production systems, (i.e. wind,coal, gas, hydro, nuclear, etc.), evaluated on a consistent basis, taking into account thesocial and economic effects in addition to the cost (dollar) effects. A major problemaffecting the evaluation of the environmental and social costs of energy production inconjunction with the monetary cost is a lack of standardization, without whichcomparisons are difficult or invalid. A conflict has arisen between those intent onprotecting their view of the environment and those intent on providing continuingeconomic development. Previous studies of the environmental consequences have beendone by the Pace Law School Energy Project, which is part of the Pace University Schoolof Law's Center for Environmental Legal Studies, located
suggests that 1) managers and engineers view the same facts fromdifferent perspectives and 2) there is a general difficulty to send or receive bad news, particularlywhen it must be passed to superiors. It is possible that the level of risk was not effectivelycommunicated to higher levels of management. Lighthall6 argues that there was a lack in basicskills in statistics with the engineers, and that the data and analyses were not valid but deficient.In fact, NASA safety organizations were not staffed with professional statisticians or riskanalysts, and project engineers were not trained in modern statistical analysis techniques.3 The following hypothesis and supporting hypotheses are thus presented for this study: Engineering curricula
a number ofassessment instruments specifically for this project. Assessment results indicate that the presentform of the Vis-MoM courseware is well received by both professors and students. In addition,quantitative results indicate a significant increase in both short term and longer-term conceptual Page 7.341.3 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”understanding when using the Vis-MoM courseware over standard lecture alone. Theassessment instruments developed specifically for this
the challenge below. You need to take this opportunity to participate in thisactivity to the best of your ability. You should identify anything you are uncertain of and identify what you would do to research more toremove this uncertainty. Your effort on this activity represents -10% of your score on the first midterm exam.Part A. Recent sports reports have focused on the use of proteins as supplements to enhance an athlete’s performance. As such, there isgreat interest in the pharmaceutical industry to produce protein-based products that can be used in over-the-counter performanceenhancing supplements. You have just been promoted to project manager at ProteinPlus Corporation. ProteinPlus Corporation’s primaryrole is to design protein
2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationobjectives of these exercises were: 1) elicit and record students’ initial concepts, 2) to illustratethe functional aspects of living systems, and introduce the principle that the design space of lifeis constrained by a rational set of physical parameters, and 3)allow the instructor to establish theframework for the discussions to follow in the course.Module 2: Introduction to The Human Genome Project and genetic mapping. For this exercise,the students were shown the recently published map of the human genome1 and were challengedto decode the meanings of its annotations
conditioning, paper mill, telephone, government contractors,and a biomedical pharmaceutical company. From employer evaluations, we find most of thestudents performed extremely well. Some of the employer comments were: “Student’s greatattitude a plus … work ethic will be an asset to any organization,” “… student is a cut above therest,” “Student exceeded expectations of intern program,” “… provided great support for multi-million dollar project,” etc. Student surveys showed that students regarded their experiences positively and wantedto continue working in some form of internship or cooperative experience. However, studentsdid express anxiety in beginning work in an engineering environment with no previousexperience. Most students were able to
of the form used to report a summary of the assessment results and anyrecommendations based on the evaluation of the results. Any particular assessment tool,homework, group project, laboratory reports, quizzes, testing, or combination deemed necessaryby the instructor could be used. The assessment might be used to monitor (M) or summatively Page 7.238.2assess (S) the student achievement. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationFig. 2. Schematic diagram depicting the process for course
offered.Course Design and DeliveryCS/EE Online courses are delivered via the World-Wide-Web in the form of hypertext files.This permits a wide range of options for course design and implementation. All courses aredesigned to facilitate asynchronous and self-paced learning. On-line Web access (utilizingcourse WebPages and WebBoard, and email) is used to facilitate group discussions and Q&Awith the instructor, and support other logistical needs such as homework assignments. FAQs andthreaded discussions are provided through the course WebBoard. Threaded discussions andQ&As are kept from each semester and are made available to students in future semestersthrough the WebBoard. Use of the WebBoard to organize project teams in CSE 5324 is shownin Fig
