, the problem-solving techniques that are learned in one context can be generalized and applied to other contexts. Instructors can draw parallels between different types of problems and show how the problem-solving techniques can be applicable beyond a single class. This can be useful for those students who have less work experience as well as those who see their engineering degree as part of a career Page 24.1118.14 pathway into management, law, or other fields.VI. ConclusionThe students in this study were able to successfully connect the class with their co-op workassignments and other authentic experiences
, the phrase‘current scenario’ in F6 could either mean a sudden change in the traffic condition aroundthe vehicle not yet detected by the FM traffic alert service, or a mechanical problem with thevehicle itself. Students need to be trained to identify and resolve such conflicts in an indepen-dent manner to be successful not only during their initial Software Engineering careers butalso throughout their professional lives. To that end, we designed this learning activity as anincremental, semester-long practice assignment.After clarifying different aspects of the application domain through a few initial meetingswith the clients, the students were given a lab assignment to create domain dictionaries12for the system. The students were divided into
-frequency wireless systems. He has a great interest in engineering education and the use of technology to advance the student learning experience. He has been honoured with three departmental teaching awards and was selected as a New Faculty Fellow at the 2008 Frontiers in Education Conference. In 2012, he was awarded the Early Career Teaching Award by the Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering.Mr. Siddarth Hari, University of TorontoMs. Qin Liu, University of Toronto Ms. Qin Liu is currently a Ph.D. candidate in the program of Higher Education at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE), University of Toronto. Her research interests are learning outcomes assessment and outcomes-based education
College and a Bronze Tablet graduate of University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign where he received a Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering.Mr. William D. Schindel, ICTT System Sciences William D. Schindel is president of ICTT System Sciences, a systems engineering company, and devel- oper of the Systematica Methodology for model and pattern-based systems engineering. His 40-year engineering career began in mil/aero systems with IBM Federal Systems, Owego, NY, included ser- vice as a faculty member of Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and founding of three commercial systems-based enterprises. He has consulted on improvement of engineering processes within automotive, medical/health care, manufacturing
haspreviously used, it is important to evaluate its effectiveness. To do this, the department initiallyplanned to enlist the aid of external evaluators to conduct a formal assessment. Howeveranticipated funding to support this effort did not materialize, so a rigorous evaluation has not yetbeen performed. Additionally, the desire to draw any clear conclusions regarding itseffectiveness is also hampered by the small sample size. To date, only four cohorts – a total of84 students including those who are currently enrolled – have taken this class. And since thestudents from the first cohort have yet to graduate, the full impact of this pedagogy on theiracademic careers is just now being assessed. More data must be collected and a morecomprehensive
Senior Planning and Research Associate in the Office of Planning and Institutional Assessment at The Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Amy L Freeman, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Amy L. Freeman is Assistant Dean of Engineering Diversity at The Pennsylvania State University where she received the M.S. in Architectural Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Workforce Education. She is Co-PI on the NSF-sponsored Toys’n MORE grant and currently manages several retention programs targeting over 2500 women and underrepresented technical students at all levels of the academic and career development pipeline. She is also an executive member of the National Association of Multicultural Engineering Program Advocates
writing flexible programs (or “functions” or“scripts”). Many seem much more comfortable using software to solve what they tend to viewas separate, standalone problems. When they move from one problem to the next, many seem toview it as a time to start over from scratch. Of course, the students in the course are mechanicaland civil engineers, and not students who are preparing for a computer programming career.However, it seems for them to be efficient in their careers, they need to consider methods forautomating tasks when appropriate. It is hoped that the experience with this project will benefitsome students by prompting them to think about how to automate repetitive tasks
hypotheses represent the very beginnings of a multi-year study in whichstudents’ and teachers’ responses to and reflections on design failures in the classroom areinvestigated as part of the aforementioned E4 Project.Study Context & Participants The E4 Project examines the impact of two engineering curricula on children’sengineering learning, science learning, interest in and attitudes towards careers in science and Page 24.980.10engineering. Also investigated within this larger study are teachers’ conceptions aboutengineering and science instruction, and their fidelity of implementation of assigned curricula. This larger study is in