date and relevant. Clear identified, clear, valid and objectives. Clear evidence of appropriate tools. Achievable completed to a high technical Excellent written work, identification of context achievable. Aims have high achievability. Link to social, and robust plan. Clear standard and fully justified presentation and style Work Background reflects the technical merit at the ethical and commercial context interpretation of key issues Issues are clearly identified. carried out independently, conception that a professional incorporated justified
Re-Engineering Technician Education For The New Millennium Nicholas M. Massa, Gary J. Masciadrelli, Gary J. Mullett Engineering Technologies Division Springfield Technical Community College Springfield, MassachusettsAbstractThe U.S. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria20001 (EC-2000) requires that graduates of two-and four-year engineering technology (ET)programs demonstrate proficiency in mathematics, science, and engineering, be able to work inmultidisciplinary teams, communicate effectively, be sensitive to the social and ethical issuesrelated to the engineering profession, and develop
/ ramifications, which may include political, social, ethical, legal, professional, or physical dimensions. Product Development Session VI Consolidation: Upload the Start: 5/18/04 Proposal 5-page project proposal Finish: 5/20/04 Assignment #6 representing the culmination of previous assignments.This paper describes the analytical methods made possible by the data collected in-situ by
skills • Ethics and Social Awareness • Quality and ReliabilityWith the above elements in mind, the objectives for the mechanical engineering programs werefirst formulated by the Undergraduate Committee within the Department of Mechanical Page 9.83.8 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationEngineering at UM. The Committee consisted of a diverse cross-section of the faculty and whichis responsible for development and monitoring of the program. These were approved in 1999after a thorough review
Session 3661 The Social Dimension of Engineering Education A. K. Mazher Aerospace Science Engineering Department, Tuskegee University Tuskegee, Alabama 36088, akmazher@tusk.eduAbstractTechnological advances have an enormous impact on our life and its effects on society,environment and human values are evident everywhere. The engineering is no longer an isolatedfield of human activities and the future role of engineering demands that social, ethical andcultural aspects should be added to the technical dimension of engineering education. The nextgeneration
Research Seminars/ Field Projects Labs Reports Facility Colloquia Trips Tours Mathematics Science Engineering Design and construct experimentsDesign a system, component or process Analyze and interpret data Function on group design teams Identify STEM problems FormulateSTEM problems Solve STEM problems Understandprofessional and ethical responsibilities Communicate effectively Be aware of STEM in a global/societal
use scientific knowledge, technicalknowledge, their intrinsic creative potential, and their engineering judgment, ethics, values, and professionalleadership skills to bring about effective creative solutions to meet previously unmet real-world needs.Today, continual needs-driven technological innovation is a systematic practice of creative engineering that is theresult of two primary pursuits: a) the deliberate exploitation of the results of curiosity-driven basic research anddiscovery, and; b) the deliberate use of the needs-driven creative engineering method to purposefully create, invent,develop, and innovate new and improved technology.8 Today, continual technological innovation in industry isprimarily the result of, and the deliberate
achieving their set goals; they also need to prioritize the scheduled activities, introduce changes if need be, solicit advice and assistance with the consent of the instructor, and maintain effective working relationships among the members. Instructors also monitor group progress, give feedback on how well each group is doing, report each group’s progress to the class as a whole, and insure adherence to accepted standards of: ethics, social responsibility, and safety.Success in implementing cooperative learning is attributable, in large measure, to: properplanning, efforts, dedication, and foresight of the instructor. Experience definitely is a majorfactor. A proper start for instructors wanting to
first day, the researcher introduced the casestudy and the relevant ethical codes, and provided the CD version of the case study to thestudents. They were divided into teams and assigned the case studies. The students wereasked to play the roles of the plaintiff, defendant, expert witness, and jury. Jim Russell, a maintenance worker at Lorn Manufacturing Inc., lost three of the fingerson his left hand during a routine maintenance procedure on a cotton manufacturing device,the Lap Winder. This occurred when the Lap Winder he was maintaining suddenly came on.Russell sued Lorn Manufacturing Inc., the designers of the Lap Winder device, for negligence.This negligence suit involves the Codes of Standards that applied to the design and buildingof
Young UniversityGregg M. Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is the External Relations and Intern Coordinator for the Mechanical Engineering de- partment in the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at BYU. He works directly with industry each year to recruit more than 30 funded Capstone projects and provides project management, team development, and coaching support to each of these project teams and faculty coaches. In ad- dition, he continues to focus on increasing international project opportunities for students and faculty. His research and teaching interests include globalization, project management, leadership, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Prior to joining BYU, Gregg worked
