determinedwith respect to the topics identified in the first three rounds4.This work was supported primarily by the Engineering Research Centers program of theNational Science Foundation under grant EEC-9876363.1. VaNTH refers to a collaboration between Vanderbilt University, Northwestern University, University of Texas,Austin and the Health Sciences and Technology Program between Harvard University and MIT.2. R.A. Linsenmeier, T.R. Harris, and S. A. Olds. “The VaNTH Bioengineering Curriculum Project”. Proceedings ofthe Second Joint EMBS/BMES Conference (CD-ROM, Omnipress): 2644-2645, 2002.3. R.A. Linsenmeier. "What Makes a Biomedical Engineer? Defining the Undergraduate Biomedical EngineeringCurriculum". IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Vol
AC 2007-2832: THE DYNAMICS OF ESTABLISHING AND SUSTAINING ANATIONAL MINORITY ENGINEERING PROGRAMS ADVISORY BOARDTony Mitchell, North Carolina State University Tony L. Mitchell, Lieutenant Colonel United States Air Force, Retired, received his B.S. degree in Mathematics from North Carolina A&T State University, the M. S. in Information and Computer Science from Georgia Tech, and Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from North Carolina State University. Currently he is Assistant Dean, Engineering Student Services, Director, Minority Engineering Programs, and Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Carolina State University in Raleigh. Previous educational
College. He is currently a Ph.D. student in mechanical engineering at Michigan Technological University, developing research in the area of environmentally responsible design and manufacturing.Brenda Puck, University of Wisconsin, Stout BRENDA S. PUCK is a lecturer in the Technology Department at the University of Wisconsin-Stout. She teaches a variety of courses in support of the Technology Education and Engineering Technology programs. She received her M.S. in Technology Education from the University of Wisconsin-Stout. She has been on the “STEPS for Girls” faculty since the programs inception and will become the “STEPS for Girls” Camp Executive Director in the future.Peter Heimdahl, University
‘Engineer:’ How to Do It and Why It Matters” Journal of Engineering Education 85 (2), 1996, pp 97-1014. Satwicz T “Beyond the Barrier: Insights into the Mathematical Practices of Engineering Students,” working paper from June 2004.5. Moussavi M “Mathematical Modeling in Engineering Education” Proceedings of the 1998 Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 1998, Tempe, AZ, paper F4H-3.6. Fadali M S, Velasquez-Bryant N, and Robinson M “Work in Progress – Is Attitude Toward Mathematics a Major Obstacle to Engineering Education?” Proceedings of the 2004 Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2004, Savannah, Georgia, pp F1F19 – F1F24.7. Underwood D “Is Mathematics Necessary?” The College Mathematics Journal 28 (5), 1997, pp
of surface measurement, for significant intellectual achievements in mechatronics and for contributions to product design.Dr. Shetty is the author of two books and more than 150 scientific articles and papers and the holder of several patents. His both text books on Mechatronics and Product Design are widely used as a textbook in many Universities around the World. Major honors received by Prof. Shetty include James Frances Bent award for Creativity, the Edward S. Roth National Award for Manufacturing from the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, American Society of Mechanical Engineer Faculty Award, and Society of Manufacturing Engineers Honor award. He is an elected member of the
of jobs openings in STEM areas is five times the number of US studentsgraduating in STEM. The National Science Foundation’s (NSF) “Strategic Plan: FY 2003-2008” acknowledges that tapping the potential in “previously underutilized groups” will becritical for sustaining the technological lead the U.S. enjoys throughout the world (NSF, 2006).National concern has been expressed about the status of the U. S. science and engineering base-specifically the human talent, knowledge and infrastructure that generate innovations andundergird technological advances to achieve national objectives. Analyses have shown that theremay be a significant shortage in the entry level science and engineering labor pool, and thatscientific and technical fields could
of the media on the perception of alternative/greener technology. 10. Understanding the concepts of sustainability Scale: 1 = Fablusi was very useful 5 = Fablusi was uselessThe Minute Paper in both semesters asked the following questions: ‚ Would the use of an Internet based simulation such as this influence your decision to take a course? If so, why? If not, why? ‚ The mail system in the simulator is NOT a real e-mail system. Please state what you think are the advantage(s), if any, of using this system ‚ Did the role play simulations create a learning environment that engaged you in the PBL exercise and did you find it enjoyable?Semester 1 2006At the end of the
