course project (40%). Course projectsrequired student teams to propose a solution to an engineering problem. Specific engineeringproblems were initially identified by student teams and project work typically occurred duringlab periods or outside of class.3.2 Input from Project-Based-Learning Faculty CohortFive faculty from Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, ComputerScience, Mathematics, and Statistics attended the Worcester Polytechnical Institute workshop onProject Based Learning in June 2019 [9]. In this institute, faculty learned the benefits of project-based approaches and strategies for developing and scaffolding interdisciplinary projects. Thisfaculty cohort drafted the first syllabus and outcomes for the course
model developed by the authors thatencourages students to learn and solve complex problems pertinent to current challenges facing society. Since its beginnings, the IBL model has evolved to improve upon course aspects and processes from previous course iterations [1]–[11]. IBL is currently implemented into a cardiovascular engineering course within four institutions across the United States. This model strives to emphasize freedom and responsibility to students through self-directed learning. In the course, students identify relevant societal problems, form diverse multidisciplinary, multi- institutional teams, and work collaboratively towards innovative solutions. IBL uses an online learning management system (LMS) that was designed and
student learning outcomes wascollected and assessed from the course’s online platform. To determine the effectiveness of usingthe IIS alongside Webb’s DoK as an assessment tool, multiple instructors from the institutionsinvolved reviewed student learning outcomes. The instructor reviews were then assessed tocompute inter-rater agreement scores, with instances producing the strongest agreements anddisagreements evaluated and results discussed. A post-course student survey was alsoadministered to gain insights of how the metrics were implemented for the students, of which,the results were quantified and assessed.IntroductionIn a world that is constantly advancing and facing new challenges, engineers must continuallyadapt and widen their skills to
learning activities inphysical labs. Certain coding platforms have been designed in recent years that allow for the easeof experimentation in online labs. These platforms offer quick feedback, code-review, andgrading. These platforms have been shown to improve student’s learning experience [5].Although the online labs cannot afford physical engagement with hardware due to logisticchallenges, they offer some detailed understanding of emulating hardware. Therefore, with slightmodification to the course syllabus, online classrooms can provide several learning opportunitiesfor kinesthetic learners. The activities may be designed to realize the same course objectives,while developing a slightly different skill set among students. KLAs are expected to
campus-wide system afterthe fifteenth week of the course. The course format includes modified mastery learning,and students were required to complete a variety of instruments to demonstrate mastery,including multi-choice vocabulary quizzes, true/false statements from the online, requiredlectures, and true/false statements from the required readings. Students whodemonstrated full mastery before the deadlines stated in the syllabus received a grade of‘C’ for the course. A buffet of optional assessments were used to assign grades tostudents above a “C”. These optional assessments included the performance of portionsof policy analysis on case studies, and reporting the results using the Pechu Kucha format(i.e., available online at: https
regular basis to discuss the course design progress,instructional resources development, online activities, etc. that will help students achieve theirgoals.Clear communication and consistency in program policies and expectations impact studentsatisfaction in online programs. The syllabus is a critical element of a well-designed onlinecourse as it communicates course details, policies, and expectations to students [20]. The MEMDirector has created a syllabus template based on recommendations from the literature [21], [22],[23] that is used across all courses in the program. While instructor policies may vary, studentsknow where to look for that information in each course. The ID reviews the syllabus templatewith the SME and clarifies ambiguities
, mostinstructors posted the course syllabus, copies of solutions to homework assignments, quizzes, andexams, and announcements on Bb. Bb was also used for grade reporting. In some courses, Bb wasused as a tool for discussion among the students and the instructor, as it incorporates a number ofsecondary features to enhance the learning experience and pedagogy. Bb was also used to sendemail messages to entire class, or the individual students. Instructors who taught online courses usedBlackboard Collaborate Ultra (BCU) for live online lectures and for recording lectures. However,different approaches for live online lectures and recording have been considered; e.g., one of theauthors of this paper [2, 3] has been recoding his lectures on YouTube and
