interests often formedthe smaller groups. The interests may have been seeing a particular historical landmark, a desire Page 20.21.7to visit a certain restaurant or a need to get back to the hotel for a nap. Managing several factorsfor a common goal helped build personal bonds between the students and the faculty leaders.There was an unspoken sentiment of trust between the group members that allowed each studentto explore the new surroundings without apprehension of the unknown. Upon leaving the hoteleach morning, the learning environment was expanded again.Overall, the responses demonstrate an overwhelming recognition of the value of the
Paper ID #10249Improving retention of student understanding by use of hands-on experi-ments in StaticsProf. Carisa H Ramming P.E., Oklahoma State University Carisa Ramming joined the faculty at Oklahoma State University as an assistant professor in January 2009 after a stint as a visiting professor in the School of Architecture during the 2007-2008 academic year. Professor Ramming is a graduate of Oklahoma State University with a Bachelor of Architectural Engineering degree in 2001 and dual masters degrees; Master of Science in Civil Engineering with an emphasis in Construction Engineering and Master of Architectural
operating companies, through a series of lectures and guest speakers, will help students make a mature and informed decision on their choice of major. Knowledge for the petroleum industry – under this topic comprehensive overview of the upstream and downstream sectors of the petroleum industry. Topics covered include formation and trapping of petroleum, geological and geophysical exploration methods, drilling, formation evaluation, reservoir engineering and production engineering. Refining, gas processing and the petrochemicals industries are also discussed. The economic and HSE aspects of the industry are considered throughout the course. An overview of the OPEC organization and
monitored. You notice that there is some oil spilled on a stair case that presents an immediate safety risk. However, the stairs can only be cleaned by a union worker but none are immediately available to help. Salaried workers have been cited and penalized for assisting with union work in the past, so you are apprehensive to do the job yourself. What should you do? If the penalty came in the form of a fine, would your decision change if the fine as $50, $500, $5,000? Are you liable if you do nothing?The topics that faculty brought to the team were scenarios that the student may encounter in theearly years of their engineering career or typical ethical issues commonly encountered by young
the course would offer a diverse group of studentsan introduction to engineering as a possible career without the risk involved in taking the courseat the university or committing to an engineering major. The pilot course was taught by HHSteacher Jim Clark, whose credentials include BS EE, MS EE, a M Edu. and five yearsprofessional engineering experience at Motorola. Twenty HHS students completed the pilotcourse in a full academic year and each received three units of college credit. Of these twentystudents, five joined the UA COE in fall 2009 and to date, all five have graduated with anaverage GPA of 3.34. Of the 2009-10 cohort, 17 students remain in the COE today and most areon target for graduation within the next academic year. Details
. Phillips was a faculty member and Chair for DVU’s Biomedical Engineering Technology Program where he mentored senior projects, and taught biomedical, electronics, and basic science courses. In addition, he developed curriculum and courses in these subject matters. Before joining DVU, Dr. Phillips was a Faculty Associate at Arizona State Uni- versity (ASU) for the Bioengineering Department, where he taught and assisted in the development of biomedical engineering courses and mentored student capstone projects. He holds a PhD and Master’s degree in Bioengineering from Arizona State University and a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois. Before entering into a career of higher learning
, SCCT emphasizes the roleof other personal, contextual, and learning variables (e.g., gender, race or ethnicity, ability, socialsupport, external barriers) that can help shape career trajectories, including the means to remediateany disadvantages from being under-represented in particular occupations.24 More recently, Lentand his colleagues have added the construct of educational and vocational satisfaction as acontributor to structural models examining the pathways between self-efficacy and interests andpersistence intentions.25 Page 24.1202.5SCCT theory has made an impact on models attempting to explain the withdrawal of students
engineering through a two-week residential summer camp. The Summer Engineering Instituteprovides participants an insight into the engineering profession and the engineering educationalsystem through a combination of lectures, hands-on laboratory activities, field trips, workshops,panels, and projects. Among the strategies employed in developing the program are emphasizingall the major fields of engineering and the various paths to an engineering career, including therole of community colleges; targeting first generation students and underrepresented minorities;collaborating with high school faculty and staff through a nomination process to identify andselect potential students; collaboration among community college and university faculty indeveloping
