and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Distinguished Professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication and the School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. She serves as Butler Chair and Director of the Susan Bulkeley Butler Center of Leadership Excellence. Editor of four books and author of over 175 articles
that there are significant differences between strata in students’reported USS (𝜒 2 = 39.72, p < .001) and PSO scores (𝜒 2 = 42.95, p < .001). Post-hoc test resultsrevealed that students from undergraduate institutions reported higher levels of social supportthan students from research institutions and MSI/HSIs. For PSO scores, no significantdifferences between strata on various professional skills opportunities were detected viaScheffé’s test using 𝛼 = 0.05. However, when using the significant level of 𝛼 = 0.1, studentsfrom research institutions reported significantly more opportunities to practice ethics andprofessional responsibilities skill (M = 5.0, SD = 1.2) than students from MSI/HSI (M = 4.7, SD= 1.2, F(4, 613) = 23.41, p <
studies in whichTeacher Moments has been used to help pre-service teachers practice facilitating argument-baseddiscussions and provide an opportunity for teachers to practice facilitating a difficult discussionon the ethics of genetic engineering [6]. The Teacher Moments platform is accessible athttps://teachermoments.mit.edu/.First, Teacher Moments has been used to help pre-service math and science teachers practicefacilitating argument-based discussions. In an on-going research study led by the EducationalTesting Service (ETS), pre-service teachers are provided with an online practice suite of virtualreality, avatar-based, and Teacher Moments simulations. As pre-service teachers engage inrealistic math and science classroom scenarios through
]. 3Sucker Effect – The sucker effect is the reduction of individual efforts while working in a teamcontext owing to a perception that others are free-riding [22]. While social loafing is an outcomefocused phenomenon, the sucker effect focuses on the above mechanism. Hence, it is measuredusing an instrumental factor, an ethical factor and an equity factor. These factors wereconstructed based on the Australian Work Ethic Scale [23] and the Protestant Work Ethic Scale[24].Social Compensation - Social compensation can be described as the tendency of individuals,especially those with low interpersonal trust, to work harder in a team environment in order tocompensate for the lower performing teammates [25]. In turn, interpersonal trust, the
global issues among other things (Kirkpatrick et al., 2011).Engineering design activities have been noted as the place to effect change (Kirkpatrick et al.,2011), since it is the ill-defined nature of design problems (Jonassen, 2000) that provide ampleopportunity to include global issues. Addressing global issues requires both technical abilitiesand social considerations. Likewise, ABET Criterion 3 outcomes a-k (ABET, 2012) calls forstudents to have much broader professional skills upon graduation. For example, engineeringgraduates shall know or be able to: design within constraints such as “economic, environmental,social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”; understand theimpacts of engineering
better solutions. Students must also learn to manage uncertainty, risk, safety factors, and product reliability. There are additional ways of thinking that are important to engineers that include systems thinking, creativity, optimism, perseverance, and innovation. Collaboration (Team), communication (Comm-Engr), and ethics (Ethics) are distinct key indicators so not included here. K-12 students not only need to participate in engineering design processes but they should also come to an understanding of the discipline of engineering and the
Paper ID #38321Board 203: A Research Study on Assessing Empathic Formation inEngineering DesignDr. Justin L. Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Justin L Hess is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Hess’s research focuses on empathic and ethical formation in engineering education. He received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue University’s School of Civil Engineering. He is the editorial board chair for the Online Ethics Center, deputy director for research for the
regarding computing and artificial intelligence. These market needs influenced howCC students defined their computing interests, relative competence, and need to perform certaintasks to be recognized as computing people.Lessons Learned - CC faculty developed and were approved to offer a 9-credit interdisciplinary AI awareness (college credit certificate) CCC to support students from a diverse set of majors (with no previous experience in coding). Courses include: AI Thinking, AI and Ethics, and AI and Business (the first of the AI interdisciplinary classes). Considerations are being made about the best timing and ways of facilitating these classes, including addressing the need for coding in the AI thinking class
