Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division (IND) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Priyadarshini Pennathur, University of Texas at El Paso; Arunkumar Pennathur, The University of Texas at El Paso; Amirmasoud Momenipour, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering Division (IND)

solidreasons and a reasonable amount of evidence for their claims. In Round 2, the teams used thesame argument structure, but responded to the other team’s arguments. A classroom debate rubricwas used to assess the debates [17].Pitch PresentationIn this final project (paper and presentation), student teams were asked to assume the role of awork system designer and pitch an idea to perform work differently or improve current worksystem activities in any industry of their choice. This project did not just focus on advancedtechnology such as robotics or AI and how it would change work, but also on new work practicesand policies that AI might entail in future work systems. The project intended to make studentscritically think and reflect about the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elliott Clement, Oregon State University; James L. Huff, University of Georgia; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

and contribute to the credibility of our future findings. By continuing ourongoing study, we hope to gain a better understanding of patterns between students’ identity andtheir engagement within capstone design and improve student’s experiences within capstonedesign courses.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation (Awards No.2138019 and No. 2138106). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.

Conference Session

DSA Technical Session 8

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Neha Kardam, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Data Science & Analytics Constituent Committee (DSA)

Internal Review Board (IRB) under the code STUDY00000378.The study recruited undergraduate students from 21 courses in mechanical and electrical engineering,but the researchers did not engage directly with the students. All participants were informed that theirresponses would be kept confidential. Additional academic incentives, in the form of extra credit,were provided to students to support increased survey participation and all surveys were conductedelectronically.Data AnalysisRaw data from student responses was initially processed using Term Frequency-Inverse DocumentFrequency (TF-IDF) Vectorizer to convert the unstructured data into structured format [12]. TheTF-IDF Vectorizer provided by Sklearn.org calculates a score that reflects the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Narges Norouzi, University of California, Berkeley; Carmen Robinson, University of California, Santa Cruz; Kip Tellez, University of California, Santa Cruz

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Since then, the outlook has not measurably improved 1 . A strong STEMworkforce sustains a robust U.S. economy and supports our national security 2,3 . Diversity inSTEM generates a variety of perspectives and approaches to scientific and technologicalinnovation, better reflects the global and culturally diverse economies of the 21st century, andproduces diverse science and engineering role models 4 . Because of their racially diverseenrollments, The National Academies of Sciences and Engineering Minority Serving Institutions:America’s Underutilized Resource for Strengthening the STEM Workforce report (2019)identifies that HSIs can contribute diversity to STEM.Of the estimated 569 U.S. HSIs, most are two-year institutions. 68% of HSIs are public

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

EC Cline, University of Washington, Tacoma; Heather Dillon, University of Washington; Amanda K Sesko, University of Washington, Tacoma; Marc Nahmani; Zaher Kmail, University of Washington, Tacoma; Joyce Dinglasan-Panlilio; Seung-Jin Lee, University of Washington, Tacoma; Emily Cilli-Turner, University of San Diego; Elin A. Björling, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

essential in improving students’ undergraduate experience and promotingacademic and career success [17]. Annual training workshops and other professionaldevelopment help faculty develop their mentoring skills and inspire reflection aboutpositionality, power and privilege to better support our diverse students.Adaptive Modifications of the Program and Lessons LearnedOver the last six years we have expanded the program by adding Information Technology,Computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Civil Engineeringto the original list of eligible degrees–Biomedical Sciences, Environmental Science,Mathematics, and Computer Science. This has helped to provide space for our STEM-interestedpre-majors to remain in the program

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tim Dallas, Texas Tech University; Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Nanyang Technological University; Kelli M. Frias