based courses. He created and co-teaches a multi-year integrated system design (ISD) project for mechanical engineering students. He is a mentor to mechanical engineering graduate teaching fellows and actively champions the adoption and use of teaching technologies.Mr. Danny Rubin, Rubin Danny Rubin is the founder of Rubin, a leading provider of online curriculum for business communication skills. Rubin, the company, provides its signature curriculum, called ”Emerge,” to engineering schools nationwide. Emerge features in-demand communication topics like email etiquette, phone etiquette, net- working, LinkedIn and more. Danny began his career as a local TV news reporter and national news consultant for NBC’s ”Meet
. [Online]. Available: https://www.acce-hq.org/accredited- degree-programs[18] ACCE, "Standards and Criteria for the Accreditation of Bachelors Degree - Revised 2019.10.21," American Council for Construction Education, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.acce-hq.org/forms-documentsAPPENDIX AFigure 2. CSM 4523 Course Syllabus – Page 1Figure 3. CSM 4523 Course Syllabus – Page 2Figure 4. CSM 3143 Course Syllabus – Page 1Figure 5. CSM 3143 Course Syllabus – Page 2
evaluation and the online discussionboard, in addition to my classroom observations.Results and DiscussionAfter presenting my visual teaching and assessment philosophy, students were asked to completea three-question survey and engage in an online discussion about teaching philosophy andsyllabus. Overall, the results show my students’ satisfaction with my teaching philosophy. Figure3 depicts that 82.8% of the students strongly agree that the course syllabus, including myteaching and assessment philosophy, is clear, helpful, and matches student expectations. Notably,98.9% of the students agree and strongly agree with this course syllabus statement. Figure 3 The results of the first survey Likert question about the course syllabus and the clear
is described as a mixture of online and face-to-face learning componentswhereby students can choose to complete any part of course face-to-face, online synchronous, oronline asynchronous [1]. From an instructional perspective, the course design typically is offeredas a face-to-face class meeting combined with a video-conferencing system (whereby the classmeeting is recorded); this provides students the option to attend in person, participate online, or 1engage with the recorded content outside the class meeting [2]. This type of course design allowsstudents the most flexibility as it relates time and learning mode, which is ideal for students whoneed to optimize work-life balance (e.g., work
. We attempt to share our key findings, which may benefit othereducators and help them adopt alternative instructional approaches in other institutions.Instructional challenges in a wide variety of courses such as Digital Electronics, IndustrialRobotics, Programmable Logic Controller (PLC), Software Engineering, System Modeling,Epidemiology, Human Diseases, Environmental Health, and Intermediate Business Analysis weremitigated using alternative or modified approaches. Hands-on and in-person learning activities(e.g., laboratory experiments and data analysis) were substituted by innovative strategies such asonline exercises via simulation, statistical software, enhanced use of audiovisual tools, andsynchronous and asynchronous online
ofinstructor disposition, lack of time to restructure courses, expectation of syllabus coverage, largeclass size/room inadequate, teaching-centered tradition, and a lack of incentives/rewards [25, p.970]. A corresponding summary has yet to be established for online instruction. Therefore, we explore the following research questions: RQ1: What barriers do instructors expect to experience when adopting active learning in online instruction? RQ2: How do the barriers instructors expect to experience when adopting active learning in online instruction differ from those for in-person instruction? We recruited instructors who used or planned to use active learning in teaching a STEMcourse for first- and/or second-year
, statements on inclusion and accessibilityshould be carefully examined to review language, tone, and scope, thereby working to avoid‘othering’ students or making them feel that they don’t belong [63].In fall 2020 I took special care with my syllabus and course policies in my first-year introductoryengineering course. Unlike a normal semester, the course was entirely online. It was intended tobe synchronous, but a few students were across the world making the lecture time challenging. Icarefully explained the purpose of office hours and encouraged students to attend for bothcourse-related and general questions. Due to COVID all office hours were online. Students weregiven an opportunity to earn extra credit the first time they visited me during office
gained by students who successfully completed AM coursework. The unit of analysis was a syllabus from an individual course. All occupational completion points, student performance outcomes, or standards and/or certifications covered in the material were be analyzed through an iterative process using a codebook derived from the Department of Labor Advanced Manufacturing Competency Models [13, 14]. Researchers also used established instruments to measure the extent to which the new professionals report entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial intentions [15, 16, 17]. In addition to deriving areas of strong and weak alignment, the researchers calculated the extent of match between the syllabi and the standards. The team employed our
