missing governing constitutive missing heat interactions heat exchanger principles equation(s) exchanger
. References[1] Reese, Susan, “Elements of an Effective Mentoring Program,” Connecting Educationand Careers, v81, n6, p20-21, Sep 2006.[2] Snyder, Ilana ; Jones, Anne ; Lo Bianco, Joseph; Using Information andCommunication Technologies in Adult Literacy Education: New Practices, NewChallenges. An Adult Literacy National Project Report, National Centre for VocationalEducation Research Ltd. P.O. Box 8288, Stational Arcade, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.[3] Bornmann, L. ; Mittag, S. ; Danie, H.-D., “Quality Assurance in Higher Education--Meta-Evaluation of Multi-Stage Evaluation Procedures in Germany,” Higher Education:The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, v52, n4, p687-709, Dec 2006
students inMay 2005 and May 2006. These results are presented below in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 showsthe rubric scoring averages in each of the five assessment categories for the industrial advisoryboard and the faculty. In general, the IAB assessed the students higher than the faculty but theaverages were very close. Page 12.1551.8 4 3.5 3 R u b ric A v e ra g e s 2.5 Board
(problem-based, tool-based, cases) Pedagogical goals Targeted course Targeted student audience, Prerequisite(s) Lecture notes (e.g. slides). Reading materials for the instructor (e.g. list of references) set of exercises and/or projects Instructor solution manual for the provided exercises Evaluation of module for potential curriculum impact assessment rubricsFaculty Training
teaching three second-semestersophomore courses, and is in a position to work with these students to produce better team projectreports using LATEX/Subversion. Lessons learned from the first pilot study should lessen some ofthe difficulties experienced by the Juniors in learning how to participate in this collaborativewriting effort.6 AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Mr. Kevin Hickey, University of Detroit Mercy Web ServicesTeam for his technical support of this project.References [1] S. Miertschin and C. Willis, “Building infrastructure to develop electronic collaboration skill among students,” in Proc. 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: The Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology Education in a Global
. Literature on data visualization spans several decades—from the time wherevisualization activities required significant and dedicated computing facilities and proprietarysoftware, to distributed and collaborative visualization using inexpensive yet powerful desktopcomputers. 9, 10, 11Currently, visualization technologies are at a critical crossroad. Will data visualization remainthe provenance of an elite few or will structures and approaches arise to distribute its Page 12.1594.4functionality to those who can best make use of its potential? It is the modern equivalent of the1990’s centralized versus decentralized computing conflict.In this
distance education classes onwireless network configuration and security.References1. Mark Ciampa “ Security + Guide to Network Security Fundamentals, Second Edition” ISBN 0-619-21566-6 ©20052. Michael T. Simpson “ Hands-on Ethical Hacking and Network Defense” ISBN 0-619-21708-13. Allied Telesis Company. Available: http://www.alliedtelesyn.co.uk/site/files/documents/datasheet/MC1X_G.PDF downloaded January 17, 2007.4. Raza, I, “Containing emissions from a microprocessor module”, IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Volume 2, 21-25 Aug. 2000 Page(s):871 – 876 vol.2.5. Phil Lunsford, Lee Toderick, "Firewalls for Remote Computer Labs", presented at the 2003 Convention of the National Association of Industrial
Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad. Vol. X. 2004.[15] DiBiasio, D., N.A. Mello, and D. Woods, (April, 2000). Multidisciplinary Teamwork: Academic Practices and Assessment of Student Outcomes. Paper presented at Best Assessment Processes III Conference, Rose-Hulman University, Terre Haute, IN.[16] Besterfield-Sacre, M., L.J. Shuman, H. Wolfe, C.J. Atman, J. McGourty, R.L. Miller, B.M. Olds, and G.M. Rogers, (2000). Defining the Outcomes: A Framework for EC 2000. IEEE Transactions on Education 43 (2), 100-110.[17] DiBiasio, D., & Jiusto, S "Experiential Learning Environments: Do They Prepare Our Students to be Self- Directed, Life-Long Learners?" 2006. JEE, 95 (3), pp. 195-204