to performance but are not a direct measure of it or when measurement arepredictors of the performance 11.Additionally, to establish an adequate measurement basis in the system, it is necessary to thinkabout why the evaluation is required 1. In this project, evaluation would measure quality andresource utilization. This provides academic units with an objective assessment of theircapabilities, processes and service delivery. It would also provide a clear measurement of theirservice performance within the confines of the expectations and needs of its stakeholders.Other essential issues in evaluation are addressed by answering the following questions 14: · Who should evaluate
pictureAt the same time as we received a grant for our project from the Service de soutien àl’enseignement, the Department of Civil Engineering was undertaking a massive overhaulof its Bachelor’s Degree program. Important objectives were to increase significantly theuse of information technologies in the classroom and to come up with learning tools thatwould be appealing and effective in promoting self-learning. Using the video files hit thetarget right on in that respect. Page 7.1056.2 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for
development of a series of software programs that can be used byinstructors, teaching assistants, and students involved in the undergraduate curricula. Theprograms are primarily developed for the teaching purposes, but they can be used in distancelearning, student projects, research laboratories, and educational workshops. This paper presents Page 7.1001.1 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”two sample programs developed for two mechanical systems including mechanical vibrationsystems
both in quality and quality of instruction and depends primarily uponthe individual director. The USC Graduate School offers dissertation workshops a fewtimes a year; however, the space is limited, the information is not discipline specific, andfew engineering students attend.The unstated assumption in graduate education seems to be that by the time studentsreach the dissertation stage, they should already know how to manage and complete theproject; unfortunately, most students have never undertaken a project of this magnitudeand are not sure how to transfer their previously-mastered skills to such a task. Thus, thefocus of the workshop became the process behind a long, messy project such as adissertation. Shifting the students' attention from
! § Repeat deficient grades survival - If you have questions or§ Allocate appropriate time to immediately need help, ask an upper level study mathematics § Don’t drop mathematics - student or the student support staff§ Avoid making careless Understand how this affects § Be persistent and persevere mistakes your plan to fulfill § Get to know and work with faculty§ Organize and work in a requirements on research projects - They will get mathematics study group § Plan to get to Calculus in one to know you better and what you§ Be cautious
and teamwork-based with assessment embeddedat every stage. The module development process has been called the Module ArchitectureÓ, aterm that is in the process of being registered by the AIM Center.The Module Architecture Ó has been initially applied to the design of a novel curriculum for acomplete associate degree program in manufacturing engineering technology. 1 Because thecontent of the manufacturing engineering field is highly interdisciplinary, application of theresults of this project can easily be introduced in either manufacturing, mechanical, or industrialengineering technologies. For the purposes of this paper the following abbreviations for thesethree programs are used, MfgET, MET, and IET
students during their course of study, throughinvolvement in professional societies and design projects. Evidences for the realization of theoutcomes are gathered through surveys (exit, faculty, alumni and employer). The last threeindicate specific performances, which can be measured during coursework by the instructors.All the program outcomes are embedded into the curriculum through course objectives andoutcomes. The faculty have described how each of the course objectives is related to theprogram outcome requirements, as well as the outcome requirements of Criterion 3 and 8. Inaddition, the faculty indicated to what extent specific courses fulfill the outcome requirementsof EC2000 as shown in Table 2 for the Mechanical Engineering curriculum
Session 1351 Study on Sludge Recirculation in a Metal Removal System Carlos A. Ortiz, Ph.D., Melanie O. Daniel, Joshua A. Becker Civil Engineering Technology Southern Polytechnic State UniversityThis study was conducted with undergraduate students to evaluate the impact of chemical sludgerecirculation on the overall removal efficiency and reduction of virgin chemicals. This project wasalso performed to demonstrate to students and faculty of the Civil Engineering Technology (CET)program at Southern Polytechnic State University (SPSU) the capabilities of the
Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology, an M. Phil. in Architecture from the Universityof Newcastle-upon-Tyne in England, and a Ph. D. in Architecture from Texas A&M University. Dr.Choudhury has extensive experience as a consulting architect working on projects funded by the WorldBank, Asian Development Bank, and some other Multilateral Development Banks. His areas of emphasisinclude housing, alternative technology, issues related to international construction, and constructioneducation. He teaches Environmental Control Systems at an undergraduate level and InternationalConstruction at a graduate level. Page 7.930.6
strengthrelative to their classmates and to a demonstration dipole antenna. Signal strength is measuredfrom an outdoor 4 th floor balcony. Students are allowed five minutes to find the orientation fortheir best reading. The signal strength can be the voltage reading on the AGC of the television setor the dBm reading on a spectrum analyzer. Both methods have been used, but not for the samesemester since the television has a 75-Ohm connection and the spectrum analyzer has a 50-Ohmconnection.Freshmen projectThe freshmen project needs to be completed in a few hours. That includes time for learning a bitof theory, construction and testing. The staff provides the freshmen with the center frequency ofoperation of the channel, the formula to calculate wavelength
will represent a highly effective department. Very similarly,collective actions and decisions are critical, but can only develop from truly collective dialog.In doing so, a chair should not attempt to ‘homogenize’ the members, but rather assemble aneffective mix of skills and expertise, which can contribute to the collective dialog in majorways. Rewarding faculty collectively may seem inappropriate or at times counter to ourindividual senses; however, it simply displays collective ‘attention’.In a typical engineering department, faculty members are most concerned with their owncourses and projects. Therefore, the chair must be able to provide an atmosphere wherefaculty sees their individual goals reached through meeting departmental goals. As
-campuscondensed summer laboratories. This delivery format ensures that each distance programhas exactly the same content as the on-campus program. One major limitation of thecurrent delivery mode of the DEDP is that it normally takes two (2) to three (3) weeks,sometimes even longer, for the video taped lectures to reach off-campus students. As aresult, students enrolled in the DEDP program are at times more than three weeks behindtheir on-campus peers in submitting the required assignments, projects, and tests. Thisdelay also generates additional load for faculty in terms of grading and advising on-campus and distance students at different points in the course. In general, facultymembers consider that under these circumstances a distance student requires
processes is a cornerstone ofEC 20001.Given the limitations of achievement tests in fulfilling outcomes assessment requirements, theassessment community has recommended several alternative approaches for assessing studentoutcomes. These include portfolios, capstone design project evaluations, student, alumni andemployer surveys, and placement data of graduates. Yet, written surveys administered to currentstudents are the most frequently used assessment instruments, due in part to two reasons – one,they are relatively inexpensive to conduct, and, two, a high response rate is almost guaranteed. Anatural question is whether these student self-assessments are valid substitutes for test questionscreated and scored by an instructor.This paper reports the
student organizations. It has also been the authors' experience that collegejuniors and seniors relate especially well to middle school students, perhaps even better thanmost engineering faculty. With the student organization leading the tour, presentation, andhands-on activities, the faculty member is then able to put his/her efforts into developing thecontacts with middle school classes, training the members of the student organization for theirparticipation, organizing the manufacturing facility tour, and soliciting the small amount offunding required. The need to develop the three activities of the program, manufacturing facilitytour, class presentation, and hands-on project, are, hopefully, thoroughly addressed in this paper.There are many
DOCUMENTATION DATA INTEGRATIONThere has been an issue raised during past presentations of this model regarding pedagogicalapproaches to teaching with this model. The engineering student will be given an overview ofeach of these topics with an exemplary activity to match. The goal is to give them an appreciationof how each of these topics impacts the design process. Unfortunately, most engineers spendlittle of their time on the job actually doing what most of them would consider “design work”. Alltoo often, engineers are tasked with responsibilities, in addition to those mentioned in theIntroduction of this paper, relating to field issues and problems, negotiations with suppliers,testing, project management, and
