experience andprepare them for work. Like many engineering programs, students at Utah Valley University(UVU) complete their requirements for graduation with a semester long capstone design projectcourse. The intention of this course is to apply competencies gained during their first three yearstoward the solution of an embedded system design problem.Educational excellence requires exposing students to the current edge of research. To ensure thatstudent projects are along the same trajectory that the industry is moving, educators continuallyintroduce emerging techniques, practices, and applications into the curriculum. Advances inwireless sensors have opened new opportunities in healthcare systems. Sensor-based technologyhas invaded medical devices
to bridge the gender disparities found in the fields of computing and art. The CIA curriculum focuses on creating a collaborative, crossdisciplinary environment in which Art and Design students integrate coding and algorithmic thinking in creative works and Computer Science students apply the principles and methodology of design thinking to visual applications. The minor enables students from different disciplines to collaborate on projects requiring both a technical and a creative perspective. The minor is composed primarily of existing courses from the Art and Design (A&D) and Computer Science departments (CSC) with the
Employers Want versus What AM Frameworks RequireAbstractIn this research paper, we compare Florida’s AM employer demands and academic requirementsto state mandated AM curriculum guidelines. Florida is an AM leader, producing intermediateand finished products ranging from plastics to tortillas to motor vehicles. In total, Florida ishome to over 20,000 AM companies employing over 320,000 workers. Florida is alsogeographically diverse, being simultaneously one of the most urban and one of the most ruralhighly populous states in the country. To characterize Florida’s AM employment needs, weanalyzed 108 job postings from Florida employers who were seeking manufacturing andengineering technicians through publicly available job
in, they soon discover that the field is vast, asare available resources. This paper offers suggestions, from the perspective of what studentsreally need to know as they begin their professional careers, for technical instructors new to thefield of ethics, focusing on the following: resources, approaches, and case methodology.ContextWhile many colleges and universities offer ethics classes through specialized departments, thispaper advocates an “ethics across the curriculum” (EAC) approach. Similar to the writing acrossthe curriculum movement of years past, EAC proponents integrate the study of ethics intocourses in the major, rather than farming it out to a philosophy department. As Cruz and Frey,University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez, note
; Pedagogical strategies for first-year learning objectives, ABET accreditation Assessment requirements, assessment; Curriculum Design, reform, evaluation, and classification of first-year engineering curriculum; Integrated experiential learning curricula & global/societal problems including service, Experiential research, and entrepreneurship for the first year; Projects Project-based, activity-based, and hands-on learning in the first year; Design Teaching and practicing the engineering design process in the first year; Creative, open-ended problem-solving courses and/or related teaching activities in first
operator theory, as well as academic integrity in international engineering education.Prof. Chengbin Ma, University of Michigan–Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute Professor Chengbin Ma received the B.S. degree in industrial automation from East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China, in 1997, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engi- neering from The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, in 2001 and 2004, respectively. From 2004 to 2006, he was an R&D Researcher with the Servo Motor Laboratory, FANUC Limited, Japan. Between 2006 and 2008, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher with the Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engi- neering, University of California, Davis, USA. He
-framing process. Aspects such as sensations of safety, emotionalconnections, changing businesses and community paths made their way into students’ spatialdata structures in a fully embedded way, issues which otherwise might not be integrated into theengineering curriculum. Outcomes suggest that engaged in this active effort of spatialproduction, students uncovered multiple layers of understanding from their site-based focus ondetailed observation. Like site-sketching, spatial mapping seems to have enabled an intensity oflooking; a process which allows a deep connection to site while engaged in a visually focused 4task. Powerfully, while engaged in creative site visualizations of community and site
and controlled. In the Internet of things, theprecise geographic location and also the dimensions of a thing is critical. Therefore,sensors, transducers, locating devices and networks play very important role in IoT.There are many areas of applications of the Internet of Things like consumer, health,industrial, transportation, security, entertainment and many other[1][2][3][4][7].Furthermore, IoT enables the technology of Laboratory on the Web. This technologywhen fully brought in the academic arena, will affect the education very significantly.It is imperative to bring the IoT technology in the Engineering curriculum as soon aspossible. This paper presents the laboratory exercises for an undergraduateengineering technology course, designed