that those students who are involved inengineering organizations are also involved in other on-campus organizations (0.85). Grade-point average was moderately correlated with considering leaving engineering (-0.37), but notwith plans to work in an engineering-related field post-graduation (0.03). These relationshipswere explored further and are discussed in the following sections, which also include a summaryof the survey response rates for specific questions with emphasis on gender and race/ethnicity(white vs. non-white). It continues with a presentation of statistically significant variablerelationships (t-tests and chi-square) and continues with identification of statistically significantfactors from regression modeling, in which tests of
social persuasion and vicarious experience are: - Mentoring: provide like-gender mentors for female mentees. Mentors can be female faculty, students enrolled in the program, or active construction industry members. - Establish Women in Construction Clubs: These clubs support both the professional and social needs of female construction management students by providing an environment of camaraderie. - Summer Programs for Prospective Female Students: Summer program experiences encourage prospective students to explore the construction management field.Future research will focus on determining whether or not female students had formal or informalmentors who influenced their academic and career
exploring andimplementing that vision. Leadership also involves the development of an understanding of thecomplexities that face us as both American and global citizens. Through the ELPS program, wefocus more intentionally on the development of a leadership plan. Students are encouraged towork with their ELPS faculty mentor to develop a plan to advance themselves in variousleadership skills. We have supported this development using self-assessment with the MBTI(Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) questionnaire with followed by workshops with Career Centerpersonnel, sharing of opportunities both on and off-campus with students and encouraging themto participate, one-on-one connections, and mentoring to help students assess and develop theirskills.One of
consider it my motivation to become an engineer. I think those are sort of like 2 separate spheres of my life. Sort of what I want to do academically and career-wise and what I want to do on a philanthropic and personal level.”SR Type 4 – These students had thought little about social responsibility or helping othersthrough their professions beyond safety and legal professional obligations at the time of theinterview. Many were focused on their studies and helping those closest to them. Brandon: “I think it kind of moves me towards it because, I don't know what to call it, the engineering code of ethics. Your job, first and foremost, is safety above everything else, it's a good job or at least that's the way it should be. Safety is
-education requirement at a sister institution (Portland StateUniversity) where the present author co-taught for several years with three faculty members fromthe Philosophy Department. The title of the original course was “Knowledge, Rationality andUnderstanding.” It was initially designed by a faculty member from the Psychology Department,and had a strong emphasis on decision-making.The present author was hired in 2005 as a “quantitative person” at the graduate-assistant level tohandle the Statistics content as well as the three hour-long weekly discussion sessions. Duringthe next three years, the primary instructors either retired or passed away, with the present author(graduate assistant) as the main constant and an increasingly central role in
students. Dr. Cadwell currently consults on a $1.2 million NSF grant that she procured in partnership with the Univer- sity of Idaho faculty in Curriculum and Instruction, UI Extension, and two local Native American Indian Tribes: the Coeur d’Alene (CdAT) and Spokane (ST) tribes. The grant, ITEST, Strategies Project—Back to the Earth (BTTE), is addressing a national call to increase the STEM workforce pipeline by supporting and improving the STEM educational experiences for Native American students. Dr. Cadwell is a member of the grant leadership team with expertise in STEM content, curriculum development, and technology ed- ucation. The team is using an interdisciplinary framework to reach under-served populations. The
Farnsworth, Managing Director of NCN (nanoHUB.org)RE: nanoHUB.org Design Project DescriptionLet me start by telling you a little about nanoHUB.org: “nanoHUB.org is arguably the largest online user facility for nanoscale engineering and science modeling and simulations in the world. It is a project that is funded by the US National Science Foundation and serves over 240,000 annually. Our users are researchers from the industry, researchers, faculty members at universities worldwide, and most importantly students – at the undergraduate and graduate levels. nanoHUB.org is the place for computational nanotechnology research, education, and collaboration. nanoHUB hosts a rapidly growing collection of
