intrapersonal competencies such as entrepreneurial mindset. In this paper, we describe our research methodology in detail, from the study’s design to data collection, analysis, and triangulation of multiple data sources. This work contributes to the literature on the use of the ethnographic approach in engineering education research and offers a practical example that demonstrates how these approaches can improve our understanding of novel and emerging pedagogies.Keywords: Ethnography, Triangulation, Pedagogical Practices, Story-Driven LearningMotivation The ethnographic approach, rooted in anthropology and sociology, is a qualitativeresearch method designed to comprehensively understand phenomena as they
Mindset, Engineering, Engineering Technology1. IntroductionThe National Science Foundation (NSF) funded FLiTE scholarship program [1] at WesternCarolina University (WCU) aims to provide opportunity for engineering and engineeringtechnology students with financial need to build qualities of the entrepreneurial mindset that maycontribute to their value as future professionals or to their launch of technology startupbusinesses. The program brings together student scholars from across disciplines in a vertically-and horizontally-integrated learning community to engage in technology invention ideationsupported by and mentored through interactions with business leaders, subject matter experts,and campus resources.The NSF grant which supports the FLiTE
the End: Introducing a Final Exam Problem on the First ClassMeeting to Foster Curiosity and Engagement Throughout the SemesterintroductionThe Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) promotes an Entrepreneurial Mindset(EM) consisting of 3 Cs: curiosity, connections, and creating value [1]. It is claimed thatinstilling students with EM will improve their learning outcomes and career readiness [2], [3].Recent research has shown that EM can be applied to Engineering Technology (ET) coursework,with promising results [4], [5], [6].The motivation for this study was to examine whether activities based on EM would improve theperceived weak aspects of an existing junior-level mechanical engineering technology (MET)class on finite element
students from the other classes, their future industrialcolleagues.Keywords: Projects, PBL, Entrepreneurial Mindset, Six Sigma, graduate students1.0 Introduction1.1 Background In the recent years, methods of teaching have developed and became more interactivethrough the incorporation of various educational approaches which immerse students in real-worldproblem solving, improve the hands-on experience and encourage the collaboration amongstudents working in groups of 3 to 5. This concept comes in agreement with the definition ofProject-based learning (PBL), which was defined by Barrows and Tamblyn as: The learning thatresults from the process of working towards understanding or resolving a problem [1]. Research indicates that
? ● Howdoestheconceptofcontinuallearningasaninstructorrelatetowhatwelookforandencouragein an entrepreneurial mindset? ook club members were invited via email to participate in individual semi-structured online BinterviewsviaZoomaftertheconclusionofthebookclub.Atotalofseventeenparticipantsengagedinthebook clubprogramacrossallmeetings.ParticipantswereSTEMfacultymembers(n=10)andLTHstaff(academic advisingandprogramdevelopers)(n=7).TenoftheparticipantsidentifiedasFemale,andsevenidentifiedas Male.Nineofthe10facultymemberswhoparticipatedinthebookclubwereteachingfaculty,andonehada tenure-track appointment
in sustainable (bio-inspired) design helps them to understand the impacts oftheir decisions on the environment and natural resources and empowers them to make positivechanges. On the other hand, entrepreneurship enables students to learn how to spot, evaluate, andexplore opportunities, build a prototype, and test it to design a project that satisfies clients' needsand aesthetic preferences. Unfortunately, educational institutions and researchers lag, particularlywhen integrating an entrepreneurial mindset with green building. Thus, this study emerged toovercome this contemporary interdisciplinary challenge and prepare green entrepreneurs and T-shaped engineers.PURPOSE OR GOAL: This study aims to prepare future green entrepreneurs and T
Paper ID #42937Designing a Bioinstrumentation Lab for All LearnersHannah Rosene Conover Kimmel, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignMaya Sri Miriyala, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignHanwen Liang, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignMegha Agrawal, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignKaitlyn Tuvilleja, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignDr. Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Rebecca M. Reck is a Teaching Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research includes alternative grading, entrepreneurial mindset
her leadership in the development of technologies to enable areal density and reliability increases in hard disk drives and was elected a National Academy of Inventors Fellow in 2018. Dr. Hipwell is currently the Oscar S. Wyatt, Jr. ’45 Chair II at Texas A&M University, where she has developed new classes on innovation and technology development as part of her leadership of the INVENT (INnoVation tools and Entrepreneurial New Technology) Lab. She is Co-PI on a National Science Foundation engineering education grant to develop a culture of and tools for iterative experimentation and continuous improvement in curriculum development. ©American Society for Engineering Education
