College of Engineering at the University of Michigan engaged in an multi-yearexperiential learning initiative to develop a framework to support students to intentionally explorelearning opportunities, engage meaningfully in experiences, reflect on what they have learned,and communicate the value of the core competencies they have developed [9]. Experientiallearning has been identified as a high-impact educational practice [12], and provides theopportunity for the student to develop and practice competencies in authentic settings [13]. Tosupport experiential learning, the College of Engineering developed a set of key professionalcompetencies (Table 1) through a strategic vision process involving faculty, staff, students,alumni, and industry
often considered the most critical factors influencing students' decision to study engineering. In many engineering programs, students need to start their undergraduate education in Calculus 1 to be on track in the major. In 2023, student readiness is significantly different because the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted math and science achievement. More incoming engineering students than ever placed below Calculus 1 and are navigating the impact this has on their engineering major and coursework trajectory. Even with the added barrier of being categorized as pre-math-ready or beginning in Pre-Calculus in their first semester, students continue to pursue engineering. What
-efficacy to embed engineering in their curricula in ways that meaningfullyconnect to students’ lives and communities [2]. Traditional “engineering” building tasks candisenfranchise students from non-dominant groups, particularly Indigenous communities, becausethere is a lack of connection to multiple epistemologies, specifically those focusing on culturalcompetency, identity, and relationships with the natural world [6]. Focusing on how engineeringeducation can be reframed as equity-centered, inclusive of diverse voices and ways of learning, isessential to increasing participation and outcomes in engineering.Supporting teachers in employing a culturally relevant approach to engineering requires new andimproved professional development (PD
% growth rate in new engineering faculty opportunities over the next 10 years, not keeping upwith the rate of Ph.D. engineering graduates [2]. As a result, graduate students will need to seeknon-academic roles in industry or the government upon graduation.As part of a research study funded through the NSF Innovations in Graduate Education (IGE),we are seeking to build upon an existing transportation engineering graduate program throughthe integration of a research-to-practice model based upon cognitive apprenticeship. As part ofthis model, we include practical experiences that we believe will prepare students for non-academic roles while maintaining the program’s current level of scientific rigor. We willevaluate the success of the new graduate
' learningexperiences and professional identity development, specifically their progression towardsbecoming engineers through experiential learning. WIL internships provide students withopportunities to learn through enculturation into the CoP and its norms, and to understand itwithin the context of their sociocultural histories, including their previous experiences andidentities in other CoPs (Eames & Coll, 2006). This aspect is particularly pertinent to thisstudy as it also aims to explore the interaction between students' prior academic trainingbased on a French engineering education model and their learning experiences and identityformation within the Chinese workplace setting. It not only assists students in comprehendingthe CoP but also facilitates
Paper ID #41431A Multi-Institutional Assessment of Entrepreneurial Mindset Perceptions ofStudents Participating in Entrepreneurial REU Programs Through ConceptMapsMs. Alexandra Mary Jackson, Rowan University Alexandra Jackson is a third year PhD candidate at Rowan University in Engineering Education. She began her research in Rowan’s Experiential Engineering Education Department in the Fall of 2019, and has developed interests in entrepreneurial mindset and student development. In particular, she is interested in assessment of entrepreneurial mindset through both quantitative and qualitative methods, and is currently
retention inengineering the above samples suggests retention rates, a critical metric in assessing theeffectiveness of educational programs, vary when reflecting each institution’s unique curricula,challenges, data collection methods, and statistical processes.Many US mechanical engineering programs implement innovative pedagogies to engage theirfirst-year students. US Coast Guard Academy introduced cyber-physical system design andrealization by integrating a Bilge Pump design project. The first-year students were exposed tovarious engineering skills, including SolidWorks, machining, sheet metal work, 3-D printing,and programming using Arduino to build and test pumps [5]. Virginia Military Instituteimplemented a nine-week Arduino-controlled Potato
Gulf conflict, in support of the Global War on Terrorism in Iraq, and during peace enforcement operations in Bosnia-Herzegovina. He was awarded three Bronze Star Medals for leadership and service during wartime operations. He earned his commission through ROTC and was a Distinguished Military Graduate, He is a graduate of the U.S. Army Ranger School and the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. He earned a M.S. in leadership development and counseling from Long Island University and a B.A. in psychology from Boston University. He is a member of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). Leo is an avid hiker, and when not at work can usually be found on a New Hampshire White Mountains high
