into future courses.The primary purpose of this study was to conduct a preliminary evaluation of the course bymeasuring pre- to post-course changes in self-confidence for specific communications tasks. Inaddition, we present the curriculum for Technical Communications as open-source content, withthe intention that others will adopt and modify elements of this novel GS course. The results ofthis study may be of interest to other programs seeking to create an early-years technicalcommunications course that features situated industry experiences and engages students incommunication strategies used in the workplace.MethodsCurricular DesignTechnical Communications was designed as a standalone course for first-year mechanicalengineering students, to
statisticallysignificant lower sense of belonging than their counterparts [18]. In response to these data, theEngineering & Design Department First Year Program (FYP) has recently implementedstrategies focused on supporting pre-major students, increasing student sense of belonging, andcreating inclusive work environments. Efforts have included updating the first year curriculum toincorporate social justice [19], integrating inclusive practices into the departmental makerspace[20] [21], creating a summer bridge program for engineering students [22], conducting researchon impacts of curricular and co-curricular changes on belonging and identity [23] [24] [25] [26],and this project, an National Science Foundation project which seeks to increase student sense
contribute meaningful insights into the effective integration of technology in education, aspiring to shape the future of STEM learning environments to be more engaging and accessible for all students.Comlan de Souza, California State University, FresnoKeith Collins Thompson, University of California MercedKhang Tran, California State University, FresnoYue Lei, University of California, MercedErica M Rutter, University of California, MercedDr. Lalita G Oka, California State University, Fresno Dr. Lalita Oka is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering at the California State University, Fresno. She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in Geotechnical Engineering. Her research interests
, Lecturer at the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University, and Assistant Professor at the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024WIP: Implementing a community engagement project in a first-yearfoundations of engineering courseIntroductionThis paper seeks to explore the benefits and challenges of incorporating community engagementprojects into an existing first-year engineering course. Instructors have noted over the years thatstudents in engineering courses often find it difficult to relate to non-technical issues, especiallymaterial
. K. Schauer, A. Kohls, and K. Fu, “Push and pull: Exploring the engineering retentionproblem for underrepresented groups and gauging interest in interdisciplinary integration intoundergraduate curriculum,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Baltimore,Maryland, June 2023.[10] J. Yang, J. D. Towles, S. Sheppard, and S. Atwood, “Internships’ impact on recognition forfirst-generation and/or low-income students,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Minneapolis, Minnesota, August 2022.[11] A. Meador, “Examining recruitment and retention factors for minority STEM majorsthrough a stereotype threat lens,” School Science and Mathematics, vol. 118, no. 1-2, pp. 61–69,January 2018.[12] T. L. Strayhorn and R. M. Johnson, “What
Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching (2023), Excellence in Faculty Academic Advising for the Department of Mechanical Engineering (2020). In addition, he is also a Co-PI on the NSF-supported HSI Implementation and Evaluation Project: Enhancing Student Success in Engineering Curriculum through Active e-Learning and High Impact Teaching Practices (ESSEnCe).Dr. Sudeshna Pal, University of Central Florida Dr. Sudeshna Pal is an Associate Lecturer in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at the University of Central Florida (UCF), where she teaches courses in the areas of system dynamics, controls, and biomedical engineering. Her current research interest is engineering education, with focus on blended learning
the examinee's response to an initial question, the CAT system engages in a promptevaluation of the response's accuracy. This step involves updating the ability level—a criticalperson-level parameter—predicated upon the estimation of likelihood. This immediate assessmentis integral to the system's next step - adjusting the difficulty level of forthcoming questions. Afterthis, by the estimated ability, model by using the Fisher information and minimize the differentiate Table 5. The CDM DINA model parameters for selected items on the FCI and FCME. Item guessing slip FCI_1 0.7342 0.0449 RMSEA2 FCI_2 0.4291 0.1921
) Disagree (3) Neutral (4) Agree (5) Strongly Agree2. In comparison to the time required to solve a calculation problem, an error detection problem on the same subject requires: (1) Much less time (2) Less time (3) Same time (4) More time (5) Much more time3. Practicing error detection problems helps me avoid mistakes on calculation problems for the same subject: (1) Strongly Disagree (2) Disagree (3) Neutral (4) Agree (5) Strongly Agree4. In my engineering curriculum, I would prefer to see: (1) No error detection problems (2) Some error detection problems in each course (0-1 per chapter) (3) Many error detection problems per course (1-2 per chapter) (4) No opinion either way5. What % of your
