: January 4, 2013.]http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.6. Re-engineering engineering education to retain women. Blaisdell, S., Middleton, A. and Anderson-Rowland, M.1996. Fontiers in Engineering Education.7. Belenky, M. F., et al., et al. Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. Tenthanniversary edition. New York : Basic Books, 1997.8. American Society of Engineering Education. University of Massachusetts Lowell. College Profiles. [Online]2011. [Cited: January 3, 2013.] http://profiles.asee.org/profiles/5224/print_all.9. Yoder, Brian L. Engineering by the numbers, p. 46. 2011-profile-engineering-statistics. [Online] 2011. [Cited:January 3, 2013.] http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/2011
Paper ID #7132Smart Grid, Industry Trends and Power Engineering EducationDr. Wajiha Shireen, University of Houston (CoT) Wajiha Shireen received her B.S degree from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology in 1987, her M.S and PhD degrees in 1991 and 1993, both from Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, all in Electrical Engineering. She joined University of Houston in 1993 and currently is a full Professor and holds a joint appointment in the Engineering Technology Department and the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at University of Houston, Houston, Texas. Her current research
, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, National Research Council (1996). From Analysisto Action. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.9 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. L., (1999), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, andSchool, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.10 Committee on Undergraduate Science Education, (1999) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science,Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, NationalResearch Council.11 Kalabon, Amy E., Loescher, Eric S., Sommerville, Alice E., and Delatte, Norbert J. (2013), “Rise and Fall of theOhio and Erie Canal,” accepted for publication by the ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in EngineeringEducation and
Foster Entrepreneurial- Minded Engineers. Retrieved October 18, 2012 from http://www.ecs.baylor.edu/news.php?action=story&story=112785 2. Drucker, P. (2007). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. Oxford, UK: 3. Butterworth-Heinemann, European Commission. (2008). Entrepreneurship in higher education, especially within non-business studies. Retrieved October 18, 2012 , http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/files/support_measures/training_educat ion/entr_highed_en.pdf 4. Goldberg, D. (2006). The Entrepreneurial Engineer. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley 5. Refaat, A. (2009
policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning, the measurement and support of change of ”habits of mind,” particularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning. Page 23.522.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Engineering Students' Perceptions of Workplace Problem SolvingAbstractResearch shows that workplace problems are different from traditional textbook orclassroom
applications throughout the engineering curriculum. The project wascompleted during academic year 2011-12.Several hands-on modules were developed for three courses in the engineering curriculum,spanning the entire freshman to senior experience. The modules were developed with “activelearning” principles in mind, to ensure students’ full participation in the learning process in theclassroom. The author chose the affordable and now widely adopted LEGO Mindstormsplatform to illustrate basic mechatronics concepts and applications.The targeted courses were the freshman “Introduction to Engineering and Design” course, junior“Kinematics” course, and senior “Dynamic Systems and Control” course. The modules weredeployed in the three courses throughout the
,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, no. 4, 1989, pp. 356–366.7. National Research Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000.8. Cardella, M. E., “Which mathematics should we teach engineering students? an empirically grounded case for a broad notion of mathematical thinking,” Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 27, no. 3, 2008, pp. 150–159.9. Christensen, O. R., “Closing the gap between formalism and application–pbl and mathematical skills in engineering,” Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 27, no. 3, 2008, pp. 131–139.10. Mustoe, L., “Mathematics in engineering education,” European Journal of Engineering
. National Grid and the Royal Academy of Engineering Report (2013). http://www.cihe.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/NGEngineeringFutureCaseStudy.pdf [Accessed 2nd March 2013]. 2. Harris, A (2013). Addressing skills shortage. http://annualreview2012.laingorourke.com/overview/engineering_excellence/addressi ng_the_skills_shortage.html [Accessed 2nd March 2013]. 3. Quality assurance agency (QAA) enhancements (2008). Publications [online]: http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/publications/Default.asp. [Accessed 10th March 2013]. 4. Dreyfus, H.L. (1986). Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer, Oxford, Basil Blackwell. 5. Anderson, L.W. (1994). Lecturing in large
Paper ID #6038Project-Based Curriculum for Renewable Energy Engineering TechnologyDr. Florian Misoc P.E., Southern Polytechnic State University Dr. Florian Misoc is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology. He joined Southern Polytechnic State University in August, 2011. Dr. Misoc earned his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Kansas State University. He also holds a Master’s of Science Degree in Engineering Technology from Pittsburg State University, and a Bachelor’s Degree in Physics from the University of Bucharest, Romania. Dr. Florian Misoc is a registered Professional Engineer
Paper ID #6968From Robots to Gorillas: Computer Programming for EngineersDr. Dileepan Joseph P.Eng., University of Alberta Dileepan Joseph received the Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Engineering from the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, in 1997 and the Doctor of Philosophy degree in Engineering Science from the University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, in 2003. Since 2004, Dr. Joseph has been with the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, where he has specialized in the team teaching of computer programming and where he has developed a research program in electronic imaging