well as ABET criteria 3a-k. This validated instrument has been used to assess students’ learning outcomes and skill gains as a result of participating in undergraduate research, industry internships (co-ops), and capstone design experiences. To date about 800 students have participated in the use of this instrument which includes over fifty learning outcomes pertinent to problem identification, the application of scientific tools, experimentation, analysis and evaluation, ethical and societal issues, project management, team and communication skills, improved attitudes, and other professional skills. Semi-annually, as well as at the beginning and end of LTS experiences, NESLOS will be
speaking, etc.) skills are paramount for success of an individual. It does no matter how brilliant their ideas are if they cannot sell them. ● Communication. Management. Ethics. Morals. Motivation. Leadership. These are all extremely important for the engineering field. Being able to tackle issues both from a technical side AND business side sets individuals apart. ● US costs cannot compete with China (10:1 for tooling and piece price in most assemblies that include injection molded components). Even the importing only costs $6-8,000 per 40' container, door to door. Our only competitive advantage is technology and advanced manufacturing processes. Unfortunately, China is catching us at an alarming
set goals; they also need to prioritize the scheduled activities, introduce changes if need be, solicit advice and assistance with the consent of the instructor, and maintain effective working relationships among the members. Instructors also monitor group progress, give feedback on how well each group is doing, report each group’s progress to the class as a whole, and insure adherence to accepted standards of: ethics, social responsibility, and safety.Success in implementing cooperative learning is attributable, in large measure, to: properplanning, efforts, dedication, and foresight of the instructor. Experience definitely is a majorfactor. A proper start for instructors wanting to try
undergraduates. The skills associated with theentrepreneurial mindset are communication, teamwork, leadership, ethics and ethical decision-making, opportunity recognition, persistence, creativity, innovation, tolerance for ambiguity, riskanalysis, creative problem solving, critical thinking, and business skills (including marketing,financial analysis, and strategic planning).1, 2, 3, 4 The network is limited to private institutionswith ABET accredited engineering programs and is by invitation only.As of January 2012, KEEN includes twenty institutions across the U.S. The KEEN programprovides access to vital resources for building quality entrepreneurship education programs thatengage engineering and technical students including grants, faculty
an Emeritus Professor of civil engineering at the University of North Dakota. He received a Ph.D. from the University of Illinois with an emphasis in geothecnical engineering. During a 39-year career as an educator, he served on the faculties of the University of North Dakota, Ohio Northern University, and the University of Illinois. Phillips has been an active member of the National Society of Professional Engineers, serving as National President in 1994-95. He currently serves NSPE on the Board of Ethical Review, as a member of the Licensure and Qualifications for Practice Committee, and as Chair of the Council of Fellows Executive Committee. He served a five-year term, including Chair, of the North Dakota Board
interpretive phenomenology.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Education Administrator of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Dr. William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette William (Bill) Oakes is the Director of the EPICS Program and one of the founding faculty members
,• professional responsibility,• professional leadership of multidisciplinary groups for needs-driven collaborative creativity,• problem-finding and visualization (needs-finding),• program making and strategic thinking,• policy making, value judgement, ethics in technology-social-safety-economic issues. 5. SETTING A NEW DIRECTION IN ADVANCED PROFESSIONAL EDUCATIONIt is now evident that most of the nation’s graduate engineers enter industry or governmentservice immediately after their baccalaureate degree preparation. After entry, most of thenation’s graduate engineers pursue technology development-oriented professional career pathsnot centered on research.21 They soon find themselves in professional leadership positions,20 andthey would
and Respond Conflict and Conflict Style Assessment NegOtiatiOn Intercultural Conflict Emotional Intelligence An Anger Action Plan Negotiation Skills Positional vs. Ethical Bargaining C0iWhillg Coaching Styles How to be a Good Coach3. sYNTHEsIs Decision Making Decision - Making Tools and Models Team Maintenance How to Handle Relationship Difficulties
engineering, science, and mathematics SO 2: an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors SO 3: an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences SO 4: an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts SO 5: an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive
regionalconstraints. We are a land grant state University, the only Ph.D. granting program in BiomedicalEngineering in the state, but are located more than three hours from the nearest major research-intensive medical school and teaching hospitals, which presents logistical and collaborativechallenges. The rural nature of our state leads to unique healthcare considerations and disparitiesthat present unique opportunities for our students to learn.MethodsClinical Observations and Needs Finding is a 1 credit hour course that introduces students to thetechnical, ethical, and professional responsibilities of biomedical engineers during the productdevelopment process. This course is offered in both the fall and spring semesters, withapproximately 30-35 students
