Conference Session

Approaches to K -12 Engineering

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carolyn Vallas, University of Virginia; Larry Richards, University of Virginia; Anaïs Miodek, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

these schools range in cost, focus,targeted demographic and duration. When other summer engineering programs for pre-collegestudents include interactive activities, such as the program at New Mexico State University,11they are not necessarily combined with the range of components implemented by ITE.The emphasis of UVa’s ITE, in contrast to some other similar programs, is to reach out to the toptier of Virginia high-school rising juniors and seniors. The program puts them in a supportiveenvironment with their high-achieving peers in order to introduce them to engineering through ahands-on approach. The program reinforces the value of intellectual achievement balanced with

Conference Session

Assessment and Evaluation in Engineering Education I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelley Racicot, Washington State University; Charles Pezeshki, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

percentageincrease [18]. Network structures, like those used in distance education and online networks, ifadapted for face-to-face and blended learning environments, hold promise for solvingassessment, workload, and scalability problems in higher education.2.2 The Capstone Industrial Design ClinicProject-based engineering design has been part of this ABET-certified mechanical engineeringprogram for more than a decade. In its current form in the School of Mechanical and MaterialsEngineering at Washington State University, student groups work on industry-sponsoredengineering projects ($80-$120,000 annually) for one semester. Students are responsible forevery aspect of project management, from specification writing to delivery, including budget,travel, and

Conference Session

ABET Accreditation, Assessment and Program Improvement in ECE.

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diane T. Rover, Iowa State University; Douglas W. Jacobson, Iowa State University; Ahmed E. Kamal, Iowa State University; Akhilesh Tyagi, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

literacy and has given numerous talks on security. His current funded research is targeted at developing robust countermeasures for network-based security exploits and large scale attack simulation environ- ments and is the director of the Internet-Scale Event and Attack Generation Environment (ISEAGE) test bed project. He has given over 75 presentations in the area of computer security and has testified in front of the U.S. Senate committee of the Judiciary on security issues associated with peer-to-peer networking. He has served as an ABET program evaluator representing IEEE for five years. He is a Fellow of IEEE and received the IEEE Educational Activities Board Major Educational Innovation Award in 2012 for his work

Conference Session

Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Warren A. Turner, Westfield State University; Glenn W. Ellis, Smith College; Robert J. Beichner, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

-based, pedagogically appropriate approaches and curricula including Peer Instruction 6,Workshop Physics7, Real-time Physics8 and Studio Physics9.But, what about circular mechanics? Arnold Aron’s observes 10, “The kinematics of circular motionin a plane is usually glossed over very quickly because of the obvious parallelism to rectilinearmotion. For students who have genuinely mastered the concepts and relations of rectilinearkinematics, this is appropriate since unnecessary repetition would waste their time.” Thisphilosophical approach has pervasively infiltrated introductory textbooks. Whole chapters aredevoted individually to the topics of velocity, acceleration, etc. while all of rotational kinematicsand sometimes even dynamics are crushed

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society (LEES) Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Haas, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Lynn S. McElholm, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Sonya M Renfro, University of Connecticut; Elizabeth S. Herkenham, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ; Melissa Marshall, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

training in communications, leadership, and presentationskills. The course also includes sessions on networking, gender and diversity issues, and otherspecial topics.Throughout the academic year, Engineering Ambassadors participate in special seminars acrosscampus as determined by group advisors and student leaders. The students plan and invitespeakers for professional development including topics of “Sexual Harassment in the Workplaceand Classroom”, “Advanced Presentation Skills”, “Technical Writing and Presentation Skills”and special leadership workshops offered by UConn’s office of student leadership. Page 23.496.14Additionally, during each

Conference Session

Faculty and Program Developments, Exchanges, and Best Practices

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

International

opportunities to assist theirdevelopment when these arise. A caring faculty can assist in bringing students closertogether through formation of learning partnerships, peer teaching, and sharing data andinformation with one another. It has been astonishing to see how working in collaborativedissertation groups has affected students. Long after their graduation, students recall themost significant aspect of their graduate program being the interpersonal learning and thedevelopment of collaborative sensitivity and mutual understanding among groupmembers. Learning how to acknowledge differences, arrive at consensus, set limits, andadminister fair sanctions to non-cooperative members are remembered and spoken of asmore memorable than either the formal focus

