Education, ASEE (2003).4. D. Pines, M. Nowak, H. Alnajjar, L. I. Gould & D. Bernardete, “Integrating Science and Math into the Freshman Engineering Design Course”, Proceedings 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, ASEE (2002).5. M. L. Temares, R. Narasimhan & S. S. Lee, “IMPaCT - A Pilot Program”, 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, ASEE (1996).6. J. Dunn & J. Barbanel. One model for an integrated math/physics course focusing on electricity and magnetism and related calculus topics. Am J of Phys, 68(8), 749-757, (2000).7. L. Cui, N. S. Rebello, & A.G. Bennett, College students’ transfer from calculus to physics. En L. Cui, N. S. Rebello, y A. G. Bennett
Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez. Author Gutiérrez Cuba gratefully acknowledgesthe National Council for Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACyT) for her postdoctoralfellowship.References1. Jonassen, D. H. 2011. Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem-Solving Learning Environments. New York: Routledge.2. Fogler, H. S., LeBlanc, S. E., and Rizzo, B. 2014. Strategies for Creative Problem Solving. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 2015. The Systems Model of Creativity: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. New York: Springer.4. AACU. 2013. Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU) Value Rubrics. Available (January 28, 2016) at: http://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics
instrumentality, whichdescribes the degree to which an individual considers something s/he is learning to be useful inhis/her future. Measures of instrumentality have been shown to predict course performance in avariety of settings, including engineering [33, 34]. Essentially, when students don’t see a need tolearn something, their learning tends to be negatively impacted. Commonly, the courses thatgate-keep advanced coursework—such as capstone design courses—include a large componentof introductory or basic content that stands in as disciplinary knowledge [35]; in such cases,students who don’t see these components as useful will tend to perform less well. Increasinginstrumentality for struggling and underserved learners is one way to support them. For
work should be built. Appropriating the turtle in 1 It is important to note, this is the first CS course, since UC Berkeley has been tracking student course data, thathas ever achieved that feat.the LOGO programming environment gave children a way to think about the principles ofcomputation and the practice of programming.Design of an Inclusive CS0 CourseAt UC Berkeley, there are two separate ways a students can get a CS degree. They can either get aBachelor of Arts (B.A.) through the College of Letters and Sciences (L&S), or get a Bachelor ofScience (B.Sc.) through the College of Engineering. The major difference between the two tracksis that students who get the B.A. get to take breadth requirements that gives them exposure tomore
asoriginally recorded...”). However, in viewing the original video footage, the authors found thatthe vignette and the video data do not correspond. The vignette that NGSS provides states thefollowing: “Ms. S. moved over to another group that had just broken into laughter and asked what was so funny. Rick related, ‘I see smashed cans all the time. I think an airfoot stomped the tanker down. And the molecules transformed into a molecule foot.’ Ms. S. asked, ‘What is this imaginary foot?’ Latasia answered, ‘Air.’ Ms. S. guided the students, ‘Let’s add that idea to the model.’ (The teacher validated the use of place [smashed cans in the neighborhood] to keep the students engaged and make a
moving from the simulations and virtual environments to the real-worldenvironment. Future work should examine the affect of students learning a skill in a computerenvironment and how their emotions evolve as they attempt to transfer skills learned in computerenvironments to real world applications. Future research should also examine whether thefindings from this study are consistent across different tasks and different 2D and 3Dimplementations.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE-1104181. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. This work was
/. [Accessed: 31- Mar-2015].[4] H. P. Mandel, The Psychology Of Underachievement : Differential Diagnosis And Differential Treatment. New York: Wiley, c1988.[5] E. W. Gordon, Supplementary Education : The Hidden Curriculum Of High Academic Achievement. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, c2005.[6] C. M. Steele and J. Aronson, “Stereotype threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.pdf,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 797–811, 1995.[7] S. Hurtado, C. B. Newman, M. C. Tran, and M. J. Chang, “Improving The Rate Of Success For Underrepresented Racial Minorities In STEM Fields: Insights From A National Project,” New Dir. Institutional Res., vol. 2010, no. 148, pp. 5–15
: IdeaKegClearly stated, there are innumerable tools for implementing creating problem solving techniquesin the classroom. One such tool is IdeaKegTM, a component of Kiln Ideas Ltd.’s broadercollaborative innovation framework known as FuseTrailTM which closely follows that of theOsborn-Parnes CPS model. We picked the IdeaKeg problem solving tool for several reasons.One is that the tool is used by companies for inventing new products and services. It also hasbeen associated particularly with generating ideas and solving problems for startup businesses,and we wanted our engineering students to model this experience in our curriculum. It includesprogressive layers of deepening associations for the participants, ending up with an example ofhow a problem was
(s) [13].We expect to have an increase on students enrolled in the EGT programs as the new MET programis in place; we also expect some migration of students from the current programs (EET, MMET)to the MET program. An additional pressure on our faculty body can be anticipated, as we will berequired to meet to the demand from our constituents, as suggested by the survey results. Thesefacts fully support the creation of a new faculty line to be fulfilled by a new faculty member.Faculty Professional DevelopmentCurrency maintenance involves continuing scholarly activities and/or professional interactionsthat strengthen the faculty member's knowledge of his/her field and its interdisciplinaryadvancements, best business practices, newest technology