developedto introduce students to systems thinking, social responsibilities and sustainability in a first-yeararchitectural and civil engineering project. The educational strategy is designed in the convergentspace of the Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM)1 and Engineering for One Planet (EOP) Framework2.EM emphasizes the development of habits and characteristics that allow students to discernunique opportunities in the creation of valuable and impactful engineering solutions. The EOPFramework seeks to integrate the fundamental skills and principles of social and environmentalsustainability in engineering curricula. These mindset models encourage students to questionwhy (abstract mindset) a certain approach is taken and not only focus on the how
contributed to the development of an interdisciplinary grand challenges focused course and introduction to engineering course in both in-person and online (MOOC) formats at ASU. She is also actively involved in the ASU Kern project and Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), focused on students’ development of entrepreneurial mindset. Amy received the national 2019 KEEN Rising Star award from KEEN for her efforts in encouraging students in developing an entrepreneurial mindset. She is also a member of the current interim Executive Committee for the international GCSP Network, and mentors schools to develop GCSPs as part of the GCSP New Programs committee.Dr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Dr. Haolin Zhu
to ensure historically marginalized groups’ academic and professional success. Further, he studies strategies for instilling the entrepreneurial mindset in engineering students and innovative teaching approaches such as using virtual reality. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Abstract:A central theme to the field of biomedical engineering is the ability to identify clinical problemsand propose and develop engineering approaches to solving these problems. To train students indeveloping these skills, our department has developed a clinical and industry immersion coursethat serves as a pre-requisite to the senior design course in the undergraduate curriculum. Thespecific content and
Engineering Network) award titled ”Educating the Whole Engineer” to integrate important competencies such as virtues, character, entrepreneurial mindset, and leadership across the Wake Forest Engineering curriculum. She has led Wake Forest Engineering with a focus on inclusive innovation and excellence, curricular and pedagogical innovation, and creative partnerships across the humanities, social sciences, industry, entrepreneurs, etc. in order to rethink and reimagine engineering education. All this has led to Wake Forest Engineering achieving unprecedented student diversity (42% women, 25% racial and ethnic minorities) and faculty diversity (50% women, 25% racial and ethnic diversity). Olga is an engineering education
institutions for over a decade-and-a-half. Throughcollaboration and a shared mission to infuse an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) into undergraduateengineering education, KEEN has cultivated this shared mission with more than 55 partnerinstitutions across the United States [15]. Each of these schools are committed to supplementingthe technical skills being taught in the classroom with a mindset that focuses on fosteringcuriosity, connections, and creating value – “the 3 C’s”. The KEEN framework, as shown inTable 1, seeks to describe the beneficial student outcomes that entrepreneurially-minded learningcan bring to engineering undergraduates. Examples of these benefits include the ability torecognize opportunities to create personal, economic and societal
of Statics topics [3]. Ramming and Phillips found thatusing hands-on labs in just the first two semesters of implementation resulted in a slight increasein homework averages and exam grades [4]. Additionally, hands-on models as learning aids inStatics are not just limited to a single topic [5]-[7]. The use of a model for the activity developedin the current paper also aims to enhance students’ 3D spatial skills, which are known to be animportant factor in the success of engineering students across many disciplines [8], [9].The activity was also meant to foster entrepreneurial-minded learning (EML) and help developthe entrepreneurial mindset in students. An entrepreneurial mindset consists of three keyelements: curiosity, connections, and
for your development of vital skills that can be enhanced by learning. You enhance your skills by becoming proficient with a set of techniques and developing a mindset that favors impact generating behaviors [aligning with the KEEN 3Cs]. It is expected that you will attend every class, participate in discussions and activities, and complete the assignments to the best of your ability.The learning objectives of the course included that upon completion of this course, studentswould be able to: 1. Apply a variety of frameworks to view their research and educational goals. 2. Detect and assess atypical professional development opportunities. 3. Define the entrepreneurial mindset, and understand how it can help guide
