macroethical and practical conceptualization of engineering work.As early as 1999, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Board of Directorsrecognized this need and declared, in an official statement, “ASEE believes that engineeringgraduates must be prepared by their education to use sustainable engineering techniques in thepractice of their profession.”1 Engineering professional disciplinary societies have responded byincluding sustainability as part of Engineers’ Codes of Ethics: the first “fundamental canon” ofthe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Code of Ethics includes that engineers “shallstrive to comply with the principles of sustainable development;”2 the American Institute ofChemical Engineers (AIChE) includes
command for complaints. Students also are informed about resources and agencies affiliated with LSU who are available to support them should they face an academic dilemma.Career Development WorkshopsThe career development workshops were professional development oriented including fourworkshops based on the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) competencies,and practical resume writing, and an ethics workshop. Each workshop was assessed for learningoutcomes and perceived value.Teamwork and Communications WorkshopThe teamwork and communication workshop teaches basic skills of workplace teamwork andcommunication aligned to the NACE competencies. Information in the workshop includedstages of team development, writing
Paper ID #42754Board 360: Reflections from Graduates on the Impact of Engineers WithoutBorders USA Experiences on Professional PreparationLazlo Stepback, Purdue University, West Lafayette Lazlo Stepback is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His current research interests focus on engineering ethics, the connections between personal morals and professional ethics, and how students ethically develop as engineers. He earned a B.S. in Chemical and Biochemical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines (Golden, CO) in 2020.Paul A. Leidig P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette Paul A. Leidig works in
Education Research (EER)AbstractThis paper reports on a project funded through the Engineering Education and Centers (EEC)Division of the National Science Foundation. The project is aimed towards buildingunderstanding in the engineering education research (EER) community about the potential valueof secondary data analysis (SDA) as well as developing guidelines for using this researchapproach. Changing the paradigm of single-use data collection will require actionable, provenpractices for effective, ethical data sharing, coupled with sufficient incentives to both share anduse existing data. To that end, this project drew together a team of experts and emergingresearchers to develop a shared understanding of SDA, and to conduct two intentional
had a significant impact on both education and practiceof engineering and related disciplines. The history of practice in many engineering disciplines is,in large part, the story of failures, both imminent and actual, and ensuing changes to designs,standards and procedures made as the result of timely interventions or forensic analyses. Inaddition to technical issues, professional and ethical responsibilities are highlighted by therelevant cases. Student learning was assessed through surveys and focus group discussions.Students were asked specifically about the technical lessons learned, as well as their response tothe case studies. Case study questions were included on homework assignments andexaminations. Survey questions linked student
profession involved in the application of mathematical and science for the needsof humanity10. Engineers may graduate from ABET accredited programs that ensure engineersmeet the standards of the profession11. One responsibility listed is understanding “professional,ethical and social responsibilities”11. Ethics for engineers deal with professionalism andunderstanding implications of their work12. The American Society for Engineering Education’sethics code appears to encourage safety by reducing conflicts of interests and partiality12.The disciplines of engineering can be put into 4 main groups; chemical, civil, electrical, andmechanical13. These groups are split into smaller concentrations with specific specialties. Despitethe concentrations
example study; and, Critically examine how the framework was used in these studies to explore, plan, Page 26.303.3 implement, reflect on, document, and demonstrate research quality.Ethical validation as a sixth validation construct and core aspect of research qualityBased on conversations at the first longitudinal workshop, over the past two years the authorshave collaborated with Dr. Alice Pawley from Purdue University to pursue the idea of ethicalvalidation as an additional, sixth dimension of the quality framework. These explorations wereprompted by the recognition in our own work that: i) ethical considerations extend