-Year Engineering at Purdue University. She focused on integrated STEM curriculum development as part of an NSF STEM+C grant as a Postdoctoral Research Assistant through INSPIRE in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University Her current research interests focus on early P-12 engineering education and identity development.Dr. Michele Miller, Campbell University Dr. Michele Miller is a Professor and Associate Dean at Campbell University. Prior to joining Campbell in 2017, she was a professor of mechanical engineering at Michigan Tech. She received undergraduate and graduate degrees in mechanical engineering from Duke and NC State, respectively. Her research interests include engineering education and
joined Oregon State University in 2018, where he is a professor and head of the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. His research interests include RF/microwave applications of additive manufacturing, development and application of microwave materials, and integrated circuit and antenna design. He holds over 35 U.S. patents and has authored over 300 professional publications.Dr. Arash Takshi, University of South Florida Bio: Arash Takshi graduated in Electronics from Amir Kabir University of Technology in Iran in 1993. Three years later he received his M.Sc. in Analog Electronics from Sharif University of Technology in Tehran. He worked in industry as an electronic design engineer for seven years
is sixteen hours. The objective of the minor is to train MET(EET)students with required expertise in EET (MET) courses. Both MET and EET minor students willundergo two specialized mechatronics courses, namely Fundamentals of Mechatronics andMechatronics System Design that will educate them with the integrated mechatronics designconcept.The Fundamentals of Mechatronics course is an introductory course for introducing students withbasic mechatronic systems and components, such as electrical and electronic components, sensorsand actuators and their interfacing with micro-controllers. This three-credit-hour course, whichincludes one-credit-hour of laboratory component, is an elective course. The course is differentfrom the required Basic
ofdiscipline specific and inter-disciplinary student-centered learning materials (courses, modules,laboratories, and simulations) in the technologies used to implement generic IoT applications andtechnology specific IoT applications. This activity will include: the development of innovativelaboratory and simulation materials using low-cost computing platforms and interactive real-timesimulations that are integrated together to mirror real world applications, the incorporation ofindustry and workplace skills into the developed curriculum materials, and the creation of severalcertificate programs in – IoT Systems Field Technician, (2) the broad dissemination of thesematerials through collaboration with existing NSF ATE Centers that have complementary
the varioussectors discussed diverse aspects of Peace Engineering and, in general, conference participantsagreed that the new global engineers, leaders and professionals need to be multi-disciplinary witha new mindset to solve global challenges. Among the aspects of Peace Engineering education theparticipants learned at the conference, they mentioned: a better idea of what Peace Engineeringis, including teaching students about compassion; the skill changes needed and the strain it willput on an already loaded curriculum as we add dimension like ethics, security and understandingof information technology; and an understanding of “good” and “bad” examples of PeaceEngineering.We also identified the overarching components of Peace Engineering
, REU, RIEF, etc.).Mrs. Samantha Michele Shields, Texas A&M University Samantha Shields is an Instructional Consultant at the Texas A&M University’s Center for Teaching Excellence. She is currently working on her doctorate in Curriculum and Instruction at Texas A&M Uni- versity, where she is concentrating on Teacher Education and Technology. Mrs. Shields taught an adjunct lecturer in the College of Education’s Teaching, Learning, and Culture department before transitioning to serving as a graduate assistant in the Center for Teaching Excellence, where she helps to develop curricu- lum.Dr. Luciana Barroso, Texas A&M University Luciana R. Barroso, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Structural
essence, effect, and potential of new teachingenhancements in real-time can be a challenge. Of course there are many factors, some named andmost not, which can affect this kind of study or alter the results. Still, with that being wellknown, this work is developed in an attempt to help push forward potential ways to establishclear, tangible, and effective approaches for determining positive enhancements in the deliveryof curriculum in the classroom. For example, if there is to be developed, a method whichdemonstrates much more than incremental improvements to teaching and learning, andsupersedes all instructor-, environment-, and student-related variables, then an accompanyingeffective assessment method utilizing a Pre-requisite Exam with