Conference Session

Administering First-Year Programs

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Russell Korte, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; David Goldberg, University of Illinois, Urbana

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Page 15.1130.4often overlooked important social and systemic influences on the newcomer’s learning process.Socialization is a complex process comprising multiple actors and interactions.19, 20, 21, 22, 23Wanous also noted that the interactions among newcomers, insiders (peers and faculty), and thesituation (context) are important sets of factors influencing the socialization process. He foundthat increasing the level of interactions between the newcomer and his or her environmentincreased the success of socialization. 10 However, it seems reasonable that the quality of theinteractivity is important—not just the frequency of activity. Increasing the wrong kind ofinteractivity may promote the wrong kind of learning, thereby decreasing the

Conference Session

Engineering as a Professional Calling

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qin Zhu, Purdue University; Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jian Yuan, Beihang University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

, in the “program evaluator competency model”,ABET also emphasizes the professional competency of program evaluators, which mainlyencompasses professional ethics requirements for program evaluators as “professional peers”: “a.conveys professional appearance and demeanor, b. is committed to contributing and adding valueto the evaluation process, c. considered a person with high integrity and ethical standards, d.represents ABET and responsible technical society as a practicing professional, e. willing tomake observations to stimulate innovation and further the program's efforts toward continuousimprovement, f. shows professional respect for institution faculty and staff, g. upholds ABETcode of conduct at all times.”18In contrast, the CEEAA’s

Conference Session

Student Beliefs, Motivation and Self Efficacy

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Kirn, Clemson University; Courtney June Faber, Clemson University; Lisa Benson, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

wanted an in-depth un-derstanding of the specific ways students experience a phenomenon from their perspective26,25 .Initially, interview transcripts were analyzed to create units of relevant meaning28 . These units ofrelevant meaning were established and refined through peer review by the authors29,28 . Next, unitsof relevant meaning were clustered for each participant resulting in a set of themes. Another passwas conducted to further cluster units of relevant meaning based on themes and patterns acrossrespondents. Four common themes emerged across participants: ‘Future Career’, ‘Characteristicsof Future Career’, ‘Future Career’s Influence on Present Action’, and ‘Past/Present PerceptionsInfluence on Future

Conference Session

Mechanical Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Trivett P.Eng., University of Waterloo

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

thermodynamics students. WhileHeller et al. 8 have helped to clarify the language, they have also shown that the path to achievinggreater student engagement in engineering requires faculty providing an active learningenvironment and demonstrating genuine enthusiasm for the topic, as well as studentsparticipating more fully in activities, and interacting with peers and faculty. As faculty, we hopethat our enthusiasm for teaching leads to student engagement and learning. However, themethods and context need to suit the student’s background.Patterson et al. 9 have proposed that “…in order to attract and retain students in engineeringcourses, the courses must be taught in a context that is familiar to students…” They haveproposed a template based on five

Conference Session

Recruiting/Retention Lower Division

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

William Guerriero; Elizabeth Chain; Mary Vanis; Donna Zerby; Bassam Matar; Mary Anderson-Rowland

insight into engineering research at ASU c) METS Workshops for Survival Strategies are held throughout the semester targeting potential and new transfer students, but anyone is welcome to attend. d) METS Student Mentors is an opportunity for new transfer students to be assigned a peer mentor. The student mentor assigned is a student who has attended ASU for at least one semester. e) METS Pilot Workshop/Bridge for new transfer students is held in early summer to assist students in locating student resources at ASU such as: parking, how to find your classes, scholarships, tutoring, the CEDAR center, and the bookstore. f) METS Orientation to new transfers gives students information about the METS program and how

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Tim Ameel; Ian Harvey; Bruce Gale

course was taught, but it was found that thehomework questions from the book were not well suited to the class, poorly written, inconsistentwith the textbook itself, and structured inconsistently such that it was challenging for students tofeel comfortable with the questions. Thus, during upcoming classes, the instructor hasdetermined to write his own homework problems to complement the text, lectures, and labs.During the last three weeks of the course, design problems were assigned that allowed thestudents to integrate all of their learning to date, instead of homework from the text. The designproblems proved to generate a number of very creative solutions. They were also excellentpreparation for the final exam, which involved a design problem