California, Irvine and is working on a Masters in Science Education at California State University Long Beach. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Breaking Through the Obstacles: Strategies and Support Helping Students Succeed in Computer ScienceIntroduction and MotivationNot only that there is a continuously growing number of students who want to study computerscience (CS) but also there is a large need for CS graduates. The computing jobs are crucial forthe development and growth of the economy worldwide. For example, the data from theIntegrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) [1] by the U.S. Department ofEducation’s National Center for Education Statistics
of students,who, through involvement in the formal college curriculum and extracurricular activities, cannurture and apply these innovation capacities. This perspective underscores the importance ofdemographic and educational factors that may influence the development of these capacities.Several studies have investigated collegiate mechanisms or individual characteristics that maydevelop innovation capacities in undergraduate students. Key factors include engagement ininnovation-related coursework [10] and positive interactions with faculty [11]. Yet there is anotable emphasis on the importance of educational practices that are inclusive and considerstudent identities and academic majors [12], [13]. These studies highlight the crucial role
linguistic diversity of these facultymembers, we aim to enhance the academic community's capacity for innovation and globalengagement. This exploration is more than a mere examination of the challenges at hand; it is anacknowledgment and celebration of the rich, diverse contributions that international faculty maketo U.S. higher education. Through this comprehensive analysis, we seek to offer meaningfulinsights into professional development for international faculty, contributing to the evolution ofglobal engineering and humanitarian design in a world that is increasingly interconnected.3. Theoretical Framework a. Community Of Cultural Wealth Framework: We framed different cultural backgroundsfrom the asset-based perspective, not from the
this multi-tiered mentoring community experience wouldaid in the development of the students’ STEM identity, evidenced by their feedback and decisionsto pursue additional research opportunities. Students who achieve four-year degrees in STEM are typically White cisgender men withconnections and resources that guide them through the process. Students outside of thisdemographic dealing with more complex circumstances tend to have more difficulty completingfour-year STEM degrees. This group of students is referred to as “disadvantaged”, and includesUnderrepresented Minority (URM) students, first-generation college students, and studentsreturning to school at an older age [1]. URM groups are defined by the NSF as “individuals ofraces or
://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133766[4] E. A. Cech, “Engineering’s Systemic Marginalization and Devaluation of Students andProfessionals With Disabilities”.[5] M. J. Erickson and K. H. Larwin, “The Potential Impact of Online/Distance Education forStudents with Disabilities in Higher Education,” vol. 5, no. 1.[6] P. Golding et al., “Building STEM Pathways for Students with Special Abilities,” in 2018ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah: ASEE Conferences,Jun. 2018, p. 30165. doi: 10.18260/1-2--30165.[7] C. Groen, L. McNair, M. Paretti, D. Simmons, and A. Shew, “Board 52: ExploringProfessional Identity Development in Undergraduate Civil Engineering Students WhoExperience Disabilities,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference &
to support student success inengineering. In border communities of the southwest, where rural communities blend acrossnational and state boundaries, student counternarratives of educational success involvecomplexity. In particular, engineering students’ descriptions of language, familial backgrounds,disciplinary knowledge, hidden curriculum of US post-secondary systems, and financial servicesbuilt for citizens OR international students indicate there is much to be learned about howinstitutions in border communities support or fail to support equitable access to engineeringpathways. In a larger study, transcript analysis of 40 interviews from undergraduates at a borderinstitution indicate scholars navigate familial and background difference
contexts. Examples offaculty experiments are supplied, as well as a program timeline and interview protocol.IntroductionAfter functioning heroically during the pandemic, the leaders at Michigan Engineering (theUniversity of Michigan College of Engineering) were exhausted and overwhelmed, like so manyuniversity faculty and staff around the nation who had contended with the challenges of a rapidtransition to online education, complex decisions around re-opening, student disengagement, andisolation. With concern for the leaders’ well-being and the flourishing of the college, the deanengaged the Director of Leadership Development in Michigan Engineering to bolsterorganizational health and effectiveness through an executive-level leadership
