filtration system using sand, pebbles, activated carbon, and coffee filters. Not only did the designs vary significantly between groups, but the creativity in planning and modeling their devices did as well
winter) that retained the standard coursedesign format or nine experimental sections (5 in fall, 4 in winter), which piloted intentionalteam role rotation as the curricular innovation. The team roles were (i) primary research, (ii)secondary research, (iii) training-building-testing, and (iv) project management and are describedbelow. Team members submitted a written assignment for each role rotation to underscore thattechnical communication is a core engineering competency and ensure individual accountabilityfor team members to the instructors.● Project Management Lead: Guides the team in setting priorities, goals, tasks and deadlines for a given timeframe; documents team progress, planning and evolution of design plan● Primary Research
common path planning technique is the A* algorithm. The A* path planningalgorithm is presented in lecture, then the students are asked to employ this algorithm as part ofthe artificial intelligence in a game where tanks need to navigate around obstacles to approach anenemy. Similar algorithms, such as Dijkstra's algorithm, are also introduced and the students areasked to evaluate the impact the new algorithms have on the performance of the game, based ontiming or frame rate. These algorithms vary significantly in performance. For example,Dijkstra's algorithm finds the shortest path but explores all possible paths and executes slowly.In contrast the A* algorithm selectively examines paths and therefore completes in a muchshorter time than
tofunction would be valuable to them as both entrepreneurs or as employees of the largercorporation. Again we discovered that giving students the chance to investigate a particular areawas not meant to change their minds to an item. It was meant to make them aware of the areaand understand that it could be valuable to them in the future. Knowledge truly became a force toreckon with.During the next semesters, we plan to expand our reviews of the material and the students’reactions to all the topics covered in the course. Our principle concern is that the student reactionfocuses on material that they have not encountered in other courses on campus. It is especiallyimportant to create an atmosphere where students can gain from topics that they might
oversees two or three teams of fourstudents each, as they work to create their final projects by coordinating project planning,encouraging an atmosphere of openness and acceptance, ensuring an even distribution of workloadand coordinating the procurement of needed items that will not be 3D printed. By encouraging anatmosphere where students feel they can voice questions and ideas freely, UGTAs are able to helpteams create projects that are tailored to their own specific interests. Typically, this involvesselecting a generic mechanical project from a pre-approved list and giving it a unique twist througha mechanical enhancement and/or adding embedded controls. An example is shown below, figure1, is a traditional clock that has been reimagined to
assortment of manufacturingtools to create, prototype, and test their designs. In engineering design education, instructors seekto introduce these techniques and train students up to a working level of proficiency.Meeting these broad course objectives requires careful planning and a suitable educationalmodel. Effective skills training should teach underlying concepts, demonstrate proper usage oftools, dedicate time for learners to practice, and most importantly, provide feedback to thelearners [1]. Well-implemented training can lead to safer practices, increased performance, andfewer mistakes. When skills are taught effectively in a class, students see positive results bothindividually and as teams [2].When teaching such an extensive field as
-Contreras, L., 2000, —A Plan to Increase Graduate Enrollment at Science, Math, and Engineering Disciplines,“ Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Las Cruces, New Mexico, April 5 œ 8, 2000, Paper 76C1.3. Brian L. Yoder, “Engineering by numbers”, the ASEE Web site at www.asee.org/colleges.4. Hasan, A., 2019, —"Advanced Manufacturing Workforce Skill Gap Analysis” Central New Mexico College’s final report to the U.S. Department of Labor, April 2019.5. McShannon, J., Derlin, R., 1999, "Interactive Learning Styles of Undergraduate Students in New Mexico: A New Model," Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Le Tourneau University, March 7 9, 1999, on CD-ROM.AHMED HASAN, Ph.D.Dr