Paper ID #5937Approaches to Integrating Policy into Engineering EducationDr. Ida B Ngambeki, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Ida Ngambeki is a Postdoctoral Researcher with a joint appointment in the Department of Technology, Leadership and Innovation and the Global Policy Research Institute at Purdue University. She has a B.S. in Engineering from Smith College and a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research interests include global engineering policy, motivation in engineering, and human-artefact interaction.Dr. Dennis R. Depew, Purdue University, West Lafayette From July, 2002 to June
three most important areas under ‘Intercultural Competency’ include a Cognitivedimension where students gain knowledge about the culture they are encountering; an Affectivedimension where students must become flexible to new situations and learn how to adapt and beopen minded; and finally a Behavioral dimension where students learn about critical skills suchas resourcefulness, problem-solving, and culturally-appropriate social skills.Looking at the current curriculum and why it is important to adapt to the changing world as King[8] noted “the economic realities of global competition and the arrival of ubiquitous broadbandcommunications are driving entry-level and more routine engineering jobs overseas… American
Paper ID #6117Mentoring Engineering Students: Realities, Challenges, and RewardsDr. Waddah Akili, Iowa State University Waddah Akili is an academician and a civil engineering consultant in Ames, Iowa. Has published in various fields including: geotechnical engineering, foundations, and pavement materials & design. He has been involved with contemporary engineering education issues, addressing a wide range of topics of interest and relevance to engineering institutions and practicing engineers, in the U.S. and abroad
Mercer University Campus, Macon, GA during March 15-17, 2012. Theobjective of this meeting is to bring together administrators, faculty, students, and staff fromKEEN Schools on a common platform to discuss about the Innovation and EntrepreneurshipEducation at KEEN Schools as well as possible collaboration between them on topics ofcommon interest that include but not limited to: • Entrepreneurially-minded Education and Culture • Intrapreneurship Education • Entrepreneurial Project-based Education • Collaboration within and between Dense Networks • Integration of Engineering and General Education • Entrepreneurial Engineering and Enterprise • Web-based Entrepreneurial Education between KEEN Schools • KEEN/ABET
Paper ID #7260Initial Development of the Engineering Genome Project–an Engineering On-tology with Multimedia Resources for Teaching and Learning EngineeringMechanicsDr. Edward J. Berger, University of Virginia Ed Berger is currently the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia. He is also Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. He teaches mostly sophomore mechanics courses. Page 23.753.1
gradelevel “Launcher” lessons involve about 50 hours of STEM exposure. Each EYE Module requiresa combination of 6 to 8 hours of class time and 1) addresses an engineering design challengearound issues related to National Academy of Engineering’s (NAE) Grand Challenges forEngineering8; 2) fosters the development of an “engineering habit of mind;” 3) integratestechnology and other resources to engage and meet the needs of diverse middle grades students,and 4) deepens understanding of mathematics and science content, with an emphasis onmathematics. The Modules are not a complete engineering, technology or STEM curriculum;rather they are a supplement to and support the existing mathematics and science curriculum.They are a set of comprehensive and
profession for 17 years. He held thetitle of lead engineer in passenger systems and had a background in mechanical engineering withheavy use of CAD. This participant was very attentive to all details of his design, and made sureto list all resources and constraints before the project got going. He was also the only participantthat suggested looking at other playgrounds for examples. His design obtained a high qualityscore. He moved through the process with a procedure in mind, which at the end seemed to stophim from finishing completely, as it appeared that he was used to completing multiple iterationsor having more time to revise. So, what I usually probably would do at the very start is to read the whole thing again to make sure I
results also rose with the incorporation of the Bridge Houselaboratory. Not only did student learning of key concepts in mechanical vibrations improve as aresult of the forced vibration testing, a healthy skepticism for computational model results wasforged in the students’ minds as well.References1. Okamura A.M. Feeling is Believing: Using a Force-Feedback Joystick to Teach Dynamic Systems. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Journal of Engineering Education, 92(3), 2002.2. McDaniel, C.C., Archer, G. C. “Full-scale, Real-time Building Dynamics Laboratory.” 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 2010.3. McDaniel, C.C., Archer, G. C
factors for attempting to mitigate the problem. Hearing from outside speakers helps to create an atmosphere of “reality” in students’ minds with respect to the project, and also is a good chance for students to learn more about the challenges faced in the ‘real world’ of engineering practice. The question that students sometimes ask, “is this really important?” is readily banished when an outside authority explains that sewage flowing into residential basements is the side-effect of undersized, failing combined sewers. 2. Review of available data. The sponsoring agency may have paper maps, GIS data, past studies, master plans, and/or reports for the subject area, and other information that can
Paper ID #6370Introduction of a Digital Logic Project in a First-Year Honors EngineeringCourseDr. Diana G. de la Rosa-Pohl, University of Houston (CoE) Diana de la Rosa-Pohl is an instructor in the Cullen College of Engineering at the University of Houston. She developed the first-year experience for the Honors Engineering Program and also teaches the two- course sequence. Her research interests include project-based learning in engineering education and the alignment of engineering education with professional practice.Dr. Stuart A. Long, University of Houston (CoE) Stuart A. Long was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on