about the online experience and the efficacy of it.In the further comments section of the survey that was distributed to respondents, they had manycomments about their graduate experience. The following comments were specifically related toonline coursework: Student 1: My wife is in the military so having a flexible 100% online curriculum was the most important to me. Student 2: Engineering online is a great program for engineers looking to complete a masters degree while working full time. I have really enjoyed it and can say nothing bad about the program. Student 3: This is my first online degree that I'm taking, so it is an interesting learning curve compared to physically being in class
proposed curriculum should be designed with a “veryholistic approach” of “mindfully considering all the aspects that go into how to train an engineer,because it's not all about what courses they need to complete.” Others echoed this desire forrevised or redesigned engineering curriculum for undergraduate students that better suited theirneeds as diverse modern-day engineers.As with the pedagogies employed in individual engineering classrooms, participants providedtheir thoughts on engineering Curricular Policy Changes and Discussions. General, structural, orsystemic issues are brought up in this code, as well as discussions on institution-wide policychange. All participants agreed that, in general, the engineering curriculum is rigorous, and
toSaturday morning at 7:00am, which alleviated some stress on the system. With the knowledgethat students submit work within 48 hours of the due date and to reduce server load, due dateswere moved to correspond with the student’s lab day and set to 11:59pm that night, which givesthem three lab periods to work on an assignment if they fall behind. A late submission period wasalso instituted with a 30% penalty for the following Monday at 11:59pm.ConclusionThe course transformation and software infrastructure described in this paper represents a stepforward in the development of a digital enterprise curriculum that emphasizes data management.Not only has our approach moved the needle in terms of level of understanding of how CAD andPDM fit into the
center of theto incorporate sustainability into engineering education sustainable practices [13].curriculum [13].Western New England University has been successful in developing an “entrepreneurial and designthinking” ecosystem using design courses from each year within the engineering curriculum: first-yearthrough senior year with extracurricular entrepreneurial design activities such as Golden Bear InnovationJam to supplement these high-impact practices [14, 15, 16]. Using this successful framework as a model,four sustainability modules were designed and mapped to select EOP learning objectives and delivered tostudents throughout the 4-year College of Engineering (COE) curriculum, one course module per gradefrom first-year to senior year. The
sustaining STEM outreach assessment and evaluation. Micaha received her Master of Science in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Education degree from the University of Kentucky College of Education, and her Bachelor of Science in Integrated Strategic Communication (Public Relations) from the University of Kentucky College of Communication and Information Studies. She worked as an undergraduate engineering recruiter and outreach director for five years prior to beginning her doctoral program.Aaron Arenas, North Carolina State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring the Impact of Industry Partnerships to Promote STEM
Congress, pp. 2071-2080, 2012.[13] P. A. Harvey, “Borehole Sustainability in Rural Africa: An analysis of routine field data” in 30th WEDC International Conference, Vientiane, Lao PDR, 2004.[14] M. Wood, “A handpump for Africa: The Afridev experience,” Waterlines, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 29-31, 1993.[15] D. Gilbert, M. Lehman Held, J. L. Ellzey, W. T. Bailey, L. B. Young, “Teaching ‘community engagement’ in engineering education for international development: Integration of an interdisciplinary social work curriculum,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 256-266, 2015.[16] “Guideline to Remote Work for International Projects,” Volunteer Village, 2024. Available: https://volunteer.ewb
point-reward system sustained bytoken acquisition and spending. When this game attribute and its induced student behaviors arealigned to complement learning outcomes (e.g. completing supplemental learning activities,participating during class), instructors and meta-studies over the past decade have demonstratedthat these pedagogical approaches can also enhance how students cognitively, emotionally, andsocially experience class content[12, 13]. While TEs have had more documented use in primary school classrooms[14], [15], reportsof undergraduate classrooms using this strategy have steadily increased since the work ofBoniecki & Moore 2003 who integrated a TE into an introductory psychology course andsuccessfully saw greater class