Conference Session

Learning Outside the Classroom

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Jessica M. Yellin, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

whether the findings discussed here are unique to URM students remains open.It is likely that the types of mentoring and support discussed above can be helpful for allstudents, regardless of their backgrounds. We are currently conducting a comparative study ofmajority group engineering students in order to better answer this question in future publications.At the time of this writing, we can report that several of our URM study subjects felt that Page 22.971.10informal mentoring is especially important for minority students, for various reasons, suggestingthat these types of mentoring interactions merit closer examination by those working to

Conference Session

K-12 Teacher Professional Development

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristin Sargianis, Museum of Science, Boston; Sharlene Yang, Museum of Science, Boston; Christine M. Cunningham, Museum of Science, Boston

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

effective in preparing you to teach using the EiE units? Why?  “Questioning strategies; Explanations of purpose”  “...turn and talk to peers; questioning strategies; scaffolding...” Page 25.503.8 Informal Formative Assessment We begin all of our workshops (and many of the individual activities within workshops) with brief, informal, formative assessments of participants’ prior knowledge. This helps facilitators gain a sense of participants’ understanding of certain terms and concepts, but it also (perhaps more importantly) continues to model the educational best practices that we hope participants will carry

Conference Session

Creative and Cross-disciplinary Methods Part II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Melissa Marshall, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Enrique D. Gomez, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Esther Gomez, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Angela D. Lueking, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

takeinitiative to pursue these opportunities for themselves. The ambassador is able to discuss howtheir “extra-curricular” experiences (internships, research, activities, etc) shaped both theircollege experience and the opportunities that have opened up to them regarding future careers.The first year students can begin their college careers seeing an example of someone who hasbeen through the experience and has reached goals relating to future careers. The ambassador isa relevant role model, a peer to whom students are able to relate. Additionally, the examplesprovided show how the work that the student has done in their engineering college career is Page

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Andrew S. Crawford

that a specific developmental opportunity or experience requires of them as well as thosethat will be most effective. This can be facilitated through discussion and feedback with anothersuch as a professor, advisor, or peer and/or be self-driven.Self-Situation Skill Match: Students need to be able to assess how their personal skills and abilitiesmatch with the skills required by a specific or selected opportunity or experience. This can befacilitated by another such as a professor, advisor, or peer and/or be self-driven.Skill Acquisition: When students become aware of the personal skills that they need to develop orenhance, they need to have opportunities and encouragement to acquire them. Optimally theseopportunities should incorporate and

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joaquin Rodriguez, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

. Leadership roles need to rotate from the first to the second project.Teams are requested to develop a team contract at the beginning of the term. Teams are alsoasked to prepare a plan for each of the two projects (dynamics and process control) and tomonitor each plan weekly. Peer grading and assessment is included at the end of both projects.Students deliver a self-assessment report at the end of the course with data on weekly timeinvestment, main contributions, peer assessment, areas for improvement, and self-grade [14].Assignments.Student teams submit a comprehensive report at the end of each project. The report includes: (a) introduction to the industrial applications related to the experiment, (b) description of the laboratory process and

Conference Session

Empowering Students and Strengthening Community Relationships

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samuel A Acuña, George Mason University; Nathalia Peixoto, George Mason University; Holly Matto, George Mason University; Siddhartha Sikdar, George Mason University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division (COMMENG)

opportunities for trainees to work on theircommunication skills within the design courses. Trainees may benefit from having more formalfeedback from professors and their peers when preparing for presentations to communitymembers or writing to government leaders. Taken together with trainees’ satisfaction andusefulness ratings, portfolio reflections provided further evidence that our courses helpedtrainees build knowledge and skills.While most students were satisfied with the design courses we offered, there is still room forimprovement in the courses. Feedback on the post-survey and course reflections suggests thatrequiring students to have completed prerequisites may help move the course along faster. Forexample, requiring a prerequisite in statistics