mathematics,science, engineering and technology,c. an ability to conduct, analyze and interpret experiments and apply experimental results toimprove processes,d. an ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate toprogram objectives,e. an ability to function effectively on teams,f. an ability to identify, analyze and solve technical problems,g. an ability to communicate effectively,h. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning,i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities,j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and globalissues, andk. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement.Only
groupdiscussions, Mentimeter online surveys to collect immediate feedback from the whole group, andnetworking breaks. Lunch was provided on both days and dinner was provided on Day 1.Day 1 was dedicated to understanding perspectives from stakeholders regarding electricityaccess and sustainable business. Keynote speakers Mou Riiny, CEO of SunGate Solar in SouthSudan and Dr. June Lukuyu, Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at theUniversity of Washington shared insights on the challenges of working in South Sudan andUganda. Themed discussions focused on enhancing the classroom experience and sustainable,ethical, and beneficial projects as well as a student panel. Table 2 shows the schedule for Day 1:Table 2: Day 1 Schedule Day 1
. Her research interests include empathy, design education, ethics education and community engagement in engineering. She currently teaches Cornerstone of Engineering, a first-year two-semester course series that integrates computer programming, computer aided design, ethics and the engineering design process within a project based learning environment. She was previously an engineering education postdoctoral fellow at Wake Forest University supporting curriculum development around ethics/character education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Student Engagement – IoT-Based Learning Materials and ProjectsAbstractEven with a return to in-person learning by many institutions
online students interested in undergraduate research opportunities?and 2) has student interest in undergraduate research changed since the onset of the COVID-19pandemic? The purpose of this study was to compare pre- and post- student perspectives ratherthan to directly inquire about perceptions of how the pandemic impacted fully online students toavoid acquiescence (response) and recall bias. This paper provides a summary of theresults.MethodsThis study was conducted at a medium-sized private university with two residential campuses andone distance campus. Online student participants were recruited from an upper-divisionundergraduate ethics course, that is required in nearly all online degree programs, ensuring abroad representation. The survey
, including research ethics, replicates/reproducibility, control experiments,validaƟon, and lab safety.Weekly Professional Development: On Mondays, the REU parƟcipants parƟcipated in a JournalClub to develop their skills in reading scienƟfic literature using ‘Quality Talk’ as a structuredframework to promote criƟcal and reflecƟve thinking [6]. ParƟcipants also shared conceptsrelated to their individual projects in 20-minute presentaƟons at least twice during the program.ParƟcipants were introduced to advanced research and applicaƟons in the field of Smart CiƟesthrough the weekly Guest Lectures or Field Trips. These events provided students to networkingopportuniƟes with regional and academic and industry leaders. Field trips showcasedoperaƟonal
can occur across many areas of engineering problemsolving. Engineers might leverage divergent thinking when developing their understanding of theproblem and its context, identifying stakeholders, or exploring potential problem-solvingmethods and strategies [9]. As educational tools, stories have been employed to convey complex factors that impactengineering solutions in practice, such as ethics [20], conflicting technical requirements [21],sustainable development [22], and the human impacts of engineering decisions [23]. Accounts ofhow individual engineers have pursued divergent thinking in their workplace may be helpfulpedagogical tools for engineering students to better understand its importance and motivateefforts to learn more. One
and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Distinguished Professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication and the School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. She serves as Butler Chair and Director of the Susan Bulkeley Butler Center of Leadership Excellence. Editor of four books and author of over 175 articles
that there are significant differences between strata in students’reported USS (𝜒 2 = 39.72, p < .001) and PSO scores (𝜒 2 = 42.95, p < .001). Post-hoc test resultsrevealed that students from undergraduate institutions reported higher levels of social supportthan students from research institutions and MSI/HSIs. For PSO scores, no significantdifferences between strata on various professional skills opportunities were detected viaScheffé’s test using 𝛼 = 0.05. However, when using the significant level of 𝛼 = 0.1, studentsfrom research institutions reported significantly more opportunities to practice ethics andprofessional responsibilities skill (M = 5.0, SD = 1.2) than students from MSI/HSI (M = 4.7, SD= 1.2, F(4, 613) = 23.41, p <