AC 2007-1460: A SUCCESSFUL ENGINEERING PEER MENTORING PROGRAMCarol Gattis, University of Arkansas Carol S. Gattis, Ph.D. is an associate professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. She also directs and develops new programs for the college-wide efforts of recruitment, retention and diversity.Bryan Hill, University of Arkansas Bryan Hill, an industrial engineer, is the associate director of recruitment, retention and diversity for the College of Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Bryan managed the 2005-2006 pilot engineering peer mentoring program.Abraham Lachowsky, University of Arkansas Abraham Lachowsky is a senior undergraduate student in the Industrial
Role of Tools In TeachingSince the mid 1990’s, there has been significant pressure applied to engineering educators byaccreditation boards to re-vitalize the real-world, open-ended, hands-on nature of engineering1.Undergraduate engineers are now being taught to design for the man-made environments inwhich they live – environments which widely require tools to be manipulated. Can we expectstudents to understand the process of hands-on design if they cannot engage in it? Although thefirst year design and communication course at the Schulich School of Engineering is not atechnical based course, it is one of the few opportunities students have to become exposed tobasic hand tools during their undergraduate academic careers. As stated by Gaba, “The
standards within its engineering programs and meet its urban mission as a university ofopportunity for students. The initial success of the program, as evidenced by the increased 2-year retention, provides a strong impetus to continue the program in support of current and futurestudents.References1. Diefes-Dux, H., “Does a Successful Mathematics Bridge Program Make for Successful Students?,” Proceedings Page 12.206.11of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Quebec, June 2002.2. Fisher, W., Quinones, S., Golding, P., “Success Strategies for First-Year Pre-Engineering Students,” Proceedingsof the 2001 ASEE-IEEE Frontiers
Senior Dngineering Design Processes. Design Studies, 1999. 20(2): p. 131-152.18. Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Mosborg, S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., and Saleem, J., Engineering Design Processes: a Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education (in review), 2006.19. Eris, O., Chen, H., Bailey, T., Engerman, K., Loshbaugh, H. G., Griffin, A., Lichtenstein, G., and Cole, A. Development of the Persistence in Engineering (PIE) Survey Instrument. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual conference & Exposition. 2005. Chicago, Illinios: ASEE.20. Tinto, V., Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. 2nd ed. 1993, Chicago: University of
background comes from the AircraftStructures course that the students have already completed in the program. Additional testshave been carried out on the engine. The current design places the main part of the enginealong with its fuel tank(s) inside the fuselage in the vicinity of the vehicle center of gravityalong with a power shaft to deliver the power to the externally configured propeller. Enginemounts and power shaft (engine to propeller) are under development at present. A landinggear team is working on a viable design for the gear based on the recommendations from theprevious teams and the expected performance of the UAV in its present configuration. Atricycle configuration is being developed in this regard. Load and failure analysis based
,” Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, 2007, in press. Page 12.1615.9Appendix A Guidelines for Writing Your Thesis/DissertationYour thesis/dissertation has two purposes.1) Document your workThe thesis/dissertation is supposed to provide a comprehensive overview of your research work.It should introduce the topic and problem to the reader, explain what previous work has beendone related to the topic, outline your approach, document your techniques and methods, detailthe data and results and provide conclusions and ideas for future work.2) Provide background for the next student(s)Your thesis/dissertation is also a teaching tool
; Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.3. Coyle, E., Jamieson, L., & Oakes W. (2005). EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service, International Journal of Engineering Education, 21, 139-150.4. Creswell, J. W. (1998) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.5. Dorst, K. (1997). Describing design: A comparison of paradigms. Ph.D. Thesis. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Vormgeving Rotterdam.6. Duffy, J., Tsang, E., & Lord, S. (2000). Service-learning in engineering: What, why, and how? Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
evaluating the design using specifications, • refining the design, • creating or making it, • and communicating processes and results.The design process described by Standard 8 is iterative in nature so that students maymake a number of models or prototypes that are tested and refined until the final solution Page 12.1447.3is achieved. One difference between the design process prescribed by Standard 8 andengineering design is the role of engineering analysis in achieving the optimum solution.Technology education is often misunderstood – it has undergone a significanttransformation since the mid-1980’s. At the core of this transformation is a