essential features of systems thinking extend beyonddisciplinary boundaries. A common general feature of systems thinking is adoption of a holistic,integrative, synthesis perspective.The work reported here employs a working definition of systems thinking taken from recentdefinitions focused on engineering applications. A key feature in common among recentformulations of system thinking is an emphasis on identifying major system elements andidentifying the relationships between those elements. Stave and Hopper created a set of systemsthinking measures by interviewing systems educators [8]. While the educators interviewedexpressed a range of opinions, the ability to recognize key components of a system was aconsistent theme. A set of systems thinking
and Tagg’s learning paradigmarticle provides us with a valuable insight about the kind of change that is urgently needed inUniversity Higher Education (Barr & Tagg 1995). The author has previously utilized these ideasin several of his ASEE publications and presentations (Narayanan, 2007 & 2009).Assessment Scholars agree that Assessment is a process in which rich, usable, credible feedback froman act of teaching or curriculum comes to be reflected upon by an academic community, andthen is acted on by that community, a department or college, within its commitment to getsmarter and better at what it does (Marchese, 1997, page 93). The National Research Councilsays that High-quality Mathematics Assessment must focus on the
- 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall”. He is a member of Nepal Engineering Association and is also a member of ASEE, and ACM. Acharya was the Principal Investigator of the 2007 HP grant for Higher Education at RMU. In 2013 Acharya received a National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant for developing course materials through an industry-academia partnership in the area of Software Verification and Validation. Acharya is also the Associate Provost for Research, Graduate Study, and International Program.Dr. Bruce R Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn Bruce R. Maxim has worked as a software engineer, project manager, professor, author, and consultant for more than thirty years. His research interests include software engineering
evaluate the fate of pesticides in drinking water treatment plants, and to develop biomimetic membranes for desalination. Her current interests include undergraduate engineering research and education. Dr. Marincel Payne is co-leading an Undergraduate Research Community to support students learning through research, undergraduate re- search to remove stormwater pollutants via engineered treatment wetlands, development of courses and research related to appropriate technology with strong emphasis on social sustainability, and frameworks for integrating open-ended problems through students’ curricula. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Lab-Scale Treatment Wetlands: A Model for
inManufacturing is 9.7% [24-25].ConclusionsThe overwhelming recommendation to entice young students to have an interest in themanufacturing sector is a well-designed Manufacturing Processes course. The course should notonly serve the academic and curriculum requirements, but also introduce the students to thesector (e.g., tours, industry speakers, and hands-on laboratory exercises). The three conclusionsare: that proximity to the manufacturing sector for students and campuses is significant, thatinternships and cooperative learning experiences are significant, and that faculty andadministration involvement are vital.A major conclusion of the work presented here is that there is a significant difference in studentsfrom campuses near more manufacturing
neighbors.Third, reaction to the workshops was generally positive. One participant said, “The workshophelped me to raise awareness of what local materials could I use in case of an eventual change orcatastrophe.” Thus, the workshops were empowering to teach tools and encourage futureinnovations in a cooperative learning environment. As further evidence of their positive impact,several participants in all three workshops expressed their desire to teach their neighbors andfamily members do build the DIY solutions.5. Integrating DIY Solutions with Engineering Education and OutreachDuring the end of the Fall 2017 semester and in the Spring 2018 semester, the authors organizedseveral DIY-style workshops at several community centers and at a vocational school
University of Waterloo. She is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won the ”Ameet and Meena Chakma award for exceptional teaching by a student” in 2014 and the ”Engineering Society Teaching Award” in 2016 and the ”Outstanding Performance Award” in 2018 from University of Waterloo. Her students regard her as an innovative teacher who continuously introduces new ideas to the classroom that increases their engagement.Prof. Scott Walbridge, University of Waterloo Scott Walbridge has been a faculty member at the University of
. It is believed that such integration of DBR with 7E can augment the overallteaching outcomes [31]-[34]. However, such approach is yet to be available in the state-of-the-artliterature.Hence, the objective of this paper is to develop an application model of the 7E method for teachingthe mechatronics course at college level, implement the model in actual classroom setting, assessthe student outcomes and modify the 7E application in cyclic order following the DBR methodbased on the feedbacks of the outcomes, which is referred in this paper as the closed-loop 7Emodel. The following two research questions are addressed: (i) Whether it is feasible to design the instruction for the mechatronics course fitting within the framework of