studies in whichTeacher Moments has been used to help pre-service teachers practice facilitating argument-baseddiscussions and provide an opportunity for teachers to practice facilitating a difficult discussionon the ethics of genetic engineering [6]. The Teacher Moments platform is accessible athttps://teachermoments.mit.edu/.First, Teacher Moments has been used to help pre-service math and science teachers practicefacilitating argument-based discussions. In an on-going research study led by the EducationalTesting Service (ETS), pre-service teachers are provided with an online practice suite of virtualreality, avatar-based, and Teacher Moments simulations. As pre-service teachers engage inrealistic math and science classroom scenarios through
]. 3Sucker Effect – The sucker effect is the reduction of individual efforts while working in a teamcontext owing to a perception that others are free-riding [22]. While social loafing is an outcomefocused phenomenon, the sucker effect focuses on the above mechanism. Hence, it is measuredusing an instrumental factor, an ethical factor and an equity factor. These factors wereconstructed based on the Australian Work Ethic Scale [23] and the Protestant Work Ethic Scale[24].Social Compensation - Social compensation can be described as the tendency of individuals,especially those with low interpersonal trust, to work harder in a team environment in order tocompensate for the lower performing teammates [25]. In turn, interpersonal trust, the
global issues among other things (Kirkpatrick et al., 2011).Engineering design activities have been noted as the place to effect change (Kirkpatrick et al.,2011), since it is the ill-defined nature of design problems (Jonassen, 2000) that provide ampleopportunity to include global issues. Addressing global issues requires both technical abilitiesand social considerations. Likewise, ABET Criterion 3 outcomes a-k (ABET, 2012) calls forstudents to have much broader professional skills upon graduation. For example, engineeringgraduates shall know or be able to: design within constraints such as “economic, environmental,social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”; understand theimpacts of engineering
between the communitycollege, university and industry partners, a non-profit organization, and social scientistsattempts to more fully understand how to implement, assess, and expand computing pathwaysfor a diverse group of students, especially in the CC context.One of the primary objectives for the project was to develop and implement an interdisciplinaryAI certificate, which was completed at the HSCC. As the program matured, two college creditcertificates were developed. The first certificate is the AI Awareness Certificate, where studentshad to take both the AI Thinking and AI Ethics course, and choose either an AI Business classor AI Robotics course. The Artificial Intelligence Practitioner certificate shares the AI thinkingand ethics courses
better solutions. Students must also learn to manage uncertainty, risk, safety factors, and product reliability. There are additional ways of thinking that are important to engineers that include systems thinking, creativity, optimism, perseverance, and innovation. Collaboration (Team), communication (Comm-Engr), and ethics (Ethics) are distinct key indicators so not included here. K-12 students not only need to participate in engineering design processes but they should also come to an understanding of the discipline of engineering and the
Paper ID #38321Board 203: A Research Study on Assessing Empathic Formation inEngineering DesignDr. Justin L. Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Justin L Hess is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Hess’s research focuses on empathic and ethical formation in engineering education. He received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue University’s School of Civil Engineering. He is the editorial board chair for the Online Ethics Center, deputy director for research for the
regarding computing and artificial intelligence. These market needs influenced howCC students defined their computing interests, relative competence, and need to perform certaintasks to be recognized as computing people.Lessons Learned - CC faculty developed and were approved to offer a 9-credit interdisciplinary AI awareness (college credit certificate) CCC to support students from a diverse set of majors (with no previous experience in coding). Courses include: AI Thinking, AI and Ethics, and AI and Business (the first of the AI interdisciplinary classes). Considerations are being made about the best timing and ways of facilitating these classes, including addressing the need for coding in the AI thinking class
classroom strategy to foster social responsibility," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 373-380, 2006.[9] K. Meyers and B. Mertz, "A large scale analysis of first-year engineering student essays on engineering interests," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Washington, D.C., 2011.[10] J. H. Pryor, K. Eagan, L. P. Blake, S. Hurtado, J. Berdan and M. Case, "The American Freshman: National Norms Fall 2012.," Cooperative Institutional Research Program at the Higher Education, Los Angeles, 2012.[11] N. A. o. Engineering, "Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering," National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2008.[12] G. Hein and A. Kemppainen, "First-year
