Asee peer logo
Displaying results 61 - 90 of 346 in total
Conference Session
FPD 2: Building Community
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Betsy F. Willis, Southern Methodist University; David A. Willis, Southern Methodist University; Mark Fontenot, Southern Methodist University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
numerous interventions and programs is reported in the literature onengineering education and higher education more generally. Outside-the-classroom interactionswith faculty members, meaningful interactions with peers, and on-campus living-learningcommunity involvement have been shown to positively affect student persistence in college.2Astin indicates that student-faculty interaction has a positive correlation with a large number ofareas related to personal growth, intellectual growth, and behavioral outcomes includingintellectual self-esteem, leadership, and an orientation towards helping other students ortutoring.3 Vogt studied the effects of approachability and accessibility of faculty on students inthe areas related to academic self-efficacy
Conference Session
Student Learning, Problem Solving, & Critical Thinking 3
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nicole P Pitterson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ruth A. Streveler, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
the classroom learning environment itself.While the activities themselves would inform the design of the learning environment, Page 24.135.4engineering faculty could basically adjust their mode of course delivery through the inclusion oflearning activities without having to feel like they have to do a complete overhaul of theirclasses. Common of these activities requires students to talk, discuss, write and apply what theyare learning outside the scope of rote learning such as memorization and application. In a follow-up study to Chi’s work, it was discussed that broad cover which is applied to all the classroomactivities used to engage
Conference Session
Cooperative & Experiential Education Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Manuel D. Rossetti, University of Arkansas; Kim LaScola Needy, University of Arkansas; Edgar C. Clausen, University of Arkansas; Carol Schubert Gattis, University of Arkansas; Micah Hale, University of Arkansas
Tagged Divisions
Cooperative & Experiential Education
, faculty mentoring and peer mentoring. Theprofessional development activities are designed to target specific points in the students’ plan ofstudy. They include various topics such as preparation of a personal development plan(sophomore level), resume writing and job search skills (sophomore and senior level),developing research skills (junior level), seven habits of highly effective people (senior level),writing and presenting an engineering-based business case (junior level), and presenting andcommunication research (M.S. level).Overview of the SIIRE ProgramThe Student Integrated Intern Research Experience (SIIRE) program at the University ofArkansas is funded via the NSF S-STEM program. The NSF S-STEM program provides studentscholarship funds
Conference Session
FPD 10: Teamwork
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laura K Alford, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Stephanie Sheffield, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
particulartasks and avoid others (e.g., CAD modeling, report writing), an issue when course outcomes areassessed at the team-level but skills are developed at the individual level.Though students perceive participation on diverse teams as “real world” and thereforebeneficial,9 their behaviors and experiences on diverse teams can be more problematic.10,11 Forexample, students of different genders tend to take different roles on teams, with females morelikely to complete project planning and communication work and males more likely to dotechnical planning and hands-on building.10 It is unclear in the research whether students chooseto take on gender-specific tasks or are pushed by teammates into those roles.Team discussions tend to privilege some students
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sohum A. Sohoni, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Kerri S. Kearney, Oklahoma State University; Rebecca L. Damron, Oklahoma State University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
written in Verilog HDL, are open-source,and are freely available. To support the hardware components, a unified assembler, cycleaccurate emulator, and board interface software package is included. The software is written inJava, works on Linux, Windows, and Mac OS, is open-source, and is freely available. The PLP Page 24.87.3hardware and software components are licensed under the General Public License version 3 toencourage open access and contribution. PLP can be downloaded free of cost from its homepagehttp://plp.okstate.edu. Figure 2 shows the current homepage at the time of writing this paper. Anew homepage, hosted at http
Conference Session
Teaching Communication II
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Judith Shaul Norback, Georgia Institute of Technology; Tristan T. Utschig, Georgia Institute of Technology; Anthony Joseph Bonifonte, Georgia Institute of Technology; Gloria J. Ross, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
appropriate ways15.  In a study comparing writing rubrics, Morozov concluded that students viewed the more detailed and extensive rubric more positively than less-extensive rubrics16. In this study, an effective rubric model emphasized skills, elaboration of skill, and critical thinking.  One recent study compared the reliability of two writing rubrics across three different settings and reported moderate reliability for most skills represented in the two rubrics17.  Multiple studies address the effect of Calibrated Peer Review (CPR) on student writing18, 19, 20 . CPR involves the electronic evaluation of student writing by their peers. None of these studies specifically address rubric
