students the opportunity to apply Mechanics of Materialsconcepts to analyze the design failure as well as investigate the ethics of the situation andappreciate the impacts resulting from engineering decisions. A two-part case study packet, designed and developed by undergraduate hearing and deafstudent researchers who have previously taken the course, was used to implement the case studyin each section. In the first part, a reading assignment with video links and a post-exercise Page 23.832.4questionnaire on the reading were posted on myCourses, an RIT online course management toolavailable to all students enrolled in the course. The post
in the semesterleads into the two main deliverables for the first semester – a team portfolio of all workaccomplished (up to the point of selection of a lead design solution strategy) along with a teamposter presentation (open to the program faculty and staff). Learning outcomes for this courseinclude those focused on application of technical and engineering design skills andprofessionalism, and also refinement and demonstration of effective communication skills viadesign documentation and presentations. In the second semester of bioengineering senior design,teams carry their work forwards through engineering analysis, prototyping, and testing withmultiple design reviews. Ethical considerations including risk-benefit, human factors
Co-op or Critical Thinking Internship Intro to Departments Strength/Weakness ID Ethics Intro to Campus Team Management
teaching, and exploring ethical decision-making in undergraduate engineering students. Dr. Finelli leads a national initiative to create a taxonomy/keyword outline for the field of en- gineering education research, she is past Chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of the American Society of Engineering Education, and she is an ASEE Fellow. Page 24.46.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 A Faculty Learning Community to Improve Teaching Practices in Large Engineering Courses: Lasting ImpactsBackground and OverviewStudent
training Page 24.58.9includes mainly technical issues, uninfluenced by ethical, aesthetic, political and epistemologicalconsiderations. Working with them demanded continuous monitoring in the face of resistance toreflections about education and the role of the teacher in contemporary engineering. It is fair tosay, though, that their own training does not help them to conduct group work, or encouragethem to invest in the collective creation of knowledge.5. Discussion and future worksThe issues raised by this study suggest that it will be necessary to review the objective ofengineering generally and mechatronics specifically, as well as continually
economics and ethics, and graduate finite elements, numerical methods, thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, plasma fundamentals and gas dynamics.Bradley S. Davidson, University of Denver Bradley Davidson is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering and director of the Human Dy- namics Laboratory at the University of Denver. He holds a BS in civil engineering from Tennessee Tech, an MS in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in biomedical engineering from the Vir- ginia Tech–Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences. His research in musculoskeletal biomechanics emphasizes measurement of human movement and motor control, with applications in the lumbar spine stability, total knee
and the principles of metrology tools will be discussed. This will be followed by a study of the current application of nanotechnology in a few select areas such as electronics, photonics, sensors and advanced materials.4. Applied Nanotechnology (Course II – University) will focus on four areas where nanotechnology has had a significant impact: Information Technology, Renewable Energy Sources, Nanomaterials and Biomedicine including the effects and ethics of nano-toxicology.The first University course titled “Fundamental Principles of Nanotechnology” was alreadyoffered and the other ones have been developed and will begin starting Fall 2013.Reaching Beyond the Boundaries of Higher EducationThe project has extended well past the
1 2 3 4 5Audiovisuals were titled, clear, easy to understand and used appropriately; presenters were comfortableand familiar with the audiovisuals used CONCLUSION 1 2 3 4 5The conclusion summarized the presentation; major points/results and theirimportance were emphasized SELECTED PROGRAM OUTCOMESAn ability to function in a team for the design and construction of buildings. 1 2 3 4 5A knowledge of how the built environment is related to contemporary issues. 1 2 3 4 5An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 1 2 3 4
antennas, microwaves, plasmas, teaching, and ethics.Dr. Paul R. Leiffer, LeTourneau University Paul R. Leiffer, Ph.D., P.E., is a professor in the School of Engineering and Engineering Technology and Chairman of the Engineering Department at LeTourneau University, where he has taught since 1979. He is the co-developer of LeTourneau’s program in Biomedical Engineering. He received his B.S.E.E. from the State University of New York at Buffalo, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Drexel University. His professional interests include biomedical signal processing, engineering design, and engineering ethics. Page
) understanding customers, (2) marketorientation, (3) relationship marketing, (4) market research methods, (5) pricing considerations,(6) advertising and promotion, (7) societal, ethical, and regulatory considerations, (8) distributionchannels and supply chain management, (9) sales strategies, to include online marketing andsales, (10) product development and management issues, and (11) partnerships and alliances.The themes were applied throughout the semester using the textbook “Marketing High-Technology Products and Innovations” 3rd Edition by Mohr, Sengupta, and Slater. The schedulewas divided into four modules: product pitch, go to market strategy, prototyping and testing, andteam presentations. There were three to four topics and one deliverable per