Transistor Length (a) (b)Figure 5. (a) SEM photograph of the eye of a mosquito 7. (b) Schematic cross-section of transistor 8.Vernier calipers over a one-month period. Their nail growth was determined to be linear withtime, ranging from 0.5 – 1 nm/s (Figure 6a) 9. The nail growth rate was correlated with forming3 – 7 amino acid molecules per second. This process was repeated on the growth of a malestudent’s beard (Figure 6b). The growth rate was linear and about 4x faster than thumb nails. Hair Growth Rate 12
. 1997. “Refocusing U.S. Math and Science Education” Issues in Science and Technology Online. Winter 1997. Accessed from 3. Gonzales, P., Calsyn, C., Jocelyn, L., Mak, K., Kastberg, D., Arafeh, S., Williams, T., and Tsen, W. 2000. “Pursuing Excellence: Comparisons of International Eighth-Grade Mathematics and Science Achievement from a U.S. Perspective, 1995 and 1999.” National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Accessed from 4. House Committee on Science. 1998. “Unlocking Our Future Toward a New National Science Policy.” Accessed from Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copyright
by U.S. Mail in a sealed envelope with company letterhead and/or logo to thefollowing address:Dr. Theodore ManikasDept. of Electrical EngineeringThe University of Tulsa600 S. College Ave.Tulsa, OK 74104-3189Please evaluate the student using the 1 to 5 scale where 5 is the highest score and 1 is the lowestscore. The numeric evaluations correspond to letter grades of:5 = A, outstanding work4 = B, above average work3 = C, average work2 = D, below average work needing improvement1 = Failing work. Evaluation Criteria Score (1 to 5)1. Attendance, timeliness in arriving for work, completed
6experience while in school. The students have benefited by getting “real-world” engineeringexperience. The companies have been able to boost their sales and enhanced their product linewith minimal investment.Bibliography:[1] S. Lekhakul and R. A. Higgins, “Senior Design Project: Undergraduate Thesis,” IEEE Trans. Education, vol. 37,no. 2, May 1994, pp. 203-206.[2] K. J. Zdunek, “Engineering Education: A Young Engineer’s View,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 18,n0. 2, March 1980, pp. 14-18.[3] G. W. Schmid-Schonbein, “The Industrial Internship Program at UCSD Bioengineering,” Proc. 1st JointBMES/EMBS Conf. Serving Humanity, Advancing Technology, Oct. 13-16, Atlanta, GA, pp. 1258.[4] L. M. Waples and K. M. Ropella, “The Biomedical Engineering
. The questions span a broad range. Forexample, the application requires them to list the positive and negative impacts(economic, environmental, social, cultural, and ecosystem) their project will have on thecommunity. They must describe local construction techniques and what skills they havethat the community does not have. The students must describe the beneficiary group(s)in terms of ethnicity, tribal and religious affiliations, spatial organization, primaryoccupations, current income, and decision-making structures of all the sub-groups. Theyneed to know the local culture, customs, and hazards. The students must convince EWB-USA that they know enough about the area for EWB-USA to approve the project.The processes of EWB-USA require the
-solving abilities should be placed on ensuring they arecompetent to express their ideas via written communication. The methods offered herein seek tointroduce writing into the engineering curriculum; future research will be directed towardsProceedings of the 2007 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 5understand the effectiveness of these and other methods in producing wholly competentcommunicators.References1. Artemeva, N., Logie, S., St. Martin, J. (1999). From page to stage: How theories of genre and situated learning help introduce engineering students to discipline-specific
drive motor and an electricmotor/generator which are independently controlled to allow power flow to and from all threecomponents, typically called Power Split. Each power source component in equation (1), in this case, isdivided by its independent rotational velocity term to yield component torque,The planetary gear set, having a sun gear, planet or carrier gears and the ring gear, provides a linearrelationship between the component rotational velocities through the following [6],where ω s is the rotational velocity of the sun gear, ω r the rotational velocity of the ring gear, ω c therotational velocity of the carrier gears and k the ratio of the ring and sun gear radii. This configurationallows one to retain the linear and quadratic