: developing entrepreneurialthinking in STEM (Entre-STEM)." Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets ThroughSTEM Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 165-194, 2023[11] T. Siller, T., & G. Johnson, G. Curriculum, Pedagogy, And Assessment In EngineeringEducation Reform. In 2004 Annual Conference (pp. 9-366), 2004 (June).[12] I. K. Amalina, S. Suherman, T. Vidákovich, L. Puspita, & N. Supriadi. The Comparison ofHungarian and Indonesian Curriculum: A Case Study of ISCED 2 Mathematics and ScienceCurriculum. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 112-122, 2023.[13] Y. Supriani, F. Meliani, A. Supriyadi, S. Supiana, & Q.Y. Zaqiah. The Process ofCurriculum Innovation: Dimensions, Models, Stages, and Affecting Factors. Nazhruna
set up as inter-disciplinary teams with a gender mix in each team. Thesecond class looked at the entrepreneurial mindset. Since almost all the professors and studentsatending the classes were engineering faculty, researchers, and students, the KEEN 3C’s approach [9] toins�lling the entrepreneurial mindset was presented. Following this presenta�on and some exercises toexemplify the 3C’s framework, Prof. Gina Andrade gave a slide presenta�on on the two communi�es ofBarcelona and Sinchal, introducing the students to the businesses in the communi�es and the challengesthat they face. a) b) c)Figure 1. a) The sign at the entrance to Barcelona with a large model of a Panama hat b) A mural on the community center
include engineering innovation, entrepreneurial engineering, Digital transformation, lean manufacturing, engineering economy, renewable energy, clean air engineering, simulation and optimization methodology, reliability engineering, and application of operations research. Dr.Omar has several Journal publications and articles in conference proceedings. His professional affiliations include ASEE, IEEE, IISE, Alpha Pi Mu, ORSA, and SMEAli Alhawiti, Western Michigan University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Integrating Innovation: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Engineering Education with AI and Lean Six SigmaOmar H AlbalawiIndustrial Engineering
student who may not otherwiseview themselves as an engineer—a curious person, an entrepreneur, a person with great ideasthat society needs, or a part of the university’s ecosystem—may be able to demonstrate theirpotential to themselves and to their community through their lived experiences viastory. Providing time for students to develop and tell their stories is a powerful way to validatethe vast experiences students bring with them to college. Likewise, faculty want to know theirstudents, and students want to know themselves. Our own work with story in this context wasinspired by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) on Stories project starting in2020 and reflects our interest in instilling an entrepreneurial mindset in our
study was to introduce a group of diverse students (ChemicalEngineering, Civil Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Generals Engineering students) toproblem-solving (PS) and foster entrepreneurial mindsets (EMs) through a 4-week project. This4-week project was to design a snowmaking system for a local ski resort. Our hypothesis was thatusing a real-world project can promote students’ curiosity in problem-solving, help students makeconnections between the knowledge they learned in classroom and the problem, and encouragestudents to apply this knowledge to create values for our communities, which are the 3Cs of EMs.To test this hypothesis, we organized a field trip and used teaching techniques such as Jigsaw inaddition to traditional lecturing
paradigm isexpanding to a more holistic view that also considers the socioeconomic impact of physicalfailures (i.e., community resilience). Given multi-faceted disaster impacts on society, it is alsobecoming more critical to consider and balance varying impacts among multiple stakeholders. Toprepare future civil engineers to fulfill a risk manager role, the civil engineering curriculumshould expand to also address these elements. These skill sets are also directly related tofostering the 3C’s of the KEEN Network’s Entrepreneurial Mindset for creating value,connections, and curiosity to promote entrepreneurial mindset learning [1]. This development isfurther supported by the ABET engineering education criteria expansion, specifically for
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Countering Passive Engagement: STS Postures and Analyzing Student Agency in Everyday EngineeringAbstract “A culture of disengagement” is what Erin Cech [1, see also 4,9] has named the phenomenonthat, within engineering schools, students graduate with less interest in societal issues than whenthey arrive. Much of this disengagement is attributed to mindsets ([2]: centrality of military andcorporate organizations, uncritical acceptance of authority, technical narrowness, positivism andthe myth of objectivity) and ideologies ([1]: technical-social dualism, depoliticization,meritocracy) that create a socio-technical divide that encourages many students to marginalizesocial issues related
the next generation of engineers. His teaching goal are to give engineers a better understanding of manufacturing, visual communication skills, entrepreneurial endeavors and how to bring their ideas to life. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Redesigning a Capstone Course with Product Design In Mind: A work in progressAbstractDuring summer of 2023, two capstone instructors in mechanical engineering at Ohio StateUniversity set about redesigning the capstone course to offer students an experience that wouldexpose them to the world of product design and development, and infuse a design mindset totheir engineering activities.To redesign the course, the instructors participated