school Physics and Chemistry courses for admission into college levelengineering degrees. One of the reasons for a low number of local students entering STEM majorsat the university was found to be the lack of access to these courses among students in high schools.This study presents a partnership between a college of engineering and the local school districtfaced with low numbers of students enrolling in STEM majors, who sought to change the trend.Our partnership began planning in 2019 and started our first cohort the summer of 2020. The Officeof Inclusive Excellence and Community Engagement offered a physics course online during thesummer of 2020. Results from the feedback survey were collected to evaluate the effectiveness oflessons offered
semester, students presented a project charter on their thesis projects thatdemonstrated their knowledge learned about related PTM skills, approaches to utilizing theseskills in their thesis research, and their learning experiences at the GAPS course. Throughout thesemester they also engaged in reflective writing assignments focused on their application ofskills to their work. A copy of the course syllabus is included in Appendix 1.Purpose of the Paper/Research QuestionsAlthough COVID-19 altered our original intention of in-person course and networkingopportunities, we chose to develop an online course as a way to pilot test some of the materialand assignments. Given the novelty of our approach and project, it was critical to develop anassessment
faculty eagerness to integrate learned technology later to also improve face-to-face course delivery [15]. Drawbacks include possible faculty difficulty with adapting to newertechnologies, lack of technical support, and lack of student readiness [16]. As a result of the occurrence of COVID-19 pandemic, the transition to move from aformerly traditional or hybrid educational system to a largely online was sudden. Therefore, thispresented immediate challenges for those who were unprepared. The main purpose this paper isto look at student and faculty experiences during the pandemic in the Spring semester of 2020through the lens of faculty. This work is part of a larger study funded by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) to address the
. [Accessed: 1 Mar 2021].[2] "CDIO Syllabus 2.0 | Worldwide CDIO Initiative", Cdio.org, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdio.org/benefits-cdio/cdio-syllabus/cdio-syllabus-topical- form. [Accessed: 3 Mar 2021].[3] C. Araneda and amp, "CDIO Organization | Worldwide CDIO Initiative", Cdio.org, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdio.org/cdio-organization. [Accessed: 3 Mar 2021].[4] R. Bragós, " Las competencias del profesorado en el entorno CDIO," REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, vol. 10(2), pp. 57-73, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2012.6097. [Accessed Dec, 2020][5] "Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference | Worldwide CDIO Initiative", Cdio.org, 2021
introduce core computer design concepts primarily to college students studying applied science and technology programs, such as computer science and information technology. With a particular focus on single-board computers and associated hardware modules, students are introduced to core computer compo- nents early in their coursework, and encouraged to study advanced engineering concepts as higher elective courses to help them better understand the underlying design of hardware modules. Hands-on ac- tivities and problem-based modules are re-designed with the flexibility to be applied in settings that involve all in-classroom cohorts, as well as courses offered in synchronous and/or asynchronous online learning methodologies, which is
ideas, and workingcollaboratively with interactive virtual media which aligns with active learning strategies [4]Meanwhile, many round table discussions focused on the advantages and disadvantages ofdistance learning, including a radical idea of permanently replacing certain in-person classeswith a remote teaching mode. Online teaching has been perceived as a temporary response to theglobal health crisis but it warrants careful assessment and consideration as a viable teachingmethod for the next generation of students. The author’s institution deployed diverse modes ofinstruction for the Fall 2020 semester, including asynchronous, synchronous, hybrid, live stream,and in-person courses. Table 1.1 shows the definitions of the various instruction
as a resource to students [2] [3]. With larger research institutions oftenhaving more laboratory equipment available for student use, students benefit from the combinedresources of both institutions and collaboration between unique student cultures and perspectives[4].To foster such collaboration, MOOCIBL (Massively Open Online Course for Innovation-BasedLearning) was used as the central learning management system for a multi-institutionalCardiovascular Engineering course across four universities around the United States [5]. Thecourse introduces students to a non-traditional Innovation-Based Learning environment. In thislearning model, students define and track their learning goals by creating tokens representingtheir completed learning
study participants.Matrix DevelopmentThe critical topics within CEM from the literature review are used to develop a matrix to recordcourse names and course topics within each course. The course topics and school backgroundinformation were used as headers for the matrix listed below.School Background Information • School Name • School Location • Type of School • School Number • School PopulationCEM Course Topics [17] • Cost / Estimating • Equipment / Power Tools • Safety • BIM • Project Management • Scheduling • Materials & Methods • Contract DocumentsAnalysisThe analysis for the matrix is performed in two steps. Upon reviewing the school countywebsites, course planning tools (syllabus), and survey interview