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

you notes within a given set.Thematic Occurrence Counting (Ryan and Bernard, 2003) allowed us to generate the data thatwere used for the analysis. a. scholarshipNSF supported students were awarded up to a $10,000/year scholarship based on their need asdetermined by FAFSA and the financial aid office. COVID related loss-of income for somescholar’s families caused higher financial need which was not reflected in FAFSA. The averageneed for NSF supported students: Cohort 1 ~$18,750; Cohort 2: ~$24,000; Cohort 3: ~$24,000;Cohort 4: ~$30,500.As can be seen from the need values, there was substantial need in each of the cohorts that rosedramatically over the four cohorts, in part due to loss of financial opportunities for participatingstudents and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Massood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; Omar Ochoa, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

ensures that issues are identified and addressed promptly, helping the team adapt and make necessary adjustments. • Sprint Review: Scrum teams conduct regular sprint review meetings at the end of each sprint, where they showcase the completed work to stakeholders. This feedback session allows stakeholders to provide input, ask questions, and suggest changes to the product. • Sprint Retrospective: At the end of each sprint, Scrum teams hold sprint retrospectives. During these meetings, team members reflect on what went well, what didn't, and how to improve their processes. This feedback is essential for making continuous improvements and optimizing the team's agility, thereby improving the overall

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michelle Jordan, Arizona State University; Kelly Simmons-Potter, The University of Arizona; Steven J. Zuiker, Arizona State University; Greg Barron-Gafford, The University of Arizona

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

member, (c) my contributions are valued by other SPVLab members, (d) my voice respected by other SPV Lab members, and that (e) I amgiven equal opportunities to fully participate in SPV Lab activities. 84% ofrespondents reported seeing others like themselves succeed in SPV lab.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underAward EEC-2055726. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theviews of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Jordan, M. E., Zuiker, S., Wakefield, W., & DeLaRosa, M. (2021). Real work with realconsequences: Enlisting community energy engineering as an approach to

Conference Session

Aerospace Division (AERO) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

E. Tyler Young, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

walk. During this activity, students walk around the classroom and read their classmates’project results. For each assignment, they leave a comment – either an affirmation or asuggestion for improvement – on a sticky note. After this gallery walk concludes, students thentake turns presenting their homework results to the class. The instructional period shouldconclude with enough time left for students to write a brief reflection on how they mightincorporate feedback from their peers to improve their presentations. These reflections will beturned in as the final exit ticket of this mini-unit.ConclusionThe “Cool It!” mini-unit described above has been conceptualized following theories ofculturally-responsive and sustaining pedagogies, community

Conference Session

Virtues in Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth M Boatman; Kyle Luthy, Wake Forest University; Christian B. Miller, Wake Forest University; Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and LatinAmerica. They discovered that only four countries had adopted the IEEE code of ethics as is andthe majority of countries (N=28) had variations that reflected sociopolitical and culturaldifferences (2014).A global professional code of ethics for engineers would be great but unfortunately does notexist. The most prominent U.S. code of ethics for engineers is the one developed by the NationalSociety of Professional Engineers (NSPE), as it represents licensed professional engineers.Please note that licensure for engineers is not a requirement for most engineering disciplines.The majority of licensed Professional Engineers (PEs) are civil engineers. Industry exemptionshave inhibited most of the other

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 18

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Navarun Gupta, University of Bridgeport; Junling Hu, University of Bridgeport; Ioana A. Badara, Post University; Buket D. Barkana, The University of Akron; Deana A. DiLuggo, University of Bridgeport

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Final lab report 120 points Lab notebook checks 100 points total Weekly reflections 150 points total Oral Hypothesis & update presentations 50 points total communication Poster presentation Poster draft presentation 30 points Final poster presentation 100 points total TOTAL (subject to 900 points total change)2.4. Learning objectivesScientific Method: This course

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: Retention & Success

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey N. Phillips, Hanover College; Kathryn A. Lowe Schneider, Hanover College

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

college’s academic success/tutoringcenter, a re-design of the first-year college success course that put increased emphasis onbuilding a sense of community and belonging and narrowed the objectives to aiding students inbecoming strategic learners, exploring and reflecting on their skills, interests and abilities anddeveloping tools and strategies for navigating social and professional situations.The data show that the combined efforts of the engineering program and the college academicsuccess team have resulted in the 1st year to 2nd year retention of engineering students exceeding80% for the cohorts entering the program from the fall of 2019 through fall of 2022. This levelexceeded that of non-engineering students in each of those years except

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 7: Graduate Student Experiences