Tokyo23NPTEL, Indian Institute X X of Technology24 It is observed that IT offers a paradigm shift in students learning and lecture disseminationmethodology. The rate of growth in IT is far high compared to the rate of IT adoption inengineering education. The standard S-shaped curve35 is plotted in Figure 1 for analyzing thegrowth rate of new IT methods in engineering education with time. Successful implementationand growth of any new technology or tools in instruction demands time based on itscompatibility, versatility and feedback from developers, instructors and students. The latersections in this paper discuss the use of such new tools and techniques for developing e-Learningcontent. Some of these have already made strides in
: Male FemaleAge: o 17 or less o 18- 23 o 24-29 o 30-35 o 36 or moreMajor: □ Mathematics □ Computer Graphics □ Physics □ Computer Science □ Other _________________________________Academic Level: □ Freshman □ Junior □ Sophomore □ Senior □ Graduate Master Student □ Graduate PHD student □ Other ______________________________ Page 12.669.11Appendix BTutoring Experience: □ 1 Semester □ 2 Semesters □ 3 Semesters □ More than 3 semestersTutored course(s): (check all that apply) □ MAT □ PHYS □ CGT □ Other
. Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in EducationConference. Session T3D-6. Page 12.782.1910 Allen, K., A. Stone, T.R. Rhoads, and T.J. Murphy. 2004. The Statistics Concept Inventory:Developing a Valid and Reliable Instrument. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Session 3230.11 Allen, K., T.R. Rhoads, and R. Terry. 2006. Misconception or Misunderstanding? AssessingStudent Confidence of Introductory Statistics Concepts. Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEEFrontiers in Education Conference. Session S2E.12 Evans, D.L., G.L. Gray, S. Krause, J. Martin, C. Midkiff, B.M. Notaros, M
. Hakuta, Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racialdynamics in colleges and universities. (pp. 126-169). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.3 George, Y. S., Neale, D. S., & Van Horne, V. (2001a). In pursuit of a diverse sciencetechnology, engineering, and mathematics workforce: Recommended research priorities to enhance participation byunderrepresented minorities. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.4 Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science,Engineering and Technology (CAWSMET). (September, 2000). Land of plenty: Diversity in America’s competitiveedge in science, engineering and technology. Available at www.nsf.gov/of/cawsmet.5 Grant Proposal Guide, NSF
,” ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, February 2006.21 Martin, R., and Delatte, N. J. (2001). “Another Look at the Hartford Civic Center Coliseum Collapse,” J. Perf. Const. Fac., ASCE, 15(1).22 Lichtenstein, A.G. (1993) “The Silver Bridge Collapse Recounted,” ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, November 1993.23 Solava, S. and Delatte, N. J. (2003). “Lessons from the Failure of the Teton Dam,” Forensic Engineering: Proceedings of the Third Congress, pp. 168 – 177, Bosela, Paul A., Delatte, Norbert J., and Rens, Kevin L., Editors, ASCE, October 19 – 21, 2003.24 Storey, C. and Delatte, N. J. (2003). “Lessons from the Collapse of the Schoharie Creek Bridge
. S. Bjorklund and N. Fortenberry, “Measuring Student and Faculty Engagement in Engineering Education”, CASEE Report, National Academy of Engineering, 2005. 2. L. Lattuca, P. Terenzini, and J. Volkwein, “Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC 2000”, Pennsylvania State University, 2006. 3. B. Olds, B. Moskal and R. Miller, “Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches, and Future Collaborationa”, Journal of Engineering Education, V. 94, No.1, 2005. 4. 2003-04 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, ABET, Baltimore, MD 2002. 5. S. Bjorklund, J. Parente, and D. Sathianathan, “Effects of Faculty Interaction and Feedback on Gains in Student Skills”, Journal of Engineering
Advisor Views Project Team Development and OrganizationAs noted for the Tibetian project, the Tufts student chapter of EWB is strongly controlled bystudents who assume the leadership role in project development, design, implementation andfunding. This project had an expansive team of 30 students involved in its development andorganization. Advisors are kept abreast of the team efforts but by no means are team leader andcoordinator. This could be problematic since it requires a strong student leader(s) to keep theteam focused and on schedule. As the travel date got closer, many of the final details, thoughcompleted, were rushed. Therefore, better time management and project schedule is required.Another area of concern was communication with