(3) face-to-face but taught in parallel with the online section. 600 500 400 300 Other 200 Reform 100 0Figure 2: Calculus I enrollment by semester.Total students “captured” by the reform project, as a percent of enrollment is shown in Figure 3.It appears to be stabilizing in the low to mid 70’s, which currently reflects the portion of calculusthat Boise State University has chosen to offer as honors, online, or face-to-face but parallel toonline. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40
implemented:a National Academy of Engineering (NAE)’s Grand Challenges hands-on design project infreshman Introduction to Engineering course; a truss bridge hands-on design project insophomore Solid Mechanics course; a manual toy hands-on design project in junior/seniorMechanism Analysis and Design course. The goal was to provide students with hands-on designexperiences throughout the mechanical engineering curriculum. In this paper, the implementationof these hands-on design projects will be described. Students’ performances in these designprojects will also be presented. Student perceptions of these hands-on design projects have beenobtained through an end-of-semester survey and results will be discussed. Overall students feltvery positively about
Question 3 W M S Avg. W M S Avg. W M S Avg.First-year 2 0 5 2.4 2 4 1 1.9 2 3 2 2.0Upperclass 2 6 4 2.2 5 4 2 1.6 3 6 3 2.0Entire class 4 6 9 2.3 7 8 3 1.7 5 9 5 2.0Figure 3. Scores and weighted averages, separated by class levelAveraging the scores for all three questions gave us the student’s overall score of a weak,moderate, or strong grasp of the connections between primary sources, engineering, and STSconcepts. First-year students contributed 2 weak, 3 moderate, and 1 strong
targeted toward engineering design. The collaboration between two universities (LTU and UDM) and three different colleges (Biomedical, Mechanical and Nursing) combines the diverse backgrounds and capabilities of students. Multidisciplinary team of this kind are the norm in industry and require project management skills such as effective communication, decision making, resource gathering and scheduling of various tasks. Therefore, the students not only must demonstrate a prototype designed for specific customer need(s) but also the execution process followed by the teams. This requires the students to recognize their roles for contributions in the team.The following sections give a brief
pN-3 … p0. The digital DDFSuses the MSB (i.e., pN-1) as the square wave output. One interpretation is to treat the pN-1 bit as asignal that divides the output period into two equal parts (i.e., two equal phases). The values of 0and 1 are assigned to the two phases, respectively. It is possible to assign multi-bit values, suchas 2 and 7, for the amplitude, and the output wave will oscillate between 2 and 7 instead. Similarly, if two MSBs (i.e., pN-1 pN-2) are considered, the same period is divided into fourphases. Different values can be assigned to the four phases. The same concept can be extendedto S MSBs, which leads to 2S phases in a period. A phase-to-amplitude lookup table with 2Sentries can be created to define the shape of the
d faculty opiinion on the use of case studies. Studdent responsses andperformaance were segregated by instructor. Student S resp onses in the sections tauught by instruuctor#1 were not n availablee.5. Next StepsDue to the overall positive effect of the case studies on student flowcharting performance, wewill continue implementing case studies. We will revise the case studies, taking into accountstudent and faculty opinions. This should include, for example, shortening Mind Games, whichuses all basic procedural programming concepts—such as input, sequencing, selection (if/else),repetition (for and while loops), and output—as well as including additional student-createdstories in the
traditional methods should not being replaced.Building Information Modeling can supplement the traditional knowledge bases and methods ofconstruction management.Bibliography1. Azhar, S., Hein, M., & Sketo, B. (2011). Building Information Modeling (BIM) Benefits, Risks and Challenges. Leadership & Management in Engineering, 241-252.2. Becerik-Gerber, B., & Kensek, K. (2010). Building Information Modeling in Architecture, Engineering and Construction: Emerging Research Directions and Trends. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineergin Education and Practice, 139-147.3. Clevenger, C. M., Ozbek, M. E., Glick, S., & Porter, D. (n.d.). Integrating BIM into Construction Management Education. Fort Collins
have been a limiting factor for this study because someone who was not an“insider” of ANSEP may have had unbiased views.Bibliography1. Executive Office of the President. Report to the President: Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. (2012).2. Frehill, L. M., Di Fabio, N. M. & Hill, S. T. Confronting the ‘new’ American dilemma: Underrepresented minorities in engineering: A data-based look at diversity. 1–109 (2008).3. Alaska Department of Education & Early Development. State of Alaska Department of Education & Early Development 2011-2012 report card to the public. (2012). at 4. Adelman, C. The toolbox revisited
Generation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 136(5), 051009. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.40269516. Svihla, V., Petrosino, A. J., & Diller, K. R. (2012). Learning to Design: Authenticity, Negotiation, and Innovation. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(4), 782.7. Fila, N. D., Purzer, Ş., & Fernandez, T. M. (Under review). How engineering students characterize their innovative design experiences.8. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of Higher Psychological Processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scrbner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.9. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.10. Amabile, T. M