, then a quantitative description of students’ community and sense of belonging at IRE.1.1 Iron Range EngineeringIRE students complete lower-division coursework at community colleges around the nation [1]. Studentsthen join IRE for one semester, named Bell Academy, on campus; this semester is focused on developingstudents’ professional, design, and technical skills. After this first semester, students earn their degreewhile working in a co-op and earning an engineering salary (average $21.5k per semester). Studentsremain full-time students through the co-op based learning format by taking 1-credit hour technicalcompetencies and design, seminar, and professionalism coursework. They also earn course credit forcoursework related to their valuable
. Student persistence is facilitated by mentors [3], [4], [5], [6], rigorous curriculum, and multiple opportunities to engage in real-world work contexts. 3. STEM identity is created through real-world experience in and connections to the STEM workforce; STEM identity is a strong and leading indicator of retention and advancement in the STEM workforce [7]. 4. Experience with STEM innovation as an undergrad fosters entrepreneurship and innovation after graduation [8]. 5. International experience as an undergrad facilitates preparation for the global STEM workforce [9].project contextTIP enrolled undergraduate students in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department(ECE) at Texas Tech University (TTU). Funding
Education, 2024“Someone has invested in me to do this”: Supporting Low-Income Students to Persist in STEM through an NSF S-STEM grantThere have been numerous, widespread national efforts to address the challenge of a growingneed for STEM professionals. In a 2012 report, the President’s Council of Advisors on Scienceand Technology suggested that the United States needed to produce one million additionalcollege graduates in STEM fields by 2022 in order to keep up with the expected growth inSTEM positions [1]. Between 1970 and 2018, STEM occupations grew 79% [2] and areexpected to continue to grow 10.8% between 2021 and 2031 [3]. Evidence suggests that thenumber of STEM degrees is increasing, as is the diversity of those obtaining STEM
employers don’t have adequate DEIframework to support students from “populations that are underrepresented in technology”, (Joy,2022). Growth Sector and the STEM Core Network have developed impactful relationships withvarious engineering and technology employers who lacked experience working directly withcommunity college students. While many of these employers had the best of intentions onsupporting community college students in their educational and career goals, many are unawareat some of the differences between the traditional undergraduate engineering or computer scienceintern (much closer to B.S. degree achievement, more technical coursework completed, moreknowledge of transit/housing options). Thus, Growth Sector and the STEM Core Network
professional skills acquired from education and needed inthe workplace [7]. In this context, professional skills are defined as “skills essential to thrive in awork setting but not historically included in engineering or engineering technology coursework.”The nine professional skills surveyed were: communication skills, emotional intelligence,teamwork and multidisciplinary work, curiosity and a persistent desire for continuous learning,project management, critical thinking, self-drive and motivation, cultural awareness in a broadsense, high ethical standards, integrity, and global, social, intellectual and technologicalresponsibility. Results showed that nearly 59 percent of respondents felt unprepared inmanagement and business skills, 60 percent in
Michigan. Her current research focuses on idea development and ideation tools, divergent thinking, and engineering curricular practices and culture. Her research interests include front-end design practices, sociotechnical knowledge and skills in engineering, and queer student experiences in engineering. Their work is motivated by their passion for and experiences with inclusive teaching and holistic mentorship of students, seeking to reimagine what an engineer looks like, does, and who they are, especially for queer folks, women, and people of color, through empowerment, collaboration, and co-development for a more equitable world. Shannon is also a Senior Graduate Facilitator and Lab Manager with the Center for
contributions to the continuity and quality of the course and for the sharing materials ateach instructor transition: David Courtemanche, Monica Lupion, and Sheldon Park. Finally, wethank the 2009-2024 faculty of the department holistically for supporting the lecture section ofthe course detailed in this paper and supervising 319 undergraduate researchers through thecomplementary laboratory sections, not including summer students. We also acknowledge thecountless graduate and postdoctoral researchers and staff members who also supported theundergraduate researchers.References[1] C. W. West and J. H. Holles, "Undergraduate Research in Chemical Engineering: Benefits and Best Practices," Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 57, no. 4, pp