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rafael De Leon, The Ohio State University; Ann D. Christy P.E., The Ohio State University; Rosalyn Stoa, Colorado State University; Alexa Jayne, Colorado State University; Bailey Underill, Colorado State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

and safe working conditions being ahot-button issue in graduate education for decades, nowhere in engineering education research isit discussed [15]. Should research in our field align itself more with the university than thepopulations being studied? How should we be studying doctoral engineering students? Whatproblems should we be highlighting?The Role of Doctoral Engineering StudentsTo decide what direction work in the field should take, we must first understand what roles andresponsibilities doctoral engineering students have at their universities.As existing literature and legislation reflect, the doctoral engineering student has long existed inan ambiguous space [15], [16]. Universities do not consistently classify them as either staff

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 10

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yi Wang; Fangyuan Chai; Yuan Liu; Jun Zhu; Jing Jin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

encounters andexistential reflections, thereby guiding their educational philosophy and praxis [8, 9,10]. Within the scope of this study, “teaching belief” is understood as the ingrainedconvictions held by educators about their pedagogical duties, student engagements,curricular substance, and the comprehensive process of instruction, which ultimatelydirect their didactic ideologies and methodologies. The efficacy of classroom evaluation practice is well-documented, with substantialevidence highlighting its pivotal role in enhancing student achievement and fosteringan intrinsic motivation to pursue academic objectives [11, 12]. This analysis delineatesevaluation not only as a multifaceted political dynamic within the classroomenvironment but also

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 6: Belonging

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University; Julie P Martin, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

not help promote their narrative to the public. For our own groups, Rachelchose a name with an acronym that reflects her career vision, Research on Identity andMotivation in Engineering (RIME) Collaborative, and Julie chose a word that reflects hers,Elevate. In both cases, the mission and focus of the groups is clear and centered around ourcareer visions.2.2 Disseminating the NarrativeOnce your narrative is developed, you must share it to raise your visibility. While simply havinga narrative can provide personal direction, we believe putting the narrative you create out intoyour field has a much greater impact than allowing others to create one for you by the activitiesthey happen to see you complete.2.2.1 WebsitesAs a faculty member, you

Conference Session

Engineering Professional Development for K-12 Teachers

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louis S. Nadelson, Boise State University; Amy J. Moll, Boise State University; Anne Louise Seifert, Idaho National Laboratory

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

forteaching science. Participants rate their beliefs on a five point Likert scale ranging from “1”representing “Strongly Disagree” to “5” representing “Strongly Agree” as they respond to itemssuch as, “I am continually finding better ways to teach science” or reversed phrased items suchas, “I am not very effective in monitoring science experiments.” We made modifications tosome of the STEBI items to reflect a more general focus on STEM, rewriting items such as,“Increased teacher effort in teaching science produces little change in some student's scienceachievement” to read “Increased teacher effort in teaching STEM content produces little changein some student's STEM learning achievement.” The modified version of the instrument waspreviously used to

Conference Session

ABET Accreditation, Assessment, and Program Improvement in ECE

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen M. Phillips, Arizona State University; Konstantinos Tsakalis, Arizona State University; Ravi Gorur, Arizona State University; Stephen M. Philips, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

definition of quantitative and precise metricsthat reflect changes in the program. A second is the data collection and the action definitions thatshould minimize or, at least, allow the resolution of interdependencies and correlations amongthem. While these form an intellectually interesting modeling and feedback problem, one mustalso be prepared to accommodate some faculty resistance, indifference, or simply lack of time toperform such tasks. Viewing automation and consistency as a key for the success of continuousimprovement, we have implemented this feedback process for the last four years and here wepresent some of our experiences.1. IntroductionObjective and meaningful evaluation of student performance and career success is a complicatedproblem

Conference Session

Manufacturing Capstone and Design Projects

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Fleishman, Western Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

Wednesdays will allow for a lab meeting the first week of classes,which is typically a partial week. The current practice is to start lab sessions the second week ofthe quarter. This combination would increase total course lab time from eighteen hours to thirtyhours, which represents a 67% increase, without changing the current four-credit courseallowance. Table 2 reflects a proposed revision to course content, as well as restructured lab sessionswhich will be attempted for the course offering in the spring of 2011. The requirement for Page 22.1530.9casting projects in addition to the welding / fabrication projects has been replaced by a