Conference Session
Addressing the NGSS, Part 1 of 3: Supporting K-8 Science Teachers in Engineering Pedagogy and Engineering-Science Connections
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University; Yi Kong, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
engineering vocabulary.Engineering Effective ways to integrate engineering into current curriculum, such asIntegration language arts, social studies, mathematics, science, and art lessons.Teaching Teaching practices that include different ways to improve problem solvingStrategies and critical thinking skills: questioning techniques to elicit student responses; writing techniques, such as expository, procedural, and reflective journal writing; and how to make learning more hands-on, etc.Student Teamwork Team building that fosters positive peer interaction and cooperative learning among students to solve problems and complete projects
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathleen L. Kitto, Western Washington University; Debra Sue Jusak, Western Washington University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
currently under construction. Initially, the purpose of the website wasenvisioned as a repository of project resources, but as our research proceeded, it becameobvious that the students perceived the concept map and web tools as essential parts of theproject and their view of their personal success strategies.Overall, the basic principles implemented in the project are supported by theory based incognitive and social constructivism and the substantial body of evidence that favorscollaborative learning and the inductive approach over the traditional lecture driven,deductive teaching approach. Collaborative learning, active/inquiry learning, conceptlearning, peer learning, problem/case-based learning, low stakes quizzing, mini-lectureswith just-in
Conference Session
Engineering as a Professional Calling
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joseph M LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jacquelyn E. Borinski, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kimberly Danielle Haight, Georgia Institute of Technology ; Elaine Catherine McCormick, Georgia Institute of Technology; Alisha A.W. Waller, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
this paper, and as derived from anonymous end-of-course surveys.We were inspired to write a paper about this course because it was well-received by the students(three of whom are co-authors of this paper), and because we felt the topic of the course is animportant one for young engineers to consider. Furthermore, we believe that, for an engineeringcourse, the way it was created and conducted is unusual. The course required a significantamount of reading, writing, and discussions, and because the course instructor, who had littleprior expertise in the philosophical aspects of the course, considered himself a co-learner withthe students. We hope that by sharing our experiences with this course, we will make it easierfor interested instructors to
Conference Session
Innovations in Pedagogy
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Catherine Langman, Illinois Institute of Technology; Eric M. Brey, Illinois Institute of Technology; Judith S. Zawojewski, Illinois Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
served on the Board of Directors for the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and on the Editorial Panel for Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. She has published in numerous teaching and research journals, and written books and book chapters for both mathematics and engineering educators. In addition, Dr. Zawojewski has long been active in writing curriculum related to problem solving. mathematical modeling, and performance assessment. Dr. Zawo- jewski is especially interested in the role of modeling and problem solving in developing mathematical capabilities, and in enhancing mathematics education for all students
Conference Session
WIED: Faculty and Gender Issues
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
theuniversity adopt worklife policies that peer institutions have adopted. The resolution waspassed by both the Benefits Committee and the full Faculty and Staff Senate in spring of2012. Currently, a campus-wide committee, led by the project co-PI, with representativesfrom each of the colleges are working to draft policies in four areas: modified dutiespolicy for faculty dealing with life transitions, tenure-clock extension policy for facultywho have/adopt children, a tuition exchange program, and a common policy on tenureand promotion.The Grant Writing Program has at its goal to increase the success of women faculty insecuring federal funding. It has sponsored a variety of activities, from a statewide NSFDay, to webinars on NSF programs, to an NSF
Conference Session
Engineering Student Experiences
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Scott Blum, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
administrative policies, faculty interactions, curriculum andpedagogy, and peer relationships. Other factors included elements of the study environment,quality of effort on the part of both faculty and student, and integration of the student into theculture of the institution. The student outcomes are explained by Astin to encompass thoseaspects of student development that the university purposefully attempts to influence, thoughdefining the outputs of interest is “clearly the sine qua non of meaningful research on collegeimpact” (p. 224). Astin1 also explained the relationships between these three factors. The collegeenvironment was clearly affected by the kinds of students who enroll (shown in relationship A).The principal concern relating to
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer E. LeBeau, Washington State University; Denny C. Davis, Washington State University; Noah L. Schroeder, Washington State University; Brian F. French, Washington State University ; Shane A. Brown P.E., Washington State University; Howard P. Davis, Washington State University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