Paper ID #8198Creating Undergraduate Applied Research Opportunities for EngineeringTechnology Students in Healthcare RoboticsDr. Saeed Khan, Kansas State University, Salina Saeed Khan is an associate professor with the Electronic and Computer Engineering Technology program at Kansas State University at Salina. Dr. Khan received his Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Electrical En- gineering from the University of Connecticut, in 1989 and 1994 respectively and his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh in 1984. Khan, who joined KSU in 1998, teaches courses in
Paper ID #6956An E-Learning Approach to Data Information Literacy EducationMr. Jon N. Jeffryes, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Jon Jeffryes is an engineering librarian supporting researchers and students in the areas of Biomedical, Civil, and Mechanical Engineering. He is currently the chair of the scholarly communication committee for the Engineering Libraries Division.Lisa Johnston, University of Minnesota Lisa Johnston is the Research Services Librarian and co-director of the University Digital Conservancy, the University of Minnesota’s institutional repository. She coordinates the Libraries’ efforts around
of Engineering Education, January 2004. 3. Starrett, S. and M. M. Morcos, “Hands-On, Minds-On Electric Power Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 1, pp 93-99, January 2001. 4. Higley, K. A. and C. M. Marianno, “Making Engineering Education Fun,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No.1, pp 105-107, January 2001. 5. Gabelnik, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R.S., and Smith, B.L., editors, Learning Communities: Creating Connections Among Students, Faculty, and Disciplines, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Jossey-Bass, 1990 6. Goodwin, T. & Hoagland, K. E. (1999). How to get started in research (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research. 7
statement was made almost 30 years ago and is probably true even today as, forexample, the Japanese cars still stand out in quality and are sought by consumers who buy for qualityand reliability.Dr. Walter Shewhart, considered the father of modern statistical quality control, said (Shewhart1939): ”The long-range contribution of statistics to quality control depends not so much on getting alot of highly trained statisticians into industry as it does in creating a statistically minded generationof physicists, chemists, engineers and others who will in any way have a hand in developing anddirecting the productive processes of tomorrow.”Dr. W. Edwards Deming, the quality guru who taught the Japanese how to make quality products,realized the need for
skills, developabilities towards scientific inquiry and engineering design, and through these processes, refinetheir epistemological beliefs about engineering.7 Designing laboratory experiments that can meetall of these end results can be challenging and faculty often simply establish course goals asopposed to student learning objectives.8 With this in mind, this paper was put together todemonstrate a variety of ways in which inquiry-based experimentation can be implementedwithin different civil engineering laboratory courses and to provide ideas for other programsseeking the same efforts.There are numerous examples within the literature of efforts to improve the undergraduateengineering lab environment and generate more meaningful educational
Paper ID #8011Engaging Community College Students in University ResearchDr. Maria Teresa Napoli, UC Santa Barbara Dr. Maria Teresa Napoli received a Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California at Santa Barbara, in 2004. In 1999, she also earned a Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Padova in Italy. Currently, she holds positions as project scientist in the Mechanical Engineering Department, and as Community College education coordinator at the University of California at Santa Barbara. Prior to this appointment, she worked for several years as a microsensors system
Paper ID #6537Cellular Phone Control Application as an Undergraduate Research ProjectDr. Robert Weissbach P.E., Pennsylvania State University, Erie Robert Weissbach is currently an associate professor of engineering at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. From October 2007 through June 2008, he was a visiting researcher at Aalborg University in Aalborg, Denmark. His research interests are in renewable energy, energy storage, power electronics and power systems.Mr. Garrett LoVerde Garrett LoVerde is a senior undergraduate student studying engineering technology at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. He will be
Paper ID #7719Design and Analyze the Frame for the Global Sustainable Urban Transport(SUT) VehicleDr. Mohammad Kamal Hossain, Tuskegee University Mohammad Kamal Hossain is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Tuskegee University. He received his Ph.D., M.S., and B. Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (USA), Tuskegee University (USA), and Bangladesh University of En- gineering and Technology (Bangladesh), respectively. His specialization is in the areas of materials and design. Before coming to Tuskegee University (TU), he worked as a Visiting Assistant
Paper ID #7102Developing Interdisciplinary Research Partners: The Learning by InnovativeNeuro Collaborations Research UREDr. Barbara Burks Fasse PhD, Georgia Institute of Technology Barbara Burks Fasse is the Director of Learning Sciences Innovation and Research in the Coulter De- partment of Biomedical Engineering (BME) at Georgia Tech. Dr. Fasse studies the efficacy and value of student-centered learning initiatives and reform pedagogy, specifically Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning, in classrooms, instructional labs, capstone design, and undergraduate research experiences. She joined the BME faculty in 2007
problemsolvers, they need team players, and they need innovative minds. This may only beachievable through progressive curriculums and effective partnerships betweenindustries, universities, and government institutions. Those partners that make the bestinvestment in technically competent employees are going to be those that prosper inthe 21st century.In conjunction with lecturing and testing, it is important to engage students andchallenge them in a creative problem-solving manner that fosters their individualgrowth and development. As the theoretical knowledge is internalized, studentsbecome intrinsically motivated search engines to fuel their own intellectual growth.To effectively connect with students at this level and prepare them for the future