Conference Session

Issues Affecting Engineering Program Development

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian L. Houston, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

business side ofthe equation is marginalized. In reality the majority of the graduates will become both practicingengineers, and eventually businessmen and women. Why diminish the importance of businessacumen other than it is not the educators area of expertise?PostscriptThis paper was never intended to be a rigorous, data mining experiment. The contents are moreof a reflection on the comments received over an eight year period from industry personnelobserving deficiencies in engineering graduates as a whole. Having arrived in academia afterpracticing for many years, the author encountered the same issues prior to academia in hiring forhis own department. Once one gains entrance into the hiring and tenure process for academia, itis obvious there

Conference Session

Curricular Issues in Computer-Oriented Programs

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Idziorek, Iowa State University; Mark F. Tannian, Iowa State University; Douglas W. Jacobson, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

onthe Internet. Others have attempted to provide security education at the university level in theform of a three-hour training session8. While arguably better than a Website, a single session isnot a sufficient amount of time for students to comprehend, reflect and attempt to applyknowledge. From our experiences, students need repetition, time to reflect on course material,and the opportunity to write about and discuss presented material in order to assess and improvetheir own understanding. This type of learning simply cannot be achieved in a single three-hourtraining session. From the authors’ collective experiences, a broad demographic of students donot have access to practical information about computer security that would improve

Conference Session

Core Concepts, Standards, and Policy in K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Sanders, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Thomas M. Sherman, Virginia Tech; Hyuksoo Kwon, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Patricia Watson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

never really achieved inpublic education, was to teach students in the early elementary through high school grades aboutthe industrial culture that dominated the American landscape in the 20th century. In contrast tothe commonly held belief that IA was only about vocational tool skills, the ideology on which IAwas established in the l870s was a general education ideology in support of the notion that allboys and girls in the U.S. would benefit from the study of our industrial culture. Much the sameideology that now leads many to believe “K-12 engineering education” today would benefit allstudents, not just those seeking the postsecondary vocational engineering track.The presentation of a paper titled “A Curriculum to Reflect Technology”10 at

Conference Session

Assessment Instruments

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Gerlick, Pittsburg State University; Denny C. Davis, Washington State University; Michael S. Trevisan, Washington State University; Shane A. Brown, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

productivity.Professional Development: 5. Growth Planning (F) Individuals document professionalIndividual demonstration of 6. Growth Progress (F) development in technical,improved knowledge, skills, 7. Professional Practices (F) interpersonal, and individualand behaviors essential to 8. Growth Achieved (S) attributes important to their personalengineering practice and project needs, professional behaviors, and ways of a reflective practitioner.Design Processes

Conference Session

Thinking Outside the Box! Innovative Curriculum Exchange for K12 Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego; Samuel Lee, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

, seeks to enhancethe effectiveness of the instructional process through application of experiential educationtechniques.According to Kolb [2], experiential learning exists across four modes, including (i) concreteexperience, (ii) reflective observation, (iii) abstract conceptualization, and (iv) activeexperimentation (p. 30). The primary components of learning processes exist along twocontinuums relating concrete experience to abstract conceptualization and reflective observationto active experimentation. The COSMOS program incorporates activities with elements frombroad ranges of these spectra, e.g., some activities were heavily observation-based while othersinvolved active, trial-and-error problems; some relate concretely to lecture material

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Interdisciplinary Course Design Opportunities for Chemical Engineers

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Baba Abdul, Washington State University; Edgar A. O'Rear, University of Oklahoma; Gary Robert Brown, Washington State University, Office of Assessment and Innovation; Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University; Paul B. Golter, Washington State University; David B. Thiessen, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

policy for this class and theholiday mood, can we discount extrinsic motivation (e.g. motivation from grade) as the soledriver for academic success in this study? To answer these questions, we start by articulating thetheoretical underpinnings of this study and attempt to operationalize the constructs to reflect thecontext of the work.2.0 Theoretical Conside rationsA lot of research in engineering education have been largely exploratory (as contrasted withcause-effect and mechanistic type research) and bereft of theoretical considerations [12]. Nomatter the type of research questions, the community of engineering educators continues toemphasize the need for grounding research in theoretical frameworks as a vital ingredient forenhancing quality