describes characterization of the instrumentswithin ASSESS as well as lessons learned throughout the project’s development. In addition, twoexamples are offered to describe ways in which ASSESS may be used by the engineeringeducation community.Instrument CharacterizationOver the life of the project, a variety of instruments were identified for inclusion in the ASSESSdatabase. In the first year, instruments were identified by searching peer-reviewed journalarticles, using branching techniques from reference sections of papers and reports, andidentifying innovative projects that may have developed and employed evaluation instruments.While comprehensive, this three-pronged strategy proved to be somewhat challenging forlocating instruments. Thus, the
Conference Session
The Interdisciplinary Nature of Engineering
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alan Chong, University of Toronto; Lydia Wilkinson, University of Toronto; Deborah Tihanyi, University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Multidisciplinary Engineering
the pedagogical approaches and classroomstructure in their HSS lectures and tutorials. If they manage to enroll in a course withcomparatively low engineering representation, they often feel isolated from their peers, and ifthey choose to enroll in an HSS elective with high out of department enrollment they are oftenshepherded into a non-arts and science lecture section or tutorial with no change in the way thatmaterial is delivered or discussed. While they may watch different modes of thought at work, it’sunlikely that they are proficient in their use or convinced of their benefit by course’s end. Andwhile another calendar entry strongly encourages students to “plan their complementary studieselectives in accordance with their career
Conference Session
Track 3 - Session 1
Collection
2014 ASEE International Forum
Authors
Arnold Neville Pears, Uppsala University; Mats Daniels, Uppsala University; Åsa Sofia Cajander
Tagged Topics
Student Development
.,  Löfström,  A.,  McDermott,  R.,  and  Russell,  L.    Intercultural  Competence  in  Global  Collaboration  Courses  in  Computer  Engineering,  Applied  Human  Factors  and  Ergonomics,  San  Francisco,  USA,  2012.[4]  Cajander,  Å.,  Daniels,  M.,  McDermott,  R  and  von  Konsky,  B.  “Assessing  Professional  Skills  in  Engineering  Education”,  Australian  Computer  Science  Communications,  vol  33,  no  2,  pp  145-­154,  2011.[5]    Cajander,  Å.  Daniels,  M.  and  McDermott,  R.  On  valuing  peers:  theories  of  learning  and  intercultural  competence.  Computer  Science  Education,  22(4):319–342,  2012.  [6]  Cajander,  Å.,  Daniels,  M.,  Peters,  A.,  and  McDermott,  R.  Critical  Thinking,  PeerWriting,  and  the  Importance
Conference Session
Curricular Issues in Computing and Information Technology Programs I
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Scott A. Kuhl, Michigan Technological University; Robert Pastel, Michigan Technological University; Ryan George, Michigan Technological University; Chad M. Meyers, Michigan Technological University; Matthew L. Freitag, Michigan Technological University; Jacob M. Lund, Michigan Technological University; Michael Paul Stefaniak
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
,backgrounds, and interests. This paper focuses on the policies and techniques that we havesuccessfully used to attract, organize, motivate, and evaluate the students in the course. We alsoprovide analysis of enrollment in Husky Game Development from Fall 2011 through Spring 2014and describe how the faculty advisor and student management share and delegate responsibilities.We hope that HGD can serve as one possible model for instructors at other institutions who desireto implement a similar course.IntroductionTraditional computer science undergraduate courses often fail to give students hands-onexperience which will help them learn how to work with a team of peers to propose, design, anddevelop large applications. Traditional courses typically consist
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Courses and Projects
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cyrus Habibi P.E., Minnesota State University, Mankato; Motahareh Tina Alaei, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Michael Ryan Lynch
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
(Outcome E). A bigportion of the project deliverables was four to five presentations made both to the client and otherpeers at the program, and the writing of several technical reports. After each presentation, the teamreceived feedback from the faculty and peers on the content and delivery of the presentation andtheir technical writing skills. Each section of the final technical report was reviewed and gradedby the team mentor (Outcome G). One of the deliverables was the contextualization documentthat reports what significance the final design might have on the environment, health and safetyconcerns, economics, ethics, etc. (Outcome H). Based on the technical evidence and submitteddocuments, these outcomes were evaluated, and the faculty mentor
Conference Session
Manufacturing and Machine Component Design
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Harold L. Stalford, University of Oklahoma
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
bending configurations.On the first day of class, the students form teams of 5 to 6 students per team. Each team picks itschoice of a vehicle, machine or system from which they will pick all mechanical components foranalysis and design in the course. Each team is required to carry out four mechanical componentprojects and write project reports and make presentations. Each project covers a time period ofthree to four weeks. For example, fasteners and springs projects are projects that require threeweeks; bearings and gears projects require four weeks. Each team makes a presentation on eachof the four projects during the semester. The presentations are judged by engineers fromindustry.The reports and presentations are required to cover analysis and