development. New York: Atherton, 1966.[31] A. W. Chickering, Education and identity. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1969.[32] W. G. Perry, Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: a scheme, 1. ed. in Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey- Bass Publishers, 1999.[33] C. M. Beck, B. S. Crittenden, and E. Sullivan, Eds., Moral Education. University of Toronto Press, 1971. doi: 10.3138/9781442656758.[34] C. Pfund et al., “Training Mentors of Clinical and Translational Research Scholars: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Academic Medicine, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 774–782, May 2014, doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000218.[35] C. Pfund, A. Byars-Winston, J. Branchaw, S. Hurtado, and K. Eagan
behavioral health translational research training program. Implementation Science, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0621-9Bamonti, P. M., Keelan, C. M., Larson, N., Mentrikoski, J. M., Randall, C. L., Sly, S. K., Travers, R. M., & McNeil, D. W. (2014). Promoting ethical behavior by cultivating a culture of self-care during graduate training: A call to action. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 8(4), 253– 260. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000056Bang, K.-S., Lee, I., Kim, S., Lim, C. S., Joh, H.-K., Park, B.-J., & Song, M. K. (2017). The effects of a campus Forest-Walking program on undergraduate and graduate students’ physical and psychological health
, collaboration, time management, ethics andresearch integrity, analytics (e.g., data science/statistics), project management, and criticalthinking — faculty members were asked to rate from 'very important' to 'not important at all.'The results showed that 'very important' is the largest proportion for all qualities or skills.Additionally, faculty members mentioned various skills that they also consider important,including writing, marketing, hands-on experiences, entrepreneurial skills, networking, self-assessment, and independent research skills.When asked if they would like to encourage collaborative research between their PhD studentsand non-academic partners (e.g., an industrial lab), 78% of the participants provided a positiveanswer (see Fig. 8
critical area that many assume will be more likely to be present within the veteranpopulation than the civilian population. The overall viewpoint by faculty and staff seems tosupport this, but the more experienced faculty (senior instructor and full professor) who are morelikely to have had more contact with veterans over a longer period (time teaching), to includestudents pre-9/11, are more neutral toward the statement of veterans being more likely to havePTSD.When it comes to taking initiative or following orders, it is clear all respondents believe that theveteran is more likely to take initiative than follow orders. Many believe those serving in themilitary are used to following ethical, moral, and safe orders and, so, question why
” chapter [23] o ASEE workshop on the “Foundations of Social Justice for Engineers” [24] • Specific case studies in fields o Case study bioengineering ethics “SUMO-1” [25] o Coded Bias documentary [26] o Nicholas Sakellariou’s “A Framework for Social Justice in Renewable Energy Engineering” chapter [27]This area is emerging. There are several scholars documenting their attempts at adding socialjustice to the engineering courses [28]–[31], though not yet in engineering research, and it is yetto be seen whether educational interventions in these courses will have a beneficial impact ondeveloping socially conscious engineers.A workshop was developed to give researchers the confidence and a framework
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #42765 Commission Executive Committee and a Program Evaluator for both computer engineering and computer science. Estell is well-known for his significant contributions on streamlining student outcomes assessment processes and has been an invited presenter at the ABET Symposium on multiple occasions. He was named an ABET Fellow in 2021. Estell is also a founding member and current Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions. Estell is Professor of Computer Engineering
Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. Gibson contributes to multiple NAE and cross-Academies initiatives, focusing primarily on the Cultural, Ethical, Social, and Environmental Responsibility in Engineering program. Gibson completed her M.S. from the Colorado School of Mines as a member of the inaugural cohort in Humanitarian Engineering and Science (HES). In the HES program, Gibson specialized in Environmental Engineering and conducted research under the NSF-funded ”Responsible Mining, Resilient Communities” project in Colombia. She was named Outstanding Graduate Student in HES. Gibson earned her B.S. in Biological/Agricultural Engineering and minor in Sustainability from the University of Arkansas, along
universities and the influence of the politics of these areas. Thisincludes managerial ethics and the impact of local/state/national politics on academia. “My concerns are on ethical principles of some people involved in academia, groupism.”Analysis of Question Set #1 (Questions 1& 2)Though some of the responses to these questions may have been influenced in how respondentsresponded to a set of Likert scale questions regarding their perceptions of their preparedness toteach, there are still some important notes regarding the responses. For instance, while none of theLikert scale questions mentioned positional availability, a plurality of responses to the questionregarding concerns for academia mentioned the difficulty to achieve a faculty