Conference Session

Sustainability and Humanitarian Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

addition, it was of interest to evaluate ifstudents in the environmental engineering course had a greater “sustainability ethic” compared totheir peers in the civil engineering course. On the initial “defining the discipline” assignment, anincreasing percentage over time of the civil engineering students included sustainability in theirdiscussions, 17% to 31% from 2008 to 2010. In comparison, 35-37% of the environmentalengineering students included sustainability. In 2009 and 2010 the second course module onsustainability did not increase the percentage of students who discussed sustainability as part ofthe fourth homework assignment on ethics; the percentage of the ethics essays that included theterm sustainable and/or sustainability were 29-47

Conference Session

Making Students Aware of Their World: Five Perspectives

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cherrice Traver, Union College; Douglass Klein, Union College; Borjana Mikic, Smith College; Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Steven B. Shooter, Bucknell University; Ari W. Epstein, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; David Gillette, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

break free of disciplinary constraints andreconfigure one’s own knowledge with the knowledge of others.15, 33, 41, 107, 113 Thus, both domainknowledge and integrative experience are important antecedents of innovation.One of the most powerful effects of E&LE integration is that of collective intelligence. Page88shows that in many situations calling for innovative solutions, who you know turns out to trumpwhat you know, and Reich93 has noted that in the modern world, successful new ventures requirea team; what he refers to as “collective entrepreneurship.” Leonard and Sensiper write, “Creativeideas do not arise spontaneously from the air but are born out of conscious, semiconscious, andunconscious mental sorting, grouping, matching, and

Conference Session

Design Communications & Cognition I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dirk Schaefer, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jitesh Panchal, Washington State University; Sammy Haroon, The RBR Group; Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

products arebeing developed through such principles. Examples include open-source 3D printers [15],electronics prototyping platforms [16], cell phones [17], cars [18], prosthetics [19], machinetools, robots, and other socially relevant design projects [20].As alluded to before, in the era of Globalization 3, new organizational structures based on self-organizing communities are emerging to complement traditional hierarchies. According toTapscott and Williams [8], the new principles for success in Globalization 3 are a) openness toexternal ideas, b) individuals as peers, c) sharing of intellectual property, and d) global action. Insuch emerging organizations, individual success is defined by the recognition gained throughcontributions towards a

Conference Session

Service Learning and Societal Issues in the First Year

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University; Kenneth Reid, Ohio Northern University; Jed Marquart, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

AC 2010-197: ADDRESSING THIRD WORLD POVERTY IN FIRST-YEARENGINEERING CAPSTONE PROJECTS: INITIAL FINDINGSJohn K. Estell, Ohio Northern University John K. Estell is Chair of the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department, and Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science, at Ohio Northern University. He received his doctorate from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process, first-year engineering instruction, and the pedagogical aspects of writing computer games. Dr. Estell is a Senior Member of IEEE, and a member of ACM, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and Upsilon Pi

Conference Session

Effective Methods for Recruiting Women to Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eleanor M. Jaffee, Smith College; Donna Riley, Smith College

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

program…through the University of Cal-Poly, and I was really involved in that program…but I kind of got led into this field just because I hate English and I don‟t really like writing, reading, and doing all that kind of fun stuff, so that steered me towards engineering since it‟s physics and math. (10:4) Well, I know I hate English, and I hate foreign languages, and I didn‟t like history, so I needed something with math and science base. And senior year of high school I went to the [area university] Women in Engineering conference and I really liked it, it was good, and then when I came to [College] I originally was looking at chemistry classes and calculus classes, not engineering per se

Conference Session

Engaging Students

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen Sanford Bernhardt, Lafayette College; Sharon Jones, Lafayette College; Christopher Ruebeck, Lafayette College; Jacqueline Isaacs, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

of those decisions; in other words, they learn from the experience. Toreinforce the concepts, the game is designed so that students repeat this decision-making processover 10 rounds of the simulation while also interacting with team members (peers) to make thedecisions. Our decision to use a game as well as our choice of the game itself is grounded in theliterature of learning strategies. The following sections review these theories, describe the gamewe have incorporated in our courses, and provide some context for the larger project of whichthis effort is a part.Learning Strategies and Educational GamesBehavioral, cognitive, constructivist, and experiential theories of learning have influenced thedesign of learning activities, including