universities, offer opportunities to expand the impact of programs to new audiences, but require clarity of goals and synergy of mission. 4References1. Massachusetts Department of Education. Science and Engineering Technology Framework. Malden, MA. http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/2001/2. New Jersey Department of Education. New Jersey Core Curriculum Content Standards (NJCCCS). Trenton, NJ. http://www.state.nj.us/njded/cccs3. Lowes, S., Sibuma, B. 2006. Evaluation of the Spring 2006 Implementation of the EOFNJ Project: The AWIM Pilot. Teachers College/Columbia University. http://www.stevens.edu/ciese/eofnj
, engineering education is builton a foundation of sciences and mathematics courses, with students taking engineering courses in their upper years, with fewstudents experiencing design outside of a focused course in their discipline. In the 1990's, in response to. accreditation criteria,most engineering schools added a “capstone” design project in the final year. These projects are meant to be complex, have a“real world” flavor, and are often multi-disciplinary. In some cases, there are industrial sponsors and students work closely withpracticing engineers. As engineering education has evolved in the last decade, the concept of a “cornerstone” or first-year engineering designproject has been added. The goal of these projects to give students early
of the mechanical engineering technology department for hissupport and assistance with the independent study project.Special thanks to Innovation First Inc. for their willingness to help with the independent study.Bibliography 1. Jerry B. Weinberg, George L. Engel, Keqin Gu, Cem S. Karacal, Scott R. Smith, William W. White, and Xudong W. Yu (2001) A Multidisciplinary Model for Using Robotics in Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education. 2. David J. Mehrl, Micheal E. Parten, Darrell L. Vines, (1997) Robots Enhance Engineering Education, American Society for Engineering Education. 3. Standards-Based Robotics Competition Curriculum Development Framework, The proceedings of the
groups, wikis and blogs were found to be an excellentopportunity for library staff to get acquainted with creating content.One of the recent programs was to train library staff on web2.0 applications; the QUL Learning2.0 Program was an 8-week voluntary online learning program that explored emerging web-based technologies. All library staff were invited to participate and given time to do the programduring working hours. 53 library staff had finished the training where they used wikis, blogs,Facebook, RSS feeds and Google Docs.Information Literacy through Queen’s University integrated learning initiativeThe integrated learning initiative at Queen’s applied science has initiated in mid 90’s to preparegraduates for increasingly rigorous
elective none of which is humanities & social restricted to technical sciences)* Includes 23 hours of upper division and EGR 225, EGR 226 and EGR 235.References 1. One University in Many Places: Transitional Design to Twenty-First Century Excellence www.asu.edu/president/univdesign/OneUniversity80305.ppt 2. C. Roberts, D. Morrell, R. Grondin, C.-Y. Kuo, R. Hinks, S. Danielson, and M. Henderson, “Developing a Multidisciplinary Engineering Program at Arizona State University’s East Campus,” 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, June 2005 3. Annette
University. This experience enabled usto choose the teaching principles, namely different aspects of problem based learning that bestimprove student learning and motivation. The pilot program of dispersed product developmentteams was a success and is continuing today. We highly recommend similar programs to otherschools as well.Bibliography1. Meier, M. Best practice in product design: concept outlines and experiences in project-oriented product design education. International Journal of Engineering Education. Vol 19. No 5. pp. 338–345.2. Eppinger, S. D. and Kressy, M. S. 2002. Interdisciplinary product development education at MIT and RISD. Design Management Journal. Summer 2002. pp. 58–61.3. de Graaf, E. and Kolmos, A. 2003
Engineering Education (CAEE). Page 12.94.11Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Huang, G., Taddese, N., Walter, E. Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education. NCES 2000-601. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics, 2000.[2] Besterfield-Sacre, M.E., Atman, C.J., Shuman, L.J. "How freshman attitudes change in the first year," ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, vol. 1, pp