Conference Session
Programming, Simulation, and Dynamic Modeling
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shanon Marie Reckinger, Fairfield University; Scott James Reckinger, Brown University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
that students are self-guided through partof the instruction. Lastly, class time is organized in such a way that the instructor spends overhalf of the time working directly with individuals and small groups. This gives the students anopportunity to have explanations individually catered to their level of understanding, as well asplenty of time for peer and instructor assistance with debugging.The course initially ran under the new model in Spring, 2013. The course ran for 15 weeks andhad 37 students split into two different sections. There were no teaching assistants. Feedbackfrom the students indicated that they benefitted greatly from the course design. Improvementsfor the second iteration of the new course model, which will occur in Spring
Conference Session
Innovations in Pedagogy
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amit Janardhan Nimunkar, University of Wisconsin Madison; Xuan Zhang, University of Wisconsin - madison; Mehdi Shokoueinejad, University of Wisconsin Madison; John G. Webster PhD, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Biomedical Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
interact with other students around their table and solvedthe problems collectively and this greatly facilitated their peer-to-peer learning process. Inaddition to this they interacted with the instructor and TAs on an individual basis. Thecollaborative peer-to-peer communication and individual interactions with the instructors and theTAs greatly enhanced their learning process. The instructor gave a 10 min lecture and discussionat the end of the class discussing the solutions to problems solved during class time. Thesolutions to these problems were posted on the course webpage after each class. Also, to measurestudents’ knowledge and learning abilities, other assessments besides the pre-quiz and class-quizsuch as research paper writing and lab
Conference Session
Computer-Based Learning Models
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael G. Morrow, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
participating in their learning process—not simply observing what their Page 24.574.3neighbors are doing and copying answers. This means that the exercises cannot be identical foreach student, but should be similar enough to encourage collaboration and peer teaching.Both of the above issues were addressed by the integration of technology. The Moodle coursemanagement system was used to deliver active learning exercises, provide automated assessmentof student responses and immediate feedback, and allow easy faculty access to class performancedata. Rather than simply being a delivery mechanism, Moodle became the focal point of courseactivities. The course
Conference Session
Design in the Curriculum
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amit Janardhan Nimunkar, University of Wisconsin, Madison; John P. Puccinelli, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Matthew S. Bollom; Willis J. Tompkins, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
lecture time can be repurposed for a moreblended learning experience in future offerings thus creating weekly modules. The weekly laboratory period focuses on directly training the students in technical skills,such as those listed above that were previously offered on an ad hoc basis, in order train studentsto solve a multidisciplinary guided design project using these skills in teams. The laboratorieswere designed and are taught in conjunction with BME faculty instructors by undergraduateBME student assistants (SAs), allowing them to gain valuable teaching experience while givingour sophomore students an opportunity to learn from and interact with their peers. The guideddesign project requires the student teams to incorporate the knowledge
Conference Session
Diversity Redefined: Nontraditional Views in Traditional Environments
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kendra Woodberry Brinkley, Virginia Commonwealth University; Falcon Rankins, Virginia Commonwealth University; Stevara Clinton, Virginia Commonwealth University Department of Chemistry; Rosalyn Hobson Hargraves, Virginia Commonwealth University
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
STEM fields. (3) (6)These programs are often characterized by the rigorous on campus academic training to preparematriculating students for freshman courses and social activities to help familiarize students with“college-life.” Reports on current summer bridge programs suggest that students who participatein such programs are more apt to successfully complete their first and second year of theiracademic careers when compared to their peers who did not participate in such programs. (4) (6)The National Science Foundation (NSF) funded Louis Stokes Alliances for MinorityParticipation (LSAMP) Program provides support for a number of universities as they implementprograms to increase the number of URM students successfully completing STEM
Conference Session
Innovative Teaching Techniques in the Classroom
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James L. Klosky P.E., U.S. Military Academy; Scott M. Katalenich, U.S. Military Academy; Berndt Spittka P.E., U.S. Military Academy; Seamus F. Freyne, Mississippi State University
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