Conference Session

Learning By Doing in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Golter, Washington State University; Bernard Van Wie, Washington State University; Gary Brown, Washington State University; David Thiessen, Washington State University; Baba Abdul, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

the initialdrafts.During the first phase of the course the students had a small number of textbook homework problemsand a write up of the case study analysis to do as individuals. Throughout the course they have amixture of group and individual problems that relate directly to the equipment they worked with inclass, and the data they collected using it. They are also required to submit periodic status reports sothat we can monitor each group’s progress and intervene if necessary. The students will have a finalexam consisting of an assessment of an existing case study design. The course grade is based 60% onthe design project, 5% on the case study analysis, 20% on homework, and 15% on the final designanalysis. The group portion of each

Conference Session

Learning Styles of Engineers

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Malgorzata Zywno

their previously higher-achieving peers. Page 7.677.11 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education 10 5 0 -5 -10 W'99 W'99 W'00 W'00 W'01 Hyper Conv Hyper Conv Hyper PBM PAM

Conference Session

Classroom Management

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

their progress through higher education focuses on the importance oflearning communities. Realizing the significance of such emotionally sustaining supportnetworks should alert faculty members to the need to seize on opportunities to assist theirdevelopment when these arise. A caring faculty can assist in bringing students closertogether through formation of learning partnerships, peer teaching, and sharing data andinformation with one another. It has been astonishing to see how working in collaborativedissertation groups has affected students. Long after their graduation, students recall themost significant aspect of their graduate program being the interpersonal learning and thedevelopment of collaborative sensitivity and mutual understanding

Conference Session

Global Competency and What Makes a Successful Engineer

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kari Wold, University of Virginia; Stephanie Moore Ph.D., University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

International

Paper ID #6464The Impact of Role-Playing Simulations on Global Competency in an OnlineTransnational Engineering CourseMs. Kari Wold, University of Virginia Kari Wold is a doctorate student at the University of Virginia focusing on instructional technology in engineering education. She has published in and has presented on engineering education, international education, writing for English language learners, blended learning, and online learning. Wold’s primary interests focus on global education and methods of online instruction. She has degrees in journalism and economics from the University of Minnesota as well as a

Conference Session

First-Year Programs (FPD) Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alyssa N Berg, University of Colorado Boulder; Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado at Boulder; Virginia Lea Ferguson, Mechanical Engineering; University of Colorado; Boulder, CO; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

perception of the degree of risk. Eachrepeated trust cycle leads to new and different level of trust1.In the present study, the trust model is used as a guide to assess the aspects of trust in the mentor-mentee relationship in the YOU’RE@CU program. We focus primarily on the threecharacteristics of ability, benevolence, and integrity. By evaluating these three characteristics, wecan examine the behaviors of the graduate mentors and the undergraduate women and URMstudents who are in research-based relationships that can help us to optimize future offerings ofthe program.MethodologyThe YOU’RE@CU program is held during the spring semester. The undergraduate studentsmust meet attendance, writing and poster requirements to receive a pass/fail credit for

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL) - ASCE Collaborations

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carly Woelfel, United States Military Academy; Brett Rocha P.E., United States Military Academy; Kevin Francis McMullen, United States Military Academy; Kevin Taylor Scruggs, United States Military Academy; Talal Salem, United States Military Academy; Aaron T Hill Jr. P.E., United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

compete each year atthe regional level in an effort to earn a slot at the national competition.Many of the requirements of the Concrete Canoe and SSBC naturally align with the ABETstudent outcomes. The Concrete Canoe competition requires each team to write a technicalproposal, give an oral technical presentation, provide a final product prototype, and conduct aprototype demonstration [17]. The technical proposal and oral technical presentation directlycorrelate to the communicate ABET student outcome. The final product prototype requires thestudents to solve, design, experiment, and apply new knowledge. The SSBC includescompetition categories for aesthetics including a poster describing design, construction speed,lightness, stiffness