microcontrollers using high level programming languages anddesign and implement an embedded computer for a large project. The 68HC11EVBU has beenthe platform for this course.Both modules have provided educators with necessary tools to fulfill microcontroller courseobjectives. If so, why change? The primary reason for switching from the 68HC11 to 68HC12microcontroller is that Motorola is no longer producing both evaluation boards due to oldtechnology-based components on the boards. Rather than creating new boards based on the68HC11, Motorola is pushing universities to use the next generation microcontroller, the68HC12.The 68HC12 improved the 68HC11 system performance by incorporating an instruction queuingsystem, similar to a parallel-pipe instruction
numerically evaluates to thecorrect answer. The system is looking to find components, which when eliminated,match the designer's solution with one or more of its components eliminated.An interesting note is that this process takes much less time than I would have fearedbecause newer machines are so much faster (800MHz - 1.8GHz) than machines that wereavailable when this project was started. Thus, the problem of CPU usage has not been asignificant factor.Evaluation of Student Input - Part 2A second routine examines the problem of identifying the probable error the studentactually made. The primary limitation here is that the set of solutions for the studenterror is merely a good guess, but a reasonable start.The system proceeds in much the same way
Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationand it would have been evaluated as correct, because it numerically evaluates to thecorrect answer. The system is looking to find components, which when eliminated,match the designer's solution with one or more of its components eliminated.An interesting note is that this process takes much less time than I would have fearedbecause newer machines are so much faster (800MHz - 1.8GHz) than machines that wereavailable when this project was started. Thus, the problem of CPU usage has not been asignificant factor.Evaluation of Student Input - Part 2A second routine examines the problem of identifying the probable error the studentactually made. The primary limitation here is that the set of
demonstrated between the two technologies. Sincecandy making is inherently interesting to students, the proposed demonstrations provide amemorable experience to the students for learning several principles of glass formation.Acknowledgement : The authors gratefully acknowledge the Diamond Chair endowment andNational Science Foundation (DMR 0074624) for supporting this work.References:1 A. K. Varshneya, Fundamentals of Inorganic Glasses , Academic Press, New York, 1994.2 The experiments discussed in this paper are a result of an Elementary School science project. Often Collegeteachers outreach pre-college students by introducing advanced scientific concepts. In this respect, the present workis just the converse; it is an 'inreach' effort where the
covered which may differfrom the department syllabus, any laboratory projects, design experience, oral or writtencommunication projects and any social or ethical issues discussed in the course. The curriculumcommittee, to determine if the department syllabus needs to be changed, reviews the coursereports annually.Senior Exit surveyAll graduating seniors are asked to fill out a survey just before graduation in the spring. Thissurvey is quite detailed consisting of 23 questions many with multiple parts. Several questionsspecifically ask the students to give an opinion about how well the department met the MEprogram outcomes. The rest of the questions were included to correspond to questions o n theone-year alumni survey and will be used for
Encryption 3Data modeling objects/UML 4 Identification & authentication 2Data mining 3 Information assurance 2Data warehousing 3 Viruses, worms, Trojan horses 2Database management 2 Table 9: Sub-topics for the DataTable 6: Sub-topics for the Database topic Security/Privacy topic area.area. Math Sub-topics # Project Management Sub-topics # Discrete math 9Project management
engineers and engineering technologists, computer support Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationspecialists, computer systems analysts, and database administrators constitute the four mostrapidly growing occupations in the US economy and are expected to increase by 108, 102, 94,and 77 percent, respectively [1]. According to the BLS, engineering technicians and relatedsupport occupations are projected to grow by 22 percent, adding 1.1 million jobs by 2008 [1].Workers in this group provide technical assistance to engineers, scientists, physicians, and otherprofessional specialty workers, and operate and