,presents a terrifying cautionary tale that warns against unethical practices in science andengineering. Elaborating on these emphases, recent critical editions of the novel published duringits bicentennial have underscored its value as an ethical text to STEM students, educators, andprofessionals alike [1]. Inspired by the novel’s capacity to foster moral imagination amongengineers, I developed an undergraduate engineering course in science, technology, and society(STS) taught in the University of Virginia’s Department of Engineering and Society called“Technology and the Frankenstein Myth.” In the course, students read Frankenstein and reflecttogether on its ethical implications for their work as designers and stewards of the
aimed at promoting student narratives through audio-based methods.Dr. Cassandra McCall, Utah State University Cassandra McCall, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and Co-Director of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Transition Services at Utah State University. Her research centers the intersection identity formation, engineering culture, and disability studies. Her work has received several awards including best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education and the Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech as well as M.S. and B.S. degrees in civil engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and
with industry, providing students with hands-onexperience in this specialized field, but not in an international environment [4], [9], [21] .This study focuses specifically on a subset of the 2023 IRiKA cohort, examining how theirinvolvement in microelectronics research abroad contributed to developing their globalengineering competencies. This study seeks to explore the intricate processes through which globalcompetencies are developed among engineering students at both undergraduate and graduate levelswho possess varying levels of research experience in microelectronics. Through the lens of threeresearch questions, the study examines the influence of the International Research Initiative inKnowledge and Academia (IRiKA) on the global
classroommethods + STEM/engineering; inclusive college classroom + engineering/STEM; inclusiveinstruction + STEM/engineering; and inclusive college education + STEM/engineering) were usedto retrieve articles from different databases. The databases include Web of Science, GoogleScholar, IEEE Xplore Library, Scopus, ERIC, Wiley Online Library, and Compendex.Forty-four articles remained in the pool. Finally, in the synthesis phase, these articles werecritically reviewed following the sub research questions, and the information was synthesized togenerate themes. Five themes emerged from the forty-four articles. First theme: Using Identity toFoster Engineering Connections, found to be especially helpful for marginalized students. Secondtheme: Using Technology
undergraduate student at the University of Virginia. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 REU program evaluation: A valuable tool for studying undergraduate socialization in engineering “This [REU experience] is exactly what I envisioned when I was younger and I thought, you know, I want to be a professional scientist.”--REU Intern This Work in Progress paper introduces research into whether and how a summerresearch experience affects undergraduate students’ sense of identity and belonging inengineering, their understanding of research as a process, and their development ofresearch-related academic and professional skills. We draw from
of fostering inclusive, cooperativeenvironments that reduce anxiety and improve skills [21]. Together, these studies support acomprehensive strategy that goes beyond conventional boundaries to address mental health inengineering education and develops students who are resilient, well-rounded, and successful intheir careers. These studies' findings are consistent with the customized interventions, research-based teaching techniques, and community-building initiatives put forth [13][16][19-21].Exemplar Studies: Together, these studies explore the nuanced terrain of mental health amongundergraduate engineering students and social identities. The study conducted in 2021 by Jensenand Cross focuses on self-reported stress, anxiety, depression
. Based on the African American Male Theory (AAMT) [4], our research team examinedthe three students’ experiences in the context of the interconnected environmental systems(microsystem, mesosystem, exosystemic, macrosystem, chronosystem). Highlighting theconcepts of “resilience,” “resistance,” and “pursuit of social justice” in AAMT, the authorsexplored the three students’ multiple-layered social and professional identities as emerging Blackmale engineering professionals.Theoretical frameworkThis study is grounded in Bush and Bush’s African American Male Theory [4], which providesan effective analytic framework to understand the unique facets of Black males’ experiencessituated in various educational, academic, and community contexts. Like other
. Industry-centered studies over the lasttwo decades show fresh graduates have limited workplace and interpersonal skills [3]. Thisscenario is associated in the literature with the shortage of dedicated engineering courses toincorporate these relevant blends of competencies into students’ coursework.In this study, we explore the efficacy of a sequence of coursework and activities designed by theUniversity of South Florida's Department of Electrical Engineering to support students’professional proficiency and technical skills development. Undergraduate students participatedin a series of Professional Formation of Engineers (PFE) courses and technical courses withinspecialized tracks designed by the department. A sample of students who had taken the