Practice 131, 19-25, 2005.4. Recktenwald, G., & Edwards, R. (2007, June), Using Simple Experiments To Teach Core Concepts InThe Thermal And Fluid Sciences Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu,Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/27375. Sundararajan, S., & Faidley, L. E., & Meyer, T. R. (2012, June), Developing Inquiry-based LaboratoryExercises for a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference,San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/211906. “POGIL, Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning,” [pogil.org. Retrieved Jan. 2016.7. Douglas . E. P. et al. “Process-oriented Guided Inquiry Learning in Engineering,” Procedia - Socialand Behavioral Sciences 56 ( 2012 ) 253 – 257.8
graduate with an engineering degree. We chose this focus because considerableliterature already addresses the development of technical and professional skills amongengineering students and recent graduates.4-6FrameworkThis research is a subset of a larger research project situated in our model, ProfessionalPathways Model, which combines Sampson et al.’s model of Cognitive Information Processing7and Eccles et al.’s Expectancy X Value Theory of Achievement Motivation (EVT).8, 9Combined, these models represent a series of factors that influence career choices. For thisparticular analysis, we focused on elements of the EVT model that are most salient to the role ofsocializers in shaping career pathways. EVT focuses on the perspective of an individual
uses 2 bands, and it applies the reactive handoff approach to each of the two channels independently. The rest of the assumptions are the same as in the notes. Comparing the duplexing (sharing the resources between access point and user terminals) mechanism of 802.11 and 802.22, what is/are the main difference(s)? i. Derive the expression for pm under this scenario. ii. Find the mean SU session time in this case.Laboratory experiments: One of the key assessments of this course were the virtual laboratoryexperiments spread throughout the semester. There were three such experiments based onsimulation of some real life application of the concepts being covered in the course. They weredeveloped using USRP software
original ideas, including those on cognitive conflict triggering learning in children werefurther elaborated and expanded by various learning scientists and applied to K–12 as well as col-lege education. For instance, Doise and Mugny 4 conducted various studies about how cognitiveconflict impacts learning. Their work showed that the other learner(s) who held the conflictingviews did not need to be physically present, as long as the learners in question saw the conflictingviews as being those of peers. While triggering cognitive conflict is possible even without en-gaging with peers (e.g., via refutation text 5 instead), combining it with peer-interaction has majoradvantages. First, interaction with peers encourages the student to verbalize the
innovation, suggested to be as in The Functions of the Executive.1 Become acquainted with this human-action based approach promulgated by Holger Thuesen beginning in the 1950’s and subsequently by Paul Torgersen since about 1962. 3) Systems Thinking, suggested to be as in Systems Engineering and Analysis.2,6 Consult this 5th Edition Pearson book and access the no cost supporting materials offered on www.a2i2.com. 4) Finally, note that the general theme and objectives of this paper are being promulgated by the international honor society for systems engineering, showcased on www.omegalpha.org.II. Extending Capital Investment Decision MakingWithout a doubt, capital investment analysis (capital
perspectives of the questioner46. It is,however, necessary to recognize that the topic is jointly explored between the researcherand the interviewee45. It is just that the researcher must “bracket” his or her views toprevent imparting beliefs onto the interviewee47.ValidityVerification of a phenomenographical study is addressed through the generalizability ofthe work and the role of the researcher(s). Validity can further be addressed through theuse of quotes from the participants in the analysis as opposed to only the interpretationsof the researcher. In this study, quotes were extensively used to put the words of theparticipants’ front and center for the reader to interpret their thoughts.The intent of the study was to provide knowledge for others
psychographic measures developed in this study reveal nuances in student values ofsustainability and global citizenship, highlighting the importance of constant revision ofeducators’ understandings of student understanding in order to graduate informed and dedicatedstudents who will engage in, design for, and implement sustainability in their future careers.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for theirsupport of this work under the TUES program (grant number DUE-1245464). Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s)and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography 1. Beane, T.P., &
donated to K-12 schools, or educationalcenters, in both nations. STEM tools are hands-on, interactive products that convey educationalphenomena associated with STEM fields, and that properly align with age and grade appropriatetopic(s). Since 2009, UAH CDC teams have produced numerous STEM tools that have beendonated to K-12 schools and science centers. Examples of the previously designed STEM toolsare shown in Fig. 1.Figure 1. UAH capstone design class STEM tools-clockwise from top left: dyslexic braindisplay, fatigue and beam bending apparatus, pulley system, velocity/motion tracks, mechanicaland solar energy race track (photos courtesy of C. Carmen)MethodologyAt the start of the international partnership, UAH and CPUT CDC instructors aimed to
’s, Dan quickly discovered the necessity of creating competitive product advantages to sustain a business model. These early marketplace experiences and highly competitive interactions inspired Dan to identify and create several new technologies for his employers leading to the application for his first three patents for these products before the age of 30. After 12 years of progressive responsibilities in managing several businesses as an employee, Dan launched his own Product Design consultancy: Consul-Tech Concepts. Dan describes his design methodology as Differentiation by Design R , a product design process that discovers the unseen activity based user needs and product requirements, seeking to reveal