Technology noted in its 2012 report5 that less than40% of the undergraduates planned to major in STEM. While attracting students into STEM is oneaspect of the problem, retaining those who indicate interest in STEM is the other end of thechallenge. The six-year graduation data for the 2003-09 cohort published in 2014 by the NationalCenter of Education Statistics6 reported that 48% of those who entered college as STEM studentseither changed their major to a non-STEM major or left college without obtaining a degree. In 2016,only 4% of African-Americans received an engineering degree7. The six-year degree completion ratein STEM was less than 40%, and persistence of females, and racial and ethnic minorities Proceedings of the 2020
. Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright © 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 7In future work, we plan to look at this and additional data across gender and other diversity lineswhen possible (i.e. when data can remain anonymous). Additionally, as we construct newquestions and update existing questions, we will work to ensure the questions are accurately statedto ensure we get the most useful data from our students. We will also consider comparison studiesbetween students that have taken UTDesign EPICS and those that have not when participating inthe UTDesign
their parents’ permission to work, aswell as their marriage plans. Because women are not expected to travel alone, female studentsmiss out on internships, additional training, and job interviews. In other words, gender remains aviable factor in female students’ lives. ConclusionsSince India’s independence in 1947, Indian women have been getting education, which was seenas a means to learn social and home skills; it was not seen as a means to have a job unless therewere economic needs. Women were expected to pursue medical and teaching career paths;engineering was seen as suited for men. Of all career options open to women in India, IT hasbecome more popular than medical and teaching. This is mostly
isimportant or convenient, implementing 1756 DHRIO and the CAT #756-EN2T will be veryimportant to allow.3. Hardware DocumentationHardware Documentation is the most crucial part of migration procedure. The first step indocumentation is setting up diagrams of the current control system, confirming every singleconnection. This is the base for the project and if it is incorrect, the rest of the project will beincorrect; any CAD software will suffice. The CAD drawings should have multiple different parts:I/O connections, high-level topology, and communication connections. After the current systemdrawings are configured correctly, the user can begin planning for the updated hardware. High-level topology is the first part that will be updated. It is
institutional planning, decision-making and reporting.Dr. Ashwin Satyanarayana, New York City College of Technology Dr. Ashwin Satyanarayana is currently the Chair and Associate Professor with the Department of Com- puter Systems Technology, New York City College of Technology (CUNY). Prior to this, Dr. Satya- narayana was a Research Scientist at Microsoft in Seattle from 2006 to 2012, where he worked on several Big Data problems including Query Reformulation on Microsoft’s search engine Bing. He holds a PhD in Computer Science from SUNY, with particular emphasis on Data Mining and Big data analytics. He is an author or co-author of over 25 peer reviewed journal and conference publications and co-authored a text- book
(is that bad)? Are these categories, steps, or orientations(I currently use all of these labels interchangeably)? Do I have the necessary disciplinarybackground to develop this (who should help me)? How does this relate to engineering andengineering education? This paper is a work in progress, and I plan to have open discussion inthe presentation sessions.IntroductionSo many of us are working in the area of diversity, especially over the last several years. Myacademic home, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly), is at apredominately white state university. The caring and “woke” individuals at the university arespending increasingly more time and resources on initiatives that will make the university morewelcoming
, 201 – 215.[6] Laanan, F. S. (2001). Transfer student adjustment. New Directions for CommunityColleges, 114, 5 – 13.[7] Young, Jacob TN, and Elizabeth Litzler. "Confirmatory factor analysis of transfer studentadjustment." Community College Journal of Research and Practice 37, no. 11 (2013).[8] Anderson-Rowland, Mary R. "Understanding How the 4.0 Guaranteed Plan Works." In2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2016.