, longitudinalstudy of over 300 engineering students at 4 universities nation-wide, students rated theirprofessional/ethical responsibility as engineers, their concern for understanding the consequencesof technology, their degree of social consciousness, and their concern for understanding howpeople use machines. Ratings were collected twice during their college career and once 18months following graduation. The results of Cech’s study revealed that engineers, both asstudents and then when working in industry, showed a linear decline for concerns about publicwelfare across the time points. This report highlighted that engineering students over timeshowed diminished prosocial trait endorsement. Cech’s findings further motivate the study ofprosocial affordance
strength and ... between the samples. However, modulus of elasticity did not vary greatly variabilty... between the samples, however variability or occurred between the tested samples and ...between the samples; however, published values. variability... 3. As stated in ASCE's Code of Ethics; As stated in ASCE’s Code of Ethics, "Engineers shall hold paramount the “Engineers...” safety, health and welfare of the public...." 4. Slope of stress-strain curve in Figure 1 The slope of the stress-strain curve in shows [...] Figure 1 shows... 5. As a civil engineer, the strength of
2undergraduate bioengineering curriculum (Table 1). The lecture content related to biomaterial fortissue engineering and ethics and nanobiotechnology techniques. Sample lecture content from theBMEN310 learning modules includes learning of hierarchical organization of extracellularmatrix of bone and soft tissues in different length scales.Table 1. Courses in which modules introducing the concepts of nanotechnology were developed # of Concepts Introduced Using two lecturesCourse Semester students Cellular engineering, drug delivery andBMEN 220: Introduction to
STEM and STEM Education.” [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2023/nsf23593/nsf23593.htm[6] ASCE, “Code of Ethics,” Code of Ethics. Accessed: May 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.asce.org/career-growth/ethics/code-of-ethics[7] ASEE, “Persons with Disabilities Leadership Roundtable,” presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[8] E. A. Cech, “Engineering ableism: The exclusion and devaluation of engineering students and professionals with physical disabilities and chronic and mental illness,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 462–487, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20522.[9] M. Svyantek, “Missing from the classroom: current
, and family structure. Our program has demonstrated past success in addressingissues important to the field and accreditation boards, such as functioning on multidisciplinaryteams, understanding ethical responsibilities, developing a sense of the global and societalcontext of STEM work, and supporting the idea of life-long learning.1-4In the eight years since the program was founded, it has grown and developed considerably.Structural changes throughout these years include adding distance students in an off-campusprogram 280 miles away, broadening the program to include multiple science majors, funding ahalf-time graduate assistant, and staffing changes in the faculty mentors. Program improvementshave included annual retreats for scholars
quality, ethics, and equityconsiderations outlined in the project proposal and updated our methods and theories tostrengthen these considerations. We documented the process and justification for updating ourproject theories and methods from the original proposal in a ASEE 2022 conference paper [1].Current StatusConceptual ModelDuring the first year of the project, we developed propositions and a conceptual model toillustrate how localized, structural features unjustly shape the demands and opportunitiesencountered by students and influence how they respond. Our model highlights mechanisms anddynamics at work in influencing the experience, learning, or persistence of students inundergraduate engineering programs. This lens should prove useful for
program aimed to create an experience that took students beyond the development of technicalcompetence in science and engineering and provided an expertise particularly on research and innovationin various areas of energy and bioengineering. Seminars and workshops complemented the programproviding students skills in areas such as laboratory safety, literature searching, entrepreneurship, effectivementoring and research ethics. The weekly group meetings with the program PIs fostered interdisciplinarycommunication between REUs which strengthened collaborations. The community was furtherstrengthened in the second year by incorporating more events with lab mates and students living togetheron campus.The RET program was designed to allow undergraduate