Conference Session

Capstone Design III

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University; Gregory J. Kowalski, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

an effective solution. Effective teamsshould also be organized enough to produce this design solution in sufficient time to test anddocument the results of their design. Page 22.242.3Assessing the effectiveness of capstone design projects is a complex undertaking. Many schoolshave turned to the use of design journals or notebooks to require students to document theprogress of their design and to reflect on the design process10,11. Other schools, includingNortheastern, have used a combination of faculty, industrial sponsors, and professional peerevaluations to provide a number of views of the quality of the projects12. Student self

Conference Session

Project-Based, Inquiry Guided, and High Performance Learning Environments: Effective Approaches

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sharon G. Sauer, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Pedro E. Arce, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

teammembers are likely to divulge it as part of this exercise. In order for the instructor to intervene in a timelymanner, a mid-term or mid-project evaluation is critical. This approach requires self-reflection on thepart of the student and also provides peer evaluation. This information can be invaluable to the instructorwho may likely not have had the opportunity to observe the finer workings of the team. As anotherexample, to assess whether or not students have utilized a process in decision making, as opposed to, forexample, a majority vote, students can be asked to write a short memo outlining a decision they made,options considered, and the means by which they determined the outcome. A well-defined rubric canthen be used to analyze the

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Potpourri II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen R. Hoffmann, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University; Ranjani L. Rao, Purdue University; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

under theumbrella of sustainable engineering. Page 22.418.2In this paper, we present two sets of data: (1) a comparative analysis of fifteen published sets ofsustainability principles (some of which are drawn from the context of engineering, some fromother contexts, but none in the context of engineering education), and (2) a summary of arepresentative set of engineering courses at US Universities that include sustainability terms intheir titles or course descriptions. While other methods of data collection may reflect a morenuanced understanding of the idea of sustainable engineering (and, in fact, seeking this nuance ispart of the motivation

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Technical Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ruth E. Anderson, University of Washington; Beth Kolko, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

project outputsmoving forward is in part a reflection of those difficulties.UltrasoundThe Ultrasound project was the result of one of the instructor’s conversations with a professor inRadiology who was training midwives in Uganda to use ultrasound technology. They werehaving some issues with the commercial portable ultrasounds (cost, difficulty of user interface,etc.), and so the problem posed to the students was: how can you make ultrasound more usableby midwives with limited training? And can you make it cheaper, too? In winter quarter therewere two CSE students and three HCI students on the team. In winter quarter, students surveyedSeattle-area midwives, created surveys to send to Ugandan midwives, investigated otherdeveloping world based

Collection

1999 Annual Conference

Authors

Albert Lozano-Nieto

evolving market, thesuccess of our graduates will depend on their ability to solve not only the current problems oftheir field, but to anticipate their future needs. Employers demand professionals with broadknowledge, not limited to technical issues. If a few years ago the basic mission of the graduatesfrom Engineering Technology programs was the repairing and maintenance of equipment, todaytheir role has evolved into being involved in technology management. These requirements fromindustry reflect in academia, as the survival of Engineering Technology programs is closelyrelated to producing graduates that can satisfy what is required from industry.This paper presents approaches to bring industry closer to the students. The main goal of

Collection

1999 Annual Conference

Authors

Darrell C. Schroder; Charles D. Turner

is a three credit hour junior level class that hasundergone continual change. The class reflects changes within the profession of environmentalengineering. The current catalog description of the course is as follows :$Introduction to the engineering aspects of environmental systems to include such topics aswater quality management, air pollution and control, solid and hazardous waste management,environmental impact assessment, and governmental regulation #.Elective courses such as IEE are good test beds for assessing the impact of course modificationson ABET’s A-K assessment criteria because they are electives and content is flexible withinbroad boundaries.II. Methodology and ResultsThe eleven criteria that make up ABET’s A-K list can be