Education, 2024 Preparing Engineering Students for Designing the Future of WorkAbstractThe next generation of engineering professionals require not only the engineering fundamentalswe teach today, but future-ready skills such as critical thinking and argumentation skills,knowledge of innovation processes and an entrepreneurial mindset. In this paper, we discuss ourefforts to better prepare undergraduate and graduate engineering students for the future of workthrough dedicated courses in the future of work, industrial innovation sciences, future workleadership and work systems management, and entrepreneurship. We present our observations ofa shift in student thinking about future of work topics across these three courses, and
tools for integrating human-centered design at thecourse level as well develop longitudinal tools to evaluate students’ learning at the programlevel. In this paper, we discuss the co-development of program-level learning progressions thatconnect directly to program educational objectives as well as ABET (formerly AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology) student learning outcomes [8]. These progressions alsoconnect to the Kern Family Foundation (KEEN)’s entrepreneurial mindset [9], which proposes aset of attitudes, dispositions, habits, and behaviors that shape a unique, desirable engineeringproblem-solving approach.BackgroundWe are an interdisciplinary design team at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign that iscomposed of
effectively enhanced students' understanding of systems engineering and digitaltransformation. Incorporating case studies, particularly using the KEEN framework, intoengineering courses is beneficial. Future studies could explore more diverse case studies andlarger samples.Keywords: KEEN, Entrepreneurial Mindset, Case Study1.0 Introduction In the realm of engineering education, integrating practical, hands-on activities isessential for deepening students' understanding of complex topics. One effective pedagogicalapproach is the use of case studies, which engage students directly with real-world scenarios.This method is particularly beneficial in courses focused on Systems Engineering and DigitalTransformation, where the principles and
two unique MOOCs, Introduction to Engineering and Perspectives on Grand Challenges for Engineering for the Global Freshman Academy/ASU Earned Admission/Universal Learner Courses Program. Her Ph.D. research focused on multi-scale multiphase modeling and numerical analysis of coupled large viscoelastic deformation and fluid transport in swelling porous materials, but she is currently interested in various topics in the field of engineering education, such as innovative teaching pedagogies for increased retention and student motivation; innovations in non-traditional delivery methods, incorporation of the Entrepreneurial Mindset in the engineering curriculum and its impact. She has published over 30 papers and
team project.A team-based (4 students/team) semester-long project was assigned in the PBL section. Themain goal of this project was to motivate students to develop a deep understanding of contentknowledge and promote various skills (e.g., creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, andcommunication) by working on real-world, ill-structured problems in small teams. Additionally,this project was explicitly designed to foster students’ entrepreneurial mindset, empowering themto enhance their technical knowledge with a proactive, exploratory, and impact-driven approach.The title of the team project was ‘Aggieland Piping System Design’, and the objective was todevelop a sustainable and cost-effective piping system design that ensures a reliable
actuation methods can be seamlessly integrated into aclassroom environment utilizing readily available resources which we detail in this paper.Hands-on experiences and projects-based learning as proposed in this activity represent some ofthe best ways for students to learn new knowledge and develop a deeper understanding of theunderlying actuation principles, material properties, and behaviors [4]. Furthermore, the projecttasks students with designing a soft fish toy tailored for children, setting up an opportunity tofoster an entrepreneurial mindset among students. Our project endeavors to ignite interest amongstudents in the realms of soft robotics and innovative design.Design IntentThere are many ways one can actuate soft robots which include
jobs in harsh occupational environments with high health and safety risks [2-4]. Furthermore, engineering professionals of the future require more than just knowledge oftechnical design solutions to help address the grand challenges of the future of work at the human-technology frontier. Equally important to consider are the employee populations affected by theincreasing incorporation of robots into the workplace (e.g., social justice and equity implicationsof technology-induced obsolescence), entrepreneurial skills to bring innovation to practice (in2021 alone, more than $17 billion was poured into venture capital-backed robotic startups [5]),and the need to address the user experience through adaptive design of the human-robot