-class, student presentations are an effective way to inspire student engagement whilesimultaneously improving communication skills. As part of three different civil engineeringcourses including infrastructure, structures, and sustainability at West Point and MississippiState, the authors have introduced a student presentation concept dubbed “Two-Minute Follies.”This paper discusses and demonstrates with supporting data that Two-Minute Follies are simpleto execute, consume a small amount of time, and engage students more directly in their owneducation while at the same time building the student’s presentation confidence and style. Byengaging the student in a direct way that provides an opportunity to share with their peers, thestudent is
Conference Session
SD Technical Session: Tricks of the Trade
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gurlovleen K. Rathore, Texas A&M University; Alexandra Coso Strong, Georgia Institute of Technology; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Student
professional membershiphas been in decline. It is critical for ASEE and its divisions to consider new ways toengage the growing ASEE student member population to improve the likelihood ofretaining these students as future professional members in the society. Previous studiesindicate that students see ASEE as an avenue for fulfilling their professional developmentneeds. A needs analysis of ASEE student members was conducted to inform the creationof a student-inclusive ASEE conference program. The analysis identified high priorityprofessional development needs (e.g., grant & proposal writing, college teaching, andnavigating the job market) of student members and possible ways for ASEE to meet theseneeds (e.g., foster student programs, provide
Conference Session
Sustainability
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Justin L. Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sarah Aileen Brownell, Rochester Institute of Technology; Alexander T. Dale, Engineers for a Sustainable World
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Multidisciplinary Engineering
. Students were prompted to complete the activity with the following set ofinstructions: 1. Get a blank piece of paper, a writing instrument, and write and circle ‘Sustainability’ in the center of the paper. 2. The general form of your map should be a series of connected bubbles, with the ‘Sustainability’ bubble at the center. These bubbles do not have to be strictly hierarchical, and can include anything from words to phrases to images. They can be nested if that fits your understanding of concepts. Don’t try to put too much into any single bubble. You can label connecting lines (often with words describing the relationship) though you do not have to. You should not consult outside sources or others’ maps during
Conference Session
Curricular Issues in Computing and Information Technology Programs II
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
MD B. Sarder, University of Southern Mississippi
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
board extensively. They need to be monitored for their discussions on coursemanagement site continually and guided constructively. Discussions generate ideas, help create alearning community in online classes, provide discussion transcripts, provide a means of onlineconference and collaboration, and get students thinking in writing as they write. It is shown thatarchived lectures with the PowerPoint slides helps student the most. Competitive group projectsare common course requirements. Technology such as selective release can create workenvironment so that students within the group use their specific room as virtual communicationplatform. It makes easy for students to do brain storming and share files with their group
Conference Session
FPD 10: Teamwork
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David W. Gatchell PhD, Northwestern University; Bruce Ankenman, Northwestern University; Penny L. Hirsch, Northwestern University; Adam Goodman; Koshonna Brown, Northwestern University Center for Leadership
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Institute and for the last seven years, he has also directed McCormick’s well-known freshman design course, Design Thinking and Communication, formerly Engineering Design and Communication.Dr. Penny L. Hirsch, Northwestern University Penny L. Hirsch, Professor of Instruction and Associate Director of Northwestern’s Writing Program, teaches classes in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences and the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, and was Northwestern’s first Charles Deering McCormick University Distinguished Lecturer. She played a key role in developing Design Thinking and Communication (formerly Engineer- ing Design and Communication), a course co-taught by faculty from engineering and writing in
Conference Session
Future Career and Professional Success for Graduate Students
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sara E. Branch, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jeremi S. London, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Benjamin Ahn, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
area 4.48 Develop and manage budgets for research 8 projects 4.48 8 Synthesize information 4.48 8 Manage multiple projects 4.48 8 Write peer-reviewed papers 4.48 Delegate tasks/projects based on others' 9 strengths 4.43 Understand how your research fits into the 9 field more broadly 4.43 9 Create proposals 4.43 9 Write grant proposals 4.43 10 Work in teams 4.38 10 Find problems 4.38 10
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jianghong (Esther) Tian, Eastern Mennonite University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Project #1, Turn in the lab notebook and work on14 10/10 and peer evaluation the final report of project #1 Turn in career topics, final report, and15 10/15 Presentation of Project #1 an electronic copy of the presentation16 10/17 Assign and discuss Project #2 Form teams and read Chapter 4 Mid-semester recess17 10/24 Introduction to Arduino Read about Arduino Turn in writing assignment and read18 10/29 Arduino programming Chapter 5