, • Advanced global awareness and ethical behavior and leadership understanding of organizations and societyTypical applications in the science and technology category include the ability to understand anduse thermodynamics, and perform engineering analyses of energy use. Other dimensions in thiscompetency are the ability to understand the range of sustainability issues from a local, regionaland global perspective, and the relationships between human activities and the environment. Ofparticular interest is the integration of sustainability goals into engineering practice. Othercompetency dimensions include the development of expertise in understanding
isevaluated each semester under SJSU’s GE program guidelines. The development and assessmentof this course has been discussed previously10.Table 1. Content, Title and Instructional Delivery Method for Each Unit in Tech 198 Unit Title of Unit Media Format 1 Nature of Science and Technology Multimedia CDs 2 History of Technology Web-based 3 Technology and Work Multimedia CDs 4 Technology and Gender Issues Multimedia CDs 5 Technology Transfer and Cultural Issues Lecture or D2L Online Module 6 Quality of Life Lecture or D2L Online Module 7 Ethics
worked on embedded systems with wireless communication, while theothers worked on the generator design. Although there was a little more prep time needed, thevariety of a multi-faceted design problem was a refreshing break from the dogma of havingeveryone grind through the same lab exercises. Finally, the motivation of being responsible for apart of a larger system rather than having to answer for only one’s own grade seemed to have apositive effect on the work ethic of the students who were engaged with the project. Page 23.73.9ConclusionsA multidisciplinary design project consisting of a hydroelectric power generation system wasdeveloped in
senior design course, and is an important partof our curriculum. The primary ABET outcomes associated with this course are [a] and [b]: “anability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering” and “an ability to designand conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data.” Further, the program hasassigned several secondary outcomes to this course: experiment design, effectivecommunication, teaming, modern techniques and tools, ethics, and life-long learning [ABEToutcomes c, d, f, g, i, and k]. The determination of particular science and/or engineering topics Page 23.140.2that should be assigned to this course has been a
to share the data in order to instill best practices for their future data sharing. 3. Cite their data in a properly structured format in accordance with emerging standards in order to prepare them to ethically reuse data in the future.6 Preservation This module will introduce 1. Explain the lifespan of potential
reviewed journal articles. Page 23.199.6 8. I loved the nontechnical issues such as ethical issues (that I came across while reading the peer reviewed journal articles) more than the technical ones. 9. My carbon print can significantly be reduced by switching my regular car to hybrid car. I learned this simple but profound point by following peer reviewed journal articles. 10. Peer reviewed journal articles taught me that I need to return the environment back to my children with least damage. This opened my eyes to focus on methods I personally could employ for the same purpose.The written comments of the students on
Judging. Judging types have a need for closure and prefer to live in anorganized manner. In contrast, the types underrepresented among engineering studentsmake decisions with personal or social ethical values in mind (Feeling), and in a flexiblemanner, considering all the information before making a decision (Perceiving). Several implications for library instruction based on the Thinking and Judgingcharacteristics emerge. 1. Lecture. Thinking-Judging types prefer lectures over group activities, although engineering students’ regular instructors may want to include group activities in order to inculcate “people skills.”4 2. Outline. Provide a detailed outline. Judging types like
ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities, j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues, and k. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement.Extracted from the document “CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGYPROGRAMS” Effective for Evaluations During the 2002-2003 Accreditation Cycle. Incorporates allchanges approved by the ABET Board of Directors as of November 3, 2001. Technology AccreditationCommission Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. 111Market Place, Suite 1050Baltimore, MD 21202. E-mail: accreditation@abet.org. Website: http://www.abet.org
standards, but its$43,000 price tag puts it in the same range as many CNC lathes. Sharpe makes a very nice copyof the Hardinge for about half as much. PUC has been using one (Figure 4) for over a year nowand it is excellent for single point threading. This presents an interesting ethical dilemma that canbe discussed with students. Hardinge originally designed the machine and Sharp (and severalothers) reverse-engineered it and produced nearly an exact copy. Which one should a personpurchase? The author has philosophical problems with an unlicensed, exact copy of theHardinge, but the Hardinge was just too expensive for PUC’s budget, so a Sharp was purchased.The Sharp excels at threading, but it is too small for general lab use in PUC’s courses
instructor;anonymous student surveys; group interviews with an independent third party; and follow-upsurveys conducted with graduates of the course. The results from our three-year pilot studysuggest that the approaches followed in this course could be adapted to introduce engineeringstudents to advanced research topics from many fields of fundamental science.Teaching Biology to Engineers at the University of Cincinnati.Biology has become a pervasive science; underlying many of the societal questions of the early21st century including the threat of bioterrorism and the ethical dilemmas associated with cloningof human beings. As technologically proficient scholars, all engineers need to be trained tounderstand the basic tenants of biology. In a more