classroom strategy to foster social responsibility," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 373-380, 2006.[9] K. Meyers and B. Mertz, "A large scale analysis of first-year engineering student essays on engineering interests," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Washington, D.C., 2011.[10] J. H. Pryor, K. Eagan, L. P. Blake, S. Hurtado, J. Berdan and M. Case, "The American Freshman: National Norms Fall 2012.," Cooperative Institutional Research Program at the Higher Education, Los Angeles, 2012.[11] N. A. o. Engineering, "Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering," National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2008.[12] G. Hein and A. Kemppainen, "First-year
, longitudinalstudy of over 300 engineering students at 4 universities nation-wide, students rated theirprofessional/ethical responsibility as engineers, their concern for understanding the consequencesof technology, their degree of social consciousness, and their concern for understanding howpeople use machines. Ratings were collected twice during their college career and once 18months following graduation. The results of Cech’s study revealed that engineers, both asstudents and then when working in industry, showed a linear decline for concerns about publicwelfare across the time points. This report highlighted that engineering students over timeshowed diminished prosocial trait endorsement. Cech’s findings further motivate the study ofprosocial affordance
strength and ... between the samples. However, modulus of elasticity did not vary greatly variabilty... between the samples, however variability or occurred between the tested samples and ...between the samples; however, published values. variability... 3. As stated in ASCE's Code of Ethics; As stated in ASCE’s Code of Ethics, "Engineers shall hold paramount the “Engineers...” safety, health and welfare of the public...." 4. Slope of stress-strain curve in Figure 1 The slope of the stress-strain curve in shows [...] Figure 1 shows... 5. As a civil engineer, the strength of
2undergraduate bioengineering curriculum (Table 1). The lecture content related to biomaterial fortissue engineering and ethics and nanobiotechnology techniques. Sample lecture content from theBMEN310 learning modules includes learning of hierarchical organization of extracellularmatrix of bone and soft tissues in different length scales.Table 1. Courses in which modules introducing the concepts of nanotechnology were developed # of Concepts Introduced Using two lecturesCourse Semester students Cellular engineering, drug delivery andBMEN 220: Introduction to
, and family structure. Our program has demonstrated past success in addressingissues important to the field and accreditation boards, such as functioning on multidisciplinaryteams, understanding ethical responsibilities, developing a sense of the global and societalcontext of STEM work, and supporting the idea of life-long learning.1-4In the eight years since the program was founded, it has grown and developed considerably.Structural changes throughout these years include adding distance students in an off-campusprogram 280 miles away, broadening the program to include multiple science majors, funding ahalf-time graduate assistant, and staffing changes in the faculty mentors. Program improvementshave included annual retreats for scholars
quality, ethics, and equityconsiderations outlined in the project proposal and updated our methods and theories tostrengthen these considerations. We documented the process and justification for updating ourproject theories and methods from the original proposal in a ASEE 2022 conference paper [1].Current StatusConceptual ModelDuring the first year of the project, we developed propositions and a conceptual model toillustrate how localized, structural features unjustly shape the demands and opportunitiesencountered by students and influence how they respond. Our model highlights mechanisms anddynamics at work in influencing the experience, learning, or persistence of students inundergraduate engineering programs. This lens should prove useful for
program aimed to create an experience that took students beyond the development of technicalcompetence in science and engineering and provided an expertise particularly on research and innovationin various areas of energy and bioengineering. Seminars and workshops complemented the programproviding students skills in areas such as laboratory safety, literature searching, entrepreneurship, effectivementoring and research ethics. The weekly group meetings with the program PIs fostered interdisciplinarycommunication between REUs which strengthened collaborations. The community was furtherstrengthened in the second year by incorporating more events with lab mates and students living togetheron campus.The RET program was designed to allow undergraduate
accessible to all students.” [4] In engineering, the hidden curriculum includesprofessional socialization, processes of developing self-efficacy, navigation of internships,professional ethics, and numerous other domains that may be implicitly addressed duringfoundational courses but can be navigationally frustrating or undervalued experiences fortransfer students [5]. Mentoring supports transfer students by establishing trust, buildingrelationships, and developing interconnectedness with faculty and peers. APEX scholars receiveformal and informal mentoring from faculty, industry, peer mentors and each other.Several research questions are posed in this work, which guide data collection. The team seeksto examine: (1) how well APEX recruitment