here, with tiered content – each topic buildingdirectly on the previous – setting up an assessment plan separating proficiency and mastery skillssets fosters improved student mastery of core principles across the entire sequence of topics.The increased success rate on the proficiency level work by the students is likely due to severalinterrelated causes, including shifted expectations and having the foundation necessary for thenext topic. Students appreciate the clearly defined expectations required for the proficiency levelcompetency (also access to a C-level grade). The instructor now also know precisely wherethese students have demonstrated competency at the end of a course. When competency inprocedural analysis is conflated with the
female. Enrollment in College Physics I, which focused onmechanics was between 20 and 30 students per semester. College Physics II, which focused onwas often smaller and composed primarily of students who intended to move on to graduate studyin biology or physical therapy. These classes were smaller and had between 15 and 20students.The 200-level students who enrolled in Physics I and Physics II were most often 1st or 2nd yearengineering majors, with 10-20 per semester. There were usually between 2 and 6 students frombiology, chemistry, or biochemistry who planned to pursue professional programs in medicine,dentistry, or optometry. These students were often 3rd or 4th year students. Additionally, 1-2math or math education students may also be
Assurance in Engineering Education in China4.1 Active participation in domestic program accreditation of engineering educationThe earliest evaluation practice①of engineering education in China started in 1992. TheDegree Committee of the State Council and the Ministry of Education commissioned theMinistry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development to take charge of the organization andmanagement. The National Education Evaluation Committee for Architecture Education wasresponsible for the evaluation of architecture program. Subsequently, it carried out evaluationwork in civil engineering, urban and rural planning, built environment and energy applicationengineering, water supply and drainage science and engineering, and engineeringmanagement.In March
augmented reality and virtual reality, quality management, and performance improvement through training and organization de- velopment. He is currently serving as the Director of HRD Virtual Lab as well as HRD Analytics Lab in the Department of Technology Leadership & Innovation. Dr. Akdere published in business, man- agement, technology, training, human resources, organization development, and education journals. He teaches courses in human resource development, leadership, training, organization development, cross- cultural management, and strategic planning. He is serving on the editorial boards of several international journals including Human Resource Development Quarterly and Total Quality Management &
[1]. Assessment of every aspect of curricular, co-curricular, and larger educational environmental aspects is the norm. Evidence-based decision-making leads those working in every aspect of higher education today to seek out or deviseassessment tools and plans to observe efficacy and introduce well-considered evidence-basedchanges where room for improvement in outcomes seems indicated. The National Survey ofStudent Engagement, or NSSE, is a widely applied instrument in the U.S. and Canada. NSSEallows participating institutions to get a periodic high-level snapshot of how their incoming First-year and near-graduation (Senior) students compare to one another, and compare to those fromother similar institutions, in their self-perceptions of
region may not be rosy in the Figure 2. Accelerated impact of sea levellong term, the urgency of recurrent flooding has rise in subject study area. These impactscreated an environment in which cities and academics and modeled approaches to adaptation andstruggle to plan and to identify strategies to ameliorate mitigation will be of use to other coastalthe impacts of a changing environment. Immediately communities globally as conditions mimicapparent is that no single discipline is equipped to those experienced currently in the studyprovide guidance. Rather, the changing world area. Source: Dr. Gabriel Vecchi afterdemands that government agencies, professionals, and Oppenheimer, Princeton Universityacademic
control logic, andthe program adjusts the duty cycle to hold the output voltage constant in the face of varying loadconditions or input voltage changes. The basic front panel in Figure 7 is shown operating infeedback mode, where the duty cycle is adjusting automatically to force the output voltage tomatch the target value. Note that a planned enhancement to this program also provides the userwith the ability to vary feedback gain and modality to study the effects of stability and settlingtime. Again, by implementing all of the control algorithms in software, these changes areexpedited compared to a hardware-only implementation. Figure 7 LabVIEW front panel in feedback modeThe basic block diagram is shown in Figure 8
of positive adaptations intrinsic to acommunity that has tried to overcome adversity. In ASGM communities, these have includedmercury detoxification programs [19], territorial local planning that keeps ASGM away fromwatersheds [20], the desire of groups that have been discriminated to organize to gain voice andpower [21], etc. For these type of positive adaptations to occur, communities must exhibit thefollowing characteristics: Collective self-esteem (love who you are as a community); Culturalidentity (know who you are as a community); Social humor (be able to laugh at who you are);and State honesty (transparency between local/state government and communities) [14]. Studentsin my class learned about these positive adaptations by researching