Education Competencies: Determine the extent of information needed Access the needed information effectively and efficiently Evaluate information and its sources critically Incorporate selected information into one’s knowledge base Use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose Understand the economic, legal, and social issues surrounding the use of information, and access******************** and use information ethically and legally The Tegrity lectures were divided into six sections. The first part [7:58] instructsstudents on how to navigate the library’s website, to download an Adobe Acrobat Reader, andhow to access the library remotely. Part two [17:38] demonstrates searching in the
Standardization (ISO) and International ElectrotechnicalCommission (IEC) standards is probably very limited for most students although someinformation on ISO and IEC processes is available on their web sites.Based on sample materials on the National Council of Examiners for Engineering andSurveying (NCEES) web site, there are no questions on standards on the Fundamentals ofEngineering (FE) exam. The only practice questions on the FE exam deal with ethics. Atthe Professional Engineer’s (PE) level, there appear to be some questions dealing withcodes and standards on the mechanical and electrical engineering examinations. For thecivil engineering exam, a list of design standards is given which must be used to answerquestions in the structural and
class wide design competitioninvolving the design, fabrication and testing of a system which must perform a set of functionsunder the constraints set by the instructors3. Typically a minimum performance level is requiredto pass the course. Superior performance levels are encouraged by establishing performancegoals and a figure of merit evaluation scheme. In the lectures, the teaching team1 attempts toprovide insights on the multiple facets of design, by addressing such topics as engineering ethics,engineering economy, manufacturing, shop practice, esthetics4, intellectual property, personalityand working in teams issues and ergonomics and also by providing students with guidancerelative to the design process 5. Proceedings of the 2003
, 1998 ASEE Annual Conference, June 1998. 3. Pritchard, M.S. and Tsang, E. “Service Learning: A positive Approach to Teaching Engineering Ethics and Social Impact of Technology.” Proceedings, 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, June 2000. 4. Okonkwo, C.U. and DeMendonca, M. “Integrating DFE as Core Course for Engineering Technology Programs.” Proceedings, 2000 ASEE Annual Conference, June 2000. 5. Guensler, R., Chinowsky, P., and Conklin , C. “Development of a Web-Based Environmental Impact, Monitoring and Assessment Course.” Proceedings, 1997 ASEE Annual Conference, June 1997. 6. Bilen, S., Devon, R.F., and Okudan, G. “Cumulative Knowledge and the Teaching of Engineering Design Processes.” Proceedings, 2002
maintain products and systems. What design criteria are typically used when developing new technologies (i.e., marketability, safety, usability, reliability, cost, materials, etc.)? How do these influence the final product/system design? 8. how technological assessment is used to determine the benefits, limitations, and risks associated with existing and proposed technologies. How does a risk/benefit analysis aid the designer in addressing potential harmful effects prior to development? How are ethical considerations, economic considerations, engineering realities, and political forces balanced during technological innovation? 9. how a variety of technologies are utilized and operated either by
competition was intended to be educational, several changes were made withrespect to team formation and ethical conduct. In the AIChE competition, faculty and graduatestudents may act only as sounding boards. In this event, teachers or advisors could assist thestudents with ideas (including specifying which reaction to use). This allowed the teachers tobetter integrate the project into their curriculum. The design and construction of the cars was tobe done primarily by the students. As with the AIChE competition, it was required that there beat least five members on a team. An entire class might be a team, and the entire team did notneed to attend the competition. To allow for flexibility in forming the teams, there was norequirement of different
. Furthermore, ethical, environmental and policy issues play asignificant role as well. The topic provides a level playing field for participants in thecourse: both faculty and students are unfamiliar, in terms of expertise, with the topic. Theremoteness and perceived strangeness of the Moon and the ‘blank slate’ that the Moonoffers for current as well as futuristic technological applications also contribute to thisequality. This equal access issue is important to our target audiences: women andunderrepresented groups such as the Deaf and minorities suffer from the real or perceivedimpression that they are less knowledgeable or able in a particular technical discipline(Leveson 1991, Howell, 1993). Removing barriers to these equalities has been a
recent scholarly activities includeM.E. Laboratory Manuals, Handbooks on Mechanical Engineering & Academic Advisingand Workshop on Professional Ethics. He is a member of the ASEE and ASME. -------- Page 8.212.8
projects, each group has to consider several aspects of the project including the: § Technical § Financial § Legal § Marketing § Safety/Liability § Ethical IssuesEach of these six aspects of the projects has to be discussed in their proposal, progress reports,final presentation, and final report.Design Project Implementation The initial idea of developing major-specific design projects volunteered by faculty membersinvolved in active research along with direct faculty guidance was formulated and implemented ona small scale in Fall 2001. The list of discipline projects was compiled by direct contact withfaculty members with active research as well as pedagogical interests. Faculty who agreed toparticipate offered a
common exercisesdone in the average ENGR 1111 course is shown in Table 1. Creative problem solving techniquesand a design project were added to the curriculum of one section of this orientation course having20 enrolled students. Table 1. Required and Common Activites for ENGR 1111. ENGR 1111 Activities Required by the College At least one team activity. (ABET outcome d) At least one activity involving ethics. (ABET outcome f) At least one oral presentation. (ABET outcome g) Library training and assignment. (ABET outcome l) Requirement to attend a professional society meeting or career fair. (ABET outcome l) At least one activity involving