sequence in the GEARSET pre-engineering pathway outlined above, admission requirements to the program (and thus thedefinition of academically talented for the S-STEM grant) was set at High School GPA of 3.0 orabove and enrollment in MATH 1330. To take MATH 1330 students must have either a 22 ACTmathematics subscore, an SAT math score of 540 or a score of 61 on the online Assessment andLEarning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS) system.• GNEN 1010 Professional Development will provide students with information aboutprofessionalism, ethical responsibility, the engineering code of ethics, the importance of, and theneed for, lifelong learning, contemporary issues, the impact of engineering in a global andsocietal context, working on multi-disciplinary teams
undergraduate engineering programs. He has advised on over forty (40) Senior Design Projects and his teams of students have received five (5) National Championships and three Best Design Awards. In the recent years, he has challenged himself with the creation of an effective methodology for successful Invention and Innovation. He was part of a 14 member multi-disciplinary team to design and create the ”Society, Ethics, and Technology (SET)” course at TCNJ in 1994 and has taught multiple regular and Honors sections of this course since then. He is currently leading a multi- disciplinary team of faculty from TCNJ’s School of Engineering and the Department of Sociology for assessment of the Professional Formation of Engineers
Scholarship presented by American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chemical Engineering Division in 2017.Dr. Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut Daniel Burkey is the Associate Dean of Undergraduate Programs and Professor-in-Residence in the De- partment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his B.S. in chemical engineering from Lehigh University in 1998, and his M.S.C.E.P and Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2000 and 2003, respectively. His primary areas of interest are game-based education, engineering ethics, and process safety education.Dr. Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University Dr. Matthew Cooper is
engineering, forensic engineering and Professional Ethics in Engineering. He has been devoted to various Federal Sponsored Project, currently being the Project Di- rector of two projects for the US Department of Education and one project as Co-Principal Investigator for the NSF. Doctor V´azquez obtained his BS, MSCE and PhD from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez and a Juris Doctor from the Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico, all of them with honors. Finally, doctor V´azquez is both a Licensed Professional Engineer and a Licensed Professional Attorney at Law and Public Notary in Puerto Rico’s jurisdiction.Prof. Fabio Andrade Rengifo P.E., University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Director of the
Paper ID #28731Developing Leadership in Civil Engineering: Turning Students’ Hindsightinto Others’ ForesightDr. Madeline Polmear, University of Florida Madeline Polmear is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. Her research interests include workforce development and engineering ethics education.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. She holds a
about the value of the ECE profession, theirinterest in the class, and their intensions to persist. The surveys also measured personalendorsements including the importance of ethical considerations in engineering decisions,the value of professional skills compared to technical training, and empathy. Data analysisrevealed that among novice students, the more they believed that the ECE professionafforded opportunities to benefit society and work with others (i.e., had prosocial value), themore interested they were in the class and in turn, the more they intended to persist in theirECE degree program. This persistence intentions relationship was not true for studentbeliefs about the ECE profession affording opportunities to gain wealth, power, and
. Bill Gates came up for his service to society to improve societal conditions (e.g. global health and Gates scholars for low income students). Parents Mother or Father who were the primary caretakers and serve as an example of strong work ethics, risk taking and success. Parent(s) that took risks, such as immigrating to US to begin a career or seek a better life, starting their own business. Parent(s) that worked hard to endure economic hardship. Close Similar role model as a parent. They are role models of people that took risks Family such as starting their own business and were successful. Club Cub Scouts and Girl Scouts organization provided