-disciplinary, project-based engineering course (ENG 1P13)that is part of the first-year engineering program at McMaster University. This paper focusesspecifically on the materials science and engineering (MSE) aspect of the course. First yearstudents are exposed to MSE content through a series of realistic projects with supporting lab andlecture content. The course content has been adapted for online delivery during the pandemic.Insight into the effectiveness of teaching materials science within a multi-disciplinary projectenvironment and best practices for remote learning will be highlighted.1. Introduction Modern tools and technologies that facilitate remote learning provide educators withexciting opportunities to transform traditional
and graduateteaching assistant. Student reflections are a selection of comments submitted anonymously viathe university’s end-of-term Student Evaluation of Instruction surveys.Instructor reflection:The transition of this thermodynamics course to online learning went surprisingly well. Coursecontents (e.g., syllabus, schedule, PowerPoint files, assignments, and other resources) werealready well organized within the university’s Canvas-based Learning Management System(LMS). The course also already used a McGraw Hill eTextbook with adaptive e-Learningreading comprehension questions (LearnSmart) and online AI-graded homework sets (McGrawHill Connect); these features were particularly helpful for the newly online course deliverysystem. Students
- tors of in-person, online, and hybrid format classes. Melissa continues to serve as a teaching consultant with CTL and focuses on projects relating to equity. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Revolutionizing Grading: Implications on Power, Agency, and EquityAbstractEven as we integrate inclusive teaching strategies and course design, the philosophy andimplementation of grading continues to be a large source of inequity in higher education. Gradessignal to students whether they belong within a course or degree major and dictate access toacademic and career opportunities. Consequently, even in a classroom
, interventions were put in place to set astandard for mentoring relationships so faculty and students could focus on their scholarship,progress towards degree, and maturation as independent researchers.The course outlined in this paper is the student side of the aforementioned intervention, buttraining is also being introduced to faculty simultaneously. The initial intention was for theseminar to be offered in three different formats throughout an academic year: (1) five-weekcourse with 2.5 hours sessions once per week; (2) two-day course with 6- hour sessions eachday; and (3) an online version. The course was piloted during the 2019-2020 academic year,during which 11 engineering departments across the College opted to make this seminarmandatory for
sustainability, and July focused on convertingproject course implementation to online formats (due to COVID-19).In order to facilitate effective sharing of information and peer learning, SUMMIT-P uses twoprotocols during project meetings that provide a format for effective and fruitful discussion. Thetwo protocols, Descriptive Consultancy protocol and Success Analysis with Reflective Questionsprotocol, have historically been applied in the K-12 education community [4]. The DescriptiveConsultancy protocol [5], originally developed by Nancy Mohr and revised by Connie Parrishand Susan Taylor in August 2013, was modified by McDonnough and Henschel [6] and has beenadapted for this project to help presenters think more expansively about a particular
Iwondered how I was going to be able to use writing as one inclusive strategy. As it turned out,building community online has been an interesting challenge and one that the students seem tobe excited to help with.Prior to Covid, students would receive 3 points just for coming to class. There was norequirement that the students had to participate in class in order to receive those points. Myphilosophy is that every person in the class is valued and their presence simply serves to createand enhance our classroom community. On my course syllabus I had referred to these points asclass involvement points and made the argument that a student was involved in class simply bybeing present – regardless of whether they asked or answered a question, helped
strengthen students’ skills asfuture engineering professionals. In an effort to bolster the chances of achieving these goals, theengineering math course outlined below was introduced in Fall 2019.Course content and materialsRatton & Klingbeil’s Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Application [11] and Stephan etal.’s Thinking Like an Engineer [12] are the primary texts used to guide the course. Theoverarching course outcomes listed within the syllabus include preparing students for the rigor offuture engineering and mathematics classes, providing students with a solid foundation of basicengineering skills, and introducing students to the different engineering majors and careeroptions. As seen in these outcomes, the course attempts to draw