reinforcement learning. His research interests include medical informatics, robotics, animal monitoring, and prediction of biomaterial properties. Before joining the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia, Emmanuel worked as a faculty member at the Department of Computer Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria. Furthermore, Emmanuel was a research and teaching fellow at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), USA, and earned a distinction in the course: ”An Introduction to Evidence-Based Undergraduate STEM Teaching” coordinated by the Center for the Integration of Research Teaching and Learning (CIRTL), 2022. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
Paper ID #41974Work in Progress: Development of a Medical Devices Course for SophomoreBiomedical Engineering Undergraduate StudentsDr. Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware Dr. Sarah I. Rooney is an Associate Professor and Associate Chair of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Delaware. Dr. Rooney’s efforts center around developing and teaching courses in the undergraduate BME curriculum and facilitating continuous improvement of the program.Mrs. Shameeka M Jelenewicz, University of Delaware ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
students and faculty, he aims to contribute valuable insights that can enhance support systems and resources available on campus. Through his academic endeavors and research pursuits, Hoc aspires to make a meaningful difference in promoting mental wellness within the academic environment.Dr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in 2011 and 2014, respectively. He has worked with Tata
universitypresentations and one conference presentation to share his research strategy and findings (1.3).The interdisciplinarity of his work also made it relevant for a variety of practitioners, leading himto share his findings with an engineering firm, a gold trading company, a small-scale goldmining consultancy, a lawyer specialized in small-scale gold mining, an NGO that empowersstudents to carry out community-development projects in vulnerable communities, and a numberof national government agencies (the Colombian Defensoría del Pueblo, Agencia Nacional deMinería, Ministerio de Minas y Energía, and Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje). (2.3)Rojas’ experiences translating his research for diverse audiences illuminated barriers forsystematically integrating
their counterparts [36]. Efforts haveincluded updating the first year curriculum to incorporate social justice [37], integratinginclusive practices into the departmental makerspace [38] [15], creating a summer bridgeprogram for engineering students [39], conducting research on impacts of curricular and co-curricular changes on belonging and identity [40] [41] [42], and an National Science Foundation(NSF)-funded project which seeks to increase student sense of belonging in undergraduateengineering students through the integration of social engagement activities into an academicmakerspace.The focus of this paper is related to an NSF-funded makerspace engagement and belongingproject. There are two main components of the project: 1. Development and
candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning More-New Edition. Princeton University Press.Carlson, E. D., Engebretson, J., & Chamberlain, R. M. (2006). Photovoice as a Social Process of Critical Consciousness. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 836–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287525Castaneda, D. I. (2019). Exploring Critical Consciousness in Engineering Curriculum Through an Ill-Structured Problem. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028370Crenshaw, K. (1991). Women of color at the center: Selections from the third national conference on women of color and the law: Mapping the margins: Intersectionality
comprehensively, the undergraduate engineering curriculum should not only besolidly grounded in the fundamentals of engineering but also aim to instill a commitment tolifelong learning in students [1]. It is essential for students to receive exposure to multiple technicaldisciplines so they can broaden their vision of engineering overall [2]. Typically, schools requirestudents to take engineering elective courses outside their primary engineering major, therebyfostering connections with other engineering domains. Electives present an excellent opportunityfor students to showcase their talents, cultivate new interests, and develop additional abilities [3],[4]. Moreover, these elective courses create an environment for students from various
and conference proceedings. Also, she is part of Dr. Siyuan Song’s research lab, the Safety Automation and Visualization Environment (SAVE) Laboratory, which integrates technologies and education themes to improve building performance and safety engineering.Dr. Siyuan Song, The University of Alabama Dr. Siyuan Song is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental engineering at the University of Alabama. Her research interests include Occupational Safety and Health, Training and Workforce Development, Engineering Education, Building Information Modeling, Machine Learning and AI in Construction, and Construction Progress Monitoring and Simulation