which provides funding for internsto travel to the UC Berkeley campus. Interns live in a traditional college residence hall for nineweeks and eat meals at a social dining facility. Additionally, they receive a $3,600 stipend aspayment for their work.The benefits of participating in the TTE program are well documented. A 2015 comparison ofpre- and post-program evaluation data found that participation resulted in enhanced confidenceto pursue further education opportunities and careers in science and engineering [5] [6]. A 2020follow-up study affirmed this finding, and additionally documented that participants were betterable to find scholarly resources, design ethical scientific experiments, conduct independentresearch, and analyze data [7
., University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Dr. Claretha Hughes is Professor of Human Resource and Workforce Development at the University of Arkansas (UA. Her research interests include valuing people and technology in the workplace, tech- nology development, diversity intelligence, learning technologies, and ethical and legal issues. She has published numerous articles and chapters in peer-reviewed journals, books, and conferences and has 13 books. She serves as a book proposal reviewer for SAGE, Emerald, IGI Global, Palgrave Macmillan, and CyberTech Publishing. She is currently involved in a National Science Foundation Research in Formation of Engineers project as a Co-PI. She has served in manufacturing leadership roles for
Ethics Center.Ms. Jennifer L Pratt, University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service Jennifer Pratt is a Research Analyst with extensive experience conducting quantitative and qualitative evaluation projects. Jennifer’s strong organizational skills impact a variety of environments in her role at the Muskie School as she guides process flow for several inter-disciplinary teams. She assists with the development and implementation of data collection protocols and surveys. In addition Jennifer develops and facilitates design of databases and use of database management systems, including computer assisted qualitative data analysis tools. She provides technical support and assistance in performance quality
thefields of water resources engineering, environmental engineering, cosmetics, and nutrition havebeen developed. By focusing on these fields, the positive impact that algae can have on issuesfaced by developing nations around the world was highlighted. Gas transfer and coagulationflocculation experiments have been used to research the sustainability of algae use in the watertreatment process, with a focus on the feasibility of replacing current processes with algae basedalternatives. Calorimeter tests have been conducted to research the potential nutritional benefit ofalgae based products. Exposure to social and environmental injustices along with ethics casestudies are also an integral part of the project. Ultimately, the purpose of this project
enterthe STEM/knowledge workforce and/or graduate school. For three years, the program recruits acohort of 10 students/year who work on a number of advanced manufacturing related projects for10 weeks in the summer starting from last week of May through first week of August. Eachstudent has to complete both research ethics and lab safety training before starting their research.All students are mentored by a professor and also a graduate student. In other words, eachstudent has a faculty and as well as a graduate student mentor. For 2018 cohort, all facultymentors were from College of Engineering. The mentors guide the students in selecting theresearch project and also throughout the progress of the research. Students participate in weeklymeetings
, voice,face, iris and other modalities). Multibiometric systems are also covered. This includesfeature fusion, classifier fusion and systems that use two or more biometric modalities.Biometric system performance and issues related to the security, ethics and privacyaspects of these systems will also be addressed.There is an acute need for biometrics education at the undergraduate and graduate levels.Institutions world-wide have an established graduate program in biometrics and offersenior level undergraduate elective courses [10][11] in the area. The University of WestVirginia offers a Bachelor of Science in Biometric Systems. The U.S. Naval Academyhas a Biometrics Research Laboratory with an aim to enhance undergraduate biometricseducation [11
confirmed by later studies.4,8 Perry7 began to question why college studentsresponded to similar learning environments differently and found that an individual’s differentepistemic stage plays a crucial role in organizing his/her learning process and dealing withunclearly defined problems. Perry’s original nine stages of epistemic development have beenrefined as four major stages:11 dualism (black-and-white types of thinking and their variations),multiplicity (acknowledging uncertainty and accepting multiple opinions), contextual relativism(acknowledging the importance of contexts for meaning making), and commitment withinrelativism (adding ethical and moral responsibility and professional commitments to contextualrelativism).Challenges of Second