internet will return a number of university programs that teach spacecraft designwith a variety of approaches: some focus on hands-on hardware experimentation; some aremulti-semester efforts, and some involve academic study of a spacecraft design. The Universityof Colorado’s program falls into the latter. With the growing interest in teaching systemsengineering as part of the engineering curriculum, teaching spacecraft design provides a richopportunity to stress systems engineering approaches to problem solving within a definedcontext.Within the University of Colorado’s Aerospace Engineering curriculum, ASEN 4148/5148Spacecraft Design has been taught as a one semester class since the 1980’s. The class originatedwith encouragement from industry
need equal opportunities to grow and develop asprofessionals. The authors write that adjuncts, (S)hould be integrated into the college community and recognized as increasingly important players in the teaching and learning process in the interest of providing quality instruction to the growing number of full and part-time students who will sit in their classrooms, in the interest of appreciating the investment value of the part-time faculty, and ultimately in the interest of establishing and maintaining the college’s reputation for teaching excellence.3The sheer number of classes covered by adjuncts makes a powerful argument that responsiblecolleges should invest in their teaching lives.The department chairs in the
methods. N Reversible S No Field Magnetic Field Figure 1: Magnetic Field Aligns Particles in MR FluidShape Memory AlloyShape Memory Alloy (SMA) materials are metallic alloys that have the special property of beingable to return to a pre-determined, or “trained,” shape from a deformed state when the material isheated above its transformation temperature. A number of alloy types are known to exhibit theShape Memory Effect (SME), or the ability to revert to a trained shape when heated
results fromthe statistical analyses suggest that coupling peer discussion with PRS use can enhance students’ability to actively construct knowledge in class.References1. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. .Washington, DC:National Academy Press.2. Wulf, W. A., & Fisher, G M. C (2002). A makeover for engineering education. Issues in Science andTechnology. Online, http://www.nap.edu/issues/18.3/p_wulf.html.3 . Ebert-May, D., Brewer, C., Allred, S. (1997). Innovation in Large Lectures: Teaching for Active Learning.BioScience, 47(9), pp. 601-607.4. Kennedy, G. E.; Cutts, Q. I.(2005). The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their
analysis software for K-college" proceedings of the ASEE Annual conference and exhibition, session 2320, 2000.6. Rogers, C. and Portsmore, M., "Data acquisition in the dorm room: teaching experimentation techniques using LEGO materials" proceedings of the ASEE Annual conference and exhibition, session 2366, 2001.7. Brockman, J., Batill, S., Renaud, J., Kantor, J., Kirkner, D., Kogge, P., and Stevenson, R., "Development of a multidisciplinary engineering design laboratory at the University of Notre Dame" proceedings of the ASEE Annual conference and exhibition, 1996.8. Levien, K.L. and Rochefort, W.E. "Lessons with LEGO - engaging students in chemical engineering course" proceedings of the ASEE Annual conference and
.: University of Missouri – Rolla "Preparing for the First ABET Accreditation Visit under Criteria 2000," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, 1999. 4. Pintar, A. J., B. M. Aller, T. N. Rogers, K. H. Schulz, D. R. Shonnard: Michigan Technological University" Developing an Assessment Plan to Meet ABET EC2000," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, 1999. 5. Miller, R. L.: Colorado School of Mines "Reflections on Outcomes Assessment and the ABET Accreditation Process," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, 2002. 6. Bailey, M.; R. B. Floersheim, and S. J. Ressler “Course Assessment Plan: A Tool for Integrated Curriculum Management,” J. Eng. Edu., vol. 84, p. 425, October
, Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 92, No. 1, 2003, pp. 73. L. J. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, J. McGourty, The ABET “Professional Skills” – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? Journal of Engineering Education - 1- Vol. 94, No. 1, 20054. K. D. Stephan, A Survey of Ethics-Related Instruction in U.S. Engineering Programs, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 88, No. 3, 1999, pp. 4595. L. Shuman, et. al., Can Our Students Recognize and Resolve Ethical Dilemmas?, (CD) Proceedings, 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conference.6. B. S. Bloom, el al, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook, 1: Cognitive Domain, New York
courses. I will provide more handouts and stressmore on this aspect in IE 417 in the future.7- ConclusionThere are many extraneous obstacles in teaching OR courses. These include both the timelimitation on covering various important topics as well as the inadequate mathematicsbackground of many students. It is important to efficiently use the resources available to teachOR concepts and improve analytical and communication skills. This is best achieved throughreport writing. “Report to a Manager” is used as a tool to enhance learning important ORconcepts as well as encouraging students to critically think about the solution outputs from ORsoftwares. This implemented pedagogy has proved to be effective.Bibliography[1] Parisay, S., "Multimedia and