for optimum learning? Wecall on engineering educators to continue their efforts to develop a curriculum theory for the fieldof engineering that will guide the discipline in optimizing the process of designing the bestcurriculum for the U.S. engineers of the future. References 1. Blanchard,Benjamin S. and Fabrycky, Wolter J. Systems Engineering and Analysis. 4 ed. Prentice Hall International Series in Industrial and Systems Engineering. W.J. Fabrycky and J.H. Mize. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006. 2. Kotnour, Timothy, and John V. Farr. "Engineering Management: Past, Present, and Future." Engineering Management Journal 17, no. 1 (2005): 15-26. 3. Farr
. Consequently, they spentmost of their time on Project Realization and the least amount of time on Alternative Solutions.The team made 16 iterations between Problem Scoping and Alternative Solution stages to clarify Page 12.89.7the problem. Figure 3 shows these iterations in a timeline. The behavior of this team is similar tothe expert designers’ behavior reported by Dwarakanath, S. and Blessing22 who found that expertdesigners entered the searching for concepts (alternative solutions) phase earlier but had morestep backs to the clarification of the task in their proceedings. Experts started by brainstormingalternative solutions and then systematically
that Group 1 received. The objectives, theory, and otherinformation have been omitted in the interest of space.“… with the CIPHER encode the following message. Also give the across R3 voltage roundedto the nearest whole number and encode the value at the end of the phraseTHE CIRCUIT PARAMETERS ARE AS FOLLOWS, R4 3, R2 6, R3 9, VS 30. R2 ANDR3 ARE IN PARALLEL AND THEIR COMBINATION IS IN SERIES WITH R4 ANDTHIS IS THEN IN SERIES WITH VS. THE VOLTAGE ACROSS R3 ISCIPHER A a) D K Z 7 V d) c) S . e) C 9 P G > <
0% engineering and new technologies without the aid of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 formal instruction. Engineering &Technology Goals Page 12.568.11Figure 8: End of Course Survey Data for ME450The best indication of the success of ME450’s hands-on approach to
module can benefit them professionally.ReferencesABET, 2006, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Evaluations During the 2007-2008Accreditation Cycle,” Engineering Accreditation Commission, retrieved January 17, 2007 fromwww.abet.org/forms.shtml .ASCE, 2004, “Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for theFuture,” Body of Knowledge Committee of the Committee on Academic Prerequisites for Professional Practice,retrieved January 17, 2007 from www.asce.org/professional/educ/bodyofknowledge.cfm .Covey, S. R., 1989, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People: Restoring the Character Ethic, Simon andSchuster, New York, NY, 340 p.Downing, C. G., 2001, “Essential Non-Technical
. 70-73, 2004.3. B. Wayne Bequette, "A laptop-based studio course for process control," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 25,1, pp. 45-49, 2005.4. Dennis S. Bernstein, "The Quanser DC Motor Control Trainer," IEEE Control Systems Magazine,3, pp. 90-93, 2005.5. Peter J. Gawthrop and Euan McGookin, "A LEGO-Based Control Experiment," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 24,5, pp. 43-56, 2004.6. B.S. Heck, N.S. Clements, and A.A. Ferri, "A LEGO Experiment for Embedded Control System Design," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 24,5, pp. 61-64, 2004.7. K.H. Lundberg, K.A. Lilienkamp, and G. Marsden, "Low-Cost Magnetic Levitation Project Kits," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 24,5, pp. 65-69, 2004.8
301 Spring 2006 Ethics Paper Assignment Engineering Ethics Paper Due Wednesday, April 12, 2006Each person has been randomly assigned to a group. Each group has been assigned onecase. The group is to review the case, using the NCEES Model Rules of ProfessionalConduct, and at least one engineering society’s Codes of Ethics to form an opinion.The group will act as a Board of Ethical Review and develop an opinion (ruling) on theengineer’s behavior. The group will write a three to five page paper (12 pt, doublespaced, 1 inch margins) briefly describing the case, stating and answering the majorquestion(s), highlighting any additional ethical questions that may appear in the case, andstating
Engineering, manages theadministrative aspect of all projects. Design projects that could be completedwithin an academic-year are recruited from local industries by the Project Centerpersonnel and the department’s design coordinator (ie. the instructor of the seniordesign sequence) in summer and early fall prior to the beginning of the academic Page 12.1190.2year. Teams of three to four students work under the direction of a companyliaison and a faculty advisor to solve a real life engineering problem.Teams spend the fall quarter meeting with the sponsoring company liaison(s) andthe faculty advisor, visiting the project site (if applicable), understanding theoverall