well as commonly used tools and equipment. The second course of the sequencefocuses on the programming based on the G-Code using both SIEMENS and FANUC controllers.In the introduction course, instruction is given in the use of hand operating machining equipmentincluding band saw, grinder, drill press, vertical milling machine, and metal lathe machine;common tools for measurement and inspection including caliper, micrometer, height gauge, anddial gauge indicator; product planning and development including path design, discussion ofcutting tools, machining feeds, and machining speeds; shop safety, and potential careeropportunities. The focus is placed on the following essential turning and milling operations as wellas tools for these operations
, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] V. P. Dennen and K. J. Burner, "The cognitive apprenticeship model in educational practice," Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, vol. 3, pp. 425-439, 2008.[2] M. Borrego, "Conceptual difficulties experienced by trained engineers learning educational research methods," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, pp. 91-102, 2007.[3] C. J. Finelli, S. R. Daly, and K. M. Richardson, "Bridging the research‐to‐practice gap: Designing an institutional change plan using local evidence," Journal of Engineering
defining the steps tomake a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. By letting participants incorporate dance whenteaching algorithmic thinking, participants were able to connect a familiar activity with thealgorithmic process in a hands-on way that was fun. One student commented to the instructorthat she loves to dance and to create and to see how dancing and programming could worktogether was great. This experience supported prior research by the authors that a hands-on,project-based learning approach in a computing camp strengthens teamwork and problemsolving skills [13].Future plans including offering this approach in other computing camps for elementary girls.Having a larger sample size will enable more data collection and assessment of the
institutions represented thelandscape of ~350 engineering schools in 2014 in terms of size and other institutional characteristicsrelated to the intent of the study. A total of 7,179 students responded to the survey; of these respondents,6,187 students were classified as “juniors”, “seniors”, or “5th-year seniors”, in keeping with the study’ssampling plan. See Gilmartin, et al. for a detailed technical report that provides extensive informationabout the study objectives and research questions, sampling framework, response rates and nonresponsebias, and respondent characteristics [20]. All procedures were approved by the Institutional ReviewBoards at Stanford University and Elizabethtown College.Variables considered in the analysis Students
Operating Board (BEGOB) as a representative to the Committee on Administration and Finance of the ASME (2011-2013) and a two-year term (2013-2015) on BEGOB as a rep. to the strategic planning committee. He has also served as a judge for the ASME Scholarship Program’s University applications from March from 2016 to 2018.Prof. Mohammad Elahinia, The University of Toledo Dr. Elahinia is a University Distinguished Professor in Engineering and Chair in the Mechanical, Indus- trial, and Manufacturing Engineering (MIME) Department at The University of Toledo. He graduated with his doctorate in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in August 2004. After graduation, he joined the faculty
’ views of success included commonmeasures of academic success in engineering; they also reflected participants’ longer-term careergoals and financial plans. Findings have implications for the development of robust engineeringpathways at both 2- and 4- year institutions. Departures from the “norm”: How nontraditional undergraduates experienced success in an alternative engineering transfer programThe idea/ideal of the traditional college undergraduate as “one who earns a high school diploma,enrolls full time immediately after finishing high school, depends on parents for financial support,and either does not work during the school year or works part time” is giving way in 21st centuryAmerica [1]. As early as 2002, researchers noted
gender diversity, particularly in UPR-Ponce, we arecollaborating with “Get by STEM”, a project funded by the US Department of Education seekingto increase the number of female students in STEM. Social science has been an integral part ofthe project that has not been fully implemented yet. Accordingly, the planned curriculumincludes guest experts on the subject.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantsNo. 1832468 and 1832427 (HSI program). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors are greatly thankful to theadvisory board members
minimized [2]. The dynamics of the panopticon areexemplified in the design of Jeremy Bentham’s panopticon as illustrated in Figure 2(b) [19]. Theauthor intends to draw on Foucault’s interpretation of Bentham’s panopticon. These are not one-to-one analogies as the instructor does not offer a “performance” in the lecture hall nor is theobserving instructor invisible to the students in the computer lab as she would be in apanopticon. The analogies hold at the level of the underlying assumptions while designing thesespaces vis-à-vis what type of interactions in the space are anticipated and planned for. (a) (b