Paper ID #27217Student Perspectives on the Use of iPads for Navigating Construction Draw-ings: A Case StudyDr. Tom Michael Leathem, Auburn University Tom Leathem is an Assistant Professor in the McWhorter School of Building Science at Auburn Univer- sity where he teaches courses in Estimating, Construction Documents, Scheduling, and Project Delivery. He has 11 years industry experience in commercial construction management, holds a Ph.D. in Educa- tion, an M.S. in Integrated Design & Construction, and a B.S. in Construction Management. His areas of research include construction education, assessment, accreditation
–Professional Outcomes (6 total Outcomes). Outcome groupings and achievement leveldescriptions mirror the BOK3 format and definitions. After each Outcome rating, Items 8 – 11also included an open text box to allow respondents to provide additional comments.Item 12 provided a list of the 10 ABET Civil Engineering Program Criteria. Respondents wereasked to rate the importance of each component to civil engineering education and the ease ofimplementation into the civil engineering curriculum (using the same 5-point Likert scale as wasutilized in Items 8 – 11). An open text box was also provided as part of Item 12. Finally, Item 13provided one more open text box and encouraged respondents to provide any additional commentsrelated to the importance and/or
for each student.In 2015-2016, the first experiment with multidisciplinary senior design was predicated on thesupposition that students would benefit from being enrolled in the senior design coursesequences appropriate to their majors. Therefore, the students participating in multidisciplinaryprojects did not enroll in a dedicated class but instead enrolled in the traditional sequences ofcourses (as shown in Table 1). The 2015-2016 cohort integrated students from multiple majorson an extra-curricular basis; students took on an additional design experience that supplementedtheir required course or worked with students enrolled in other classes. This effort met with asignificant lack of success and became a source of frustration for students
are youdoing to work with 10,000 students? It's not possible! You have to take a strategic approach. Soyou have to meet with … deans, associate deans, you have to know all of them. …Every departmenthad a director or a chair – you have to know them, which means you have to meet with them all atleast once a year. Every department has an undergraduate curriculum person and a graduatecurriculum person. You have to know them. Those roll in and out, so you have to stay on top of it.So you are going to meet all of them. And then the courses that you want to be integrated to, youhave to meet and know the faculty.[I4]"An important element of the strategic approach is to use a top-down approach to explain theimportance of ILI to University
University. During 2006-2010, he was Chair of the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences, Founder and Director of the Center for 3-D Visualization and Virtual Reality Applications, and Technical Director of the NASA funded MIST Space Vehicle Mission Planning Laboratory at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore. In 2010, he joined Eastern Michigan University as an Associate Dean in the College of Technology and currently is a Professor in the School of Engineer- ing Technology. He has an extensive experience in curriculum and laboratory design and development. Dr. Eydgahi has served as a member of the Board of Directors for Tau Alpha Pi, as a member of Advi- sory and Editorial boards for many International
EngineeringBody of Knowledge (CEBOK), with the third edition (CEBOK3) [2] being published in thespring of 2019. ASCE developed and proposed changes to the CEPC following completion ofboth prior editions of the CEBOK.To manage change in the CEPC, ASCE has established a timeline to consider possible revisionsto the CEBOK and subsequent changes to the CEPC [3], including the CEBOK3. Many civilengineering programs may consider modifying their curriculum based on the CEBOK3,regardless of if or when ASCE actually proposes any changes to the CEPC or whether anychanges in the CEPC even occur based on the CEBOK3. Therefore, an important step inevaluating the CEBOK3 in terms of undergraduate education, whether considering accreditationor curricular design, is to
line with contemporary trends of various disciplines’ integration in theconstruction industry. The main objective of the proposed model was to foster the potentialbenefits that arises from shared educational goals between different technical areas. Throughcoordination with an existing Architectural class, the project involved students in Architecture,Civil Engineering, and Construction Engineering. The senior project mimics an Integrated ProjectDelivery process that simulates the complete development of a commercial building, fromconceptual design to construction. Architecture students led the first phase of the conceptual designof the project, with Civil and Construction Engineering students setting constraints in term ofstructural efficiency