or the VBioR Laboratory Project. Biological and environmental engineering studentsgenerally choose the VBioR Laboratory Project, while chemical engineering students chooseeither the VCVD or the VBioR Laboratory Project. In this study, eight teams choose the VCVDLaboratory Project and eight teams choose the VBioR Laboratory Project, with all eight VBioRteams selecting the protein production option. The students work under the supervision of twocoaches, who are faculty members in the unit. One faculty member is the VCVD coach and theother the VBioR coach and both coaches are content experts in their respective fields.Data Collection and AnalysisThis research study is an ethnographic case study using discourse analysis.47 The data iscollected
studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She runs the erstwhile Research in Feminist Engineer- ing (RIFE) group, now renamed the Feminist Research in Engineering Education (FREE) group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at the website http://feministengineering.org/. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu.Canek Moises Luna Phillips, Purdue University, West Lafayette Canek Phillips is a graduate student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University-West Lafayette and works as a graduate assistant in Dr. Alice Pawley’s Feminist Research in Engineering Ed- ucation lab. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rice University and an M.S. in Mechanical
, and AutoCAD. Without confidencein math, students may fail these courses and drop out of college9. Therefore, fundamental mathskills should be developed before students reach upper level courses. Students must be able toconfidently solve construction-related math problems by the time they graduate.Research Purpose and Method Page 24.161.2The main purpose of this study is to explore different pedagogies and identify an effective one toteach math-related content knowledge in construction education. This study investigated threepedagogical approaches to teach math-related CM courses: the traditional lecture model, theproblem-based learning model
whereby a standinggraduate faculty committee and an appointed Enhancing Graduate Education (EGE) committeeworked together to create a sustainable process for periodic program review that included aframework for interpreting the five new university-level graduate student learning competencies:Knowledge, Application, Context, Communication, and Leadership. Also required wasdevelopment of a methodology for assessment and continuous improvement. This approachearned a very positive 2013 MSCHE evaluation: “university assessment practices of graduateStudent Learning Outcomes [were] particularly thoughtful ...[including] the plans, examples ofimplementation [and] the support structure.The recently developed framework for graduate SLO assessment allows
of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Mr. Amadin Osagiede, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amadin Osagiede is an MBA candidate in the Krannert School of Management at Purdue University. He obtained a
the categories. The following section gives an overview and discussion of the variousthemes. The next section also compares these findings to previously published results.Motivations Connected with StudentsAll of the participants identified student learning as a motivation for being a part of the EPICSprogram. However, perceptions regarding the program learning objectives and the influence onstudent’s careers varied among participant groups. The objectives of the community partnerswere largely focused on the learning about their specific organizations, while the advisors hadlarger educational goals. For the purpose of the program, both the community members andadvisors see EPICS impacting the student’s careers as engineers. However, the
Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm”, was presented in Japan at COMPEL 2012.Cristina Rivera-V´elez, GREAT IDEA Cristina Rivera-Velez is from Mayaguez, Puerto Rico. Holds a B.A, in Communications from the Uni- versity of Sacred Heat, San Juan, P.R. Attended the University of Puerto Rico- Mayaguez, where she completed her Master of Business Administration (2013). As graduate student, she worked as a graduate research assistant with GREAT IDEA, where she assisted in the research regarding attitudes of engineers. Also a member of the GREAT IDEA, she organized two events for the academic community, an Alter- native Job Fair and an Appropriate Technology Forum. During the Fall 2013 semester, served as the teaching
is closely related to business skill self-efficacy, having a“divergent” learning style, and a “systemizing” approach to problem solving. This suggests thateSBL curriculum could be an important tool in preparing engineering students for a career inentrepreneurship or other business-related activity within core engineering course content. Inaddition, faculty impressions on instruction using this curricular tool are shared.1. Introduction: Engineering + XThe career pathway for engineering students overwhelmingly leads to industry. A recent studyby the National Science Foundation of newly graduated engineering bachelor and master’sdegree recipients shows that 75 percent of graduates are employed by “private industry orbusiness.”1 It is apparent