Computer Engineering (CpE), Electrical Engineering (EE), andMechanical Engineering (ME) programs and can be integrated into any academic program to fostercreativity while teaching strategies that promote ethical academic and professional behavior. Theeducational outcomes align with the EE department’s strategic goals and the university’s mission toprovide high-quality academic programs, as demonstrated below: 1. Students demonstrate ethical decision-making and embody the attributes of an engineering profession. 2. Students majoring in Electrical Engineering and Theatre collaborate to educate their peers in ethical awareness and moral values. 3. Students acquire cross-disciplinary lifelong learning skills.To assess the impact
well as Digital Systems Design with FPGA using Verilog but it doesn’t imply any method oridea to use a FPGA to develop a μC or μP. The curriculum in many colleges probably teaches with thesame content and method but the result is not the purpose of this paper tries to present. On the otherhand, some improvement has been made to enhance the learning of μC or μP such as what the article[2] shows with an experiment platform, but it again doesn’t discuss any information to let studentsdesign their own processors or controllers. As described above, knowing how to design with acommercially available μC or μP opens a door to explore embedded system development whichredirects the focus of the development of a digital system into software and hardware
the final cost and the $200 allowance was covered byvarious donations either in kind or monetary.ConclusionsBoth projects will be integrated into the curriculum for the Applied Fluid Mechanics coursecommencing in the fall semester of 2024. A subsequent paper will analyze the influence of theseinternally developed laboratory tools on the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET)curriculum, along with the evaluations linked to each upcoming laboratory experiment.In conclusion, the development and integration of in-house laboratory demonstration units haveproven to be essential in enhancing our engineering technology students' content knowledge,fostering curiosity, creativity, promoting effective teamwork and collaboration while creatingvalue for
any.Analysis of the data would yield an informative conclusion of effects of the AI intervention inengagement and learning.AcknowledgementThis research was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Innovative TechnologyExperiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) program under award numbers DRL–1949384and DRL–1949493.References[1]Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, and Computer Science TeachersAssociation, “Advisory Group Promotes ‘5 Big Ideas in AI’ for K-12 Schools”, June 7, 2023.[Online]. Available: http://ai4k12.org/ Accessed Dec. 26, 2023].[2] H. Zhang, I. Lee, S. Ali, D. DiPaola, Y. Cheng, and C. Breazeal, “Integrating Ethics andCareer Futures with Technical Learning to Promote AI Literacy for Middle School Students
, Formal MentorshipPrograms, Industry Internships, Professional Networking Events, Curriculum Integration, CareerCounseling Services, Cross-disciplinary Collaboration, Faculty Development, AlumniEngagement, Industry Research Collaborations, and Academic-Industry Forums), only tworesources, Industry Internships, and Industry Research Collaborations, stood out as 'Very helpful'(see Fig. 7). This finding reveals that faculty are interested in building stronger ties to industrybut are not able to realize them. For the remaining nine resources, eight of them were ranked as'Helpful' in the largest proportion, whereas one resource, Curriculum Integration, was considered'Moderately helpful' by the largest fraction of faculty.When asked about additional
Paper ID #41571Board 279: Failure in Focus: Unpacking the Impact of Video-Based Reflectionson Museum Educator PracticesDr. Amber Simpson, State University of New York at Binghamton Amber Simpson is an Associate Professor of Mathematics Education in the Teaching, Leaming and Educational Leadership Department at Binghamton University. Her research interests include (1) examining individual’s identity(ies) in one or more STEM disciplines, (2) understanding the role of making and tinkering in formal and informal learning environments, and (3) investigating family engagement in and interactions around STEM-related activities.Dr
-doctoral fellow in the Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering at the University of New Mexico. His Ph.D. is in Engineering Education from Purdue University, and he has worked as a K-16 STEM instructor and curriculum designer using various evidence-based active and passive learning strategies. In 2015, Ruben earned an M.S. in Chemical Engineering at Universidad de los Andes in Colombia, where he also received the title of Chemical Engineer in 2012. His research interests are grounded in the learning sciences and include how K-16 students develop engineering thinking and professional skills when addressing complex socio-technical problems. He aims to apply his research to the design of better educational