receiving the URP funds recruitedstudents internally4. In 1986, the NSF established the REU program emphasizing recruitment ofstudents from underrepresented groups and required the grantee institutions to recruit most of theresearch participants from outside the host institutions4. Raicu and Furst5 have described a modelfor interdisciplinary undergraduate research by engaging students in studies targeted at exploringthe frontier between computer science and medicine. In a study reported by Gonzalez-Espada andZaras6 , the authors found an overwhelming evidence to show that the REU programs at NationalWeather Center (NWC) are having a positive impact on students’ decisions to pursue careers inscience. In describing their experiences of a successful
requirements (their history, political agendas, desires, forms of knowledge, etc.) is fully understood. (p. 125)18So how do basic and contextual listening relate to each of four design strategies? Listening indesign for technology may be constrained. For instance, in one of our research interviews, aformer graduate student and current faculty member stated that his undergraduate educationand early industry experience taught him that, in design contexts, he needed to “listen to thespec.” By that, he meant that he needed to listen to the specifications that were implicit orexplicit in the client’s explanation of the problem and desired solution. That trained his ear tobe a basic listener and to consciously filter out information that did not
Page 24.970.2 Corresponding author; Nepal@tamu.edu, 1-979-845-2230, Fax: 1-979 845-4980very successful serving over 2500 students, 62 faculty members, and 49 separate courses acrosssix engineering departments in one year alone. There are different models of experientiallearning mentioned in the engineering education literature. For example, service learning is atype of experiential learning approach in which students can achieve their personal growth andearn professional development education while providing service to community [5]. However,researchers argue that experiential learning that takes place during community service activitiesis different from the one that takes place in the university laboratories [6]. The reason behind thisis
the basement of the residencehalls, have faculty member presence in the dorm, and hold extra-curricular activities to promotestudent engagement and community growth. However, both LCs differ in terms of academicrequirements for admittance to the program, resources available to the participants, and programgoals.The honors LC (HC) has an interdisciplinary focus and is open to students in any major whomeet minimum academic requirements. The mission of the HC at this institution is “to foster Page 24.504.3continued intellectual growth, to cultivate a lifelong respect for learning, and to prepare studentsfor lives as leaders and change-agents”5
human who plays an active and pri-mary role in making the final decision. Such a process is called assisted requirements tracing(ART).8 Recent studies on students’ ART performances5, 8 clearly showed the challenges inthat students invariably made errors of omission (threw out correct links) and errors of com-mission (added incorrect links). Dekhtyar et al.8 conducted a statistical analysis of the fac-tors affecting ART performance, though all the participants were students enrolled in Soft-ware Engineering courses. Our work, reported, in this paper extends the body of knowledge inART by making a head-to-head comparison between students and software professionals.Preparing graduates for a smooth and successful transition toward their roles in
Fellow of ASME, 2005; Chancellor’s Award for AdvancingInstitutional Excellence, 2006; Faculty Award for Excellence in Graduate Student Mentoring, MechanicalEngineering Graduate Student Council, 2007; Chancellor’s Awards for Public Service:CARES (Commu-nity Assessment for Renewable Energy and Sustainability), 2010; Best Note Honorable Mention, (withKimiko Ryokai, Lora Oehlberg and Michael Manoochehri) ACM CHI (Conference on Human Factors inComputing Systems), 2011; Professor of the Year, UC Berkeley Pi Tau Sigma, 2011; Academy of Dis-tinguished Alumni, University of New Mexico, 2012; and Leon Gaster Award for Lighting Technology(with Yao-Jung Wen), 2012; AAAS Lifetime Mentoring Award, 2012-13; and Reviewers’ Favorite Awardat the 2013
Research and Learning (INSPIRE) at Purdue University. In 2011, she received a NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students ap- proach innovation. She is also a NAE/CASEE New Faculty Fellow. She is an editorial board member for the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education (JPEER) and the journal of Science Education. Purzer conducts research on the assessment of difficult and often vaguely defined constructs such as innovative- ness, information literacy, engineering design, and data-driven decision-making. Purzer has M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in Science Education from Arizona State University. She also has a B.S. degree in Physics Education and a B.S.E. in Engineering.Dr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue